The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Kuffarphobia in Africa


Kuffarphobia in Africa

To defend the 4 Freedoms in Africa
(apart from Nigeria, Egypt and Sudan which have their own rooms)

Search Site:
Members: 14
Latest Activity: Sep 12

About This Room

Discussion Forum


Started by shiva. Last reply by paul collings Aug 9, 2016. 4 Replies

Church Street Bombing

Started by shiva Apr 23, 2015. 0 Replies

Soft Jihad in Kenya: Push for Polygamy Successful

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by paul collings Apr 3, 2015. 3 Replies

A HARD LOOK AT RACISM (Warning Graphic)

Started by shiva. Last reply by Alan Lake Jul 19, 2013. 4 Replies

...and the beat goes on!

Started by Dave. Last reply by Dave Nov 12, 2012. 14 Replies

Islam Solution to Aids

Started by shiva. Last reply by Dave Jul 30, 2012. 1 Reply

The success of the suicide bomber.

Started by paul collings. Last reply by paul collings Jul 19, 2012. 2 Replies

Mali: Students flee Sharia in northern schools

Started by shiva. Last reply by Alan Lake Jun 24, 2012. 1 Reply


Started by shiva. Last reply by shiva May 24, 2012. 9 Replies

No Peace for south sudan.

Started by paul collings. Last reply by Joe Apr 30, 2012. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Kuffarphobia in Africa to add comments!

Comment by Alan Lake on March 12, 2013 at 1:15

I feel for those South Africans, they've been shafted then abandoned by the world.

In a way, what we are concerned with here on 4F is not just strictly the threat from Islamism, perhaps we are more concerned with picking up human rights 'gaps' which have been dropped by all the other 'humanitarian' organisations, because they don't conform to the current politically correct narrative.

So any criticism of Islam is verboten now, since they are the chosen ones.  And any support for oppressed white people is similarly verboten, because they, apparently, have to pay for crimes committed by their great great grandfathers (although nobody else has to do that).

There is a sickening list of fraudulent players in this space, from Amnesty International to the UN Human Rights Council.  It goes back to that old phrase: "who watches the watchmen?".

Comment by Antony on March 11, 2013 at 11:37
Comment by Antony on February 22, 2013 at 18:53
Comment by Antony on February 21, 2013 at 12:46
Comment by Antony on November 25, 2012 at 17:18

Britain gives £19million aid to South Africa - its President spends £17.5 million on palace ;

Comment by Kinana on November 11, 2012 at 23:29

Good one Alan.  Also 'fat-cat right' is a new term to be applied to those on the Left who are not quite left enough for the pure Left.  sort of like Left in name only -- or LINOs.  

Comment by Alan Lake on November 11, 2012 at 22:47

The bigots at the Economist have excelled themselves there, as their leftist brains spin in their own contradictions.

After spending the whole article teaching us that the ANC have total control of the country and nobody else has any hope of getting a look in, the Economist says:

The best hope for the country in years to come is a real split in the ANC between the populist left and the fat-cat right to offer a genuine choice for voters.

But hang on: the ANC leadership are black aren't they?  And they are allegedly "for the people", socialist?  But the Leftists have to call them Right Wing because, that's their term for anybody they disagree with.

So, next time someone calls you Right Wing, ask them:
"Are you saying I'm a black socialist?"

Comment by Antony on November 11, 2012 at 9:21
Comment by Alan Lake on October 2, 2012 at 1:49

Feds Hired British Security Firm to Protect Benghazi Consulate

The State Department signed a six-figure deal with a British firm to protect the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya just four months before a sustained attack on the compound killed four U.S. nationals inside.

Contrary to Friday’s claim by State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland that “at no time did we contract with a private security firm in Libya,” the department inked a contract for “security guards and patrol services” on May 3 for $387,413.68. An extension option brought the tab for protecting the consulate to $783,000. The contract lists only “foreign security awardees” as its recipient.

The State Department confirmed to Danger Room on Monday that the firm was Blue Mountain, a British company that provides “close protection; maritime security; surveillance and investigative services; and high risk static guarding and asset protection,” according to its website. Blue Mountain says it has “recently operated in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, the Caribbean and across Europe” and has worked in Libya for several months since last year’s war.

A representative for Blue Mountain, reached at its U.K. offices Monday, said no one was available to comment.

The State Department frequently hires security companies to protect diplomats in conflict zones. It usually is done through what’s known as the Worldwide Protective Services contract, in which a handful of approved firms compete to safeguard specific diplomatic installations. In 2010, State selected eight firms for the most recent contract. Blue Mountain wasn’t among them, and the State Department did not explain why the Benghazi consulate contract did not go to one of those eight firms.

It isn’t known how the Blue Mountain contractors performed Tuesday when the consulate came under sustained attack by small arms fire. In an official account provided Wednesday by the Obama administration, embassy security staff — both American and Libyan — failed to break the assault. They required help from Libyan security forces, assisted by a sympathetic Libyan militia, to regain control of the consulate’s main building and end a pitched battle that raged for 4.5 hours.

Nor is it clear if two former Navy SEALs killed in the assault were Blue Mountain employees. One of them, Glen Doherty, told ABC News last month that he was part of a mission sent to Libya to lock down Moammar Gadhafi’s missiles to prevent them from reaching the black market. Blue Mountain’s contract doesn’t refer to safeguarding thousands of rockets and missiles that have gone missing in the aftermath of the 2011 war.

But the call for contract security came at an opportune moment. Shortly after the department issued the contract, extremist elements active in Libya began targeting U.S. and allied installations. On June 5, the consulate sustained a rocket attack shortly after news spread that Abu Yahya al-Libi, a Libyan member of al-Qaida, was killed in a drone strike in Pakistan. Another rocket attack in the city attempted to kill the visiting British ambassador on June 11. (Both attacks allegedly were by the same extremist organization, the Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades, which may have played a role in last week’s consulate assault.)

Much remains unclear about the attack on Benghazi. But the presence of private security guards in the lightly-defended compound helps explain how approximately 25 to 30 diplomatic staff held out for over four hours against a crowd of possibly hundreds armed with rifles, rockets and other small arms without massive loss of life.

Comment by Antony on August 28, 2012 at 12:43

Members (13)


Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2018   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service