The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Given the reach and significance of the BBC as pointed out here:
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4068/the_bbc_s_groupthink_on_...

and the depth of their manipulation shown here:  http://melaniephillips.com/the-real-bbc-scandal
they are a key player in all current political issues.

Its now clear that the BBC is controlled by Muslims, who get any awkward messages for Islam, suppressed.  Thus the BBC is another of our Watchmen that has been hijacked.  This forum will be used to collect their fabrications, obfuscations and misdirections.

Some older 4F discussion is in this forum: http://4freedoms.com/group/freespeech/forum/topics/bbc-bias-ian-duncan-smith-complains

More monitoring is on this website:  http://bbcwatch.org/

___________________________________________________________________________________

The BBC's Misrepresentation of Islam

http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6134-...

Published on Friday, 25 October 2013 21:28.  Written by IQ al Rassooli 

I was directed to the BBC web pages on the religion of Islam. Having read most of the content and found an enormous number of misconceptions, misrepresentations and blatant falsehoods, I came to the conclusion that it could not have been put up by the BBC but by the Boko Haram Broadcasting Corporation.

Before I even begin to point out the most important errors, I would like readers to know that the politically correct dimwits and the followers of Muhammad will most certainly accuse me of being a racist, an Islamophobe or both.

There are three types of people who could have authored such incredible misrepresentations and unconscionable mendacities:

1) A person who knows as much about Muhammad's Quran and Sunna as a pig knows about the science of personal hygiene.

2) A Muslim who is deliberately whitewashing the hatemongering and warmongering verses of Muhammad's Quran.

3) A total moron.

Let me point out the following to the dimwits and to the Muslims:

1) Islam is not a religion but a cult belief system, the cult of Muhammad. It has followers of every race, colour, nationality and tradition, and hence is not a race, therefore I cannot be called a racist.

2) The immense majority of people who accuse anyone who points out the true characteristics of the cult of Muhammad (Islam) are invariably accused of being Islamophobic, without the accusers actually knowing how to spell the term or what it really means.

3) The single most important item to be remembered by every person reading my articles or listening to my talks is the fact that humanity has only the word of Muhammad that he received 'revelations' from Allah through the Angel Gabriel.

Neither Muhammad's wives nor his companions ever saw or heard Gabriel talk to Muhammad. All that humanity has are the unsubstantiated, unwitnessed and uncorroborated words and declarations of a single man called Muhammad that what he is telling his followers are truths.

Let me enlighten these holier-than-thou Sharia ignoramuses that 'phobia' is usually associated with irrational fear, such as arachnophobia (fear of spiders), acrophobia (fear of heights), ailurophobia (fear of cats) etc. These fears – there are hundreds of them – are not associated with any prior dreadful experience by the person, which is why these fears are irrational.

Hence fearing Islam's scripture is totally rational and not fearing Islam's scripture would be totally irrational.

Having set the stage, I shall now address the most important misconceptions, mistranslations or deliberate falsifications in the BBC version of Islam.

A) Anyone reading (let alone studying) the history of Arabia prior to, during and after Muhammad would know that Allah is not God but the name and only the name of the supreme god of pagan Arabia of 360 deities set in stone centuries before Muhammad and his Quran. After all, Allah, the pagan god of Arabia, had three daughters: al Lat; al Uzza and al Manat (famous for The Satanic Verses controversy).

Muhammad very cleverly metamorphosed the god of pagan Arabia (Allah) into the God of Jesus, Moses and Abraham.

Muhammad actually repackaged the pagan god Allah and Islamised it into the one and only God of Israel.

Can I prove my assertion that Allah is not God and most definitely not the same as the God of Jesus, Moses and Abraham?

Of course I can; in over twenty different ways in less than sixty seconds, each way based entirely on the Islamic scripture itself.

B) The BBC gives the word 'Jihad' the benefit of the doubt that it is holy war but can also mean a spiritual struggle to commune with God. To dispel even a shadow of a doubt that there is any chance that Jihad (according to Sharia) can be other than total war against unbelievers/ kuffar, I am willing to wager the sum of $100,000 to the first person who can show us all a single operative verse in either Muhammad's Quran or Sunna demonstrating Jihad as a spiritual struggle to commune with God.

Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 4.50 narrated by Anas bin Malik

"The Prophet said, 'A single endeavour of fighting in Allah's cause {Qital fi Sabil Allah} [Jihad] is better than the world and whatever is in it.'"

Sahih Muslim Hadith 4631 and 4626 Abu Huraira

"I heard Muhammad say: ... 'I love that I should be killed in Allah's Cause [Jihad]; then I should be brought back to life and be killed again.'"

Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 4.73 narrated by Abdullah bin Abi Aufa

Allah's Apostle said, "Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords."

There are hundreds more similar verses in the Quran and Hadiths (traditions about Muhammad as transmitted by his wives, family and companions) for those who have the appetite for blood.

According to the exegetes of Islam, Jihad is the unwritten Sixth Pillar of Islam.

C) The BBC alleges that Muslims conduct Jihad invariably in self-defence like Muhammad. Really?

Dear readers, It was Muhammad who aggressed against his own kith and kin the pagan Quraysh in the years 620 to 622AD when he started on his self-proclaimed mission as the messenger of Allah.

According to the Hadiths, it was Muhammad who started his aggression against the Quraysh by insulting, demeaning and humiliating the (pagan) religion and beliefs of the Arabs in Mecca for almost 13 years, and they did not slaughter him.

It was Muhammad who declared war against his own people because they refused to accept him as the messenger of Allah their God.

Al Tauba 9:05: "And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them with every strategy of war. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful."

It was Muhammad who ambushed the caravans of the Quraysh for plunder, starting at Badr.

The Quraysh was a trading tribe. Their richest caravan was coming home from Syria heading to Mecca under the leadership of Abu Sufyan. The caravan was protected by some thirty men. News of the arrival of the caravan reached Muhammad, who couldn't resist the temptation.

Sirat Ibn Hisham tells us:

Muhammad called for the Muslims and said: "These are the camels of Quraysh with their money, go for it may Allah make it yours."

What a nice messenger of Allah! He then organised a force of over three-hundred of his followers to ambush the caravan before it arrived in Mecca.

Bukhari vol. 3 book 46 no. 717 pp. 431-432

"The Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day."

Dear readers, I can go on and on and on till hell freezes, but neither you nor I have the time or the stomach for these wilful deceptions and mendacities.

Having studied and researched the subjects of Muhammad, his Quran, his Sunna, Sharia, the New Testament and Hebrew Bible for over thirty years (in Arabic mother tongue as well as in English) the only conclusion I could come to is the following:

No one ever revealed the Quran to Muhammad because every single letter, word, verse/ aya and chapter/ sura is the product of Muhammad's imagination. These are the secretions of his mind, representing his alter ego, his autobiography, but very cleverly projected into the unsuspecting mouths of Allah and Gabriel to give them the aura of sanctity and divinity.

Anyone finding my statements and/ or conclusions unacceptable, do yourselves a favour: put up or shut up!

IQ al Rassooli – kafir and proud!

Tags: BBC, Controlled, Muslim, The

Views: 798

Replies to This Discussion

I Just saw the BBC 3 doc called ‘EDL Girls - Don't Call Me Racist’. (Monday 10 March 2014) It could have been worse. But the people on screen were excellent. What came across strongly from this doc was the constant theme of the charge of racism. This underlying assumption was one that the Angels had to speak against all the time. And yet the BBC never showed one instance of racism in the EDL. They even concluded the show by saying the EDL will always be noted for being racist. It is sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy when the biggest media outlet in the country miss-represent the subject of their own documentary. grrrr

It was clear from late 2010, that the media were going to ignore all evidence that EDL was not racist.  In fact, with evidence to the contrary, throughout 2009 the media were not calling EDL racist.  Even in 2010 and 2011, EDL had non-white leaders like Guramit Singh and Joel Titus, but the media ignored them.  My money is on the NUJ making it mandatory for journalists to designate EDL as racist in all reporting.

