The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

http://faith-matters.org/images/stories/fm-reports/english-defense-...

This academic apparently took money from Faith Matters (an alleged "inter-faith" organisation), in payment for writing a report on the EDL.

Copsey is a professor of history at Teeside University.  His report was written in 6 weeks.  He admits this on page 6 (where he describes his "methodology" in 3 1/2 lines -- I've seen longer methodologies for making an omelette).

He says the entire report was based on 6 weeks of internet surfing, reading newspaper articles, and consulting some "secondary material".  Yet all of that is secondary material!  Primary material would be to interview people in a movement, to observe their meetings and demonstrations.  He has no idea of the veracity or accuracy of anything posted by random and pseudonymous members of the public in a forum or on Facebook.

He says that because of "limited time" he could not conduct any interviews.  Then why sign your name to such a report?  What was the hurry?  Did they not pay him enough to do a longer study?  

Even from a cursory glance at the report, I can see many falsehoods; falsehoods that appear because Prof. Copsey did not bother to verify any of the information in the study by interviewing people involved. What kind of historian simply rehashes newspaper articles full of falsehoods, and relies on internet gossip? 

Only a biased and politicised historian would attach his name to a report that he recognised was based entirely on unsubstantiated and/or biased sources, when a scholarly work could be done by taking the appropriate amount of time to investigate things first hand.

I do not believe that Copsey would have accepted such a report from as a 3rd year dissertation.  He does not deserve to teach history or academic methods to students.  You can be sure of one thing - future historians will not be referring to this work by Copsey as an example of how contemporary history should be written.

Tags: Zblacklist, Zedl, Zuk, copsey, nigel, prof

Views: 437

Attachments:

Replies to This Discussion

Reply by Sysadmin on March 31, 2012 at 9:18

How often are we told by the MSM that information gleened from the inter-net is unreliable.  Unless of course its used to discredit any right leaning organisation.

I suppose he was hoping his research would be taken on faith. He quite obviously has little understanding of real time events and would be better of waiting a couple of hundred years so he can right an historical piece on the EDL.

I shall send a request to the prof.? and see if he is willing to explain himself.

Reply by Paul Collings on March 31, 2012 at 9:57

Theres a table showing how many arrests were made at demo's. I've seen several veriations of those figures, and from what i can tell none of them agree with each other on any of the figures. What they do agree on, is NOT telling everyone the numbers of counter demonstrators arested. It is also not made clear who ends up in court charge with offences. And more importantly how many and from what groups guilty convictions are imposed.

From that lack of info, one can only presume that the majority of guilty people come from the so called 'anti-fascist' movement.

Joe is right in his discription of prof copsey's work as being shoddy.

Reply by Sysadmin on April 10, 2012 at 20:49

An e.mail has been sent to Professor N.Copsey in regards to his report.

It has been easter holidays so we shall allow 14 days for a reply. Another E,mail will be sent and an attempt will be made to contact the Prof by phone  after that.

Did you ever get a reply Alan?

Alan Lake said:

Reply by Sysadmin on April 10, 2012 at 20:49

An e.mail has been sent to Professor N.Copsey in regards to his report.

It has been easter holidays so we shall allow 14 days for a reply. Another E,mail will be sent and an attempt will be made to contact the Prof by phone  after that.

Yes, we wrote to him, and phoned him, leaving a message.  We got no reply from either of those contact attempts.  I guess he's too busy doing research (i.e. browsing the internet) to get back to the people he's writing about.  Or perhaps he's just a moral coward, and can't face talking to the people he falsely accuses.

RSS

Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2021   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service