The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Here’s Everything I Wanted To Say About Islam Yesterday, But Couldn’t

There’s only so much time in the day, especially you’re being snogged by ruggedly handsome Canadian men (it turns out that isn’t an oxymoron) as a “f*** you” to Islam.

So I didn’t say everything I wanted to say about the “religion of peace” at my press conference in Orlando today. But that’s what columns are for!

Here are the full remarks I had prepared for today.

Britain Is A Warning

Now, as you all know, I come from Britain. As a country, I believe it should serve as a warning sign for the United States, which must face its Muslim problem before it is too late.  I myself am leaving the UK behind, as I no longer recognize much of my beloved London.

Gallup poll of Muslims in the UK found that not a single one of the 1,001 people polled thought that homosexuality was morally acceptable. That is compared to 58% of the overall British population who think homos are OK. The same poll found that just 35% of French Muslims and 19% of German Muslims thought homosexuals were morally acceptable.

In my opinion those percentages have probably cratered following Europe’s importation of hordes of young Muslim radicals affectionately known as “rapefugees” on the continent. Some more stats specific to British Muslims from a channel 4 poll:

  • 52% believe homosexuality should be illegal
  • 23% would like to see Sharia law in England
  • 39% believe a woman should always obey her husband, as opposed to 5% of English overall
  • 31% consider it acceptable for a man to have multiple wives

If the United Kingdom remains in the EU, much of this data may change, and not for the better. Large scale Muslim immigration from Turkey and other Muslim countries will introduce more fundamentalist opinions to the country.

Turkey, you’ll keep in mind, is the country whose reaction to the Orlando shooting included the newspaper headline “50 perverts killed in bar.”   In other words, the Muslims pouring into Europe and the UK, and America if your current government democrat AND republican has its way, are not kind easygoing Muslims, they are hardliners.

This speech was supposed to be delivered yesterday on the campus of the University of Central Florida.  UCF cancelled that event and a rescheduled event for today, because the police say they cannot guarantee my safety. After receiving threats, the police and UCF have made plain that it is not safe for a gay man to speak out against Islamic terror in Florida.

This is the school that once hosted Siraj Wahhaj, a terror co-conspirator of Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the “blind Sheikh” who masterminded the World Trade Center bombing in 1993. Apparently speakers calling for the replacement of America’s constitution with a Caliphate suit the university just fine, but a dangerous faggot does not.

De Tocqueville

It is a uniquely American trait that your country has relied on foreigners to take the true stock of American culture. Before I was saying America can be Great Again with Trump, it took a Frenchman named Alexis de Tocqueville to document the miracle of American democracy in his 1835 book “Democracy in America.”

I share something else with de Tocqueville: he was also a critic of Islam. 

He was right about America, and he was right about Islam when he said “I studied the Quran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad.”

America Has a Muslim problem

America has a Muslim problem. Notice my wording carefully here. It isn’t a radical Muslim problem. It isn’t an ISIS problem, an Al Qaeda problem, a Taliban problem, or any of the Muslim terror groups that have sprung up in 2016. The terror attack on Saturday is an expression of mainstream Muslim values.

Barack Obama,The “leader of the free world” is too scared to say this.

In fact I have already referenced Islam both mainstream and radical in reference to this terror attack more often than Obama, who didn’t mention it at all.

I like to imagine President Obama on “Wheel of Fortune” sweating bullets over “Radical Islam” with only a letter or two missing. I think he’d say “I’d like to buy a vowel” or if his teleprompter is broken, just “I uh uh uh uh uh.”

Following Obama’s lead, Hillary Clinton has put out the exact statement we’d expect.  Islam is not our enemy, it is a religion of peace, blah blah blah. Forgive me if I think her speechwriters are imams from Saudi Arabia.

The Left won’t blame Islam

Alarmingly, prominent liberals and homosexuals have fallen right in line.  They are blaming rifles, the NRA, masculinity, video games — anything but Islam.

