The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Posted by Joe

http://gatesofvienna.net/2013/02/if-i-hadnt-done-it-i-would-been-dead/

 In this interview with Lars Hedegaard the (presumably experienced) news interviewer asks Mr. Hedegaard "What is it, do you think, that makes you attack [your would-be assassin]... how could you react like that?"

How do we grasp that that is how a "journalist" responds to a fellow journalist who has just survived an assassination attempt?  She is clearly not on the side of the victim.  Her dhimmitude is so profound, she is surprised when any other dhimmi defends themself from a muslim murderer. 

Lars Hedegaard reacted as one would expect any sane person to react (or even any animal when threatened with violence).  In fact, he clearly has not grasped the contamination that islam has already wrought on modern european society.  He should have been anticipating assassination and taking steps, at the very least having CCTV installed, and demanding that any unknown caller presents ID. If I was LH, I would not be approaching my front door to an unknown caller without a lethal weapon behind my back.

What I find so astounding about this whole thing is not the assassination attempt, it is the dhimmitude of the journalists reporting on it.  This Danish journalist is astonished he would try to defend himself.  The BBC, The Guardian and AP portrayed Lars Hedegaard as the criminal, not the assassin.

They would never report on an attack by a kuffar like this.

Tags: -, BBC, Denmark:, Enablers, Fascist, Fascists, Free, Hedegaard, Lars, Speech, More…advocate, assassination, attack, attempt, of, support, the

Views: 107

Replies to This Discussion

Joe,

As I've said many times, my big regret about 4F is that I got the categorisation methodology wrong.
I've reposted your article in this Censorship Room.  It displays victim-hood in several categories at once, as most articles do.
However, the principle aspect would have to be the slowly tightening grip of censorship, including the method of elimination or intimidation of anyone attempting to preserve our freedom of speech.

I recognise that.  But it is the attitude of dhimmitude expressed by the journalist that made me initially put it in the "infiltration" category.  Dhimmitude shows that they have infiltrated our minds.  It is an example of a direct attempt by muslims of censorship based on murder and intimidation; but it is also an example of how the journalists have been so dhimmified they are shocked that another kuffar would resist the uber-mensch.

Too true. This article needs both tags, at least.  How I wish I'd got the categorisation right.  

RSS

Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2022   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service