The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

This is  a summary of many articles about Mubarak, Western leaders & Media which will save you the time of reading many LONG articles.  Summaries are as short as possible. They were written by smart/ reliable/honest people. some references are on the bottom. Please forward.


* Some commentators believe that western leaders unable to understand what will happen in Egypt as a result of their undermining of the Mubarak regime. Other fear  that western leaders are not naive at all, but he instead knows too well what he is doing, for ideology reason; Without thinking  he automatically respond to all revolutioners in the world, even if they are dangerous and cruel, and he fully support them without checking their goals. He sees them as freedom fighters, poor people, which need a "change" in their life, even if  it will eagerly promoting radical/ brutal/ non-democratic and anti-women rights of the radical Islamists.
Inevitably, sooner or later, the Muslim Brotherhood will take power, usher [escort] in a barbaric Islamist power in Egypt that will control the Suez Canal, and show no mercy to its own people or its perceived foes.
As an example of Muslim brotherhood violence: The Egyptian prime minister, Nokrashi Pasha, was struck down.  The forces behind the killings were elements of both Arab socialist movements and the Muslim Brotherhood.  Today, in the streets of Cairo, we have an unholy alliance of the current radical left with the same Muslim Brotherhood.
History of Muslim Brotherhood and their co-operation with the Nazis on the "final solution", including Egyptian and Arafat involvement, is on:

* Israeli newspaper wrote that it took the US administration two weeks to understand that they should not throw away Mubarak.


In 1952, Gamal Abdul Nasser [Egypt President]  forged an alliance with Russia, blocked the Suez Canal  and threatened the oil supplies to Britain and France from the Middle East.
Britain,  France and Israel invaded the Canal Zone and Sinai desert to end Nasser's blockade of the Suez Canal.
U.S.A. stupidly decided to  forced Britain and France out of Egypt.  This was, as future events showed, a dreadful blunder of the  USA administration.  It also led to Nasser remaining in power with the strong support of the Russian as a major ally and arm supplier.  All this Arab aggression began long before the so-called Israeli "occupation," which Arab and pro-Arab propagandists now use as the excuse for present Arab aggression against Israel.

President Mubarak has been a U.S. ally fighting terror for thirty years. The center of gravity for world terror is Egypt, and it was Anwar Sadat who refused to give ground to the terror organization in his own country. Where was the PLO birthed in 1964? Cairo, Egypt. Where was Sadat assassinated? Egypt. From where did Mohammad Atta, the brains behind the 9/11 attack come? Egypt. From where did Sheikh Abdul Rahman, the planner for the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center come? Egypt!

What the Liberal Left media is doing in Egypt and in the United States should be called treason. If Hitler controlled the media today in Egypt, he could not do a better job than the U.S. media. It sees these terrorist devils as "freedom fighters" ... little George Washingtons.

This is exactly what happened to our strongest ally, the Shah of Iran- This last sentence is based on interview of more than fifty Iranian government officials including the former empress of Iran and the last Iranian ambassador to the United States, most of the Shah's cabinet alive today.
It is a marriage between the Liberal Left media and a Liberal Left president. The Muslim Brotherhood has been trying to assassinate Mubarak and overthrow Egypt for decades. Not only is the PLO involved in this revolution in Egypt, so is al-Qaeda, and Iran with its two long arms of terror, Hamas and Hezbollah. Yes, al-Qaeda operatives are in Cairo doing everything possible to fan the flames. Please forward this to everyone on your email list. Only the truth will set us free. CLICK HERE TO READ the LATEST UPDATE ON THE CRISIS IN EGYPT:

The liberal media has attempted to dumb-down the American people painting a picture that the crisis in Egypt is simply a matter of innocent Egyptians who want democracy versus Murbarak-supporting mobs attacking the freedom demonstrators. That is an outright lie. It is bad enough to tell a lie, but it is worse to believe it.
The  Liberal Left media are trying to define the terms of the debate in Egypt through lies. Why? They don't really believe that the terrorists behind this chaos are evil. Nor do they believe evil really exists.
The media attacks have become so severe anyone that contradicts them is considered ignorant, evil, racist, and a bigot. This is done in the name of political correctness and godless globalism. It is the theater of the absurd and a festival of hypocrisy.


*  The mainstream and left stream media have been telling us that the Muslim Brotherhood is not dangerous, not radically Islamist. Western leftists view the Brothers as have earned the right to be democratically voted into power by the people and we have no choice but to support what may turn out to be an even worse tyranny than that of Mubarak’s.