Dan Savage blames toxic homophobia and toxic gun culture. Well Dan, I have news for you: toxic homophobia has a name, and the name is Islam.

Many will say that what I just said is an Islamophobic statement. Islamophobia, the irrational fear of muslims, is a nonsense term.

Fear of Islam is entirely rational. I can tell you specifically that for gay people, “Allahu Ackbar” is the scariest words we could ever hear.

Gun Panic

Liberals always wait to determine the race and sex of a shooter before deciding how they will attack gun rights. 

Let me give you a clue,  liberals — Muslims don’t just use rifles, they use bombs, airplanes and knives, they like did in Paris Monday night. They will use anything to kill the hated “infidels.” 

Fewer than 300 people were murdered in 2013 with rifles. Nearly 1500 were murdered with knives to put that in perspective.  In fact more than double that number were murdered by hand and fist.

I don’t think you’d ever get gays to line up behind a ban on fisting!

The Anti-Gay Muslim speaker

In April, a Sharia law expert named Sheikh Farrokh Sekaleshfar spoke in Orlando and had some interesting things to say about gays.

Death is the sentence.  We know there’s nothing to be embarrassed about this, death is the sentence … We have to have that compassion for people, with homosexuals, it’s the same, out of compassion, let’s get rid of them now.

Is there a lot of wiggle room there?  It seems pretty clear. When Fred Phelps says his homophobic drivel, Christians are expected to say “That’s not Christianity” — does the responsibility not extend to Islam, when instead of waving signs they shoot 100 people?

Phelps may protest funerals, but Islam creates them.

Honestly, can anyone connect the dots here? A Muslim sharia law expert says gays must die, and then Omar Mateen sells his house to his sister for $100 and starts planning the massacre of 50 gays and the wounding of at least 50 more.

Even the sternest free speech advocate draws the line at incitement to violence, and it’s pretty clear that’s what was going on here.

Omar was Gay

There is one more thing. It is clear at this point that Omar was himself a gay man.

The very latest information is that Omar himself was a regular at the club, some witnesses saw him there a dozen times. His own ex-wife, who as a good muslim he beat, has come out with the fact he was gay.

This is what Islam does to its own gays.

If they are clever enough to not be killed in a middle eastern country, they must develop the most intense self-loathing imaginable.

It is beyond my powers to picture a lifestyle in which your religious leaders, your family, and your larger culture not only disapprove of your lifestyle which is normal for many gays, but actively call for the killing of those that share your lifestyle.

And liberals think “bigoted” Christians are the problem.

Muslims Rely On Liberals

It’s a sad fact that Muslims rely on being enabled by liberals and overly-tolerant leaders from other faiths to help them spread their poisonous ideas.

Consider the response of the Central Florida Interfaith Council to the vile teachings of Sheikh Farrokh. They say “[we] wish congregations would focus more on helping the homeless, poor, and abused instead of persecuting a group that can take care of itself.”

Where is the condemnation of calling for the murder of gays? When did being against murder become a controversial position for religious leaders?

Why Islam Escapes Blame

With all of this information implicating Islam, a reasonable question to ask is why the government and liberal media refuse to speak the plain truth.  

Beyond all complicating factors, the root cause of this mysterious lack of assigning blame to Muslims is that they are now seen as the apex victims in our culture.

Liberals consider everyone that is not a straight white male to be on a pyramid of victimhood. Various minorities shift places on this pyramid For example, white gay men have recently dropped quite close to the bottom. (I think I’m partly responsible for that!) 

For unknown reasons, liberals have put Muslims at the very top of this pyramid.

That is why Muslims can act and speak with impunity against others groups like gays, Jews, and women– they have been placed at the pinnacle of the victim pyramid.

The major flaw of liberal logic, with apologies to the term logic, is that in this case the top of the victim pyramid is intent on murdering and abusing the entire rest of the pyramid!

When we examine liberal thinking, we find that the already shaky logic doesn’t hold up when juxtaposed with other similar cases. Let me provide you with some examples: When supporters of Donald Trump are violently attacked and his rallies interfered with, the liberal response is that the Donald provoked these attacks.

