The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Kuffarphobia via Free Speech Attack & Deceit

Information

Kuffarphobia via Free Speech Attack & Deceit

Civil society has many benefits we take for granted. These are being eroded by a process often called "soft jihad".  For example: 

  • loss of free speech, via increased legal or media censorship and speaker intimidation. The Islamic term for this is riddah
  • loss of equality in law, via special treatment for Muslims
  • loss of community policing, via  acceptance of self-regulating Islamic zones
  • loss of justice, via decadent judges and witness intimidation
  • loss of fair elections, via false voter registration and voter intimidation
  • loss of safe employment, via media directed vilification and employer intimidation (as performed e.g. by the Animal Rights movement)
  • costs and burden of security checks due to terrorism
  • burden of admin and security checks due to fraud by criminal communities
  • loss of a polite society, because some of the public are hostile and un-approachable, with hidden faces and threatening dress

This room should be split into two: one for Free Speech and the other for Deceit and False Flag Ops (FFO). This will be done later.  Also, Infiltration, Parasitism and Segregation also degrade Civil Society - however they are in 2 separate victim rooms.

Members: 18
Latest Activity: on Saturday

Key Info

Anyone curious as to why there aren't more Gay spokesmen to speak about Gay ethnic cleansing in Tower Hamlets, or Women to speak against FGM, need only look to this room for the reasons.

Self importance is man's greatest enemy. What weakens him is feeling offended by the deeds and misdeeds of his fellow man. Self importance requires that one spends most of one's life offended by someone or something - Carlos Castenada


http://4freedoms.ning.com/video/buried-chest-high

N.B. Nesriin (the poetess) has already closed her channel due to excessive trolling. The above video is from a mirror site.

Discussion Forum

Censorship by Twitter

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton on Saturday. 1 Reply

Censorship by Google / Youtube

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony on Friday. 1 Reply

The Post-Dialogue World

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Oct 25, 2017. 3 Replies

Tim Burton Jailed.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Kinana Aug 6, 2017. 5 Replies

The Muslim Controlled BBC (MC-BBC)

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Aug 4, 2017. 71 Replies

Civil War

Started by Joe. Last reply by Antony May 3, 2017. 79 Replies

Geert Wilders: Speeches and Incidents

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Mar 3, 2017. 5 Replies

Free speech, free expression.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Alan Lake May 2, 2016. 2 Replies

Ayaan-Hirsi-Ali.

Started by Philip Smeeton. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Apr 25, 2016. 1 Reply

Kuffarphobia via Hijacked Watchmen / NGOs

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Feb 22, 2016. 8 Replies

Language Tricks used by the Media

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Kinana Feb 14, 2016. 12 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Kuffarphobia via Free Speech Attack & Deceit to add comments!

Comment by Antony on December 31, 2012 at 11:02
Comment by Antony on December 27, 2012 at 13:27
Comment by Antony on December 19, 2012 at 10:29
Comment by paul collings on December 15, 2012 at 12:37

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/debate-on-islam-and-...

Anthony.

Islam doesn't like to discuss anything that goes against the word of god. Still that is also true amonst some christian groups. Although main stream christianity does accept evolution, as long as theres a moment of creation. I'm not sure if Islam could accept this into their teachings as they're not allowed to change the koran.

Its still weird to think in britian today that we can't have this type of debate. 10 years ago i would have laughed at this story. Now its not so funny.

 

 

Comment by Antony on December 15, 2012 at 11:32
Comment by Antony on December 13, 2012 at 5:58

Blasphemy must be an untouchable human right ; http://richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2012/12/12/blasphemy-must-b...

Comment by paul collings on November 30, 2012 at 14:53

This from East anglian EDL.

It seems as though laws are being passed in many countries that all serve the same pupose. Silence the people. As with our section 5, and the  new law that will almost certainly be passed in the UN next year, (resolution 16/18)  these laws are so vague that they will almost certainly be used for purposes other than that which they are supposedly ment. Or should i say the purpose we are told these laws are ment for.

When laws are passed they get used, and we are supposed to obey them. Saying they are bad or un fair won't help those that end up on the wrong side of them.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

India Facebook arrests: Supreme Court demands explanation

Posted: November 30, 2012 in News Feed

 

India’s Supreme Court has asked the government in western Maharashtra state to explain last week’s arrest of two women over a comment on Facebook.

Shaheen Dhada was arrested for her comment following the death of politician Bal Thackeray.

Her friend, Renu Srinivasan, who “liked” the comment, was also arrested. The two were later released on bail.

The arrests of led to an outrage in India with critics accusing the government of “abuse of authority”.

On Thursday, India’s telecoms ministry issued new guidelines which make it harder for the police to arrest people for comments on social networking and other internet sites.

Now, a senior officer must approve before a complaint can be registered under the controversial Section 66A of the Information Technology Act which can send a person to jail for three years for sending an email or electronic message which “causes annoyance or inconvenience”.

‘Vague’

A Delhi student, Shreya Singhal, has challenged the law in the Supreme Court.

She says “the phraseology of Section 66A is so wide and vague and incapable of being judged on objective standards that it is susceptible to wanton abuse”.

On Friday, a Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Altamas Kabir and Justice J Chelameswar heard her petition.

“The Maharashtra government is directed to explain the circumstances under which the two girls – Shaheen Dhada and Renu Srinivasan – were arrested for posting comments made by them on Facebook,” Press Trust of India quoted the justices as saying.

The judges gave the state four weeks to give its response.

The Supreme Court also asked the government in West Bengal state and the southern city of Pondicherry to explain similar arrests made in recent past.

In April, the West Bengal government arrested Professor Ambikesh Mahapatra, a teacher who had emailed to friends a cartoon that was critical of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. He was later released on bail.

In October, Ravi Srinivasan, a 46-year-old businessman in Pondicherry, was arrested for a tweet criticising Karti Chidambaram, son of Indian Finance Minister P Chidambaram. He too was later released on bail.

All the arrests were made under Section 66A.

Comment by Antony on November 28, 2012 at 5:39

If the National Union of Journalists won't defend journalism - what's the point of it ? ; http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewgilligan/100191729/if-the-n...

Comment by paul collings on November 27, 2012 at 18:32

http://t.co/rYMs4MzO

Anjem Choudary is 'allegedly' going to pakistan and will issue a fatwa against malala.

I don't think he's allowed to make a fatwa, but thats not the point. Students of this man have gone on to commit terrorist crimes. Anjem may seem like a bit of a clown, and figure of fun, but he is taken serious by many people. If he is going abroad  to preach  more of his fundermentalist hate he should be arrested and thrown in a cell for a while, he is a british citizen, so he is our problem. And so the media should report on him if he issuing fatwas. As rediculas as this idea seems. Because history has shown, theres some one out there following him who could well take him serious.

Comment by Antony on November 27, 2012 at 6:19

No Regrets from Innocence of Muslims director ; http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/us/from-the-man-who-insulted-isla...;

 

Members (18)

 
 
 

Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2018   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service