Such journalists also claim that the Egyptian people in the streets are not “political,” that they are impoverished, broken, barefoot warriors who have heroically risen up for jobs, food, and an end to corruption and tyranny. Indeed, the people may not be “political”—but their heroism may end up benefiting those who, unlike themselves, are already organized militarily, economically, and ideologically—like the Muslim Brotherhood.

Caroline Glick, reminds us that according to a June, 2010 Pew opinion survey of Egyptians:

59% said they back Islamists. Only 27% said they back modernizers. 50% of Egyptians support Hamas. 30% support Hezbollah and 20% support al Qaida. Moreover, 95% of them would welcome Islamic influence over their politics. When this preference is translated into actual government policy, it is clear that the Islam they support is the al Qaida Salafist version.

82% of Egyptians support executing adulterers by stoning, 77% support whipping and cutting the hands off thieves. 84% support executing any Muslim who changes his religion.


When given the opportunity, the crowds on the street are not shy about showing what motivates them. They attack Mubarak and his new Vice President Omar Suleiman as American puppets and Zionist agents. Protesters told CNN's Nick Robertson that the US is controlled by Israel. They hate and want to destroy Israel. That is why they hate Mubarak and Suleiman.

by Phyllis Chesler, an Emerita Professor of Psychology.

= = = =  =

* From where we sit, one thing seems clear: Too many officials in the west and in Washington, both the  administration and in Congress don’t understand the Muslim Brotherhood—or don’t want to.

 *Commentators expressed shock at how the United States as well as its major European allies appeared to be ready to dump a staunch strategic ally of three decades, simply to conform to the current ideology of political correctness.

"The politically correct diplomacy of American presidents throughout the generations ... is painfully naive."

Obama on Sunday called for an "orderly transition" to democracy in Egypt, stopping short of calling on Mubarak to step down, but signaling that his days may be numbered. "AMERICA HAS LOST IT"


*"Jordan and Saudi Arabia see the reactions in the West, how everyone is abandoning Mubarak, and this will have very serious implications," Ha’aretz daily [Leftist Israeli newspaper, not right wing at all] quoted one official as saying. Haaretz also wrote:  Obama had betrayed "a moderate Egyptian president who remained loyal to the United States, promoted stability and encouraged moderation."

To win popular Arab opinion, Obama was risking America's status as a superpower and reliable ally.

"Throughout Asia, Africa and South America, leaders are now looking at what is going on between Washington and Cairo. Everyone grasps the message: "America's word is worthless ... America has lost it."

*Privately, some Israeli government officials have expressed deep concern at what they view as the hypocritical abandonment by the US of a longtime ally once he seemed to be in trouble. The more likely scenario was that this would lead to an Islamist regime even worse on issues like human rights and freedom than Mubarak.

* Obama’s refusal last year to aid the pro-democracy students demonstrating in Iran against the oppression of the mullahs flies in stark contrast to his preposterous demand that President Mubarak of Egypt negotiate with the violent Egyptian street. He surely knows that behind the rioting and upheaval is a well-planned action of the Muslim .         Is Obama complicit in inflaming and supporting the enemies of the West and Judeo-Christian civilization?               Is he simply naïve beyond belief, or is there something far, far more sinister at play?

* With Obama “listen to the protesters….” we are witnessing a foreign policy gone mad. Remember the Suez Canal – the West’s lifeline – runs through Egypt. Remember Nasser in 1956 and 1967 and the Canal.

*  Israel is hated and loathed by most of the world even as it strives to seek peace with the Arab and Muslim world – a vain hope if ever there was one –

Of course, many will object the above.  To them the words are just not peaceful enough. But appeasement is in the air and it is Munich [Hitler’s  peace agreement] all over again. Despite the clearest of all warnings, there still will be those calling for “peace now” even with an implacable and demonic enemy from whom the only peace will be that of the grave.

* Israeli former Chief of staff said [on 2-5-11] that Obama should not reject Mubarak and shouldn't support the demonstrators immediately on the second day of demonstration as it only helped the demonstrators to be tougher and reject negotiation with any other authority, inside or outside Egypt.

He also said that all countries now probably won’t rely on Obama and USA, and will search for replacement  ally. Israeli leaders will decide what is good for Israel without asking for Obama approval. After any decision, Israel might ask USA to support the decision.

Israeli really understand that any agreement and relationship with any Muslim leader (including Palestinians) can be rejected by their extreme Muslim replacement.

Another Israeli former chief of staff said that Egypt main problem is the one Million additional mouse  it has to feed every year, and no one has a simple solution for it,  even not the demonstrators.

* “Egypt is the world’s largest wheat importer, beholden to foreign providers for nearly half its total food consumption [before the revolution, with Mubarak]. Half of Egyptians live on less than $2 a day. Food comprises almost half the country’s consumer price index, and much more than half of spending for the poorer half of the country. This will get worse, not better.”

