The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Some years after adding this discussion, I found an article from 1999, about a report from The Commission for Racial Equality, stating that most of the victims of racist attacks in the UK are white.


This is divided into 3 sections: 1. racist murders, 2. serious racist violence/attempted murder, 3. more "minor" racist violence.  Within each section, new items are added at the top of each section.

2001: Senior police officer says "asians" behind most racist attacks:

2006: white people are the victim in half of racist murders ("political correctness stifling debate"):

Racist Murders of White Men/Women by Muslims

88yo Margery Gilby in Shadwell care home murdered by 17yo muslim from Romford (2013)

Alex Holroyd (2013)

Lee Rigby (2013)

Kieran Crump-Raiswell (2013)

William McKeeney (2012)

Victor Parsons & Keith Needell (2012)

Rosina Waller (2010)

Christopher Folkes (2009)

Keith Brown (2008)

Andrew Holland (2008)

Vicente Delgado (2007)

Christopher Yates (2005)

Mary-Ann Leneghan (2005)

Kris Donald (2004)

Gavin Hopley (2003)

Charlene Downes (2003)

Ross Parker (2001)

Marilyn & Nicholas Cook (1992) 

Attempted Murders/Extreme Racist Violence by Muslims

Barnsley Soldier (2013)

 Attacked from behind, stomped on while unconscious by a "pack of dogs"

Aaron Dugmore (2013)

 9 y.o. hangs himself after being victim of racist bullying by "asians"

Adrian McCarthy (2013)

Ronald O’Connor (2013)

Daniel Stringer (2012)

Gary Smith (2011)

Shaun McNally (2010)

[muslims know of Kris Donald, when the white population does not].

Joseph Haigh (2009)

Oliver Hemsley (2008)

John Payne (2006)

"Minor" racist attacks by muslims:

22yo muslim man gets 18 weeks in prison for unprovoked attack on white schoolgirl, breaking her jaw (2013).

Mr. Tull, bus driver (2013)

Tara Quigley, victim of acid attack (2013)

Muslim men in racist attack on 11yo white boy (2013)

Christopher Riley (2013)

Andrew Goodram (2011)

Un-named 25yo father + baby son (2005)

Walter Chamberlain (2001)

Tags: Attacks, People, Racist, White, on

Views: 5131

Replies to This Discussion

I think that a similar comparison for England would be roughly the same, or at least demonstrate that those with dark skin were killing far more of those with white skin than vice versa (the cop figures might not be the same).


72yo man killed by 19yo muslim in an unprovoked attack.

Muslim gets 3.5 years. Probably out in 2.

How the hell is that manslaughter? So is it ok now to walk upto someone and beat them to death by manslaughter, on the understanding that its the hospitals duty to make sure they don't die from it?

And after his criminal record, we will have to support him for a lifetime on benefits, and we will be to blame for not employing him due to, of course, our inherent 'Islamophobia', nothing to do with his violent kuffarphobia.

At least Knowles will be happy: another Muslim recruit who's rights are to be protected. No point in defending the pensioners rights, after all, since he's dead.

Meanwhile, unbalanced Bonehill got the same jail sentence. Only instead of killing an old man for no reason, Bonehill sent some tweets.

Joe said:


72yo man killed by 19yo muslim in an unprovoked attack.

Muslim gets 3.5 years. Probably out in 2.

Mark Sharp, murdered in Luton in 1995.  Just read about how light the sentences were.  Staggering to think that Muslims can get away with industrial-scale rape of schoolgirls, terrorism and even racist murder.  No wonder ordinary people don't fight back when the courts are on the side of the replacement population.

The Murder of Mark Sharp

On 30 August 1995, Mark Sharp died in hospital in Luton, Bedfordshire.He had been attacked three days earlier by a gang of Asians.Mark was driving his car in Luton and was forced to brake sharply when another car driven by Abdul Shahid stopped suddenly in front of him. Mark overtook, making a rude gesture as he did so. Shortly afterwards he parked his car in High Town Road. The other car pulled up beside him and four Asians got out and confronted him.These were Abdul Shahid, Jomir and Forid Miah and Abdul Tahid. Even though it was four to one, Tahid felt it necessary to telephone for reinforcements Subsequently, Abdul Abbadin and Rejan Uddin and two others arrived and they came armed.A Mr. Tatham, who owned a nearby laundrette, witnessed the attack. From inside the laundrette he saw a man hit out at Mark who then fell. He heard someone shout: "Stab him!" and added: 
"When Mr. Sharp was in a crouching position they all converged. They were fighting to get one in. There was kicking and everything, hitting and kicking. When Sharp was lying down the group was hitting and kicking." Another witness, a Mr. Harper, described how four or five Asians were arguing with Mark: "They were pulling things out of their sleeves and started to hit him. They looked like poles and bars. I think they all had a weapon like a chrome bar, looked like, and one looked like a wooden bar about two feet long... 

