The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Fightback by Ideology, Dialogue & Constitution

Information

Fightback by Ideology, Dialogue & Constitution

Deals with ideological threats to our freedom and society.  

Analyses argument and rhetoric in all its forms: media interview, debate, and oratory.

Also considers fight back by fixing the 4 constitutional vulnerabilities as identified in the principles of 4F.

Members: 42
Latest Activity: 5 hours ago

Key Info

Religious arguments go in the Theology Room, so all the rest (i.e. secular ones) come into this room. One-on-one arguments are treated in the same way as combat skills are treated in the UFC, as a pure skill, unrelated to the truth or falsehood (whatever that is) of the underlying message.

The CODA glossary is here:
http://4freedoms.com/group/argumentation/forum/topics/dialogue-analysis-glossary


Find more photos like this on The 4 Freedoms Library

  • "The strictly leveled playing field is not a level playing field  (it advantages thugs)" - Alan Lake
  • "Let me now state what seems to me the decisive objection to any conservatism which deserves to be called such. It is that by its very nature it cannot offer an alternative to the direction in which we are moving. It may succeed by its resistance to current tendencies in slowing down undesirable developments, but, since it does not indicate another direction, it cannot prevent their continuance. It has, for this reason, invariably been the fate of conservatism to be dragged along a path not of its own choosing. The tug of war between conservatives and progressives can only affect the speed, not the direction, of contemporary developments." - Hayek, 1961

Related Sites:
http://www.ethicalsoc.org.uk
http://www.humanism.org.uk
http://www.iransecularsociety.com
http://www.secularism.org.uk

Discussion Forum

Failed Heroes of the Left: Linda Sarsour

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake 12 hours ago. 2 Replies

Alt-Right and the media.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Antony on Sunday. 21 Replies

Failed Heroes of the Left: Che Guevara

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Jan 25. 9 Replies

The Power Elite

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Jan 20. 398 Replies

Failed Heroes of the Left: Tony Blair

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Dec 13, 2016. 18 Replies

Family Discussions and Christmas

Started by Alan Lake Nov 21, 2016. 0 Replies

Weasel Words and Wrong Translated Words

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Nov 21, 2016. 5 Replies

The Ideological Chasm

Started by Joe. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Oct 20, 2016. 330 Replies

Pascal

Started by Philip Smeeton Sep 13, 2016. 0 Replies

Failed Heroes of the Left: Peter Sutherland

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony Jul 29, 2016. 4 Replies

Failed Heroes of the Left: Mohammed Ali

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony Jun 6, 2016. 13 Replies

Islam = Fascism

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Jun 5, 2016. 1 Reply

British History.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Jun 2, 2016. 1 Reply

Failed Heroes of the Left: Malia Bouattia

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake May 30, 2016. 3 Replies

1984 - Tracking Our Descent into Madness

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake May 19, 2016. 1 Reply

How human beings think/ do not think.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Philip Smeeton May 16, 2016. 2 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Fightback by Ideology, Dialogue & Constitution to add comments!

Comment by Antony 5 hours ago
Comment by Philip Smeeton yesterday

I like Tomi Lahren and appreciate that she thinks for herself, I do not have to agree with everything she says, just most of it. And that applies to everyone I know. It is not possible to be friends with someone that is dynamically opposed to your views, but if they are sincere they can be tolerated.

We have to be honest as an individual and say what we mean. We have also to be open to change our minds at sometime in the future. We must always be asking if what we believe is true. Sometimes things are neither true nor untrue and then I make my mind up about the issue based on feeling, emotion, how I want things to be. We may be a member of a group but we do not have to agree with everything that the group says. Of necessity political groups have party programmes, that members should not stray too far from. The best we can hope for is to be able to vote for a party that shares most of our political beliefs. Most of all we must be true to ourselves and aware of what we want the world to be like, and let no one shame us or intimidate us.

Comment by Antony yesterday
Comment by Philip Smeeton on Sunday

The most basic fundamental guiding principle of Islam is to expand by invading and destroying every land, culture or thought that is not islamic.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on Saturday

It is beyond white nationalism and above racism. We have to see nationalism as something positive for every large ethnically unique group of people, and as something beneficial to everyone on this planet. We need international cooperation not divisive global migration. 

There is a positive racism that unites, and a discrimination that benefits all parties. It is obvious to me that the muslims living in western countries would be better off living in muslim countries. The same applies to most migrants they would be best served  if they returned to origin and worked to improve their own country and culture. Minorities like the Kurds should be granted a homeland and the Jews must be allowed to retain their hard won nation. The world is already divided into nations and according to culture. This is the best model for humanity, mutual respect and an end to conflict, the right to be what you are. We cannot continue on the globalist path, we are denying our own nature and needs.

The movement of poor people to rich countries is not the solution, the solution is to get poor countries to function.

Comment by Antony on Saturday

The Left are'nt the only ones who can play at the "feelings" game, it is more valid for patriotic freedom lovers to feel (correctly) that the invasion of fighting age muslim males and sub-saharan africans are a threat to their well-being, and to want revenge on a national scale for all the young white girls who have been groomed and raped....

Comment by Alan Lake on Saturday
Yes, its clear where we are heading. And ironically, its the advanced technology of social media, that is leading us back to the witch hunts and mobocracy of the middle ages.
Comment by Joe on Friday

Alan, the Left are now advising their activists to give up on facts (like they ever cared about facts) and to deploy emotion instead.

https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/842748822535266304

Comment by Antony on Friday
Comment by Antony on March 13, 2017 at 8:40
 

Members (42)

 
 
 

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service