But when Muslims attack gays, there is no outcry that the gays provoked Islam by being Fabulous. Which is it liberals, were they asking for it, or weren’t they?

When a christian bakery chooses not to bake a gay wedding cake due to religious beliefs, they are decried as religious bigots and driven out of business, the target of a national religious shaming.

When Muslims call for the murder of homosexuals in the months leading up to the largest mass shooting in American history, they will receive absolutely no blowback whatsoever, as we are told this was due to assault rifles and toxic masculinity.

When a single picture emerges of Dylann Roof, the Charleston church shooter, posing with a confederate flag, the media and the government attempted to erase the entire history of the South by removing flags, renaming buildings, and destroying monuments.

When Omar Mateen shoots some 100 people in a gay nightclub, the initial reaction of the government and media was to stumble over each other trying to be the first ones to say Islam is a religion of peace and had nothing to do with the attack

Despite the terrorist’s own cries of “Allahu Ackbar,” his call of allegiance to ISIS during a 911 call, and the fact he was acting within the murderous tenets of his religion as preached in the very city of Orlando.

When Eliott Rodger killed six and wounded quite a few people in California, the media called it an act of misogyny and violence against women, despite the fact that he killed more men than women.

Compare that with how they have handled the terror acts of Major Nidal Hassan and Omar Mateen.

Nidal Hassan killed 13 unarmed soldiers and wounded 30 while screaming “Allahu Ackbar.” This case was called workplace violence, and in fact his victims have been denied special benefits due to the victims of a terror attack.

Omar Mateen’s Muslim terror attack has already run the gamut from ‘the rifle did it’ to ‘video games’ and everything in between. Everything except his religion of death.

And here are some more, awkward facts about his religion, and its followers, who liberals want to allow into your country in mass numbers.

According to the Center for Security Policy:

  • 51% of American Muslims want to be allowed to be governed by Sharia Law
  • 30% of American Muslims believe it is legitimate to use violence against those that insult Islam
  • 25% of American Muslims said that violence against Americans can be justified as part of global jihad
  • 33% said that sharia should take precedence over the constitution if they clashed

Around the world, Islam reigns through fear and terror. If the Mullah’s executioners don’t get you, the bombs of his insurgents will. America must not go the same way.

America must not become a country in which people are afraid to kiss. It must not become a country in which artists and satirists are afraid a drawing might get them killed.

The terror attack was on a nightclub, which combines music, alcohol, the genders mixing and in this case homosexuality. The Paris attack on a concert fits this mold as well, as does the Bali bombing in 2002.

You will never please them and will never placate them short of the adoption of Sharia law. So don’t give an inch- they won’t stop taking!

It is time for the LGBT community to come home to conservatism and libertarianism where it belongs. The left no longer has your interests at heart, and is actively making the Muslim problem worse.

It is time for the LGBT community to take up arms in order to defend itself from further muslim attacks. Guns are not icky, gross, or scary. In the next Muslim terror attack on gays, a gun will save your life and those of the people around you.

If you are uncomfortable with guns or associate them with the Christian right, find one of the many LGBT-friendly shooting instructors spread throughout the entire country.  

If you think carrying a concealed pistol will ruin how cute you look in your new jeans, honey get over yourself you aren’t all that anyways.

Remember, as the saying goes, “Armed Gays don’t get bashed”

The Religious right are not your worst enemies. They don’t want to bake your cakes and will not fly rainbow flags, but they want you alive and free. In fact the religious right can now be seen as allies.

While liberals were crying and hashtagging, the notoriously christian chick-fil-a, which is normally closed on Sunday, opened up to feed those donating blood to keep LGBT victims alive.

The LGBT allies of the past might call you brave and like your social media pasts, but the christian right are men and women that will fight for your rights, and more importantly, teach you how to fight and shoot on your own.