They started hitting the man, pushing him to the floor and beating him. I could see all the blood. I thought about five were involved in the attack...

All of them started pushing him about, knocked him to the floor and kicked and beat him... He had no chance really. He tried to defend himself, but did not get much chance." Ian Smith, a ten-year-old boy, was watching from the window of a flat.He saw one of the 'reinforcements' take part of a snooker cue from his sleeve and watched as he attacked Mark with it. He said:
"He didn't make him go down and the white man turned and looked around. Then another Asian kicked him. He banged off the railings of the church and fell down. Then all of them just started hitting him, stamping on him and kicking him. All the men who came down the road had sticks as well. These sticks were all the same as the first stick that I just described. 

When the white man fell to the ground, the Asians with sticks hit him with their sticks. Others were stamping on him and kicking him. All of them were attacking him. No-one was trying to stop what was happening."The gang carried on kicking and beating him even when he was lying lifeless on the ground. At some point Mark was also stabbed in the head. Nevertheless, Mark hung on for three days.Then he died.On 11 July 1996, Rejan Uddin and Abdul Tahid were convicted of murder and sentenced to life. At the trial, the Judge explained to the jury how they could consider PROVOCATION as a defence. This might reduce murder to manslaughter if they considered that any of the accused had been caused to lose their self-control by things that Mark had said or done which might have been 'ENOUGH TO MAKE A REASONABLE YOUNG ASIAN MALE ACT.' He added:"If the answer is yes then HE IS GUILTY OF MANSLAIGHTER (not murder) BY REASON OF PROVOCATION." Jomir Miah, Abdul Shahid and Forid Miah were acquitted of murder but convicted of manslaughter. Forid Miah and Abdul Shahid were sentenced to four years imprisonment. Jomir Miah was sentenced to four years detention in a Young Offenders Institution. Abdul Abedin fled to Bangladesh. A warrant for his arrest was issued but a Bangladeshi High Commission spokesman said:
"We have no extradition treaty with Britain. It can only be done on goodwill now. It depends on how serious the British government is."On 26 April 2004, the BBC website reported thus:"Abdul Abedin, 31, fled the UK following the death of Mark Sharp, 37, in High Town Road, Luton, Bedfordshire. Mr. Abedin is believed to have been held in Bangladesh for 43 months awaiting extradition before he returned to England and turned himself in."
Yet another foreigner who would rather be banged up in Britain than at liberty in the land where his ancestors are buried.

On 12 May 1998, the convictions of Abdul Shahid and Forid Miah were quashed. Luton Crown Court was then told that:

"The murder charge had been substituted by one of wounding."
So, if you put two fingers up at an Asian who almost causes a traffic accident with his dodgy driving and, subsequently, he aand his mates punch you and kick you and bludgeon you repeatedly and stab you in the head, he and his mates may expect to be charged with manslaughter instead of murder, and, thereafter, sentenced to just four years.

The so called justice system in this country is a facade used only to fool the ignorant and gullible. 

Muslim gang rampaged through Liverpool attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”

10:22, 27 JUL 2017

A gang of Muslim men rampaged through Liverpool city centre attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”.

One witness feared Amin Mohmed, Mohammed Patel and Faruq Patel were ISIS terrorists.

The drunken yobs targeted three unknown men before Mohmed, 24, and Mohammed, 20, set upon Gary Bohanna when he revealed he was Christian.

Laughing Faruq, 19, who was not convicted of a racial or religious motive, then filmed Mohmed punching St Helens councillor Paul Lynch to the ground, as his terrified girlfriend tried to protect him.

Liverpool Crown Court heard counter-terrorism officers raided the three men’s homes in Bolton after the shocking incident on March 20 last year.

The judge, Recorder Louise Brandon, said: “This was a disgraceful and sustained campaign of violence carried out on the streets of this city.”

Paul Treble, prosecuting, said fellow-Muslim Edris Nosrati spotted two of the gang attacking a man in Bold Street at around 3.30am.

