The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

I suspect that if this man continues "reforming" islam, then he will probably be the first muslim that the "extremists" assassinate.

It's not clear from this report if the libel was over the claim that he was ahmadi/sacked from Cape Town university.  It may well be that the court refused to judge whether or not he was a true muslim.  

It would be interesting to see what the courts would do in the case of an Ahmadi who sued for someone saying he was not a true muslim.

Dr Taj Hargey won substantial damages from the Muslim Weekly newspaper in a High Court libel case after it accused him of not being a true Muslim.

Dr Hargey, who previously backed a school's legal battle over its refusal to let a pupil wear the niqab in class, claimed the attack reflected tactics by the "Muslim Establishment" to smear those who question their authority.

In what is believed to be the first case of its kind in the UK, Dr Hargey sued and won a five-figure sum from the newspaper.

Dr Hargey said: "This historic case highlights the right to freedom and dissent within the British Muslim community and represents a crushing defeat for Muslim McCarthyism in this country.

"Just as US politicians terrorized the American electorate by unfairly labelling their foes as communists or communist sympathisers, the Muslim clergy uses the same intimadatory tactics to impose theological uniformity and cultural compliance in the community.

"Iconoclastic thinkers, liberals and non-conformists who dare to challenge this self-assumed religious authority in Islam by presenting a rational or alternative interpretation of their faith are invariably branded as apostates, heretics and non-believers."

Dr Hargey, chairman of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford (MECO), had brought proceedings in London's High Court against the publisher and editor-in-chief of The Muslim Weekly, a leading newspaper within the community.

His advocate, David Price, told Mr Justice Eady that the May 2006 article alleged that Dr Hargey held himself out as the chairman of MECO and a practising Muslim when he was a Qadiani and therefore a non-Muslim - a matter that he sought to conceal.

It also alleged that he was misleading the public by holding himself out as the chairman of a Muslim organisation and arranging events in that capacity, notwithstanding his true non-Muslim beliefs.

Mr Price said that it also claimed that Dr Hargey was sacked from his post teaching Islamic studies at the University of Cape Town as a result of the fact that he was a closet Qadiani.

He added that the truth was that Dr Hargey was not a Qadiani but had always been a devout and observant Muslim.

He spoke and lectured widely about Islam and had at no stage misled the public or represented himself as anything other than a committed mainstream Muslim.

In fact, Mr Price said, Dr Hargey was well known as a passionate believer of orthodox Sunni Islam and regularly appeared as a key representative of the Islamic faith in academia and the media, including regional and national television and radio programmes.

He was not dismissed from his post in Cape Town, where his academic responsibility was history and not Islamic studies, but left the university of his own accord at the end of his fixed-term appointment contract because he had been offered a better research position elsewhere which he chose to take up.

Afterwards, Dr Hargey said the settlement would also have significant repercussions for those calling for the imposition of Sharia law in Britain.

He said he has been a "thorn in the side of Muslim hierarchy" because he has openly endorsed non-niqab and non-beard-wearing Muslims, sanctioned marriages of Muslim women to men of other faiths, actively promoted mixed congregations in mosques, arranging for the first ever female-led Muslim congregational prayers to be held in the UK last October.

In 2007, he offered to help fund a school's legal battle over its refusal to let a pupil wear the niqab in class.

The settlement was revealed in a statement read out in the High Court. Muslim Media Ltd and Ahmed Malik have apologised and agreed to pay Dr Hargey substantial damages and his legal costs.

Views: 780

Replies to This Discussion

Its no good Islam proclaiming that the terrorists have highjacked their religion, and then persicute moderate Muslims.  By claiming that Dr Hargey's views made him a non muslim, and the smear campaign that followed has shown how the mainstream protectors of the faith believe Islam should be practised.

It is quite clear that moderate islam requires its female victims to accept beatings. The removal of their private parts, the wearing of some form of covering, and a life of near worthless existance. And thats just for starters. It is their (men and women) duty  to engage in jihad, pray five times a day, and follow the example set by their prophet muhammad. What they eat, how they wash, even how they go to the loo.

The followers of Islam are like children. Unable to do anything with out refering back to their instruction manual, the Koran. With more detailed instruction in the Hadith.

I also note because of Dr Hargeys moderate views how quick the Muslim establishment were to label him a non muslim, when they never label terrorist murderers rapists and women beaters as non muslim, always insisting on muslims who have commited any of these so called un islamic offences (in the name of islam) on having their rights as muslims up held.

I wonder what would have happened if osama bin laden had been given a proper autopsy, his brain removed and put in a pickle jar and what was left of him cremated and his ashes thrown into a swamp. I'm sure there'd have been riots. And yet there was a man who'd inspired the death of thousands in the name of islam, and helped create thousands of jihadi's. Would islam descibe him as a good muslim, or a bad muslim. Or no muslim at all.

I wish the good Dr well. And i hope islam doesn't kill him. Time will tell.  


Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2022   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service