It takes a nation to protect the nation
Ameaca islamica - the islamic threat - the denial
Trata-se de uma ameaça extraordinária, que exige respostas extraordinárias e não a cobarde e suicida atitude de apaziguamento que a esquerda preconiza e que se traduz na rendição perante a ameaça e na auto-censura, fazendo deslizar o continente para um estado geral de dhimmitude.
A esquerda não consegue de um modo geral livrar-se de uma identificação subliminar com os muçulmanos, a quem vê sob o prisma marxista, como “povos oprimidos” e recusa-se a encarar o problema em toda a sua dimensão.
Uma espreitadela à demografia da Bósnia, pode dar pistas.
No Kosovo ainda foi pior
E assim que os muçulmanos ganharam a batalha demográfica, soltaram-se os demónios da guerra.
O que se passou nos Balcãs, está já a acontecer lentamente no coração da Europa, com a França a caminho de se transferir para o dar-al-Islam.
Há que acabar com o multiculturalismo e o masoquismo cultural que lhe subjaz. Não temos de aceitar como válidas as práticas sociais do Islão e muito menos as ameaças e as fatwas que os mulahs declaram contra qualquer pessoa que “ofenda o Islão”.
Temos de limitar seriamente a imigração provinda de países muçulmanos e estimular a oriunda de outros espaços culturais (hindus, chineses, etc), com práticas sociais não agressoras.
Não podemos mais permitir a edificação de mesquitas na Europa com fundos vindos dos países muçulmanos e que funcionam hoje como postos de comando avançados da jihad contra o dar-al-harb.
Há que aplicar medidas duras às comunidades muçulmanas, restringindo a liberdade a quem quer que tenha viajado de e para países como o Paquistão e Arábia Saudita, e a quem adopte comportamentos públicos de desafio e ameaça.
Há que deportar todos aqueles que ataquem, por palavras e actos, os valores prevalecentes nas sociedades ocidentais.
Não é politicamente correcto escrever isto, mas temos de descriminar, até que doa de modo a que a comunidade islâmica se sinta pressionada a alterar comportamentos e a educar os filhos para viverem pacificamente nas sociedade hospedeiras, em vez de os mandar para as lavagens ao cérebro nas madrassas do país de origem.
Eles odeiam-nos porque somos “decadentes” e pela forma liberal como encaramos o sexo, o álcool, etc.
Nós temos de fazer com que o resultado desse ódio se volte contra eles.
Porque no fim de contas, qualquer sociedade que quer sobreviver tem de distinguir quem são os amigos e quem são os inimigos.
Few people today have clarified doubts about the threat that Islam poses to Europe, not only in the instrumental aspect of the terrorist act, but rather the existential threat of subversion of values and demographic ride.
This is a formidable threat, requiring extraordinary responses and not suicidal and cowardly attitude of appeasement that the left advocates and that translates into surrender to the threat and self-censorship, sliding the continent to a general state of dhimmitude .
The left can not generally get rid of a subliminal identification with Muslims, whom he has seen through the prism of Marxism, as "oppressed peoples" and refuses to face the problem in all its dimensions.
A look at the demographics of Bosnia, can give clues.
In the mid 70's, the Serbs had gone from 44% to 30% Muslims and 25% to 45%.
Kosovo was still worse
And so the Muslims won the battle demographic loosened up the demons of war.
What happened in the Balkans, is already happening slowly in the heart of Europe, with France on the way to moving to give al-Islam.
The future is not auspicious if Europe refuses to see the problem for what it is: Islam threatens us!
We must do away with multiculturalism and cultural masochism that underlies it. We have to accept as valid the social practices of Islam, much less threats and fatwas that declare mulahs against anyone who "offends Islam."
We must severely limiting immigration from Muslim countries and stimulate coming from other cultural (Hindu, Chinese, etc.), with social practices not aggressors.
We can no longer allow the construction of mosques in Europe with funds from Muslim countries and which operate today as advanced command posts of jihad against the give-al-harb.
We must implement tough measures to Muslim communities, restricting the freedom to anyone who has traveled to and from countries such as Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, who adopt behaviors and public challenge and threat.
We must deport all those who attack, by words and deeds, the values prevailing in Western societies.