Kinana said:

I Just saw the BBC 3 doc called ‘EDL Girls - Don't Call Me Racist’. (Monday 10 March 2014) It could have been worse. But the people on screen were excellent. What came across strongly from this doc was the constant theme of the charge of racism. This underlying assumption was one that the Angels had to speak against all the time. And yet the BBC never showed one instance of racism in the EDL. They even concluded the show by saying the EDL will always be noted for being racist. It is sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy when the biggest media outlet in the country miss-represent the subject of their own documentary. grrrr

Surely it would have been logical for the BBC to interview this EDL girl ? ; http://www.englishdefenceleague.org/edl-girl-speaks-an-interview-wi...

Antony,

2009, Tommy & black men from EDL went on Newsnight & burned a swastika and denounced nazism.  This story has NEVER been referenced in the following 4 years, not even by the BBC.  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/8303786.stm

early 2010, The Guardian video about an EDL demo tracked along a line of EDL supporters, then did a jump cut to excise the gay people/flags on the demo.  After cutting those images out, the video continued to track along the line of supporters.

late 2010, Fiyaz Mughal commissions a report, which the media used to describe EDL as "white extremists". The day before, loads of photos of non-white people were taken at just 1 of the 2 simultaneous EDL demos happening (Nuneaton and Preston).  See the photos here - http://4freedoms.com/group/uk/forum/topics/muslim-sponsored-report-...

In 2012, when EDL was supposedly dying, an EDL march in Manchester stopped and gave a hero's welcome to Abdul, who stepped out onto a balcony on the route of the march.  At another demo, Tommy took Abdul on stage and said "this man's the reason why I won't burn a koran".  Both incidents ignored by the media.

As I pointed out to police at the end of 2010 "if EDL ends up becoming a Nazi/white supremacist organisation, it will be because the police/media positioned EDL in that way, even though there was plenty of evidence to the contrary".

I've personally seen more than 20 different non-white people at EDL demos.

BBC drops debate on homosexuality in Islam from “Free Speech” progr...

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/03/bbc-drops-debate-on-homosexuality...

'This is what “free speech” means in Dhimmi Britannia today: speech that is as free as Muslims want it to be, and that stops at the point at which they begin to feel as if they are not being accorded the proper amount of “respect.” As Britain goes gently into that good night and submits ever more fully to Islamic supremacism every day, there are occasional moments of high comedy, as in the “Free Speech” program censoring itself for fear of offending Muslims. But no comedian in the once-sceptered isle would dare have a crack at it — for fear of offending Muslims.'

When will this conspiracy with Islam, by the world's largest media organisation, stop?

Published on Mar 18, 2014

Very disappointed by BBC radio solent this morning. They gave airtime to a comment that we possibly carried knives to Bournemouth University "Islamic awareness event" and intimidated people. Here is our response we sent. Interesting that they would do a piece on Bournemouth EDL but not invite us to even give a statement. I don't listen to solent so let me know if they retract their silly comments...............

Bournemouth EDL are very disappointed that you would give air time to comments that we carried knives to the BU Islamic Awareness event and were intimidating others there. We went to that event as we were concerned that our teenage kids at university were being given a white washed version of Islam or even worse the people running the event might have been extremists / separatists / Muslim supremacists calling for sharia to dominate the uk etc. If this was the case we would have disrupted the event by any means necessary. 

After listening to the speakers for a while we came to the conclusion that what they were talking about wasn't really extreme in nature even if they were using miss-information and lies. One of them talked about homosexuals being bad or evil but apart from that they only came out with relatively tame religious dogma. So we chose not to disrupt the event. We sat down, did not raise our voices. We challenged a few things they had said politely and treated the speakers and audience with respect. We also left early to give the audience time to ask questions of the speakers as they had planned to. If people are intimidated by 5 people sitting down and talking politely they need to have a word with themselves lol

We also offered a chance for one of the speakers to attend one of our meetings to answer our members questions and also give him the chance to ask us anything he'd like to speak about. 

The EDL doesn't care what god people pray to, about the colour of their skin or what religion they follow. We stand against certain specific components of Islam that are extreme in nature and represent a very real threat to our country, culture and national identity. For example ;- 1. Honour killings / violence. 2. Sharia law. 3. Cruel halal slaughter which often funds terrorism. 4. Muslim grooming gangs. 5. FGM. 6. Violent jihad. 7. political Islam. 8. Mass uncontrolled immigration against the majority of the peoples wishes. 9. cultural misogyny. 10. the Burqa / veil.

