The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Invasion of Europe: The ship is going down

Sam Gerrans is an English writer, translator, support counselor and activist. He also has professional backgrounds in media, strategic communications and technology. He is driven by commitment to ultimate meaning, and focused on authentic approaches to revelation and realpolitik.
He is the founder of Quranite.com – where the Qur’an is explored on the basis of reason rather than tradition – and offers both individual language training and personal support and counseling online at SkypeTalking.com
Published time: 24 Jan, 2016 12:38  Get short URL
Stranded migrants scuffle with Greek police officers at the Greek-Macedonian border, near the village of Idomeni, Greece © Alexandros Avramidis

The Kübler-Ross model of trauma describes the emotional pathway for any European with an interest in protecting the continent his forebears created from the perfidy of national leaders whose actions will breed him and his children out of existence.

First there was denial: surely Angela Merkel couldn’t be so stupid as to sink the European ship?

Next came anger as news of the organized attacks by so-called asylum-seekers on European white women seeped through the checkpoints embedded in the mainstream media machine.

Then came the stage known as bargaining as people thought they would settle for some restrictions on numbers so long as the tidal wave was stopped.

Read more

And now we are at enforced acceptance: the tidal wave will not stop – so get used to it – with Jeremy Corbyn, for example, calling for the UK to take similar numbers as Germany.

If you feel like you didn’t vote for any of this, that’s because you didn’t. Your opinion isn’t worth the paper it’s written on. It’s people like George Soros who are making these decisions. Your job is to shut up, pay taxes, and learn to get on board with this new round of social engineering and ethnic cleansing.

But now that it is obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that – hand-wringing apart – the fix is in, it is interesting to observe how career politicians are talking now that the dust is settling on the new reality.

Because talk is all that they will do. We are at the tipping point. And once we get over that, the ship is going down, make no mistake.

Political positioning

The French Prime Minister Manuel Valls, for example, has managed – albeit belatedly – to get an intellectual handle on what’s going on: the refugee crisis is destabilizing Europe.

Now, he does not mean what you and I mean by Europe: our countries, nations, languages and histories. He’s a Bilderberger so he has at least a mid-level understanding of the actual plan and doesn’t care about any of the things the people who vote for him care about. He means the Union of European Soviet Socialist Republics; the Brussels oligarchy in other words.

The Guardian writes‘He said a message to refugees that said “Come, you will be welcome” provoked major shifts in population.’

His grasp of the obvious now it is too late to do anything about it is impressive.

The Dutch prime minister, Mark Rutte, said Europe was close to breaking point: “We need to get a grip on this issue in the next six to eight weeks.” But, he went on: “No one wants to kill Schengen, but if it is only a fair-weather system then it cannot survive.”

Geert Wilders is described by the liberal press as a ‘far-right’ Dutch politician. This means he has stayed roughly where our grandparents were while everyone else was processed by Cultural Marxism. Wilders has called for the invading, marauding males to be locked up in asylum centers and for the safety of Dutch women and girls to be put first. What a novel idea.

This isn’t ‘far-right’. It is just right. But, we already know, it will never happen.

RT interviewed Hansjoerg Mueller of the Alternative for Germany party. Mueller said: ‘Germany now is somewhere at the edge of anarchy and sliding towards civil war, or to become a "banana republic without any government."

He went on: ‘Bavaria is the first region because we are affected the most – we are living on the border to Austria where the influx of refugees stems from. But the second regions of Germany where this happens are Saxony and Thuringia. First of all, they have also borders to the Czech Republic, that’s the first reason. And the second reason is that in former Eastern Germany people are still aware of what it is living in a dictatorship. They are feeling quite well that our so-called democracy is sliding more and more towards a totalitarian state.’’

Read more

Interesting and objectively correct words. But then Mueller does not hold any real power.

Donald Tusk, on the other hand – as chief apparatchik in the European Soviet machine – does have power. He now warns that we have only two months to get things under control. This means, of course, when after two months the invasion is only worse, we will be expected to accept the situation as fait accompli.

Tusk also has a holy reverence for the nonsense known as the Schengen Agreement and warned that if Europe fails to make the strategy work “we will face grave consequences such as the collapse of Schengen,” the 26-nation passport-free travel zone.

