Fightback by Ideology, Dialogue & Constitution

Add a Comment

Comment by Philip Smeeton 15 hours ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxglLVlcVeM

It is defeatist, you have to focus on the positive in humanity while defending yourself from the evil. If you are not prepared to die for your children then you might as well commit suicide, but like everyone else you only have the right to kill in self defense. No one has the right to press the doomsday button, though I do think nature would be better off without us, we are here and we have a duty to life and to fight to preserve life. Giving up is not an option. Human beings are unlikely to change, so fight for what you believe in even if there can be no final victory. You can make the world, your world a better place. Right now socialism has failed and done enough damage and Islam is the greatest threat to our well-being. We need law and order in order to defend our freedom and happiness, everything criminal or that is totalitarian in nature has to be opposed, that gives meaning to life, that and caring for those that care for you.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on Sunday

http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/06/17/abbass-fatah-party-co...

-In a statement, Fatah called the deaths of the three assailants, who attacked at two locations near Jerusalem’s Old City, a “war crime.”-

It is important to understand the alternative logic of the Muslim mentality.

Thereby, the police that killed the three freedom fighters in the London Bridge attack commited a war-crime.

Fatah admits that it is at war with Israel, the implication being that Islam is at war with everything that is not Muslim. (The House of War and The House of Islam).

So what we falsely term terrorists are in fact soldiers fighting for a just cause.

The conclusion every muslim is bound to reach is that non-Muslims are to blame, in the wrong and are the aggressors and are morally wrong; Muslims are blameless in whatever they do and we others are always wrong and the bad-guys. The good guys the heroes are the "terrorists" and every Muslim sincerely believes that he is right and that the terror is justifiable self-defense. This is the sum of the teachings of Mohammed. Our only answer and chance to survive is to eradicate the Islam in our midst and to isolate ouselves otherwise from it by building "walls". a tried and proven defence strategy against enemy attack.

We have to be very clear and get this into perspective; Islam is at war with us, a war that will not end until Islam wins with a final and total victory.

In classical Islamic law, the major divisions are dar al-islam (lit. territory of Islam), denoting regions where Islamic law prevails,^[3] dar al-sulh (lit. territory of treaty) denoting non-Islamic lands which have concluded an armistice with a Muslim government,^[4] and dar al-harb (lit. territory of war), denoting adjoining non-Islamic lands whose rulers are called upon to accept Islam.^[5]

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 12, 2017 at 14:32

A multi-racial(multicultural) society is bound to become a multi-racist society, riddled with; ethnic conflict, divided loyalties, and a lack of cooperation such that the society(nation) ceases to exist(function).

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 8, 2017 at 9:14

Homosexuality is a non-problem.

Leave gay people alone and they will leave you alone.

Leave a Muslim alone and he will plot to, and, kill or enslave you.

Anyone that is a victim of or an enemy of Islam is my ally. Any issues I have with gays, christians, hindus, jews, any foreigners, or even socialists are secondary. We must unite in the face of a common enemy that wants to destroy us all. We can get back to our petty and unimportant squabbles after final victory= the extermination of the religion and ideology of Islam.

As Muslims are inseparable from Islam they are all my enemy until they renounce Islam and cease to be Muslim. How can you ever trust a so-called moderate-Muslim?

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 8, 2017 at 8:59

The facts, the truth, are in the fossil record, not in the Bible.

Likewise:

The facts, the reality, are in the disgusting behaviour of Muslims, not in the wishful-thinking liberal-socialist Book of Morality.

It is the task of the Muslims to free themselves from Islam, not ours. Our task is to defend ourselves against Islam.

Islam is suffering, sacrifice and death; blind obedience to an imaginary being, and to It’s cruel and destructive laws. 

Islam is the antithesis of; “…Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”.

Comment by Alan Lake on June 8, 2017 at 1:27

Both the original writer, and most of the subsequent posters have got this incident wrong.
https://altright.com/2017/03/03/this-is-the-future-liberals-want

The drag queen should be seen as a celebration of Western values, not a degeneration. They are enjoying the freedom, without exploiting it in order to destroy the entire system. Please dont be like a rightist parrot, repeating the lines that allow the fascist left to classify you as simply a bit dim and old fashioned. If you disagree with this, then please show me the Drag Queen Manifesto, similar to the Muslim Brotherhood Manifesto, which outlines how Drag Queens are going to destroy secular democracy.

Comment by Antony on June 7, 2017 at 10:45

Social Justice - we've won the battle but not the war ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xhs5VKP1oYw&feature=em-uploademail

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 6, 2017 at 14:33

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/06/05/pictures-thousands-atten...

After each Muslim terrorist attack the most disgusting pro-Islam propaganda campaign always swings into action.

It’s like praising a sadistic mass-murderer for his deeds.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 4, 2017 at 15:10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULJtLrCVCRA

Black Pigeon: London: A Society with Collective Cognitive Dissonance

We have to give up on the idea that people can think for themselves. Large numbers vote for the socialists every time there is an election. If people were actually thinking they would be voting for nationalist, anti-islamist and anti-immigration politicians; for closed borders and national self interest; and for the deportation of muslims and other vermin. People have been taught that there is only one way to think, the way that their betters think, so they let their betters think for them. Unfortunately their betters think in the way that the socialists have taught them to think; through the media and educational institutions that the socialists run. The socialist version of the truth is exactly that, just one version of the truth, and wrong for a patriot.

Some people actually do think for themselves, but who is there for them to vote for? Even the anti-discrimination laws are against them, and by restricting speech also restrict thought and communication and political freedom. It takes an effort of real will power, in the face of these adversities, to stay the course and to maintain enough self-respect to be capable of thinking against or even speaking out against, or to vote against something that you feel in the fibre of your being is wrong. This destruction of your culture, your folk and your heritage- everything that is you and yours and given to you. Given now away by feeble minded leaders versed in socialistic thought patterns,(open borders and equal rights for anyone and everyone) that consider themselves to be morally superior to you.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 3, 2017 at 13:07

http://www.newsweek.com/jefferson-constitution-and-quran-why-foundi...

Why Jefferson's defense of Muslims matters today.

We have to win the battle for hearts and minds, we just cannot allow this sort of drivel to dominate the debate.

There is so much nonsense, the worse Muslims behave the more determined the Left are to defend them. It could just be because they fear that the truth about the fallacy of their own beliefs will be revealed. Neither the Muslims nor the Left are interested in truth, all they want to do is suppress opposition. It is still a mystery to me though why they are allies.

By truth I mean rational and objective conclusions reached through open debate about reality and factual situations. A sort of consensus of opinion about what can be termed truth or not. No system of belief is qualified to claim to own the truth or to be entirely right. Truth has to be an open subject.

Most people think that they are on the right side, which means there can be no right side. Just individuals pursuing what is best for themselves and agreeing in general terms as to what is best for their particular group. At the next level what might be beneficial for humanity as a whole. 

Everyone has a right to an opinion but no one has a right to force their opinion on others. Then we should try to agree on fair and just terms of behaviour, rules and laws, customs and traditions. What is right and true has to be a continual debate, in which all participate (speaking ideally of course and naively).

I do not think that Jefferson would defend Islam today, it betrays every principle that he held dear.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 57
• Next ›
• Page