He said: “He was concerned because one of them seemed to be using racist language, talking about Muslims and Christians.

“One of them came up to Mr Nosrati and said ‘are you a Muslim?’ Mr Nosrati said he was, but the man said ‘well, what’s the Muslim word?’”

He said Mr Nosrati replied with a “well-known” Arabic phrase: “There is only one God, and Muhammad is a messenger.”

Mr Treble said: “He said it’s a phrase often linked with ISIS.

“He was concerned as to their exact intent and that they might be associated in some way to an extremist organisation.”

Mr Nosrati was told “you can go”, but when he tried to stop them punching another man, one replied: “It’s none of your business.”

He followed the gang to Renshaw Street, where Mr Bohanna was asked: “What are you?”

The victim was confused but when one of them said “I’m a Muslim, what are you?” he answered “I’m a Christian”.

The attacker shouted “Why aren’t you a Muslim?” before punching him twice
The attacker shouted “Why aren’t you a Muslim?” before punching him twice, breaking his glasses and causing a 2cm cut above his left eye.

The gang then encountered Mr Lynch, Labour councillor for Moss Bank, and his girlfriend Jill Newton.

Footage taken by Faruq captured Mohmed punch Mr Lynch with a “sickening blow” that could be “seen and heard”.

No racist comments were used, but Liverpool John Moores University student Faruq could be heard laughing as the victim fell.

Mr Nosrati called police but Faruq fled, so the witness chased and caught him.

The teenager punched Mr Nosrati and struck him in the eye with his phone, but the hero held on.

Mr Bohanna and Mr Lynch - who suffered bruising and bleeding to his eyes - were taken to hospital.

Mohmed made no comment to police, but later claimed he could not remember anything because he was so drunk.

Mohammed initially denied the assaults and suggested they had been racially abused by other men.

However, he confessed to “targeting people because they were white and non-Muslim”.

Faruq told officers people called him and his friends a “dirty p***” and they retaliated.

He admitted filming “because he thought it was funny” and described it “as a laugh”.

Mohmed, of Perendale Rise, Bolton, and Mohammed, of Eastbank Street, Bolton, admitted racially or religiously aggravated assault causing actual bodily harm.

The pair, along with Faruq, of Crumpsall Street, Bolton, also admitted assault causing actual bodily harm and affray.

Martine Snowdon, defending Mohammed, said her “deeply remorseful” client was “terrified” of being locked up.

The university expelled him but he had re-enrolled at Salford University and asked for “mercy” to continue his studies.

Andrew Costello, defending Faruq, said his “ashamed” client was “very drunk” but maintained he did not hit anyone or use racial abuse.

However, he conceded the “apologetic” accountancy student “tried to lie his way out of it”.

Mohmed has previous convictions for criminal damage and battery, relating to a family row last November.

Sarah Johnston, defending Mohmed, said it appeared the group were racially abused but that was not an excuse.

She said: “He has brought not only shame and embarrassment but also distress to his family.

“The Counter Terrorism Unit became involved in the investigation and the defendants’ family homes were turned upside down by the police.”

Recorder Brandon said the group may have suffered racist abuse, but targeted innocent men in “violent and senseless attacks”.

She said Mohmed and Mohammed’s punching and kicking of Mr Bohanna was aggravated by “hostility based on his religion”.

The judge said: “References to the fact he was not a Muslim was made and you appeared to justify your actions because of certain beliefs you held.”

Recorder Brandon said after the joint enterprise attack on Mr Lynch, “frightened” Miss Newton “had no idea what you were going to do next”.

She said Mohammed “confirmed those targeted that night were targeted because they were white and non-Muslim.”

Mohmed cried as he was jailed for 42 weeks. Mohammed and Faruq Patel received 42 and 18 weeks respectively in a young offenders institution.


Most race attack victims `are white'

THE MAJORITY of victims of racial attacks are white, according to a report to be released next week by race relations watchdogs.

The disclosure, days before the release of the findings of the Stephen Lawrence inquiry, will provoke intense debate over Britain's future direction as a multicultural society.

The Commission for Racial Equality, which has produced the report, called for detailed government research into the nature of racist attacks on white people.

CRE chairman Sir Herman Ouseley said: "It would be irresponsible for us to not try to take this on head-on and understand it better."

He said: "It's absolutely clear in our view that you can be black and racist. Clearly the evidence we have shows that this is not just a white problem."

