It takes a nation to protect the nation
Facebook: Enemies of Free Speech and Critics of Islam
Facebook has stepped up its ideologically-driven mission to purge the internet of messages related to patriotism and criticism of Islam.
On Thursday last (18 April 2019) Facebook issued a statement and disabled the accounts of:
“Individuals and organisations who spread hate, or attack or call for the exclusion of others on the basis of who they are.”
“Under our dangerous individuals and organisations policy, we ban those who proclaim a violent or hateful mission or are engaged in acts of hate or violence.
“The individuals and organisations we have banned today violate this policy, and they will no longer be allowed a presence on Facebook or Instagram. Posts and other content which expresses praise or support for these figures and groups will also be banned. Our work against organised hate is ongoing and we will continue to review individuals, organisations, pages, groups and content against our community standards.”
This ban of course includes the English Defence League though we have never advocated violence toward any group of people or individuals. We are fiercely patriotic and critical of Islam but sophisticated companies like Facebook cannot be expected to make distinctions between belief systems and people who profess them.
According to Facebook the concept of being critical of ideas found in Islam is the same as targeting Muslims. This is a very Islamic view of the matter. In Islam a person is what they say they believe. To respect the person as a human being without respecting their beliefs is anathema to them. To paraphrase the vegan principle: you are what you believe.
In Islam, whole groups of people are categorised based on their stated beliefs. Civil and religious laws in Muslim/Sharia countries base their social structures on these categories e.g. Christian, Jewish, atheist, polytheist, hypocrite Muslims, etc. This is like apartheid which the Left are opposed to but for some reason are blind to this elephant in the societal room.
Furthermore Islamic teaching requires Muslims to hate non-Muslims. (See Quran 60:4 and 9:29 and the writings of Al Qaeda for just a tiny sample of sources.) So by its own criteria Facebook should also ban any promotion of Islam from its platforms. Don’t hold your breath.
Any individual who loves their country is a target of the Facebook police. To stem the populist tide growing in Europe and America, globalists like Facebook are coming down on those who do not share their world view that the nation state is obsolete and even a dangerous thing. So our national history, culture and way of doing things must be discarded and replaced by the utopian future of global interests as defined by …who? Certainly the likes Facebook executives and politicians like Labour MP Yvette Cooper. The crimes of the future start with thought control today.
According to the statement by Facebook, individuals are not allowed to even ‘express praise or support for these figures and groups” like the EDL. We challenge Facebook to look at our website and find any racist and violence-promoting material. It is not there.
Those who support us are fed up with the way their country is changing and they see widespread danger ahead unless changes happen now.
They hate, yes hate, the slow destruction of our beloved country;
They hate, yes hate, an ideology that encourages hatred toward non-Muslims; and
They hate, yes hate, the constant thrust of the Sharia-pushers to enforce political submission of traditional British values and culture to Islamic values and culture.
Are emotions like hatred and anger always and everywhere to be purged from what it means be human? Are these feelings always morally wrong? Is it not right to hate evil and wrongdoing? Ask any soldier the answer to these questions.
The opposite of hate is love. And they know that to love our country is to save it.
To love our country is to work to save it through discussion, education, debate and demonstrations in the public square. But the thought-control people like Facebook will not have it. Because they know better, because they believe that they in fact are better. Again this attitude finds its mirror in Islamic teaching. For Muslims are also taught that they are the best of peoples (Quran 3:110).
Freedom of speech is the most fundamental freedom of all, because without the freedom to communicate information, express our views and debate issues, our ability to defend other rights, expose crimes and corruption, advocate for our common good and come to informed conclusions are fatally circumscribed.
What has happened is the internet equivalent of Kristallnacht. And those who collude with these ongoing purges and blockades and ‘burnings’ reveal that they are afraid of discussion and debate. They reveal themselves to also be in favour of a dictatorship of the mind as well as society.
To quote Winston Churchill:
“Dictatorship … [a] state of society where men may not speak their minds, where children denounce their parents to the police, where a business man or small shopkeeper ruins his competitor by telling tales about his private opinions; such a state of society cannot long endure …”
These people dig society’s grave.
But the English Defence League will not be crushed. We will find other ways to organise and communicate with our supporters who will not just disappear because Facebook has told us to do so. The stakes are too high for that to happen.
http://www.englishdefenceleague.org.uk/facebook-enemies-of-free-spe...
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Philip Smeeton on
-
There are a lot of snotty-nosed little leftist moderators (some coloureds and muslims, but all a pathetic excuse for a human being) that are carrying out personal vendettas against everything that they have been taught (or have decided themselves) to be wrongful thinking. How do you qualify to be a moderator?
But we cannot let them put us out. We have to find other ways of exerting political influence.
We are smarter than they are, and we do not tell lies or believe that there is any justification for warping reality. The facts do actually speak for themselves and we must tirelessly hammer them home. Any animal that fails to recognise reality will perish. The same applies to the human animal, anyone that does not recognise Islam to be a bloodthirsty predator will succumb to it.
What these leftists refuse to see, is the harm that their beliefs are causing. At such a low intellectual level things that go wrong are always someone else's fault, because their beliefs are faultless and impeccable.
