It takes a nation to protect the nation
I'm wondering why the plan doesn't include "Stop Muslim immigration into Europe."
It seems to me that the plan mainly addresses symptoms rather than the root cause: too many muslims coming into Europe.
Rather than address symptoms by banning minarets or burkhas, wouldn't it be better to just cut to the chase and keep Muslims out of Europe?
Thanks for looking the Plan over. As regards 'symptoms' and 'causes', I believe we've had the discussion before and I haven't changed my views. As regards immigration, you raise a good point, so I will have to look at sacrificing one of the other points since 12 is the max for a human list IMO.
When looking at the construction of a state, you can make it on a Theocratic basis or a Secular basis. If you make it Theocratic like Iran or Pakistan, then its fine to create laws which name and victimise particular religions (or all except one which is the same application of the discrimination principle and negates the Golden Rule). So you have the famous Section 295C in Pakistan and all the persecuted, murdered and raped Christians in Pakistan which the Fascist UAF are too illiterate to read about.
But if you make a state on a secular basis, it is not (or should not be - British Government please take note) permissible to name any particular religion or grouping in your laws for either positive or negative discrimination. Therefore, it is not permissible to make a law excluding all Muslims from immigration.
However, you are obviously saying this because they are the ones blowing people up and wanting to overthrow the state. This is a non-trivial question in the US, but in the UK and much of Europe, it is actually a trivial question.
So if we are going to put halting immigration on the list, it has to be put as a case of redressing an inequitable distortion of civil rights, or of one of the 4 freedoms. Well, I think it distorts the "Freedom of Election" idea, because it is allowing the Labour Party to import voters to boost its standing in the polls. Its a kind of Gerrymandering. And as regards Civil Rights, nobody was ever asked if they'd like to have immigration, so that new immigrant that comes in has been given privileges that the resident countryman has been denied.
Any suggestions as to which of the 12 points should be replaced?
The only way I can see to fit in this extra point would be to collapse points 8 and 9 together, into a single point all about abuse of women. That would make it a bit of a mouthful though as in:
8. Stop Abuse of Women via Bigamy, Grooming, Forced FGM and Forced Marriage
Bigamy should be made legal for everyone, or illegal for everyone. Muslims should not receive special privileges. The law should be applied equally to protect minors against abuse by their parents, by FGM for example.
© 2023 Created by Netcon. Powered by