The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Slavery Victims


Slavery Victims

Any ideology which accepts the use of slavery, denies the 4 freedoms. This room covers such use, upto the present day.

Search Site:
Members: 14
Latest Activity: Oct 5

Key Info

Many people are unaware of the pivotal role in the slave trade played by Muslim merchants that brought the slaves to the coast for sale, and are similarly unaware that slavery was still practised by several Islamic states well into the 20th century.  White slaves were even captured by Muslim raiders from the coasts of Europe and Britain and taken back to the Middle East. Indeed, there was a defined process of ransom for recovering those who were well enough connected. Slavery is codified in the Islamic scriptrures, and is still practised even today in Sudan, under the authority of those texts.

The Islamic Slave Trade:

Discussion Forum

Sex Slaves Market and Harem

Started by Indoeuropean. Last reply by Joe Aug 7, 2013. 1 Reply

Overview: Slavery, Islam and White Guilt

Started by Joe. Last reply by paul collings Aug 4, 2013. 1 Reply

Arabs and the Slave Trade

Started by Joe. Last reply by Joe May 1, 2013. 3 Replies

Slave Chains

Started by shiva. Last reply by Alan Lake Aug 9, 2012. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Slavery Victims to add comments!

Comment by Philip Smeeton on August 31, 2014 at 12:08

That's cheap, I expect that they are a top export commodity in the Arab world.

Comment by Joe on August 31, 2014 at 9:10

The Caliphate taking women as slaves, selling them for $25.

Comment by Alan Lake on August 20, 2014 at 2:10

Of course, you wouldn't be allowed to produce such a video nowadays.  Rather than stop such cruel slavery, the cowards would rather beware of "offending" Islam.

Comment by Antony on August 19, 2014 at 12:49

islam & Slavery

Comment by Antony on May 27, 2014 at 6:51
Comment by paul collings on May 3, 2014 at 12:17

There has been a concerted effort to paint White people as evil/bad. If you look at recent history, Hitler, Stalin from Europe that could well seem true.

We can look to others in recent times, like Franco, Mussolini, and the south American dictators, who depending on your political motives can be any colour or race you like, I refer to the case of Treyvon Martin And whether his killer George Zimmerman was white black, Hispanic, or whatever.  

There was all the eastern European dictators who were white, they were evil, and a multitude of black dictators from Africa (and still are) who are evil.

If we look back in history and recall the name of Genghis Khan, was he any less evil. You can call him a great leader, but try telling that to all the people who had their backs broken on a barrel, trampled under a horse or slash by a sword.

What about Alexandra the Great. How great would have thought he was when you were pegged out in the desert with your eye lids cut open, or while you was watching your village get raised to the ground.

I don't suffer white guilt, but I see history for what it is. History. Something to be learned from. At times it may look like the white coloured humans  are better the black coloured people, but time will put that into perspective.

On the whole most people are decent. Individuals are often evil, we all have a lot to learn. But I don't think on an historical basis anyone can claim the moral high ground. Its what we do in the future that will decide if the human race as a whole is good or evil. The future is catching up with us, and the lines are being drawn.

Will people do what's right. Or will they join the side they think will win the ideological war.

With the whole world divided between black and white, east and west, man, and women, old and young, rich and poor, Islam and non Islam, capitalist and socialist, I think the only winner in the short term will be evil. And it won't be bothered what colour you are.      

Comment by Philip Smeeton on May 3, 2014 at 10:04

What it all boils down to is- "only white people bad". An objective (unbiased) view of history would show that they were (are) no worse than any other colour and in many cases they were (are) less evil. We have every reason to be proud of European acheivement. I do not suffer from white-guilt, what pains me is being falsely accused of wrongdoing.

We are envied for our success by those that are incompetant and that use us to excuse their own laziness.

Comment by paul collings on May 2, 2014 at 13:26

The taking of slaves is as old as the human race, Almost, if we're to sue everyone for every wrong doing in history, we may as well all go to war.

The Egyptians were big on slaves. so were the Greeks, and the Persians. It was people from the Islamic nations that continued the trade of slavery, and indeed its written in their lovely book that taking slaves is permissible.

The slave trade still exists in places like Arabia. But no one cares about that. It is looking more and more like its a ploy to keep racism and  division alive in 21st century life.

And its working.   

Comment by Joe on May 2, 2014 at 12:52
Comment by Antony on May 2, 2014 at 11:55

Phil - agreed - in addition, these people have already had the lion's share of reparations in the form of 3rd world aid, welfare benefits etc anyway.


Members (14)


Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

The threats to Secular Democracy (SD) arise due to fundamental vulnerabilities (or bugs) in its constitutional model. Hence the 4 Freedoms definitions give 4 corrections to those constitutions.

We are not hopeful of those corrections being adopted, because SD rests on an even more fundamental fallacy: that it is similar to Adam Smith's free marketplace of prices - which leads to a successful economy.

Therefore, The 'open marketplace' of ideas driven by an invisible hand of rational self interest, is thought to lead to successful government.  But ideological faction is not equivalent to economic grouping, because the rational self interest of ideological actors performs differently to that of economic actors. Consequently, the open society of SD, will succumb gradually to any strong, unified gang, of which, Islam is one example.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks; nor to read them; nor even to record them, so 4F gives only a sample view of how far it has advanced and by what methods. We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and will force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow Muslims the possibility of escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close the 4 vulnerabilities in the standard model of Western Secular Democracy.
1. Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of free speech and democracy
2. Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed -except one advocating the end of free speech and democracy
3. Freedom from Religion
Religion & culture operate freely in the private sphere, but are regulated by law in the public sphere, which is kept completely secular
4. Freedom of Resources
The government is not allowed to control resources which can just as well be directed by individual choices

© 2014   Created by Netcon.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service