The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Peter McLoughlin's book on the Muslim grooming gangs, Easy Meat: Inside the British Grooming Gang Scandal, has now been updated to include new material bringing it up to 2016.

It can be bought in paperback and ebook from Amazon. McLoughlin is maintaining a website of material supplementary to the Easy Meat book - .

UPDATE: In January 2022, Amazon removed this book from its website, without explanation. Waterstones has it listed

but is it 'currently unavailable'.  Give them notice via email for when it is back in stock.  But don't hold your breath.

The link to his website points to a page showing you what the additional material in the book covers.

There is also a very useful interactive, searchable table on McLoughlin's website. You can search and sort this table using names, towns, dates to see this grooming gang scandal from different angles.

Michael Coren & Gavin Boby on Muslim rape gangs in England

The original video was taken down from Youtube at the end of last year.  The text below was part of the video on Youtube.

However it is available here:
Gavin also speaks on this topic at 12:50 in this video:

Published on Feb 27, 2014

Alibhai-Brown illustrates her point by zeroing in on this sentence by Berelowitz & co.: "Perpetrators come from all ethnic groups, and so do their victims -- contrary to what some may wish to believe." In response to which Alibhai-Brown offers this comment: "Yes, we know they come from all backgrounds. But that rather cutting second line is directed at people like me who believe that in some British cities -- especially in the North of England -- circles of sexual hell for young girls are run by gangs of Muslim men (most of Pakistani or Bangladeshi heritage) who mostly prey on white girls....To generalise their crimes, and lump them in with all the other abusers across the country, is to deny what the victims of these men and their families are saying about the abuse that has gone on."

Indeed. Of course, the OCC's statement about perpetrators coming "from all ethnic groups" is yet another example of the handy PC dodge whereby the link between Islam and pretty much any of its more horrific aspects can be swept away by means of a simple rhetorical formula. For example: "Honor killings occur in a wide range of religions." Or: "Female genital mutilation is not an exclusively Islamic phenomenon." Or: "The practice of forced marriages is not restricted to Muslim families." All true -- and all cynically designed to avoid the uncomfortable statistical reality, and to protect the speaker from being accused of racism or Islamophobia. (It's no surprise that ITV's brief online account of the OCC report actually made that insipid truism its headline: "Report: Child exploiters 'come from all ethnic groups.'")

"The report," notes Alibhai-Brown, "points out that 28 per cent of the victims they found were of black and Asian background. But it doesn't state what it should have: that some of the worst long-term abuse is carried out by mainly British Pakistani men targeting lost young white girls, often from troubled or poor families....The children are neglected and hungry for love. The men offer treats, car rides and kebabs, then drugs and alcohol; and then they corrupt them." Alibhai-Brown argues that while authorities fear "that the racial aspects of child sex gangs will be hijacked by groups such as the English Defence League," it is important to "confront some of the values that drive such men to prey on white females" and to look squarely at "some Asian cultural assumptions that make the paedophiles feel no guilt or shame about what they do."

Exactly which "values" and "Asian cultural assumptions" is Alibhai-Brown talking about? Alas, she doesn't say. That's where her article ends: with a gutsy-sounding call to face up to "values" and "Asian cultural assumptions" that, it appears, she would prefer not to identify at the present juncture.

What to say about this? Well, first of all, anyone who is genuinely interested in facing up to the truth of these matters needs to stop talking, as Alibhai-Brown does incessantly in her article, about race. This is not about race but about religion -- not about black and white but about Muslim and infidel. Alibhai-Brown wants to be seen as bravely pulling back a curtain on an ugly reality, but her repeated reference to dark-hued men and "white girls," and her use of that cowardly, dishonest (and, alas, ubiquitous) British euphemism "Asian" is nothing more than a way of skirting the truth -- namely, that the "cultural assumptions" at work here aren't "Asian" -- aren't Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese, Mongolian, or Thai -- but Islamic. As she and most of her readers well know, countless Muslim boys are brought up to view infidel females as little more than whores whose "immodest" attire makes them legitimate targets for physical assault. Most Westerners who are seriously concerned about these matters have long since learned that the Koran itself condones such conduct, and that in cases of rape it is the victims, not the perpetrators, who are considered the guilty parties. These repulsive facts have been widely known in Europe for many years now.

for info on the book referenced by Gavin go here:

Tags: Gavin Bobby

Views: 13189

Replies to This Discussion

If you type in Barnardos in the search bar of this site you will find a plethora of references.  They deserve their own forum for their disgusting failures to shine more clearly.  Something else to do!  But until then I place this data here.

