It takes a nation to protect the nation
This room documents the ways in which the burqa and niqab are used oppress the kuffar, and extract extra rights from him.
[Some forums on this topic are currently in the Women Victims room. They will be relocated here once technically possible]
Members: 4
Latest Activity: Jul 12, 2021
The burqa and niqab (B-N) are used to oppress the kuffar by imposing these extra risks and burdens on his society, by extracting special privileges to cover the face.
Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Jun 23, 2019. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Apr 4, 2019. 4 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Aug 30, 2018. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Aug 14, 2018. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Jun 21, 2017. 4 Replies 0 Likes
Add a Comment
"Indian women's college bans burqas as part of dress code crackdown"
When will the riots start?
Indian women's college bans burqas as part of dress code crackdown
https://www.rt.com/news/479152-muslim-college-burqa-ban/
HMP Belmarsh is almost like the UK’s version of Guantanamo Bay.
It’s a maximum-security prison and home to the worst of the UK’s convicted terrorists. The ISIS killer of Lee Rigby is there, for example.
But why am I telling you this?
Well, yesterday, as you know, I was there to visit Tommy Robinson as he’s currently serving the remainder of his "contempt of court" sentence in Belmarsh. (He has about two weeks until he is "free" again).
As you’d expect, every visitor — myself included — must go through an airport-style security checkpoint prior to sitting down with a prisoner.
Everyone has to submit to a fingerprint scan when they enter and when they leave… Well, not quite everyone.
Here, check out my eye-opening report to hear about what I saw:
Can you believe that? They just let her in, full burka, no fingerprints?
Not only was she not asked to remove her burqa, but the henna on her hands meant the fingerprint scanner didn't work for her — yet the security guards just let her through — no questions asked.
Still cowardice on their part, the "justice" minister should be prepared to fight every case and pay whatever it takes to uphold the law. The government and parliament are the Law Makers they must make laws that allow the police to do their job and to do it effectively. As usual it comes down to leadership or the lack of it.
The reason the police bow to Leftists isn't because of fear of violence, its fear of legal come-back. They have loads of legal back-up. Remember the outcome of the kettling at Oxford Circus about 9 years ago? In the end the payout was nearly £1 million I think. Then they're still reeling from the fall-out of the Stephen Lawrence inquiry, so is it any wonder they are in such a mess?
Dead right Kinana, what use is a police force that chooses when and when not to enforce the law. The more immigration there is the worse it will get.
The native British respect the laws that they themselves created. Muslims are more likely to respect Sharia. While the Blacks follow the law of the jungle.
Philip, on many EDL demos, EDL people were required to remove face coverings (because it is the law apparently) but a few feet away the police refused to force the Antifa types to remove their face coverings. Of course, it is easier to bully people who will comply with the law (and want to obey lawful authority) than to confront people who will give the police two fingers (and more). I feel often that the police just want an easy life and to stay on the job long enough to collect their pension. 'Enforcement' is a four letter word. Enforcement is a like a river, it flows where there is least resistance.
As far as I recall France banned the Burqa a few years ago. But after a two arrests, at separate times, each followed by rioting the Burqa ban is no longer enforced. The price of enforcement is too high so the enforcers cave in. Which means the lawbreakers take over.
It should be forbidden to cover your face in public, period. What annoyed me most is that this law allows Antifa to continue to cover their faces. (or am I wrong?).
There is just one part of this that I agree with though. Its part of the government trying to make lots of non-governmental persons and organisations, responsible for enforcing new and contentious laws. For example:
In the Dutch case, I can understand why a solitary bus driver might be reluctant to deny entry to a burqa clad Muslima, especially if he is in a Muslim enclave, or if the Muslima has just one Muslim men accompanying her, or on the bus, or in the queue. We all know what happens when they get 'offended' don't we?
It really seems like the government chickened out on this issue and deliberately off-loaded it to the transport companies. If they simply banned the burqa everywhere in public, then the onus of enforcement would fall on the police, who are paid to do that sort of thing. To shift the responsibility for that to commercial organisations is just plain cowardly.
Welcome to 4 Freedoms!
(currently not admitting new members)
Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.
Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them.
At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.
Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.
We need to capture this information before it is removed. The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.
We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.
These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper).
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:
© 2023 Created by Netcon.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Kuffarphobia via Burqa, Clothing & Symbols to add comments!