The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Artist & Heritage Victims of Kuffarphobia


Artist & Heritage Victims of Kuffarphobia

The artistic and cultural heritage of a society are often targeted by Islam, as a possible threat to its mono-cultural dominance, as first shown by Mohammed's zeal for killing poets (13 in all). When world heritage cultural treasures are destroyed, we are all the victim.

Search Site:
Members: 14
Latest Activity: Aug 15

Key Info

Relevant Organisations

Discussion Forum

The Islamic Destruction of Palmyra (Syria, 2015)

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Apr 23, 2016. 9 Replies

The Islamic Destruction of Alleppo (Syria, 1400 & 2013)

Started by paul collings. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Aug 26, 2015. 16 Replies

The Islamic Destruction of Libraries

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake May 23, 2015. 4 Replies

The Islamic Destruction of Ctesiphon (Persia, 637)

Started by shiva. Last reply by Philip Smeeton May 22, 2015. 1 Reply

Vasily Vasilyevich Vereshchagin,

Started by shiva. Last reply by Philip Smeeton May 11, 2015. 2 Replies

Britain: Lost Territory,

Started by shiva. Last reply by Kinana Apr 28, 2015. 9 Replies

The Islamic Destruction of Nalanda (India, 1193AD)

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by paul collings Feb 25, 2015. 2 Replies

Passion for Freedom

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton May 1, 2014. 2 Replies

Music Verboten to Muslims in America

Started by Joe. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Jun 16, 2013. 1 Reply

Fascists target Canadian Muslim artist over bra

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Apr 15, 2013. 3 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Artist & Heritage Victims of Kuffarphobia to add comments!

Comment by Alan Lake on May 21, 2017 at 5:13

We could say that Modern Art suffers from the same hollowing out as democracy does from relativism and the search for ever more equality.  Only in the case of Art, its the search for ever more freedom (from defined styles) and the attempt to differentiate oneself from the previous styles.

We could even say that both these processes are the logical conclusion of what was started in the Enlightenment, with the birth of reason, and its purported supremacy over past knowledge.

Someone wrote a brilliant essay on this post-enlightenment slide downhill - which was quite a surprise to me as we naturally assume that the enlightenment was a great thing - but I can't remember who it was right now.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on May 20, 2017 at 17:34

Cleon Peterson is a political artist and political art is never good (unless it rises to a level of art above it's message)) and is only shocking. Mostly it is just bad illustration of pathetic ideas.

I was always criticised because my work (paintings) were not consistent. Having created successfully that which I wanted to achieve I moved on even into different styles (my primary objective being to create an Art work). But curators, the ones that decide what is art and what is not, require artists to repeat themselves. The curator's only chance at fame is to be the one that consistently recognises the next genius or trend. Curators are unnecessary and inhibiting, and are the reason there is so much crap in art galleries and museums. For them aesthetics are not enough, the work has to be sensational, shocking, provocative and violent; political and disgusting. It has above everything else to be politically correct; non-“racist“ and all-including multicultural, vibrantly diverse and positive to everything except patriotism and truth.

It does not matter whether you have talent or not, that is superfluous, the only chance you have to succeed is if you shock or if your have the right political message. In other words that you no longer produce art, but are actively a  political far-left internationalist inter-racialist. The standard of the work is invariably low, these people simply cannot paint or draw and have no colour perception other than glaring and stark banality. They are un-talented. All they do is crudely illustrate infantile conceptions that disgust, discriminate and insult sensibilities.

Comment by Antony on May 17, 2017 at 14:09

The passion of Cleon Peterson ;

Comment by Alan Lake on April 12, 2017 at 17:13
A lying soft jihadist.
Comment by Philip Smeeton on April 12, 2017 at 11:42

"Curiouser and curiouser! "said Alice.

Everything is political now, entertainment no longer exists. We are bombarded with minority interests every time we turn on the telly or watch a movie.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on April 4, 2017 at 9:33

A classic example of someone saying the truth for a change, being accused of bigotry, then being forced to go into denial and damage control.

“A coward dies a thousand times before his death, but the valiant taste of death but once.” - Bill Shakespeare.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on March 10, 2017 at 17:29

I was aware that the liberal-socialists were rewriting history and editing literature, thank you for making me aware that they are also rewriting art history and redefining art. Seems that there are no areas of human activity left that have not become multicultural and antiracist. It has gone from anti-art to anti-culture, the end of culture. Art has become mediocre or disgustingly provocative. It's like we should be ashamed of being beautiful because ugly people find it offensive. The art revolution was initially interesting intellectually but has degenerated into trash, criminal public vandalism, graffiti, has been raised to the level of art, where as in fact it is a mediocrity and an insult to the very concept of art.

The mantra is "I am an artist because I say so" and "what I make is art because I say so"

I am a painter artist myself and strive to create art, but it is up to other people to judge if I succeed or not, some sort of consensus. What we call the great art is that which has consistently attracted admiration and been ascribed value.

I do though also believe that belief in God demonstrates a lack of intellect. And i find abstract art aesthetically pleasing.

Comment by Alan Lake on March 9, 2017 at 4:05

Iraqi soldiers recapture hollowed-out shell of Mosul museum from ISIS

Comment by Philip Smeeton on February 15, 2017 at 15:08
Comment by Philip Smeeton on February 14, 2017 at 10:46

There was a brief period in the past, around 1900, when things really were better.

There was hope. Now we despair because we have lost that which bound us together as a Nation.


Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service