It takes a nation to protect the nation
Not All Immigration Is Good.
Some immigrant groups contribute to society while others contribute mostly to prison populations and as welfare clients. Countries that were once stable, prosperous and ethnically homogeneous have been flooded with aliens that are mostly culturally incompatible and that have higher birth rates. In places like Sweden around 50% of immigrants of Middle-Eastern or African descent are unemployed and living on welfare, compared to 7% in the native population, and the proportion of foreigners in prison is 5 times their proportion in the population of the country.
Immigrants from neighboring countries can be easily integrated and absorbed, or return to their own countries, but foreigners, immigrants and refugees, from incompatible cultures do not integrate and contribute to the common good. And they mostly do not desire to return to their country of origin. They also retain their own language, culture and traditions, and their attitude to law.
The intellectuals, journalists, politicians and academics dream up fanciful concepts such as that “we are all descendants of immigrants”; something that is patently not true. The first Europeans that arrived in America were invaders not immigrants. The Muslims that enter Europe now in such large numbers are also invaders and not immigrants. They make no secret that their intention is to take over, as their religion requires that they do.
In most countries around the world the populations are not immigrants their forefathers have been living there for thousands of years. Moving to a country does not automatically give you the same rights as the people that live there, you are a guest and it is up to the host to decide if you are to are allowed to stay or not. It is not a human right to live anywhere that you choose.
“Open borders”, is another fanciful, damaging and dangerous concept, based on the idealistic concept of universal equality- that we are all equal and that all cultures are equal. The problem is that we are not all alike or even think alike. Open borders results in; an increase in poverty and crime, a lowering of standards, confusion and ethnic conflict.
We may all be citizens of the world but first and foremost we are citizens of our native country and a product of the dominating culture in that country. The differences in cultures and mentalities make it very unwise to encourage unrestricted immigration and to relax or abolish border controls. Criminals have no respect for cultures and some cultures have no respect for other cultures. Multiculturalism simply does not work.
If the migration trend continues Sweden will no longer be Sweden, America no longer America and Britain no longer Britain, countries as we know them will cease to exist. Which is all very well if you believe in; one world, one race, one culture. Perhaps a future possibility, but suddenly opening borders and abolishing nations will not function, this would have to be something that evolved slowly and carefully. As it is now most are satisfied with their own nation and culture.
It is only natural that people in poor countries want to migrate to rich countries, but this is not a solution, it only damages developed countries. The answer is to reduce poverty, and it is essential that global population growth is reduced, perhaps by compulsory contraception. The poor countries can never stabilize as long as population growth outstrips development.
If the poor that migrate to developed countries do not immediately become wealthy, they become consumed with envy and hatred, blame discrimination, and only want to destroy what they cannot have.
Tags:
Based on an article by Thomas Sowell.
http://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/thomas-sowell-what-the...
Welcome to 4 Freedoms!
(currently not admitting new members)
Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.
Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them.
At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.
Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.
We need to capture this information before it is removed. The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.
We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.
These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper).
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:
© 2023 Created by Netcon.
Powered by