The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

http://www.liberezvous.org/viveDieu/index.php?%2Ftopic%2F137-the-to...

Unless demands made by the baned islamic group (to which Mohammed Merah belonged) are met, then they will consider the covenant to be broken.

Considering that Muslims are in constant danger in France and abroad, we demand from the Government a non-aggression pact to the Muslim community in the image of what was done at the time of the Prophet salalahou 3alayhi wasalam with the disbelievers as planned in one of houdaybiya. We are fully aware of the deplorable state of our security on French territory and abroad and it is vitally important for balance and harmony between peoples that the authorities take seriously this requirement . This covenant must clearly state the terms of mutual respect for the beliefs and rituals so that neither one nor the other can not be seen and reached in his convictions that the security of Muslims is never questioned. French troops must leave all territories with Muslim majorities, without conditions or delay. We demand the right to practice our authentic religion. We also demand the withdrawal of these despicable acts against the veil and the niqab in public and in private. Clauses must be clearly stated and explained so that there was no ambiguity. Reciprocity must remain the key word. If by any chance our demands are not taken into account then we consider that the government went to war against Muslims and allow to proliferate hatred towards us voluntarily. Security of the Jews being carried out officially by example with the Gayssot law which punishes severely Antisemitism in France, therefore it can be considered a defense pact against the Jewish community. We reject the idea that our simple identity card would be a form of pact with France as trying to make us believe some ignorant who seek at all costs especially not mispronounce "bwana".

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed claims that before the London 7/7 bombings, muslims in England informed the UK government that the covenant had been broken, and that this now meant that muslims in the UK would treat the UK as a target:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-London-Bombings-Independent-Inquiry/dp/...

Even though the French muslim population is at least twice as large proportionally to that of Britain, in the last 10 years there has been relatively far less terrorism in France than in Britain (much of the terrorist incidents in France related specifically to Algerian issues).  However, that may be about to change.

Despite being banned, Forsana Alizza (and its associated organisations) still seem to be pretty active.  And what would you know. Britain's own al-Muhajiroun is connected to Forsa Alizza.  That makes the connotations of the covenant being broken rather chilling.

http://forum.internet-haganah.com/showthread.php?730-Forsane-Alizza...

Vues : 54

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service