The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Jewish Victims of Kuffarphobia


Jewish Victims of Kuffarphobia

To protect Jews, whose 4 Freedoms are under particular attack

Search Site:
Members: 58
Latest Activity: on Thursday

Key Info

Nazi Palestinian Children - training to kill Jews

Who do the territories belong to?

Discussion Forum

Iran Nuclear Deal

Started by Almog. Last reply by Alan Lake Oct 14. 8 Replies

Israel, Islam and Jew Hatred

Started by Kinana. Last reply by paul collings Jul 23. 7 Replies

Paris’s Kristallnacht

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Philip Smeeton Oct 31, 2015. 1 Reply

Islamic Jew Hatred

Started by Joe. Last reply by Joe Oct 9, 2015. 10 Replies


Started by Almog Apr 16, 2015. 0 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Jewish Victims of Kuffarphobia to add comments!

Comment by Albert on March 8, 2011 at 5:09

Jewish Student Brings Civil Rights Case Against Berkeley

A first of its kind federal civil rights case has been filed in United States District Court in Oakland, California, against the University of California at Berkeley, by a Jewish student who had been assaulted on campus last year by a leader of a Muslim student organization during a pro-Israel event.

It's about time. The persecution of Jews on university and college campuses is another leftwing dirty secret. Islamic antisemitism is the new radical chic. The modern age of the barbarian.

Download Felber v. Yudof et al Complaint-1

 Jewish Student Brings Civil Rights Case Against Berkeley
 Claims the University failed to take measures to protect against racially motivated assault
 A first of its kind federal civil rights case has been filed in United States District Court in Oakland, California, against the University of California at Berkeley, the Regents of the University of California and their ranking officials, by a Jewish student who had been assaulted on campus last year by a leader of a Muslim student organization during a pro-Israel event.
On March 5, 2010, Jessica  Felber, a twenty year old Jewish student at Berkeley, was attacked and injured on campus because of her Jewish ancestry and religious affiliation. At the time she was holding a sign stating “Israel wants Peace.” Her assailant, Husam Zakharia, also a UC Berkeley student, was the leader of Students for Justice in Palestine (“SJP”) at Berkeley.
Defendants were fully aware that Zakharia, the  SJP and similar student groups  had been involved in other incidents on campus to incite violence against and intimidate Jewish and other students. Nevertheless, in clear dereliction of their legal responsibilities, Defendants took no reasonable steps to protect Ms. Felber and others.
The Complaint  further describes how the SJP conspires and coordinates with the Muslim Student Association (“MSA”), which has a publicly documented history of affiliation with and support of organizations deemed “terror organizations” by the United States Department of State. That they have resorted to intimidation and harassment is evidenced most recently by the fact that the  District Attorney of Orange County, California, has indicted eleven students from these groups for inciting and disrupting a speech given by the Israeli Ambassador to the United States at the University of California, Irvine.
The Complaint charges that the assault was the result of the university having:  (1) fostered  and encouraged campus terrorist incitements by the SJP and the MSA) ; (2) turned a blind eye to the perpetrators of illegal activities; (3) failed to effectively discipline the MSA and SJP for their pro-terrorist programs, goals and conduct; despite having ample notice that such violence was foreseeable;  and (4) failed to provide adequate security to prevent the violence, harassment and intimidation which occurred on March 5, 2010.
Ignoring complaints from students about the poisonous climate on campus, defendants condoned, allowed and enabled groups such as the MSA and the SJP to threaten, harass and intimidate Jewish students and to endanger their health and safety. Their tolerance of the growing cancer of a dangerous anti-Semitic climate on its campuses, and their failure to take adequate measures to quell it, violated the rights of Ms. Felber’s and other students to enjoy a peaceful campus environment free from threats and intimidation.
As the Complaint reminds us,  the on-campus activities of the SJP and MSA against plaintiff and other students of Jewish religion and ancestry  - and the university's failure to confront them - present a disturbing echo of the darkest period in history: the incitement, intimidation, harassment and violence carried out under the Nazi regime and those of its allies in Europe against Jewish students and scholars in the leading universities of those countries during the turbulent years leading up to and including the Holocaust.
There is a genuine fear by Ms. Felber and other students of Jewish ancestry on campuses throughout the University of California system that the tragic lessons of history have not yet been learned by these defendants. They fear that the University of California campuses are no longer places of hope and dignity, of academic and personal freedom, or of peaceful life and personal safety.
Ms. Felber is represented by Joel H. Siegal a civil rights attorney in San Francisco, and New York attorney Neal M. Sher, who for many years was the Director of the Justice Department’s Nazi prosecution office.

Comment by Albert on February 20, 2011 at 4:30

How does Moral Relativism affect the way in which Israel relates to its Arab minority?