And they were criminally slow in dealing with the Muslim jihad rape gangs in the north of England, but now are so very concerned to be on the side of the woke angels.

That is such a disgusting statement. They also appear to be saying that black pupils are inferior and slow learners, and that black youth are more inclined to criminal behaviour. 

And what's this about privileged white children not suffering discrimination and abuse? Try telling that to 200,000 pimped, raped and abused white girls, victims of Muslim gangs.

The Home Office finally released their report (supposedly held up for 2 year as "not in the public interest").

The report repeatedly mentions the high profile cases Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, etc. where 100% of those prosecuted were Muslims. The report then says: majority of offenders are white men, no ethnic disparity. Grooming gangs are submerged within the wider problem of sexual abuse of children.

The report relies entirely on the previous cover-ups, which were refuted by Peter McLoughln in 2014.  No mention is made of the prosecution data from Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, etc.

Report has only 1 reference to Muslim/Islam - to Muslim women's group who said "Muslim girls were victims too" (no mention that there too the perps were Muslim men).

Effectively, Easy Meat was a refutation of this Home Office report, 6 years before the Home Office published it.

The implication of this Conservative government's report is: "Muslim grooming gangs are a racist myth". Exactly the same line used by UAF/MCB in the 2010 general election.

The controlled news media lapped up this report. None of them made any of the observations I made above. It will be intersting to see what Andrew Norfolk of The Times does in response to this report.  Remember: this was the journalist given The Orwell Prize (among other journalistic awards) for finally breaking the silence on this pattern of abuse.

It's maddening.

Vote Tory, get Trotsky.

Last election was the first time in my adult life I did not vote. They are as despicable as I thought they were.

Alan Lake said:

It's maddening.

"criminally slow in dealing with the Muslim jihad rape gangs in the north of England"

Barnardos did nothing but take the government money & cover-up the rape gangs. Every statement from that organisation was phrased so that the media could take it and say "Muslim grooming gangs are a racist myth".

The founder of Barnardos was a fraud. Not a doctor. He kidnapped children and pretended they were orphans. From the start it has always been about money.


There was controversy early on with Barnardo's work. Specifically, he was accused of kidnapping children without parents' permission and of falsifying photographs of children to make the distinction between the period before they were rescued by Barnardo's and afterwards seem more dramatic. He openly confessed to the former of these charges, describing it as "philanthropic abduction" and basing his defence on the idea that the ends justified the means. In all, he was taken to court on 88 occasions, largely on the charge of kidnapping. However, being a charismatic speaker and popular figure, he rode through these scandals unscathed. Other charges brought against him included presenting staged images of children for Barnardo's "before and after" cards and neglecting basic hygiene for the children under his care.[10]

Between 1945 and 1974, Barnado's supported and participated in colonisation policies that saw around 150,000 children exported to imperial colonies where they were mostly abused, beaten and neglected.[11]

Kinana said:

If you type in Barnardos in the search bar of this site you will find a plethora of references.  They deserver their own forum for their disgusting failures to shine more clearly.  Something else to do!  But until then I place this data here.

And they were criminally slow in dealing with the Muslim jihad rape gangs in the north of England, but now are so very concerned to be on the side of the woke angels.

I watched this 1960 movie about girls' school St. Trinians.

Turns out the entire story is about a new headmaster who comes from Baghdad. In truth he takes over the school to sell girls into the Islamic slave trade in Arabia.  At the end the headmaster even says "I'm a Muslim".

Just 15 years after this film was made there were trials going on in English towns where Muslims (and only Muslims) from a variety of countries had lured schoolgirls into a life of rape and sex-slavery.

The very existence of this movie (one of the most popular and successful English movie franchises) shows that the British public of 1960 knew that Muslims preyed on non-Muslim schoolgirls. Within 20 years of this movie the army of state employees in Britain was aiding and abetting the Muslim child-rapists.

Give me a gun and a licence to use it.


Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2023   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service