The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Peter McLoughlin's book on the Muslim grooming gangs, Easy Meat: Inside the British Grooming Gang Scandal, has now been updated to include new material bringing it up to 2016.

It can be bought in paperback and ebook from Amazon. McLoughlin is maintaining a website of material supplementary to the Easy Meat book - .

The link to his website points to a page showing you what the additional material in the book covers.

There is also a very useful interactive, searchable table on McLoughlin's website. You can search and sort this table using names, towns, dates to see this grooming gang scandal from different angles.

Michael Coren & Gavin Boby on Muslim rape gangs in England

The original video was taken down from Youtube at the end of last year.  The text below was part of the video on Youtube.

However it is available here:
Gavin also speaks on this topic at 12:50 in this video:

Published on Feb 27, 2014

Alibhai-Brown illustrates her point by zeroing in on this sentence by Berelowitz & co.: "Perpetrators come from all ethnic groups, and so do their victims -- contrary to what some may wish to believe." In response to which Alibhai-Brown offers this comment: "Yes, we know they come from all backgrounds. But that rather cutting second line is directed at people like me who believe that in some British cities -- especially in the North of England -- circles of sexual hell for young girls are run by gangs of Muslim men (most of Pakistani or Bangladeshi heritage) who mostly prey on white girls....To generalise their crimes, and lump them in with all the other abusers across the country, is to deny what the victims of these men and their families are saying about the abuse that has gone on."

Indeed. Of course, the OCC's statement about perpetrators coming "from all ethnic groups" is yet another example of the handy PC dodge whereby the link between Islam and pretty much any of its more horrific aspects can be swept away by means of a simple rhetorical formula. For example: "Honor killings occur in a wide range of religions." Or: "Female genital mutilation is not an exclusively Islamic phenomenon." Or: "The practice of forced marriages is not restricted to Muslim families." All true -- and all cynically designed to avoid the uncomfortable statistical reality, and to protect the speaker from being accused of racism or Islamophobia. (It's no surprise that ITV's brief online account of the OCC report actually made that insipid truism its headline: "Report: Child exploiters 'come from all ethnic groups.'")

"The report," notes Alibhai-Brown, "points out that 28 per cent of the victims they found were of black and Asian background. But it doesn't state what it should have: that some of the worst long-term abuse is carried out by mainly British Pakistani men targeting lost young white girls, often from troubled or poor families....The children are neglected and hungry for love. The men offer treats, car rides and kebabs, then drugs and alcohol; and then they corrupt them." Alibhai-Brown argues that while authorities fear "that the racial aspects of child sex gangs will be hijacked by groups such as the English Defence League," it is important to "confront some of the values that drive such men to prey on white females" and to look squarely at "some Asian cultural assumptions that make the paedophiles feel no guilt or shame about what they do."

Exactly which "values" and "Asian cultural assumptions" is Alibhai-Brown talking about? Alas, she doesn't say. That's where her article ends: with a gutsy-sounding call to face up to "values" and "Asian cultural assumptions" that, it appears, she would prefer not to identify at the present juncture.

What to say about this? Well, first of all, anyone who is genuinely interested in facing up to the truth of these matters needs to stop talking, as Alibhai-Brown does incessantly in her article, about race. This is not about race but about religion -- not about black and white but about Muslim and infidel. Alibhai-Brown wants to be seen as bravely pulling back a curtain on an ugly reality, but her repeated reference to dark-hued men and "white girls," and her use of that cowardly, dishonest (and, alas, ubiquitous) British euphemism "Asian" is nothing more than a way of skirting the truth -- namely, that the "cultural assumptions" at work here aren't "Asian" -- aren't Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese, Mongolian, or Thai -- but Islamic. As she and most of her readers well know, countless Muslim boys are brought up to view infidel females as little more than whores whose "immodest" attire makes them legitimate targets for physical assault. Most Westerners who are seriously concerned about these matters have long since learned that the Koran itself condones such conduct, and that in cases of rape it is the victims, not the perpetrators, who are considered the guilty parties. These repulsive facts have been widely known in Europe for many years now.

for info on the book referenced by Gavin go here:

Tags: Gavin Bobby

Views: 10961

Replies to This Discussion

Rotherham Council has been nominated for a “social work employer of the year” award, despite the authority failing 1,400 girls.
comment following above article:   a day ago

I am a contract social worker and have worked all over the UK. My work is mainly in Adults, Mental Health and learning disabilities. I have contract friends and family who work with children. I do not have enough space to tell you what is going on, and is still going on. Many like me believe that what is happening is a process of normalisation of this type behaviour. To an extent it has now been forced in the open, not because of fake journalists like The Times's Andrew Norfolk, but it just became so big it could not be covered up anymore. Now we see the real truth, it is everywhere, and absolute epidemic. If you compare the sentencing of say, that foot baller only kissed the 14 year old and got over six years, and many of the Muslim rapists got nine years average and some are now walking the same streets, we see a massive inequity in the sentencing.

