The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Free Speech and Civil Society


Free Speech and Civil Society

Civil society has many benefits we take for granted, so these are being eroded by a process often called "soft jihad".  For example: 

  • loss of free speech, via increased legal or media censorship and speaker intimidation
  • loss of equality in law, via special treatment for Muslims
  • loss of community policing, via  acceptance of self-regulating Islamic zones
  • loss of justice, via decadent judges and witness intimidation
  • loss of fair elections, via false voter registration and voter intimidation
  • loss of safe employment, via media directed vilification and employer intimidation (as performed e.g. by the Animal Rights movement)
  • costs and burden of security checks due to terrorism
  • burden of admin and security checks due to fraud by criminal communities
  • loss of a polite society, because some of the public are hostile and un-approachable, with hidden faces and threatening dress

Clearly Infiltration, Parasitism and Segregation also degrade Civil Society - however they are in 2 separate victim rooms.

Also, Crime and Terrorism cover the initial costs of the acts, but even if brought under control, the whole society is left with the administrative burden of extra security checks, as has happened with car insurance and aircraft journeys.

Search Site:
Members: 15
Latest Activity: yesterday

Key Info

Anyone curious as to why there aren't more Gay spokesmen to speak about Gay ethnic cleansing in Tower Hamlets, or Women to speak against FGM, need only look to this room for the reasons.

Self importance is man's greatest enemy. What weakens him is feeling offended by the deeds and misdeeds of his fellow man. Self importance requires that one spends most of one's life offended by someone or something - Carlos Castenada

Discussion Forum

The Muslim Controlled BBC

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake yesterday. 33 Replies

Cognitive Dissonance.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Philip Smeeton May 6. 3 Replies

Civil War

Started by Joe. Last reply by Antony Feb 25. 70 Replies

BBC Bias

Started by paul collings. Last reply by Alan Lake Dec 28, 2014. 10 Replies

The Death of Socialism.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Dec 25, 2014. 2 Replies

Enforcement of Sharia Law on the UK

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Nov 23, 2014. 6 Replies

Prevention of Terrorism: Censoring the Koran

Started by Joe. Last reply by paul collings Oct 11, 2014. 3 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Free Speech and Civil Society to add comments!

Comment by Philip Smeeton yesterday

Waters and Wilders are my heroes.

Comment by Antony yesterday
Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 22, 2015 at 12:23

"- that brings the whole discussion into disrepute."

The whole point is, that we shouldn't have to think about this at all.

It is our language, our culture, our heritage; and if the Muslims object to it so strongly then they should move to a country where pork is not part of the culture.

Three Little Pigs.

Ten Little Nigger Boys.



How pathetic and cowardly the establishment is.

Ban Islam!

Comment by Alan Lake on June 22, 2015 at 9:21
Thanks Heather! I thought it was a bit fishy and didn't have time to check.

But I'm not completely convinced by the OUP response; I don't trust them. There is something rather guarded about their wording, for example:

OUP does not have a BLANKET ban on pork products in its TITLES, and we do STILL publish books about pigs.

Maybe they have a PARTIAL ban.
Maybe there is also a restiction on the CONTENT.
Maybe some books have been cancelled, but not all, so there are STILL some.

If they've nothing to hide, then why not just link to a public copy of those very same editorial guidelines?
Comment by Heather Gilbert on June 22, 2015 at 6:23

According to, the word pork has not been banned:

Comment by Alan Lake on June 22, 2015 at 1:49

University Press Bans Word ‘Pork’ Because It Offends Muslims

Oxford University Press has banned children’s book authors from using the words pig, pork because Muslims were offended.

Publishers HAVE to submit to SHARIA LAWby banning the word ‘pork’ and similar.

“I’ve got a letter here that was sent out by OUP to an author doing something for young people,” said TV host Jim Naughtie, whose wife Eleanor Updale is working with Oxford on an educational book series. “Among the things prohibited in the text that was commissioned by OUP was the following: Pigs plus sausages, or anything else which could be perceived as pork.”

“Now, if a respectable publisher, tied to an academic institution, is saying you’ve got to write a book in which you cannot mention pigs because some people might be offended, it’s just ludicrous,” he added. “It is just a joke.”

Even Muslim Labour MP Khalid Mahmood agreed that this was going too far.

“I absolutely agree,” he conceded. “That’s absolute utter nonsense. And when people go too far, that brings the whole discussion into disrepute.”

Oxford Press, however, defended their politically correct move in a statement:

“Many of the educational materials we publish in the UK are sold in more than 150 countries, and as such they need to consider a range of cultural differences and sensitivities.”

“Our editorial guidelines are intended to help ensure that the resources that we produce can be disseminated to the widest possible audience.”

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 6, 2015 at 13:38

Kid's Koran.

Luke 19-27. Jesus did not actually say these words, it was a king in a parable used by Jesus that says these words. Jesus never asked his Followers to kill anyone. Mohammed told his followers to kill people repeatedly. Not that I believe in Jesus. The Muslims have got it wrong and misuse this quote from the Bible.

Comment by Antony on June 5, 2015 at 9:43
Comment by Philip Smeeton on May 29, 2015 at 10:20

Regarding Geller.

How can someone be called a bigot for criticising bigotry? A bigot is someone that is extremely prejudiced and intolerant to another’s person or beliefs. Such as a race or religion fanatic. Geller is not a fanatic, she is very concerned about the bigotted, prejudiced, discriminating, fanatical and intolerant teachings of Islam and the behaviour of the followers of Mohammed. We should be intolerant towards intolerance. And condemn murder done in the name of Allah. Muslims fail to condemn this murder because it is fundamental to their faith.

Is it wrong to draw attention to the fact that a large portion of the world’s population want to annihilate freedom, democracy, Israel and everything and everyone that is not Muslim?

Looking at the facts about and the behaviour of those concerned in this freedom of expression conflict, it is obvious that it is Islam(Muslims) that is bigotted, not Islam’s opponents.

If unopposed Islam will suppress free-speech and democracy and fulfill it’s primary objective, (and this would sound bizarre if it were not a fact), of global domination.

Comment by Antony on May 29, 2015 at 8:31

Washington officials ban mohammed cartoon from subway ;


Members (15)


Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So 4F has categorised a subset of its depredations in a way that allows principal information to be retrieved for argument.  

We need to capture this information because it is slowly being removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But they also require - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to police these vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Religion
Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)
4. SP Freedom from Electoral Fraud
The import of new voters by immigration is only allowed if it can be shown not to favour any political party

© 2015   Created by Netcon.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service