The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Kuffarphobia via Burqa & Niqab

Information

Kuffarphobia via Burqa & Niqab

This room documents the ways in which the burqa and niqab are used oppress the kuffar, and extract extra rights from him.

[Some forums on this topic are currently in the Women Victims room.  They will be relocated here once technically possible]

Members: 3
Latest Activity: Mar 16

Key Info

The burqa and niqab (B-N) are used to oppress the kuffar by imposing these extra risks and burdens on his society, by extracting special privileges to cover the face.

  • It is a used for crime - there are many documented cases of criminals wearing B-N and so being able to proceed to the crime unchallenged
  • It is a security risk for terrorism.  There are many documented cases of Muslims wearing burqas in order to commit acts of terrorism, or in order to escape when being chased by the police.
  • It is a divisive element in society, stopping fellow citizens in the community from recognising and relating to each other
  • It is a political statement of the political ideology of kuffarphobia.  In the same way that we are offended by someone walking down the street wearing a swastika armband, we should be offended by someone wearing B-N

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Kuffarphobia via Burqa & Niqab to add comments!

Comment by Philip Smeeton on March 16, 2017 at 9:32

That Muslim headscarf is an issue that has to be addressed. The feminists have failed miserably here.

What we had is a society in which reasonable principles of equality were gaining ground. (Not going out into the lunatic fringe of transgender toilets and showers). A woman was beginning to be regarded as an equal in every manner not limited by directly physical differences, and we were beginning to understand certain psychological differences. We had an ordered and law-abiding civilization.

Which should have made it impossible for us to accept in our midst the systematic islamic discrimination of women that the muslim dress code and acceptance of genital mutilation represents. I insist that these muslim problems are not our problems and not something that we should be burdened with. Our courts and police force should not be burdened with futile attempts to enforce our laws and morality on people that directly disagree with and oppose our values.

Instant deportation back to country of origin for any family that chooses headscarf wearing or that mutilates their little girls.

The Left are so obsessed with minority rights that they cannot see that they are supporting the abuse of women every time they come out in defence of Islam.

They are not thinking when they maintain that all immigration is beneficial, desireable and unavoidable. They make insipid and unreasonable excuses for all of the damage that they continue to do.

Comment by Alan Lake on March 16, 2017 at 4:33

Employers can ban wearing of visible religious symbols – top EU court

https://www.rt.com/news/380627-eu-ruling-religious-symbols/

Comment by Alan Lake on February 21, 2017 at 1:53

Women’s faces hidden on Australian Islamic Peace Conference flyer, sparking outrage | Herald Sun

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/womens-faces-hidden-on-australian-...

Comment by Alan Lake on February 8, 2017 at 20:33

Russian opinions split equally over school hijab ban, poll shows — RT Russian politics

https://www.rt.com/politics/375757-russian-society-split-into-equal

Comment by Alan Lake on February 8, 2017 at 20:26

VIDEO: Thousands of Muslims March Against Burqa Ban in Austria

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/02/08/video-thousands-muslims-...

Comment by Alan Lake on January 13, 2017 at 11:55

In 99% Muslim Morocco, they can ban the burqa for security reasons.  But in Islamophilic Britain, you'll be vilified and destroyed for even suggesting such a thing.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/01/11/morocco-bans-...

Morocco Bans the Burqa

However, the Interior Ministry of Morocco just announced it has “taken the step of completely banning the import, manufacture and marketing of this garment in all the cities and towns of the kingdom.”

According to the UK Independentproducers and retailers of the Islamic women’s garment have already begun receiving written warnings. The notices give them 48 hours to dispose of their inventory, or it will be confiscated by the government.

“The ban is understood to apply only to full-face covering burqas. The majority of Muslim women in the country wear headscarves without the veil [hijab], or niqab,” the Independent adds.

France24 reports that Interior Ministry officials conducted “awareness-raising campaigns with traders to inform them of this new decision” on Monday.

The burqa ban is evidently motivated by security concerns, particularly over bandits using the full body and face coverings to disguise themselves. Australia’s News.com also quotes politician Nouzha Skalli praising the ban as “an important step in the fight against religious extremism.”

Public reaction to the ban is described as “muted in the absence of official confirmation” by France24, with the loudest complaints coming from Salafist Muslims who worry that slightly-less-concealing niqabs might be banned next. Salafist sheikh Hassan Kettani declared that a niqab ban would be a “disaster” on Facebook.

Comment by Alan Lake on January 11, 2017 at 9:55
‘Embarrassing’ anti-burqa posters add fuel to fire in Swiss naturalization debate
https://www.rt.com/news/373254-swiss-burqa-posters-naturalization
Comment by Alan Lake on December 20, 2016 at 3:17

Muslim intern refuses to remove headscarf, German mayor fires her on 1st day

Comment by Alan Lake on December 15, 2016 at 23:53
Comment by Alan Lake on December 15, 2016 at 23:51
German minister sparks anger after refusing to wear hijab in Saudi Arabia
https://www.rt.com/viral/370414-german-minister-saudi-hijab
 

Members (3)

 
 
 

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service