The CRE report, called Racial Attacks and Harassment, records that 238,000 white people told researchers they had been victims of a racial offence in a 12-month period, compared to 101,000 Asians and 42,000 blacks.

Race experts believe that many of the white victims could be Jewish, Irish or from other European minorities.

Other incidents result from tensions between the English, Welsh and Scottish, which are increasingly seen as racial.

It also believed that some white victims of crimes such as street-robberies, where a disproportionate number of offenders are black, are reporting the incidents as race attacks.

Sir Herman said that the "white" category was "very broad" and that it did not necessarily follow that a white victim had been racially abused or attacked by someone of a different skin colour.

He said: "It is easy to put interpretations which are not accurate onto figures, and at the moment the figures are a bit too bald."

The CRE report, which draws on a wide range of government and academic research studies, comes as local authorities across England and Wales are conducting audits of race attacks.

Bradford Metropolitan District Council reported last month that police records of racial attacks showed that 52 per cent of victims were white, 9 per cent black and 35 per cent Asian. Suspects were described as 50 per cent Asian, 37 per cent white, 2 per cent black and 11 per cent unknown.

The CRE report points out that, because of their smaller numbers, members of minority ethnic groups are still far more likely to be victims of racial attacks than whites.

Some 8 per cent of Pakistanis reported being victims in a year, compared to 5 per cent of Indians, 4 per cent of Caribbeans and 1 per cent of whites.

The CRE report coincides with findings published today by the Institute for Public Policy Research showing that, as Britain has become more multiracial, parts of the white population have grown defensive and insecure.

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, author of the IPPR study, states: "Increasingly, white people of all classes are feeling deep anxieties about the loss of white identity as we go into the next century and into further integration with Europe."

IPPR research in the inner London district of Somers Town, found the five most common words used by whites to describe neighbouring Asians were "scroungers", "dirty", "animals", "pigs", and "not British".

In response to such attitudes, eight young Asian men told the IPPR that they "would retaliate with physical force if they were provoked" and that they "hated these whites". Five said they had attacked white boys and would do so again.

Even in the more affluent London borough of Richmond and Hounslow, researchers found that "some black and Asian families had developed a hatred for white people".

Partly as a result of this, some whites now say they have been victims of racial offences.

But other white victims will be Irish, Jewish, gypsies and travellers, English settlers in Scotland, and Scottish settlers in England. Dane Kim Stevns-borg came to live in England because he was so impressed by the hospitality he received as a visiting football supporter during the Euro 96 tournament.

But in October he took his Sheffield employer to court for racial discrimination after his supervisor repeatedly referred to him as a "Danish bastard".

A report next week by the Refugee Council will show that the latest people to be targeted by racists in Britain are newly-arrived Kosovan refugees.

Rachel Rees, of the Refugee Council, said many Kosovans in Dover are too frightened to speak publicly in their native language in case they are attacked by racists. One elderly couple were forced to flee their home after a brick was thrown through their window.

Meanwhile the IPPR study reveals evidence of discord between some members of different Asian communities.

The research indicates that Britain is following America's path towards a more segmented society. Ms Alibhai-Brown said years of government inaction had inhibited integration and called for a national strategy of multiculturalism to bring the British public closer together.

Imagine if the grooming gangs were also treated as racist attacks.  

Those headline reports from The Independent and The Guardian from 1999 to 2006 at the top of this discussion would never see the light of day now.  From my own experience I know that the police will not even countenance an undeniably violent racist attack on white people as being racist - the police do not even want to register the crime as a crime at all, because to do so would open the can of worms of the indigenous population being victims to racist immigrants.

I notice that in a video interview between Gavin Boby and Simon Harris, Gavin recommended that people just move town if they discover a mosque application in their area or the rape of their daughter.  He said it was barely worth getting the authorities involved.  I don't know if Gavin was thinking of this case, but when I read the report I found it unutterably depressing:

The case got to court, but still there was no justice.

"She refused the judge’s offer of restorative justice as part of his sentence, wanting no part in meeting her tormentor for him to apologise."  

Restorative justice?  What's that?  Is that where the victim is made to marry the rapist?

How long will it take the Stalinists of Hate not Hope to respond with cries of racism and fascism against the CRE? Counting down: 5, 4, 3, 2 ...

I think its only a matter of time before doxing starts on Judges as well, and they are no longer able to act with the impunity they so freely grant the perpetrators.


Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2018   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service