Love,indifference and hate Kinana. -
-
Permalink Reply by Kinana on
-
Thanks to Alan Lake
This article relates to Facebook so should really be in the Facebook forum, but I'm using it to underline the above point.
- CrossFit storms off Facebook and Instagram, citing long list of grievances
https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2019/5/24/18638670/crossfit-facebook-...
So you can even be purged from Facebook and Instagram, for your views on diet and fitness! The time to prepare is now; the electronic guillotines will be coming down on all our necks pretty soon.
- CrossFit storms off Facebook and Instagram, citing long list of grievances
-
-
-
And if you use a Gym consider Crossfit!
https://www.crossfit.com/battles/crossfit-suspends-facebook-instagram
And finally,
8. Facebook is acting in the service of food and beverage industry interests by deleting the accounts of communities that have identified the corrupted nutritional science responsible for unchecked global chronic disease. In this, it follows the practices of Wikipedia and other private platforms that host public content but retain the ability to remove or silence—without the opportunity for real debate or appeal—information and perspectives outside a narrow scope of belief or thought. In this case, the approved perspective has resulted in the deaths of millions through preventable diseases. Facebook is thus complicit in the global chronic disease crisis.
For these reasons, CrossFit, Inc. has placed Facebook and its associated properties under review and will no longer support or use Facebook’s services until further notice.
-
-
-
We have to sit down and take a very serious look at the concept of right and wrong.
Is that not the basis of morality; the right thing to do and the wrong thing to do.
It may seem strange to say it, but I am thinking, ideals, beliefs and morals are a hindrance to our understanding. All systems of belief; religions and ideologies cripple our thought processes.
A person that considers himself to be a good person might say "I have always tried to do the right thing", But how did he arrive at this certainty as to what is right and what is not?
Morality is being dictated to us by the rich and powerful and the institutions of learning, people are being punished or excluded for saying something that they believe to be true. And, though there are of course other unpleasant reasons for people to be silenced, right now in the Western world people are being silenced because those that have the power to silence them believe that they themselves are doing the right thing. This is their unshakeable belief, even though others would argue that they are doing something wrong. Doing something wrong is immoral.
Of course being a skeptic I could argue that right and wrong and morality are only products of the overdeveloped human brain. Does the Fox ever feel guilty about what he does?
I would say that right and wrong for an animal is as simple as the difference between what causes suffering and what causes gratification.
Human societies if they are to function have to generally reach an agreement as to what is right and what is wrong. Our present day societies are disfunctional in so many ways. -
-
-
Giving rights to some, them may involve taking away the rights of others, us. Some even sacrifice their rights to others and deprive themselves, out of a mistaken sense of moral goodness.
-
-
-
Good musings Philip. Considering what is right and wrong has been a uniquely human activity since humans have been around, imo. Philosophically, I think the range is from Nihilism to Behaviourism, to the most strict of religious propositions.
-
-
-
https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/32380-facebook-t...
..."Candace Owens for one, believes that Facebook and the entire tech sector, including Twitter, Spotify, Apple, Google, and YouTube, are engaged in preemptive election meddling against Donald Trump for 2020. “More and more Americans are waking up to and rejecting the fantastical ideology of the Left. What we’re seeing now are social media companies that are desperate to help subvert a mass awakening,” Owens told Breitbart.
“Facebook is attempting to manufacture a virtual reality for the Democrats by silencing voices that run counter to their party mission, which is to get rid of President Trump and to turn America into a socialist country.”
etc.
"Owens’ crime? A post from May 4, where she listed several poverty statistics and wrote, “Black America must wake up to the great liberal hoax. White supremacy is not a threat. Liberal supremacy is.”
-
-
-
YouTube censored ‘Borderless,’ a new documentary about mass immigration from independent filmmaker Lauren Southern, on the day of its release.
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/05/25/youtube-censors-lauren-so...
--
update
available here:
-
-
-
They concede defeat, almost!
https://nypost.com/2021/12/14/facebook-admits-the-truth-fact-checks...
Facebook admits the truth: ‘Fact checks’ are really just (lefty) opinion
Facebook finally admitted the truth: The “fact checks” that social media use to police what Americans read and watch are just “opinion.”
That’s thanks to a lawsuit brought by celebrated journalist John Stossel, which has exposed the left’s supposed battle against “misinformation” as a farce.
Stossel posted a pair of videos that touched the third rail of liberal politics — climate change. Neither questioned whether climate change is real, but each talked about other issues, namely forest management and using technology to adapt. Yet the third party that Facebook contracts to review these pieces, Science Feedback, flagged them as “false,” or our favorite, “lacking context.”
Why? Science Feedback didn’t like Stossel’s “tone.” That is, you can’t write anything about climate change unless you say it’s the worst disaster in the history of humanity and we must spend trillions to fight it.
-
Welcome to 4 Freedoms!
(currently not admitting new members)
Page Monitor
Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.
Muslim Terrorism Count
Mission Overview
Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them.
At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.
Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.
We need to capture this information before it is removed. The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.
We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.
The 4 Freedoms
These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper).
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:
- Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"
© 2023 Created by Netcon.
Powered by