How complicated is it?

There is nothing holy about the Schengen Agreement – the UK is not party to it, for example. But European leaders talk about it as though it were somehow problematic to revoke it.

It’s not.

The Schengen is an idea. The invasion of Europe and the destruction of the ancient cultures within it, however, is very real.

If these were not ‘refugees’ but infantrymen (even ones without guns) arriving from – let’s say – North Korea, this problem would not have got to first base.

This is an invasion. But because it is dressed up in the garb Europeans fall for every time – the language of compassion – we are now in a state where European women cannot walk unmolested in their own streets or use public pools without being subjected to degradation.

Read more

Given the political will, this problem can be fixed in a five-minute conversation. It’s a group Skype call at best. The fact that this doesn’t happen belies the reality: the fix is in, and politicians like Valls and apparatchiks like Tusk are trying to distance themselves from the inevitable fallout. This is why they are saying things they think people will want to hear: not because they are going to step up and do what is necessary, but because they don’t want the coming chaos attached to their names.

The solution is obvious: stop ‘saving’ all the ships arriving in Europe; put officers with real powers on borders, and have anyone without a passport or other valid ID immediately ejected from the EU space. And border guards both at the peripheries of individual countries and the EU itself should be told in clear and uncertain terms what their job is: to protect what’s behind them from what’s in front of them.

If EU border guards’ pay was inversely indexed to the number of persons shown to have entered the EU illegally – and if internal police had equivalent motivations – this problem would be solved in a month.

If there is a genuine case for asylum – based on the existing legal framework – the place for that discussion is on the border of the EU, not within it.

Pretending to address the problem

Germany has followed Switzerland in confiscating the assets of ‘refugees’ over a certain value – shown to be four-figure sums on average. This will do nothing other than ensure that the next wave comes with nothing, or has it sent over in parcels later.

The real causes for invasion lie with neo-colonialism and the banking cartel which drives it – ‘philanthropists’ such as Soros – and NATO’s genocide against Libya and the murder of Gaddafi – who was holding back the population floodgates for us.

NATO has no compunction about killing people in very large numbers when it suits the bankers’ agenda. The fact that Europe’s military is pussy-footing around now that we actually need soldiers to do their only legitimate job – defend our borders – suddenly everyone is Albert Schweitzer. The case is so plain, even 16 year-old German girls with no previous interest in ‘politics’ are getting it.

Anyone who suggests taking effective action is labelled ‘far-right’ by the liberal media which panders to those whose intellects are bypassed by means of emotional trigger-words such as ‘compassion’.

But the motif of the ship is a fair one. When a ship goes down there are never enough lifeboats. Sailors are trained to beat off with violence those still in the sea once the lifeboat is full. If they do not – everyone dies. This is real compassion.

If there is a silver lining in this tale of corruption and perfidy it is this: the liberal’s catch-all justification for his crimes against his own people – that of pleading ‘compassion’ – is no longer beyond criticism. People have had enough. Wanting your family and your culture to survive does not make you evil.

This is not a game; it is deadly serious. And if the helm cannot be wrest from those bent on taking the ship down, it’s time for those with the wit and the means to make a quiet move for the exits.

@SamGerrans

Tags: -, Europe:, Gerrans, Invasion, Sam, The, by, down, going, is, More…of, ship

Views: 96

Replies to This Discussion

No major party has a plausible plan to cut immigration. They should stop pretending - Daily Telegraph

By making impossible pledges David Cameron and Ed Miliband have abdicated their political responsibility to take on the racists of Ukip

Face off at the Britain First Demo in Rochester, Kent
Far right activists clash with anti-fascists ahead of the by-election in Rochester, Kent Photo: Eddie Mulholland/The Telegraph

So now we know. David Cameron’s pledge to reduce net migration to tens of thousands was rubbish. A pipe dream. A little Englander fantasy.

But then, we always knew it was a fantasy. And we knew it was a fantasy for this reason: although David Cameron pledged to reduce immigration, he couldn’t, and he knew he couldn’t.

