The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Kuffarphobia via Burqa & Niqab


Kuffarphobia via Burqa & Niqab

This room documents the ways in which the burqa and niqab are used oppress the kuffar, and extract extra rights from him.

[Some forums on this topic are currently in the Women Victims room.  They will be relocated here once technically possible]

Members: 3
Latest Activity: on Sunday

Key Info

The burqa and niqab (B-N) are used to oppress the kuffar by imposing these extra risks and burdens on his society, by extracting special privileges to cover the face.

  • It is a used for crime - there are many documented cases of criminals wearing B-N and so being able to proceed to the crime unchallenged
  • It is a security risk for terrorism.  There are many documented cases of Muslims wearing burqas in order to commit acts of terrorism, or in order to escape when being chased by the police.
  • It is a divisive element in society, stopping fellow citizens in the community from recognising and relating to each other
  • It is a political statement of the political ideology of kuffarphobia.  In the same way that we are offended by someone walking down the street wearing a swastika armband, we should be offended by someone wearing B-N

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Kuffarphobia via Burqa & Niqab to add comments!

Comment by Philip Smeeton on Sunday

Too late, they should have turned away hijab wearers at the border.

Comment by Alan Lake on Saturday

German bus driver faces €10K fine for refusing to transport niqab-wearing Muslim woman

Comment by Alan Lake on Saturday

Muslim films staff REFUSING to allow her on flight wearing hijab

Comment by Alan Lake on April 3, 2017 at 13:53
Chechnya passes bill allowing schoolgirls to wear hijab in class
Comment by Alan Lake on March 29, 2017 at 17:40

Norway’s Islamic Council hires face-veiled woman as communications officer, sparking controversy

Comment by Philip Smeeton on March 16, 2017 at 9:32

That Muslim headscarf is an issue that has to be addressed. The feminists have failed miserably here.

What we had is a society in which reasonable principles of equality were gaining ground. (Not going out into the lunatic fringe of transgender toilets and showers). A woman was beginning to be regarded as an equal in every manner not limited by directly physical differences, and we were beginning to understand certain psychological differences. We had an ordered and law-abiding civilization.

Which should have made it impossible for us to accept in our midst the systematic islamic discrimination of women that the muslim dress code and acceptance of genital mutilation represents. I insist that these muslim problems are not our problems and not something that we should be burdened with. Our courts and police force should not be burdened with futile attempts to enforce our laws and morality on people that directly disagree with and oppose our values.

Instant deportation back to country of origin for any family that chooses headscarf wearing or that mutilates their little girls.

The Left are so obsessed with minority rights that they cannot see that they are supporting the abuse of women every time they come out in defence of Islam.

They are not thinking when they maintain that all immigration is beneficial, desireable and unavoidable. They make insipid and unreasonable excuses for all of the damage that they continue to do.

Comment by Alan Lake on March 16, 2017 at 4:33

Employers can ban wearing of visible religious symbols – top EU court

Comment by Alan Lake on February 21, 2017 at 1:53

Women’s faces hidden on Australian Islamic Peace Conference flyer, sparking outrage | Herald Sun

Comment by Alan Lake on February 8, 2017 at 20:33

Russian opinions split equally over school hijab ban, poll shows — RT Russian politics

Comment by Alan Lake on February 8, 2017 at 20:26

VIDEO: Thousands of Muslims March Against Burqa Ban in Austria


Members (3)


Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service