*  we need to realize is that the Muslim Brotherhood operates in the United States under a variety of names and organizational umbrellas. Technically, there is no “Muslim Brotherhood” in the United States. But the Muslim American Society (MAS), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and others are – according to a document captured in a raid and released by law enforcement in 2007 during the Holy Land Foundation Hamas funding trial) – Brotherhood-linked organizations.

*  the Muslim Brotherhood’s mission in the U.S. is “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

*  people with ties to these organizations are involved with the Obama Administration, right? On the first day of his presidency, the President showed an eagerness to be friendly toward the Brotherhood: he chose Ingrid Mattson, president of ISNA to offer a prayer at the National Cathedral during inaugural festivities on January 20, 2009. ISNA has even admitted ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, which calls itself “one of the wings of Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine.”

*  Obama approved of a role in the next Egyptian government for the Muslim Brotherhood just as a Brotherhood leader was calling for war several days ago with the tiny Jewish state. It was telling. What better way to unify the ummah than with tried-and-true, religiously mandated Islamic anti-Semitism? For all of those quisling clowns desperately trying to scrub the Muslim Brotherhood, this declaration of war was a good hard slap in the face.

Further, it’s interesting how the Muslim Brotherhood is blaming Israel for Mubarak’s regime. They’re not blaming the $300 billion the US has pumped into Egypt. The Camp David Peace Accord (no matter how cold a peace it established) was a good thing. Now we hear that Obama’s would-be peace partners, the Muslim Brotherhood group Hamas, are going to destroy the accord. But they want peace with the Jews;

*  In June 2009, Obama appointed a Muslim, Kareem Shora, to the Homeland Security Advisory Council. Shora had been executive director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, a group that had generally opposed anti-terror efforts since 9/11 – as have all the Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups in the U.S. But more worrisome was Obama’s appointment of another Muslim, Arif Alikhan, to be Assistant Secretary for Policy Development at the Department of Homeland Security. Alikhan is affiliated with the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), which is another highly deceptive Brotherhood-linked group. These appointments were obvious attempts to show the Muslims of the United States and the world that anti-terror efforts were not anti-Islam or anti-Muslim. Shora and Alikhan would stand as moderate Muslims within the DHS, living illustrations of the iron dogma that all Muslims aside from a tiny minority were loyal Americans who abhorred Osama bin Laden and everything he stood for. But when he made the appointment, Obama didn’t notice, or didn’t care, that as deputy mayor of Los Angeles, Alikhan (who has referred to the jihad terrorist group Hizballah as a “liberation movement”) had blocked an effort by the Los Angeles Police Department to gather information about the ethnic makeup of area mosques.

*  This was not an effort to close down Los Angeles mosques, or to conduct surveillance of them. There was no wiretapping or interrogation involved. No one would be jailed or even inconvenienced. Los Angeles Deputy Chief Michael P. Downing explained in 2007: “We want to know where the Pakistanis, Iranians and Chechens are so we can reach out to those communities.” But even outreach was too much for the hypersensitive Muslim leaders of Los Angeles: they cried racism, discrimination, and “Islamophobia” until the LAPD dropped the plan. And Arif Alikhan spearheaded their drive against this initiative. 

 - - - -  - - - -  - - - -  - - -  - - - -  - -

Some References:

by Victor Sharpe:


The Islamic tide is cresting, by Victor Sharpe,  .  Related posts:

Ms. Geller’s book, co-written with Robert Spencer, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on Ame...

1.         Two nations under Islamic duress by Victor Sharpe In the 14th century, the Byzantine Empire...

2.         The Root of the Arab-Israeli Conflict: The Classic Islamic View of ... by Hagai Mazuz, Hudson New York From the day Israel...

3.         The Islamic infiltration of America Islam in America, Part 5 By Dr. Richard Booker In...

4.         New Book: Islamic Tsunami Islamic Tsunami: Israel and America in the age of Obama...

5.         Palestinians Don’t Want Peace It seems that although the Israeli government and moderate Palestinians...


FrontPage Interview’s guest today is Pamela Geller, founder, editor and publisher of the popular and award-winning weblog She has won acclaim for her interviews with internationally renowned figures, including John Bolton, Geert Wilders, Bat Ye’or, Natan Sharansky, and many others, and has broken numerous important stories — notably the questionable sources of some of the financing of the Obama campaign. Her op-eds have been published in The Washington Times, The American Thinker, Israel National News, FrontPage Magazine, World Net Daily, and New Media Journal, among other publications. She is the co-author (with Robert Spencer) of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on Ame...


Views: 16

Write New Comment Here - to be added sequentially at end of Forum

Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2023   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service