The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Actually, the racist feminists are too indifferent to even speak about their indifference.

100,000 British women mutilated

Investigators from The Sunday Times said they secretly filmed a doctor, dentist and alternative medicine practitioner who were allegedly willing to perform circumcisions or arrange for the operation to be carried out. The doctor and dentist deny any wrongdoing.

The practice, which involves the surgical removal of external genitalia and in some cases the stitching of the vaginal opening, is illegal in Britain and carries up to a 14 year prison sentence.

It is also against the law to arrange FGM.

Known as "cutting", the procedure is traditionally carried out for cultural reasons and is widespread across Africa.

It is thought to be needed as proof of a girl's "purity" for when she marries, but victims are rarely given anaesthetic and frequently suffer long-term damage and pain.

Research suggests that every year up to 6,000 girls in London are at risk of the potentially fatal procedure, and more than 22,000 in the UK as a whole.

The Metropolitan Police said since 2008, it had received 166 reports of people who fear they are at risk of FGM.

It is the same story for all 43 forces across England and Wales with no convictions for the offence ever taking place, according to The Sunday Times.

The newspaper added that only two doctors have been struck off by The General Medical Council since 1980.

According to Forward, a charity which campaigners against FGM, an estimated 100,000 women in the UK have undergone mutilation.

Supermodel Waris Dirie, who was mutilated as a child, is a vociferous opponent of the practice.

Calling for a crackdown on FGM, she said: "If a white girl is abused, the police come break down the door. If a black girl is mutilated, nobody takes care of her. This is what I call racism."

Tags: britain, fgm, racism

Views: 257

Replies to This Discussion

I believe it is racism that nothing is done about this.  

White feminists do not see it as their problem - they are "respecting different cultural practises".  If it was being done by white working class women to their children, the feminists would be on the streets, in parliament, in councils, and on TV demanding that something be done to stop these "chavs".  But because it is done by non-white people, they turn away and ignore it.  I've had exactly this conversation with middle-class feminists in the Labour Party.

While British trade unions take the subs from their members and promote "equality" in Africa, they totally ignore the inequality in Britain.  White girls don't suffer this torture, so the trade unionists aren't interested.  If it was black people being tortured in the old apartheid South Africa, then yes, British trade unionists would kick up a stink about it.

Their anti-racism is moral jewellery.  They wear it to assert their moral superiority.  And they use it now and then to inflect some pain on other white people.  Those are the only two uses they have for being anti-racist.

Plenty of white kids are taken off their parents for far less abuse than happens to these muslim girls.  And race is so clearly the issue (the fear of being called "racist" for getting involved).

The crimes have been known to occur for at least 3 decades (the oldest British law against it is from 1985), so it's not that the authorities don't know it happens.  France has been far more successful at dealing with it than Britain.  The Metropolitan Police in London have a specialist unit dedicated to prosecuting FGM.  Not one conviction has been made.

All the acts of the establishment are window-dressing.  And if feminists cared about this they would have made sure that it was more than window-dressing.

I'm glad the news report has come out, it makes a change to see some investigative journalism for a change, though I note that they do not mention Islam once, although in Britain, and indeed the rest of the world, it is a muslim sanctioned practise.

I'm sure this is a practise most British people find instinctively repugnant, and there are grounds for a mass campaign on this issue.

PS - Here is a report on the whitewashing of FGM in the USA ;

all the comments on the Daily Mail on this story are appropriately outraged and angry.  Maybe the tide is turning.

Just when you think it couldn't get any worse.

Despite an Act being passed against FGM being performed on our shores in 1985, the Sunday Times investigation names a Birmingham dentist (muslim, of course) who carries out FGM here.  And of course, no sign of him being prosecuted or struck off.

And then there is this tidbit (which really should not come as any surprise to me, but as utopian as I am, it does):

But FGM is not on the curriculum for medical school training, or for social workers, or teachers and even for midwives it may only be covered in the inner city. There is very low awareness. We owe these little girls born here more than that.

It looks like all the so-called action against FGM in the last 27 years was just more moral jewellery.  What a disgusting society.  Better to do nothing than pretend to do something.

Two men in Birmingham arrested over FGM - their "race" is not given (i.e. their muslim names were not given).  But the addresses betray that they are 100% going to be muslims.

My cynical guess is that these two were arrested as a result of the Sunday Times investigation rather than the police growing a pair and investigating fgm offences themselves - if the press draw attention to a crime they have to investigate.

Fairly strong piece from a British woman writing for Al Jazeera.  The situation in Britain is so bad, that we actually have to go to countries outside to get the reportage that our own craven journalists won't touch.

And according to that piece the problem is .... wait for it….

Patriarchy !!  It is men again, like with the grooming gangs are a problem because of Pakistani men, as Lady Warsi tells us.

Since patriarchy has been with us for some time (however way it is defined) we should see FGM happening throughout Europe going back to the Romans and Greeks.  But was it even happening in the UK 50 years ago?  But the UK is now listed as one of many countries in Europe and North America where this crime occurs.  But why?  Are the present patriarchs now feeling more able to assert themselves but were too wimpish to do so 50 years ago?

Oh, and we are also assured that all the hadiths relating to this crime are inauthentic because Dr.Muhammad Lutfi al-Sabbagh, Professor of Islamic studies at King Saud University in Riyadh says so.  He further assures us "…female circumcision…cannot be legitimate under Islamic law, particularly since nothing that recommends it is definitely established as said by the Prophet {Peace Be Upon Him}. It is, however, established that he has said: "Do not harm yourself or others". This hadith is one of the basic principles of this True Religion.”

I like the hadith the good doctor mentions but unfortunately he does not give a reference for it.  I suppose we are to just trust the doctor.  He is probably a greater authority on this subject than what we read in ‘Reliance of the Traveller, a classical manual of Islamic sacred law (in Arabic with facing English text, commentary and appendices edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller (1994)) re ‘circumcision’ we find the Arabic actually says –

‘“Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female) by cutting off the piece of skin on the glans of the penis of the male, but circumcision of the female is by cutting out the clitoris (this is called HufaaD). “ (p59) (Shafi’I jurisprudence)’’

In another translation I read:

20.4.3 Circumcision is Obligatory

Circumcision is obligatory for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (bazr) of the clitoris but not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert.  Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but Prophetic practice, while Hanafis consider it a courtesy to the husband.


Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2023   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service