Gays and Lesbians must have the mindset of the Jews that fought so many hard conflicts against muslim aggressors in the past. They realized they had sat and watched while Germany committed unspeakable atrocities against their people. They said Never Againand meant it.

Today is the LGBT community’s chance to say Never Again. Never Again will we allow Muslims to slaughter us, and never again will we support politicians who enable despicable terrorists to commit these senseless crimes.

http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/06/16/heres-everything-wanted-sa...

Tags: -, About, Everything, I, Islam, Milo, Say, To, Wanted, Yiannopoulos

Views: 210

Replies to This Discussion

Muslims do understand Islam, they know just as much as we do about it, so there is no excuse from our point of view for them to continue to be muslims.

There are almost two billion of them, so it is unrealistic to hope that any more than a few will reject Islam, in fact the more opposition they get the stronger their faith will become, more radical, violent and self-justifying.

The only thing we can do is to counter claims that Islam is thereligionofpeace.

It's the old- you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. Muslims are going to continue to deny reality.

I suspect that the majority of muslims want Islam and Sharia and believe that the violence, force and threats are necessary in order to rid the world of sin and to force people to realise that the only way of being is the muslim path, Allah has spoken.

What I meet in christians is: I ask the question- how can you believe in such nonsense, to which they reply how can you not.

Someone that sincerely believes in what I consider to be imaginary dimensions and beings, is unlikely to have a change of mind.

Christians are advised by their faith to keep company with other christians, be members of self-sustaining congregations, it is the same in Islam, just that muslims are instructed to kill those that leave the fold.

It is positive that some homosexuals and feminists are summoning the courage to risk their lives and speak out against islam. There are so many victims of Islam, we must try to put aside our differences and unite in our opposition.

Western politicians, the United Nations, the European Union, all human rights organisations, most of those in a position do say or do something are cowardly. 

There are many violations of human rights almost everywhere, but the most dominant and visible are the violations done in the name of Islam by muslims. They will not even sign up to any declarations of human rights.

Had the developed world had a conscience it would have defined what acceptable civilized behaviour is and condemned Islam for its barbarity. It seems that they go after and condemn everything but Islam.

also more here

http://realisticobserver.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/milo-yiannopoulos-o...

Milo Yiannopoulos: ‘Mainstream Muslim culture’ is the problem
By Jessica Chasmar-

 Gay conservative activist Milo Yiannopoulos says “mainstream Muslim culture,” not radical Islam, is to blame for Sunday’s terrorist attack at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida.

Mr. Yiannopoulos, a senior editor at Breitbart News, told Rich Zeoli in a radio interview that he believes all of Islam encourages violence against gays and women.

“I’m not talking about Islamists,” he said. “I’m not talking about terrorists. I’m not talking about radical Islam. I’m talking about mainstream Muslim culture. There are 11 Muslim countries in which I could be killed for being a homosexual. The state penalty is death. One hundred million people live in countries where the penalty for homosexuality is death. This is not radical Islam. This is mainstream Muslim society.

“Look what’s happening in Sweden,” he continued. “Look what’s happening anywhere in Germany, anywhere there are large influxes of a Muslim population. Things don’t end well for women and gays. Women are treated abominably everywhere in the Muslim world. Gays are treated even worse. It shouldn’t be a surprise to us that when we invite these people into western, democratic, capitalist, free societies that bad things start to happen.”

Mr. Yiannopoulos blamed politically correct politicians for pandering to Muslims.          


“The left has got to make a decision” he said. “Do they want to be regressive? And pander to Muslims and suck up to Islam at the expense of women and blacks and gays? Remember, the shooter in Orlando was working at G4S and said he wanted to kill all black people. He didn’t get fired. Why? Because he’s Muslim. One was scared. Do they want a world in which Muslims get to do and say whatever they want and these tragedies become common place? Because I don’t want to see America go that way. Or do we make a stand?

