The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Gay Victims of Kuffarphobia


Gay Victims of Kuffarphobia

We work to protect Gay people from the neo-fascists of the political left and the religious right.

Search Site:
Members: 17
Latest Activity: Oct 30

Discussion Forum

Forcing People to be Transsexual

Started by Joe. Last reply by Alan Lake Dec 22, 2014. 1 Reply

The new Egypt.

Started by paul collings. Last reply by paul collings Nov 2, 2014. 8 Replies

Why Cameron Disowned Douglas Murray

Started by Joe. Last reply by Alan Lake Dec 22, 2012. 6 Replies

Douglas Murray: What are we to do about Islam

Started by Joe. Last reply by paul collings Dec 21, 2012. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Gay Victims of Kuffarphobia to add comments!

Comment by Alan Lake on January 19, 2012 at 8:33

Well, I've never met her so I can only guess what she's really like. I like to try get inside peoples heads, and I think she (in part quite rightly) fancies herself as an intellectual luminary, unswayed by politically correct appeals to emotion.
But, whether she likes it or not, she is a child of an age (1960s?), and with it a pre-packaged set of conditioned beliefs. Well, some have slipped thru the net (of critical judgement that we begin to erect in our twenties.

She's making herself look foolish and doing all conservatives a diservice, with these ridiculous statements, which I believe rest on various technical errors and inbuilt prejudices. It ought to be easy to demolish them (altho until I actually try it against her, I could be deluding myself).

So, I don't believe that that video shows that argument against her won't work, it shws that it doesn't work with that protagonist. Also, the format of debate is too lugubrious and clumsy for affecting a mind like hers. Much better would be a tough interview, or an intensive round table dicussion.

Comment by Joe on January 18, 2012 at 12:08

Yes, debate is better than silencing people.

However, that's not what 2009 link you provide proves.  Ms. Phillips continued from then on to make even more stridently homophobic comments, such as her claim last year that "the gay lobby" is responsible for the islamisation of Europe.  There is little point in debating with jew-haters, or gay-haters, particularly when they have spent any amount of time espousing an opinion in public.

I've had success converting quiet racists into being anti-racists.  But they don't have a history of a "public persona" whose integrity/rationality they seek to protect.

Remarks like hers about "lifestyle choice" don't wash well with those lesbian and gay Brits who were given electric-shock treatment in the 1960s and 1970s for being gay.  I met two such people in the 1980s.  They were still gay, and they were furious that they had been tortured by the state.  That is where the deranged illiberal views of Ms. Phillps lead. 

Comment by Alan Lake on January 18, 2012 at 0:42

Surely this proves that debate is better than silencing people?

I find one of her arguments very funny, that being gay is a lifestyle choice. Would she say the same thing about cake, I wonder? For example:
"My friend John, deep down, likes cheese cake, but he persists in eating sponge cake. Its a lifestyle choice"

I think people eat what they want to eat.

Comment by Alan Lake on January 18, 2012 at 0:27
Comment by Alan Lake on January 18, 2012 at 0:19

I don't get the above article.

1. those 2 guys look like bikers, not nazis

2. why would jews be offended by this? christians yes, but not jews.

Comment by Alan Lake on June 28, 2011 at 11:40

Great, a working day, so all the people on benefits or some dumb State/Council job, can get together and plot the destruction of all the other people who are hard at work in the office.

"As Muslims we believe in ... the unacceptability of homosexuality which is often portrayed as a lifestyle choice."

These racist, homophobic bastards get away with anything, while the Cameron coward wets his pants.

Comment by Albert Case on June 27, 2011 at 2:47

East London Mosque breaks its promise on homophobic speakers after just eight days

Earlier this month, reporting the East London Mosque/London Muslim Centre’s latest pledge to ban homophobic preachers, I described how the mosque has repeatedly lied and broken such promises before: waiting a couple of months until the coast is clear, then bringing the extremists back.

This time, however, it has only taken just over a week for the mosque’s bad faith to emerge. The day after tomorrow, 29 June, it welcomes to its premises an organisation called Sex and Relationship Education Islamic (SRE Islamic), one of whose main purposes is to campaign for “the unacceptability of homosexuality which is often portrayed as a ...” That’s a quote from the first sentence of SRE Islamic’s statement of values.

SRE Islamic is run by members of Hizb ut Tahrir, a racist and extremist group which believes that Muslims should not mix with non-Muslims. Hizb ut Tahrir says that Muslims who believe in democracy are “kafir,” or unbelievers. Hizb ut Tahrir works for a worldwide Islamic superstate, or caliphate (as does the Islamic Forum of Europe, which runs the mosque.)

SRE Islamic’s director and Hizb ut Tahrir member, Yusuf Patel, will be speaking at Wednesday’s event, alongside the director of the East London Mosque himself, Dilowar Khan: a clear official endorsement by the mosque. Indeed, the meeting is co-sponsored by the mosque.

Let us remind ourselves what Salman Farsi, the mosque’s PR, said on 9 June, exactly 18 days ago: “Any speaker who is believed to have said something homophobic will not be allowed to use our premises.”

Wednesday’s meeting is not just with someone who has “said something homophobic,” but is organised by a campaign explicitly dedicated to promoting the “unacceptability of homosexuality.” The meeting was first advertised on 17 June, precisely eight days after Mr Farsi’s ringing pledge.

Could there be a clearer indication of just how much an East London Mosque promise is worth?

Comment by Joe on June 4, 2011 at 9:13
I meant Mohamme Hasnath, who admitted his guilt in marking east London as a Gay Free Zone. Sorry for the confusion. But it is clear that the UAF and Searchlight are also run by homophobic pricks.
Comment by Alan Lake on June 4, 2011 at 1:37
Sorry to be a bit dim, but who is the 'homophobic prick'?  Is it Nick Lowles of Searchlight?
Comment by Joe on June 3, 2011 at 21:14
Those "queer" morons had been hitherto prevented from using that venue by the political machinations of a gay male porn star. Yep, a porn star. The man clearly outranks the wart-hogs of Queers For Palestine in beauty, intellect, morals and political acumen. Those left-wing queers are just more traitors. It is no surprise to me that there are currently Israelis marching through the streets of Israel shouting "Death to Leftists". I feel like joining them, and I considered myself left-wing for the past 30 years.

Incidentally, it has come to my attention that at no point in the past week did Searchlight/Hope Not Hate even comment on the conviction of the islamo-fascist for the Gay Free Zone signs. Furthermore, on searching the UAF website via Google, it is clear that there was not one (not 1!) mention of those homophobic signs in the last 9 months (the signs first appeared in July 2010 in Nottingham).

Believe it or not, there are left-wing homos actually saying they feel sorry for the homophobic prick.

Members (17)


Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service