Ref the Burqa / veil - One of the reasons we came to this event was that we were concerned that miss Faris was a speaker on the weds evening. Her views on the Burqa / veil are a slap in the face to British values.

We will not sit back and be tolerant in the name of PC multiculturalism. We will speak up when we see something that is wrong.

---

from Kinana

'one of the girls there thought that they [EDL] would have knives'

So the BBC gives space to this charge without any evidence.  Even the scared girl does not say that she actually saw any of the EDL members carrying a knife.  But now along with being associated with racism, bigotry and xenophobia we will be knife carrying thugs.  What else can we expect from the BBC?

I think the EDL were very brave considering the amount of Muslims who've used suicide vests to kill and maim people across the world. You stand more chance of being blown limb from limb by a radical muslim than dying in a plane crash.

I wonder if the BBC mentioned that.

The sooner the BBC is defunded the better.

The Bokoharam Broadcasting Corporation at their propaganda again.

The Islamist group Boko Haram abduct 100 (some sources say 200) schoolgirls in Northern Nigeria:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-27037181

No mention of the religion of the girls.

No mention of the risk of rape, as is common with Islamist gangs.

No mention of this being actions permitted and even sanctified by oh-so-holy Islamic "scripture".

The BBC's Head of Religion and Ethics is Aaqil Ahmed.  Mr Ahmed became the first Muslim to be the head of the religious affairs programming three years ago, amidst much controversy.

Pakistan 'blasphemy lawyer' shot dead in Multan office

Protesters react to a rumour that a member of the Hindu community had desecrated the Koran, in the southern Pakistani province of Sindh (March 2014)Perceived insults against Islam can cause much public anger in Pakistan
7 May 2014 Last updated at 22:46

Related Stories

Gunmen in the Pakistani city of Multan have shot dead a lawyer defending a university lecturer accused of blasphemy, police and officials say.

Police said that Rashid Rehman was sitting in his office when he was shot. Two of his assistants were injured.

Allegations of blasphemy against Islam are taken very seriously in Pakistan.

Critics argue that blasphemy laws are frequently misused to settle personal scores and that members of minority groups are often unfairly targeted.

Pakistan's blasphemy laws

  • After partition in 1947 Pakistan inherited offences relating to religion which were first codified by India's British rulers in 1860
  • In the 1980s clauses were added to the laws by the military government of General Zia-ul Haq
  • One clause recommends life imprisonment for "wilful" desecration of the Koran, another says blasphemy is punishable by death or life imprisonment
  • Muslims constitute a majority of those booked under these laws, followed by the minority Ahmadi community
  • A majority support the idea that blasphemers should be punished, but there is little understanding of what religious scripture says as opposed to how the modern law is codified

Senior police official Zulfiqar Ali told AFP news agency that Mr Rehman died amid "indiscriminate firing" in his office on Wednesday evening.

He said he and his two injured colleagues were rushed to hospital where doctors pronounced him dead upon arrival.

Mr Rehman was defending Junaid Hafeez, a lecturer at Bahauddin Zakariya University accused by hardline student groups of making derogatory remarks against the Prophet Muhammad in March last year.

An official at the independent Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) told AFP that for a year no lawyer was prepared to take up the case because of fear of reprisals from extremist religious groups.

Mr Rehman, a rights activist and co-ordinator of the HRCP, decided to defend Mr Hafeez despite reportedly receiving death threats.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27319433

Note in the above article no explanation of section 295c of the code.  No accusation of blatant discrimination and racism (if Islamophobia is 'racism') by Pakistanis of non-Muslims, enshrined in their legal code.  If you click on the link to the Q&A on the 'blasphemy laws' you get the impression that the laws are some kind of legal anomaly left behind by the British.  No explanation that this incident is probably the final nail in the coffin of free speech by totalitarian Islamists of Pakistan.  I doubt if there is anyone left there now prepared to make a stand against these fascist, 'racist' enforceres of Islam.

Imagine if the situation were reversed and it was the UK or the EDL leadership that enacted and applied these regulations, imagine how the Leftist hyenas would be howling?  These people make you sick.

RSS

Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service