“The left has got to make a decision,” he said. “Either they want female emancipation and it wants gay rights or it wants Islam. It’s got to pick. “America is the greatest country in the world. It is a country founded on freedom, freedom of movement, free enterprise, property rights, the rule of law, the First and the Second Amendment. Those principles have created the greatest country in the world. Those things are under threat from an alien culture that respects none of those principles.”

Mr. Yiannopoulos is currently on his self-titled “Dangerous Faggot Tour” throughout American universities. He’s expected to give a speech about Islam’s treatment of gays Tuesday night at the University of Central Florida, just 20 minutes east of the gay nightclub Pulse, where 49 people were killed and 53 injured by a Muslim terrorist early Sunday morning.


Source: Washington Times

It's taken Milo a long time to wake up. 

Tatchell was awake in the early 1990s. Bruce Bawer by the early 2000s. As far as I can see, Milo has only turned his attention to Islam in the last 12 months. Consequently, he's unaware that things are much worse than he says. The 2016 Gallup poll could not have been better designed to allow Muslims to conceal their Nazism (and that's what many of them did). During the years when the Policy Exchange survey came out (2007) or the Gallup survey (2009) or the Gay Free Zone (2011), Milo was more interested in tech startups and social media. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milo_Yiannopoulos#Education  Even as late as 2014 he was embroiled in GamerGate, and in 2015 was chasing Feminists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milo_Yiannopoulos#Gamergate

He's kind of an enfant terrible, who seems to get embroiled in things that will make him more notorious (such as saying he's going straight because being gay is just not outrageous any more). 

Still, he's one more on our side. I'm glad he's woken up to this controversy, as it's far more important than how PC video games have become.  

 I saw people saying that the Peter McLoughlin article was a re-hash of what Bruce Bawer was writing in 2006. And that is probably true.  The specifics have changed, become magnified, but the basic problems are the same (they're just worse now because there are more Muslims).

Something more significant than the Orlando massacre is going to have to happen before our cowardly and treacherous media start to tell the truth about Islam. Even Milo recognizes that in the above article.

Following Obama’s lead, Hillary Clinton has put out the exact statement we’d expect.  Islam is not our enemy, it is a religion of peace, blah blah blah. Forgive me if I think her speechwriters are imams from Saudi Arabia.

The Left won’t blame Islam

Alarmingly, prominent liberals and homosexuals have fallen right in line.  They are blaming rifles, the NRA, masculinity, video games — anything but Islam.

Dan Savage blames toxic homophobia and toxic gun culture. Well Dan, I have news for you: toxic homophobia has a name, and the name is Islam.

Sadly, Milo's TV performance didn't live up to this speech. I wish he could camp it up less, in order to make his points better. He makes some very good points in his article. However, Leftism is a religion, and Leftist gays will struggle to give it up. 

I've come round to the phrase that is used quite casually on Gates of Vienna. What we are undergoing is a culture war. I don't know just how much of progressivism is going to be rolled back. Leftism is going to have to be marginalised. And when it is marginalised, the Left will return to terrorism - anyone remember Red Army Faction? Baader Meinhof? These kinds of Leftist terrorist groups will return. And they will regard the enemies of Islam as the enemies of Leftism.

Milo is saying what every rational, thinking and honest person must say.

I agree completely with every point that he makes.

We, free people, have a common enemy, Islam, and must fight against it until it is removed from free countries. It would take a global war to defeat Islam entirely.

You are right Joe, 

“These kinds of Leftist terrorist groups will return. And they will regard the enemies of Islam as the enemies of Leftism.”

If the Left and Islamists prevail it will be Rightist terrorist groups that rise. Right now however any right-wing terrorist attack is counter-productive. We have to win this culture war in the ballot box, something that is easier to do in countries like Switzerland, Slovakia and Hungary. We have to win the war of words and redouble our efforts. Get people to take the threats seriously and vote the Right way.

Even without the Cox incident I have been expecting the Brits to vote to stay in Europe.  It won’t make much difference because the muslim problem is a problem for the entire free-world, and it is only countries refusing to take in muslim immigrants that have fully understood this.