It's not politically correct to write this, but we have to discriminate, until it hurts so that the Muslim community feel pressured to change behavior and educate children to live peacefully in society host, instead of sending them to the brainwashing in madrassas in the country of origin.
They hate us because we are "decadent" liberal and the way we view sex, alcohol, etc..
We have to make the result of this hatred will turn against them.
Because in the end, any company [country] that wants to survive has to distinguish who are friends and who are enemies.
- Anexos
-
-
images.jpg, 12 KB
-
Respostas a este tópico
-
Permalink Responder até Kinana em
-
Joana, thanks for this. Who wrote it?
it might be a translation problem but when I read this
'We can no longer allow the construction of mosques in Europe with funds from Muslim countries...'
I think we must not allow any new Mosque construction anywhere in Europe and it is not a matter of the source of funding. A mosque, as the rest of the article says, is a source of agressive divisions in society which work to establish sharia-land in the host country. It cannot be otherwise. Until the teachings of Islam change and become more hospitable and contribuitory to the host countries those same countries should not allow space for Islam.
-
-
Permalink Responder até Joe em
-
Absolutely. There should be no more mosques built. The people of europe have been lied to about every aspect of islam. We have islamic experts telling us that islam is fascist, we have the proof of the evils of islam from their books of sharia law which spell out exactly what the future is that significant numbers of muslims want here, we have islamic parties like Hizb ut Tahrir (and probably 100 muslim organisations who push the same line of islamic fascism).
-
-
Permalink Responder até Joana C Dias em
-
Dear kinana, usually i "grab" a quote that somehow interests me and comment on it, the translation its googles.xx
Kinana disse:
Joana, thanks for this. Who wrote it? ...
-
-
-
Yes, you re right shouldnt be allowed any kind of funding for mosques, i meant that its even worse that those funds are allowed in .
Kinana disse:it might be a translation problem but when I read this
'We can no longer allow the construction of mosques in Europe with funds from Muslim countries...'
I think we must not allow any new Mosque construction anywhere in Europe and it is not a matter of the source of funding. A mosque, as the rest of the article says, is a source of agressive divisions in society which work to establish sharia-land in the host country. It cannot be otherwise. Until the teachings of Islam change and become more hospitable and contribuitory to the host countries those same countries should not allow space for Islam.
-
-
Permalink Responder até paul collings em
-
It might help if you see the population explosion that has taken place across the Middle east and north Africa, MENA.
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Demographics_Of_Africa_And_The_Mi...
The area cannot sustain this population growth, the people are starving, but more importantly they cannot supply enough clean water to drink.
The people who will come from these areas to europe, including Russia, and to a lesser degree America, (north and south) will be desparate. death means nothing to them, but when they reach a western democratic country they will demand life. These people have no choice, if they want to live, other than to move.
The Mosques are being built, and the roads are being paved. They are coming. We need to stop doing anything that helps a foriegn culture come and take over. Most of the people in the MENA don't have a grand mosque to pray in, once they are here they become radicalised in the western built saudi funded, wahabbi taught mosques. The Mosques are the rally points.
The Greeks wanted to put a huge fence up along its boarder to stop the immigration problem, (its estimate 70% + of illegals come via Greece) but the EU said NO!. The reason can only be because they didn't want a 'Berlin style wall' built that would have exposed the sheer numbers of desperate people entering Europe.
It would have looked bad as i'm sure thousands would have reached the fence and then just camped around it, (like they do in calais france around the channel tunnel) waiting for their chance to 'run the fence'.
As i said, nothing will stop this exodus. They are being driven by their own govenments, by wars, by a lack of food and water, and they are being welcomed and incouraged by the policys of the Europeans, and the USA. We have to blame ourselves for allowing this to be the only course open to us. Our own demise.
Joana C Dias said:
Yes, you re right shouldnt be allowed any kind of funding for mosques, i meant that its even worse that those funds are allowed in .
-
Welcome to 4 Freedoms!
(currently not admitting new members)
Page Monitor
Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.
Muslim Terrorism Count
Mission Overview
Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them.
At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.
Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.
We need to capture this information before it is removed. The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.
We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.
The 4 Freedoms
These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper).
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:
- Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"
© 2023 Created by Netcon.
Powered by
