The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Kuffarphobia against Free Speech


Kuffarphobia against Free Speech

{This room should be split into two: one for Free Speech and the other for Civil Society. We hope to perform this re-organisation at a later date.}

Civil society has many benefits we take for granted, so these are being eroded by a process often called "soft jihad".  For example: 

  • loss of free speech, via increased legal or media censorship and speaker intimidation
  • loss of equality in law, via special treatment for Muslims
  • loss of community policing, via  acceptance of self-regulating Islamic zones
  • loss of justice, via decadent judges and witness intimidation
  • loss of fair elections, via false voter registration and voter intimidation
  • loss of safe employment, via media directed vilification and employer intimidation (as performed e.g. by the Animal Rights movement)
  • costs and burden of security checks due to terrorism
  • burden of admin and security checks due to fraud by criminal communities
  • loss of a polite society, because some of the public are hostile and un-approachable, with hidden faces and threatening dress

Clearly Infiltration, Parasitism and Segregation also degrade Civil Society - however they are in 2 separate victim rooms.

Also, Crime and Terrorism cover the initial costs of the acts, but even if brought under control, the whole society is left with the administrative burden of extra security checks, as has happened with car insurance and aircraft journeys.

Search Site:
Members: 17
Latest Activity: 44 minutes ago

Key Info

Anyone curious as to why there aren't more Gay spokesmen to speak about Gay ethnic cleansing in Tower Hamlets, or Women to speak against FGM, need only look to this room for the reasons.

Self importance is man's greatest enemy. What weakens him is feeling offended by the deeds and misdeeds of his fellow man. Self importance requires that one spends most of one's life offended by someone or something - Carlos Castenada

Discussion Forum

The Muslim Controlled BBC

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony yesterday. 41 Replies

Civil War

Started by Joe. Last reply by Alan Lake on Wednesday. 77 Replies

The Death of Socialism.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Alan Lake on Sunday. 5 Replies

The Racist Policies of the NUJ

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Jul 13. 5 Replies

Cognitive Dissonance.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Philip Smeeton May 6. 3 Replies

BBC Bias (discussion closed)

Started by paul collings. Last reply by Alan Lake Dec 28, 2014. 10 Replies

Enforcement of Sharia Law on the UK

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Nov 23, 2014. 6 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Kuffarphobia against Free Speech to add comments!

Comment by Philip Smeeton 11 hours ago

Geert Wilders is, of course, right Kinana. We have to remove Islam from our societies. Any Muslims that want to stay have to completely renounce Islam, it is not enough to claim to be a moderate. As you know, and apparently those that should know better do not, all of Islam and all of its laws applies to all Muslims.

They play the democratic game but believe in the islamic state. Sometimes the mask slips and they admit things such as that apostates must die.

Comment by Kinana 23 hours ago

Philip, I agree.  Islamism (if such a thing exists) must come from Islam. Islamists get their authority from the texts of Islam - the Quran, hadith and Sira.  Same as Islam.  It is the last ditch attempt to distance Islam from the cruel and vile behaviour of Muslim jihadists.  

Comment by Antony yesterday
Comment by Philip Smeeton on Wednesday

" hell with their culture" Muslim culture. Hear! Hear!

Comment by Antony on Wednesday
Comment by Philip Smeeton on October 2, 2015 at 19:27

Aki Muthali showed a picture of this video of Maher, Dawkins and Maajid Nawaz.

I don't know if she swallows the crap that Nawaz, Quilliam, serves but I certainly do not.

He argues (and is taken seriously by all that were present) That there is a difference between Islam and Islamism. That islamism is responsible for all of the terrorism and Islam is not!

Well according to my analysis, Islam is the cause of all of the islamist terrorism, Narwaz does not have a point, but anyone that can appear sincere and that is convincing enough gets the heads of those that are listening nodding as you clearly see in this video. Heads nodding; Moore, blondie and Sharpton. Just shows that Dawkins and Maher are not very perceptive.

Islam, "islamism", terror, sharia, are all part and parcel of the same thing. You cannot separate Muslim and Islam. The so called moderate Muslim is a person that has not understood Islam. The Islamists have; they kill and spread terror and are intent on subduing all resistance to Islam. As Mohammed said ,fight until everything belongs to Islam. 

Comment by Antony on October 2, 2015 at 7:54

The very striking Aki Muthali on why there should be a bigger platform for anti-islamists ;

Comment by Dag Walker on September 29, 2015 at 18:16

I left a link below to one of my books. Wrong link. This link should lead to Motoons.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on September 29, 2015 at 15:28

Offending people.

Because the term Nigger is offensive to black people we should not use it, unless we intend to insult them. A black can call another African American a nigger and we can laugh. Then the word nigger exists and is acceptable under certain circumstances.
What words do we use when we really want to insult or hurt someone. What words are permissible or acceptable in human conversation? Spick, mick, dego, wog, chink, slant-eyes, four-eyes, bastard, fascist, nazi, jew, frog the list is long, some terms are racist some are not. I am only familiar with white english insults. Naturally english is not full of insults aimed at white people, honkey just doesn’t hurt. Most insults are aimed at our former enemies or people we in order to regard as property, or people whose lands and people were just objects for exploitation, we needed to regard as inferior. It is unwise for a slave owner to regard his possessions as equal or even as quite human.
So the insults are there and being in english do not quite bite on white people. Belittle, hurt or oppress is the purpose of insult. Of course there are degrees, you bastard, is almost a term of endearment sometimes.
I am sure others can speak more eloquently on this subject.
What I object to is the rewriting of history and literature. Grow up, is my response. retaining the title of an Agather Christie book, tenlittleniggerboys, is not intent to insult it is a statement of historical fact like golliwog dolls are. I object to Enid Blytons books being banned, by all means write a preface explaining that insult is not intended.
We should have evolved beyond racial insults, but they were better disapproved of than forbidden by law. I am not in the habit of insulting people so have little use for insults. When Muslims are offended it is because they have chosen to be offended, I simply state facts about the evil nature of Islam. If I did call a black a nigger it would be with the intention of insulting him. I would call Obama a stupid ignorant fool but not a nigger. 
I sympathize with Walker’s need to set no limits to expression, and to insult anyone you have a mind to. I would also respect the right of the worst sadist, criminal, racist or satanist to say anything they want, I am able to imagine every disturbing thought that they may harbor. But allowing them to practice their beliefs or sadistic fantasies is out of the question, and should they try they should be caged or executed. Not that I would insult Walker by comparing him in any way to a sadistic homicidal maniac. I understand the desire for unlimited expression. Though in my experience creation is a very controlled and selective process. In using a term like nigger you have to be very aware of your intention. I have ordered and will look at Motoons and offer constructive criticism. Criticism not founded in belief that I am in any way superior.
Comment by Philip Smeeton on September 27, 2015 at 19:43

Unfortunately the only answer to violence is violence.  Faced with extreme violence from the far-left thugs and their islamist comrades, I fully understand those far-right German youths that retaliate. Peaceful demonstration does seem to be a waste of time, against the disaster that is washing in over Europe and weak political leadership. The tribe needs its warriors, not only to fight the invading foe but in order to remove treacherous leaders.

Our leaders let the police and security forces loose on people that are trying to save the nation, instead of attacking those that are determined to destroy the nation.


Members (17)


Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Expenditure
The government can spend money in any way it wants  - except one where the debt burden passes across generations (20 years)
4. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)

An additional Freedom from Religion may be deduced from equal application of the law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2015   Created by Netcon.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service