Jo Cox was killed on 16th June.

Note the date here: http://www.batleynews.co.uk/news/local/more-than-150-years-jail-for...

Halifax is 11 miles West of the town where Cox was killed. It may well turn out that the grooming scandal is the real reason why she was killed. 

Rotherham has 11 convictions for grooming. West Yorkshire has 47 convictions. We can reasonably expect that for every man convicted, 100 have got away with it. Here's one of the details from that Halifax trial.

http://www.pmclauth.com/news/how-100-men-were-able-to-prey-on-one-v...

If it turns out Cox was killed because MPs turned a blind eye to 3 decades of rape of schoolgirls, then there will be a lot of scared MPs in Yorkshire, Lancashire, and the Midlands.

Doesn't it seem more credible that someone would kill over Muslims being allowed to rape schoolgirls with impunity, than over Britain continuing to remain in an organisation which it's been in for 40 years?

Milo on why we should leave the EU to prevent muslim immigration ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJJZLwkcEhU&feature=em-uploademail

Joe, yes, I think he camps it up a bit too much.  He says he loves Daddy (Trump), but Trump, as a hard-nosed businessman, would know to keep clear of that.

Also, I wish he'd stop swearing.  I wince as he does it in his podcasts.  By all means do it in Europe, but I don't think he realises how it just doesn't fit in the U.S.  Doesn't he watch any American TV and get how squeaky clean it is?

In his visit to UC Irvine (podcast 12), he responds to a challenge from a Feminism supporter, but with his constant sidetracks I think he missed a key point.  The challenger said that Milo was short circuiting the conventional academic process of peer review and accepted authority.  Milo's response was to ask for an example of a valid issue (he never got one) and to say effectively "by their fruits ye shall know them".  All perfectly valid, but I think he should also have questioned that basis: peer review and accepted authority.

In science, those 2 tests are backed up by a 3rd test: experimental observation, test and prediction, preferably also using a 'control'.  Without the experiment, the peer review and accepted authority can merely reduce to the emperor walking naked from his palace, and only a little boy asks where his clothes are.  

At one time peer review said that the earth was flat.  At another time, the motion of the heavenly bodies was given by Copernicus, and so on. You get the idea.  With peer review and accepted authority, the latter can still be totally wrong.

Looked at from this vantage point, the centres for 'academic excellence' and 'scholastic rigour' the challenger was so keen on, need to be re-labelled as centres of propaganda and indoctrination.  In which case, there is no point in going to study there to check their validity, as the challenger was demanding.  In other words, his demand for participation in his academic processes, is merely a demand that we submit to his process of propaganda and indoctrination - or we get a fail grade. Surely this is an even more important point to make?

There's actually a name for this: its called argument by appeal to authority, argumentum ad verecundiam, and its such a blatant and species dirty trick, I would have preferred it if Milo had mocked the challenger for that trick, instead of joking remarks about lycra or whatever.

If it turns out Cox was killed because MPs turned a blind eye to 3 decades of rape of schoolgirls, then there will be a lot of scared MPs in Yorkshire, Lancashire, and the Midlands.

They would never allow such a truth to be revealed.  Just like the call the Orlando Muslim terrorist made to 911, any important facts linking to Islam will be removed.  Our 'great and good' have got this down to a fine art.

AND...

30 years ago this is EXACTLY the point that the Left would have made about academia.  But now that they are in control of academia, it becomes the only "objective" measure of things.

At the end of the day, I think Milo sees celebrity as a career. I also think that he (like Jack Buckby, etc.) see themselves getting jobs in the US (either as TV celebrities or in think tanks). Have a look at how Buckby presents himself.

http://www.jackbuckby.co.uk/

Alan Lake said:

Looked at from this vantage point, the centres for 'academic excellence' and 'scholastic rigour' the challenger was so keen on, need to be re-labelled as centres of propaganda and indoctrination.  In which case, there is no point in going to study there to check their validity, as the challenger was demanding. 

RSS

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service