"...We are dealing with politicians who daily perceive Arab hostility but who cannot cope with such hostility because of their compulsive, egalitarian mentality. A mindless self-defense mechanism induces them to defame as "racist" anyone who, out of concern for the cultural self-preservation of the Jewish people, recommends some limitation on the voting power of Israel's burgeoning Arab population. (The simple desire for cultural self-preservation prompted Japan to limit citizenship to ethnic Japanese. Which indicates that democracies which do not make equality a fetish or totalitarian principle [need not succumb from egalitarinism].)

Is it rational, is it just, that Arabs opposed to Israel's existence should be accorded the equal political rights of Jews who work or fight and even die for Israel's existence? How shall we describe those who insist on such indiscriminate, such monstrous, equality even though this democratic principle will logically lead to democratic Israel's demise?

"...the egalitarian and culturally neutral principle of one adult/one vote will enable Israel's prolific Arabs to transform the country into an Arab-Islamic dictatorship. ...compulsive egalitarianism prevents them from addressing this dilemma. This compulsion, permeated by fear, inhibits politicians across the political and religious spectrum from confronting the problem of Israel's shrinking Jewish majority. They surely know from current estimates that Arabs, now 20% of Israel's population, may number 8.5 million by the year 2010, a demographic time-bomb. Even before then, and thanks to the policy of "territory for peace," Israel will have the highest population density in the world!

- Prof. Paul Eidelberg is the Co-founder and President of the Foundation for Constitutional Democracy in the Middle East

Comment by Albert on February 20, 2011 at 4:19


Historically, what has been the greatest diplomatic error Israel has made in its relationships with its neighbors?

  • "Israel's indecisiveness in the annexation of these territories rekindled the PLO's hope for a second Palestinian state [Jordan being the first] and the subsequent destruction of the Jewish one. Israel's policy stemmed from an incorrect assesment of the situation. Its leaders, brought up on the European values of democracy tried to transplant these values into Middle Eastern soil. They believed that the Arabs would eventually understand how advantageous it would be for them to have the Jews as their neighbors. They were promulgating these values, completely ignoring their incompatibility with Islamic doctrine. The idea of the Arab empire was still fresh in the Arabs' memory; the Jews were "dhimmi" in their eyes. To allow the creation of an independent Jewish state in the middle of the Arab world under these circumstances was absolutely intolerable to Arab nationalists. The Peel Commission Report confirmed this in 1937 by stating that the conflict between the Arabs' and the Jews' aspirations is "irrepressible" and "irreconcilable" and that it is "difficult to be an Arab patriot and not to hate the Jews."

    - Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations Yosef Tekoah, in an address made in New York, on April 15, 1975, on the occasion of the twenty-seventh anniversary of Israel's independence


  • "...Jewish thought has traditionally been bewildered by and unable to account for or come to terms with the persistence of Evil..."

    - Jacques Givet, "The Anti-Zionist Complex"

Comment by Indoeuropean on January 9, 2011 at 18:47
Comment by Pat McCrann on November 30, 2010 at 19:01
This article talks about the liberal media's somewhat quiet response to the Wiki leaks on Middle East fears of a nuclear Iran...
Comment by Pat McCrann on November 30, 2010 at 18:16
Many thanks for posting that link Udi. I've spent the last year or two trying to educate myself on what is really going on there in the bits of spare time I can find. But that is THE best video and the best summary on the subject that I have seen. And I discovered I had the picture right too. This video needs to go viral!!

Thanks again,
Comment by Udi Shayat on November 30, 2010 at 17:22
Following link is 5 Minutes video explanation on the ISRAELI/PALESTINIAN simple to explain problem, by Dennis Prager- UPDATED video version:
Comment by Pat McCrann on November 30, 2010 at 15:12
Here's a great quote from that link by Walid Shoebat...

“Why is it that on June 4th 1967 I was a Jordanian and overnight I became a Palestinian?” “We did not particularly mind Jordanian rule. The teaching of the destruction of Israel was a definite part of the curriculum, but we considered ourselves Jordanian until the Jews returned to Jerusalem. Then all of the sudden we were Palestinians - they removed the star from the Jordanian flag and all at once we had a Palestinian flag”. “When I finally realized the lies and myths I was taught, it is my duty as a righteous person to speak out”.
Comment by Pat McCrann on November 30, 2010 at 15:06
If you get a chance Kinana have a look at this...
Comment by Kinana on November 30, 2010 at 13:35
thanks for this survey. if true then true peace in that area is even more impossible than i imagined it could be. the 'leaders' of the palistinians, do they include Hamas and those in the West Bank? whatever, if the people continue to believe and follow their leaders then peace is simply not going to happen. we (and Israel) must get used to it and make adjustments accordingly.

Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service