There are many popular theories for why immigration to Britain is increasing. One favourite is the loucheness of our benefits system. Another – recently propagated by the Home Secretary herself – is the corruption of the student visa system. A third is an erosion of those stout sentinels that constitute the UK Border Force. Labour are especially keen to talk that one up at the moment, although I see Yvette Cooper is this morning pushing a new pet theory, namely that the migration figures reflect the fact we don’t have enough apprenticeships.

It’s rubbish. More immigrants are coming to the UK for three reasons: because they want to work here, because there are lots of jobs for them to do here, and because they can.

I’ve witnessed some bizarre debates during my time working in and writing about politics. Tony Blair’s attempt to justify the war to seize Saddam’s chemical weapons when he had no weapons and we knew he had no weapons; Margaret Thatcher’s efforts to convince the country the Poll Tax was fair. But the spectacle of our politicians scurrying around, pledging to curtail immigration into the UK, whilst maintaining open borders and defending free movement within the EU, tops the lot.

Recently the Prime Minister delivered a speech designed to resolve, once and for all, the immigration issue. It contained no fewer than 8 major proposals.

A ban on migrants' in work benefits. A ban on child benefit for overseas dependants. Removal of migrants after 6 months if they haven’t found work. Restrictions on entry for non-EU dependants. Stopping of Universal Credit. Accelerated deportation of convicted criminals. Longer re-entry bans. Restrictions on entry of citizens of future EU member states.

All of which is fine. But there’s one minor problem with this grand plan to stop immigrants coming to the UK: it leaves immigrants free to come to the UK.

Where are the immigrants? This map will tell you

Figures for 2014 are year to September

Imagine if David Cameron stood up and announced in the House of Commons: “For too long we have been excessively liberal in our attitude towards convicted criminals. We have cosseted and pampered them. This pampering must end. So today I am announcing we are releasing all convicted criminals from prison with immediate effect." Or if Ed Miliband proclaimed: “Tax avoidance is a fraud. It is a fraud perpetrated by the richest in our society on the poorest. This fraudulent behaviour must cease. To ensure it does, the next Labour government will abolish Income Tax."

By committing themselves to “getting to grips” with immigration, whilst advocating and maintaining free movement within the EU, this is essentially what David Cameron and Ed Miliband are doing. They are advocating one objective while simultaneously proposing a policy that guarantees a diametrically opposed outcome. There is a technical term for this; it’s called lying.

What exactly are Cameron and Miliband hoping to achieve? Do they think people won’t spot the disconnect? “See, immigration’s up by another 46,000, Bill!” "Yeah. But don’t worry. Ed Miliband’s going to bring back apprenticeships. Everything’s in hand."

Some time later today, Nigel Farage will pop up and say, “see, we told you! Both the Tories and Labour promised to get to grips with immigration, and they failed. If you really want to tackle the problem, the only solution is to vote Ukip.” And Nigel Farage is right. Ukip’s stance on migration is underpinned by naked prejudice. Their policy proscription – EU withdrawal and closure of our borders – would be economically cataclysmic for Britain. But credit where credit is due. At least it’s honest and intellectually coherent. If you want to reduce immigration, then a vote for Ukip is indeed the only option.

The same cannot be said for the policy stances of either the Conservative party or the Labour party. Their positions are bankrupt, both morally and intellectually. They have pledged not to out-Ukip Ukip, and then tried to do just that. They have talked tough on immigration whilst pursuing policies they know full well will lead to an increase in immigration. And through their failure to make the case for immigration – a case they know is, in fact, unanswerable – they stand guilty of one of the worst abdications of political responsibility for a gene.... Appeasement, masquerading as political populism, itself masquerading as political empathy.

And like all acts of appeasement, it has failed. David Cameron’s credibility has been damaged, as Ed Miliband’s will be as he scrabbles around trying to exploit the moment. Nigel Farage will seize on the figures as a drowning man grasps a piece of flotsam. But they’ve arrived too late. Ukip’s decline will accelerate as we approach the reckoning of May 8.

Leaving us with what? More vacuous, undeliverable immigration pledges. Pledges that will continue to broaden the gap between rhetoric and reality. A gap that will again be filled by anger, and frustration, and the tortured, unfulfilled fantasies of little England.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11436934/No-majo...

RSS

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service