I have a relative who was involved in age assessments of those fake "child" refugees who came in last year. This relative told me, at a meeting several contract social workers charged with age assessing these "children" came back to these management meeting and stated clearly these were grown men and not under 17 years old children. I won't go into the long details but the upshot is that managers ORDERED the social workers to place the "children" into foster homes despite social workers raising questions of safety for the young vulnerable girls these men would come into contact with, and some pointed out past sexual abuse of young girls in foster homes by such men. It mattered not to these managers and instructions were given with stoney faced orders of, "Place them or you are out of a job..." The social workers were left just staring in disbelief. One stated that if the manager was willing to put her instruction in writing then she would do it. The mangers refused to put anything in writing, and would no doubt deny such instructions should anything go wrong.

After being told this I contact, David Davies office (brexit Minister) and was told to contact the news papers. Yes, you heard me right. I said I wanted Mr Davies to ask questions in Parliament. I got nowhere. The news papers weren't interested. they almost wanted me to write the story for them.

Any a group of us got together and made phone calls to child intake teams of the London boroughs involved and stated the following. We told them we were a group of social workers who had enough. We had taken photographs of these men in childrens homes, and if they weren't removed we would give them to the news papers. We could hear all hell breaking loose at the other end of phone. To ensure compliance we contacted child exploitation teams in the areas and told the the same. They Sexual Exploitation teams acted immediately and turned up at the homes and turfed out the fake refugees children. THIS IS WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO IN TODAYS'S UK TO PROTECT CHILDREN. AS FOR THE RESPONSE OF MANY MPs, I would not plss on them of they were on fire. I suspect there are many in Westminster who find nothing wrong with kiddy fiddling.

My opinion is that the UK is screwed. If we survive another generation rape will be all but normalised. But I suspect we as a nation, and the West in general in going down the path to civil conflict, as soon it will become obvious to all, that what is happening is all deliberate.

Peter McLoughlin has a table cross-tallying the significant historical events with the actual convictions (and showing which of those convicted are Muslim and what the overall ratio is of Kuffar to Muslims among those convicted).  I take this as a kind of visual summary of the scandal and of the content of his book.

I tried to paste the table here, but it exceeds Ning's 40k character limit.

The way in which newspaper websites have either disabled commenting or have banned many commenters (I believe Paul is banned from the Daily Mail, as am I) shows how tightly they are keeping a lid on this kind of thing.

Affirmative action in Britain has resulted in the discrimination of the Native British. The British are treated by their "own" in exactly the same way that Islam treats Kafirs, they are second class citizens with severely restricted rights.

Simple questions: What would have happened if the British had behaved towards Muslims in the same way that Muslims treat the native British? and, what would have happened if Muslim children had been sexually exploited in vast numbers by gangs of British men? How would the police and law and government and press and NGOs,  SJWs etc. Have reacted??????


Muslim grooming gangs and other rape jihad convictions

The following list is arranged alphabetically by their main location.
There are now 138 known completed trials with convictions for rape jihad offences at 61 main locations. These have a red bullet below (). Other cases of interest are marked with a black bullet ().
We list, where known, the location of the offences, the victim’s home town, the home town of the charged/arrested/convicted people and the location of the trial court. The ethnic or national origin of the convicted men is also shown where reported. Other key features are mentioned, including the ages of victims and perpetrators and comments from the judge.
Note the geographic spread of these offences.
Note too that it is not a “tiny minority” of Muslims involved in this form of abuse. See notes on Keighley and Rotherham at the foot of this page and another note on the nationalities of those convicted. See also how imams in British mosques enable and condone abuse of English girls.

Grooming gangs are abusing victims all over country ;

Child sex grooming cases increase 64% in 1 year ;

Child grooming crimes up 70% in Derbyshire ;

"According to the best available data, Asian men make up 75 per cent of “Type 1” group abusers, who target children and young women because they are vulnerable. 

But white men make up 100 per cent of recorded “Type 2” group abusers, who target children because of a longstanding paedophilic interest."

-There is no mention of the race of the child victims in Type 1 here. Are any of them "Asian"?

-Type 2, (paedophiles), are Pakistanis and West Indians never Type 2?

-“Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls”. Had Sarah Champion said "Asian" men would there have been a problem?

It is revolting that there are so many paedophiles, but a lot less English girls would have had their lives destroyed if there were no Pakistanis in England.

They all also get convictions for perverting the course of justice. Is that because of witness intimidation? Anything is possible with this criminal scum.

"Child abuser shouts no justice". I agree, a Muslim is entitlied to rape anyone and anything whenever he chooses, that is his fundamental human right. We that disagree are wrong and should be punished, we should thank him for forcing us to acknowledge how beneficial Islam is.


Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2018   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service