The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Muslim couple sue school who banned their nine-year-old daughter from wearing a hijab

  • The parents, who have not been named, claim the school's dress code is a violation of their daughter's religious freedom
  • But the school claims they were made aware of the policy two years ago when she enrolled
  • Now the couple are taking the school to court over the hijab ban


Dispute: A Muslim couple are taking the school attended by their nine-year-old daughter to court after she was banned from wearing a hijab. Pictured is a girl wearing a hijab in Kabul, Afghanistan. File image

A school is being sued by a Muslim couple after it banned pupils from wearing the traditional Islamic headscarf.

They launched their legal battle with St Cyprian's Greek Orthodox primary in south London after withdrawing their nine-year-old from the school when she was banned from wearing one.

The parents say it would be a sin for their daughter's head to be uncovered while in the presence of male teachers as she has 'reached puberty'. 

After failing to gain the support of the school governors, they have now launched a legal action to overturn the ban.

The school now faces a High Court Case amid claims that the uniform policy is a violation of the child's religious freedom.

But Kate Magliocco, head of St Cyprian's Greek Orthodox Primary School in Thornton Heath, south London, said the parents were informed about their uniform policy when their child, whose brother remains a pupil at the school, was first admitted at seven.

She said: 'The school is being taken to the High Court by parents of a Muslim girl.

'They believe that, because she is nine, she has reached puberty and it would be a sin for her not to be covered because the school has male teachers.

'The decision not to allow her to wear a headscarf was taken by the governing body.

'The school has a very particular uniform policy, which is shared with parents and, as head, I must follow the plan.


'The pupil in question came to us from a private school.

'Her parents actively chose us and, before she arrived, we held a meeting which included details of the uniform plan.'

She added: 'They are a really nice family and it is a regrettable situation for both sides.'

Government guidance on school uniforms states that schools should 'act reasonably' in accommodating religious beliefs when it comes to hair, clothes and jewellery, but heads have the final word on restricting religious dress.

Admission details on the school's website begin with the promise: 'The children of St Cyprian's will be equipped with the knowledge, skills and spirituality to enable them to achieve their full potential and to prepare them to contribute positively to the challenges of a diverse multi-cultural society.'

The dispute over the ban on the hijab will now go to the High Court, a move the school described as 'regrettable'

The dispute over the ban on the hijab will now go to the High Court, a move the school described as 'regrettable'

It adds that the school will 'respect the religious beliefs and practice of all staff, pupils and parents'. 

The uniform policy on the school website requires girls to wear a dark blue coat, an optional blazer, a skirt, white blouse and a navy blue pullover, but it does not mention a ban on headscarves.

There have been a number of legal challenges launched after pupils fell foul of school dress policy on religious and racial grounds.

Shabina Begum successfully challenged her Luton school, which had refused top allow her to wear a traditional gown, six years ago. The judgement was later overturned. 

A court hearing is due to take place next month.

Read more: 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Views: 67

Replies to This Discussion

Points to note:

  • The parents agreed with the uniform policy on entry.  It is time to stop being polite and merely describe their actions as "regrettable", as the school does: the parents are liars and tricksters
  • This is part of a deliberate policy to destroy all centres of non-Islamic culture, while the Islamic centres merely grow stronger and more numerous.  Or would any non-Muslim parent, Gay or woman like to teach at, or have their children attend, a Muslim school then campaign for equal rights over there?  Thought not.
  • This is part of the jihad by litigation, from which the entire education system and employers are suffering.  The average school (or employer) simply doesn't have the resources to take on this kind of legal fight, especially if the Muslim protagonist is being supported by their well funded pressure groups.


Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2023   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service