The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Intro to letter re ISEB Revision Guide

I came across a Study Guide for primary school pupils recently. I went to the section on Islam and found it so deficient I sent the letter below to the teacher who showed me the Guide. The teacher will pass on my letter to the author of the Study Guide, Mr Michael Wilcockson. The age group for this Guide is 12-13 years. The Independent Schools Examinations Board is the group in the UK which prepares pupils for entrance exams to fee-paying (i.e. private) secondary schools. Mr Wilcockson is Head of Divinity at Eton College, which is one of the leading independent senior schools in the UK.

The attachments to my letter consist of the section on Islam in the Guide and my compilation of the quotes from the Qur'an and Hadith I mention in my letter. I did not feel that I could respond to every deficiency in the section on Islam so if you wish to critique a part of the Guide that I did not deal with, feel free to do so here. At some point maybe the ISEB will come here for guidance on their next edition!

I say in my letter I believe that pupils should learn about all religions, including Islam but the task of educating children is not immune from influence of politics and expediency.

My letter:

14 November 2009

Dear [teacher’s name],

Thank you for showing me the Religious Studies ISEB (Independent Schools Examinations Board) Revision Guide by Michael Wilcockson, first published April 2008.

As you know I am particularly interested in the section on Islam.

I understand that this material is to prepare 13 year olds for entrance examinations. Given this limitation I was still quite surprised at the errors and omissions contained therein.

I think it is not fair to be critical of omissions unless they are very serious ones so I will only comment on a few of those omissions and concentrate on what I consider to be errors of fact. For ease of reading I will only give the references to the Qur'an in the letter and quote in full those references in the appendix.

Also please note that I consider this Revision Guide to contain many more errors than I will comment on in this letter. More comment available on request!

Section 6.1 God (p 128)

One sentence reads: ‘God has 99 beautiful names.’

My comment:

The Quran openly states that Allah is the 'best deceiver'. (Qur'an 3:54; 8:30)

Allah deceived Mohammed as stated in Qur'an 8:43-44

Allah also deceived Christians as stated in Qur'an 4:157-158 by making them believe that Jesus died on the cross.

Therefore this name/attribute of Allah is not so ‘beautiful,’ in my opinion.

Another sentence in this section reads: ‘God will judge all people according to their deeds on earth.’

My comment: This sentiment is not only untrue but actually contradicts the sentence found later on in section 6.5 (p 133) which states: ‘Unbelievers or the disobedient will be sent to Hell to a life of torment.’

I see a contradiction here. How can deeds be a factor in the judgement of Allah when this chapter also says that Allah will send the Unbelievers to Hell regardless of what they have done? It cannot be both ways. Either good deeds will merit a person a reward in paradise or only belief will. The second sentence says that no matter how many good deeds a person does he/she will be sent to Hell if you are an unbeliever. The reverse seems to be perversely true. Allah will forgive all your sins if you only believe in the true faith and die a martyr, Qur'an 4:95-96.

But the larger error of the first statement is contradicted by multiple verses in the Qur'an and hadith which clearly say who is in hell based on belief not deeds or at least not only deeds. True, there are provisions for ‘bad’ people to go to hell but in Islam ‘badness’ includes non-belief in Islam.


Qur'an 5:72; 5:73; 98.6; 9.73; 3.12; 48.6; 4.56; 33.64; 72.23

And Mohammed affirms that the majority of inhabitants of Hell are women (Bukhari 1:6:301).

Section 6.3 (p. 130)

Under the section on ‘The spread of Islam’ you imply very strongly that Islam ‘spread’ without violence. The only slight nod to warfare was your admission that Mohammed ‘marched on Mecca.’ The sentence: ‘The Muslim empire spread to Africa, India and even reached China’ begs the question: why did it not ‘spread’ throughout Europe? It ‘spread’ all the way to China which is much further away and over many mountains and through many deserts but failed, for some reason, to ‘spread’ to Europe.

Your sentence: ‘Many people were impressed by life at Medina and converted to Islam’ leaves out, of course, the three Jewish tribes who did not convert to Islam. Two were expelled by Mohammed and a third met the fate of the mass execution of all the adult male population by beheading. While a devout Muslim may say there were very good reasons for these events I think that to leave them out and to imply a rosy picture of life in Medina is a serious omission.

6.13 Marriage

In the section on Mohammed (6.2 p. 128) the guide states that Mohammed is the guide to ‘how to live the perfect Muslim life.’

But in this section on Marriage nothing at all is mentioned of Mohammed. This is very curious. There is no mentioned that he had more than four wives and at one time. Also omitted is his ‘marriage’ (I use the quotes because I do not consider this a marriage in the normal sense of the word) to six-year old Aisha and the consummation of that ‘marriage’ when she was only nine years old (Bukhari (005.058.236)). This example of the ‘perfect Muslim life’ is not just a matter of history but is still an ‘example’ for so-called ‘marriages’ today.

I commend the Guide though for this one sentence: ‘Love is not a primary reason for marriage.’ I would hope though that the pupil would seek answers to the obvious questions that would arise from that most vile, but true, statement.

6.2 Mohammed (p.128)

But the major error I see in this Guide is in this section

This sentence stands out:

‘His [Mohammed’s] new laws taught that under God’s rule all people were to be treated as equals.’

It is hard to know how to begin to respond to this sentence. Inequality is in the very fabric of Islam. We know this from Allah’s words and the example of Mohammed.

Muslim men are considered superior to their wife/wives and are allowed to beat them. (Qur'an 4:34)

Muslims are to rule over and dominate non-Muslims (Qur'an 9:29)

Non-Muslims, in a Muslim state are in effect non-citizens. They are required to pay a special/additional tax to be allowed to live in a Muslim state (Qur'an 9:29) Bukhari (039.039.531))

Muslims are not to be friends with non-Muslims or take them as allies or protectors (Qur'an 3:28 and 4:144).

The dominant religion in a Muslim state must be Islam (Qur'an 2:193) (Bukhari (001.002.024)).

Muslims who leave Islam are considered apostates and are to be killed (Bukhari (009.084.057))

Jews particularly have been cursed by Allah (Qur'an 5:60)

Muslims are encouraged to have an attitude or mindset of hatred towards non-Muslims (Qur'an 60:4)

Non-Muslims are considered like ‘cattle’ (Qur'an 7:179)

Slavery is permitted in Islam (Qur'an 016.071)

Non-Muslims (e.g. polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, and in the Message of Muhammad) are considered to be unclean/impure (Qur'an 9:28)

Islamic law, the Sharia, does not consent to and therefore does not recognize a marriage of a Muslim woman with a non-Muslim man.

My comment on the details of the Guide end here, but let me offer, by way of a contrast, what is taught in Saudi Arabia's public schools. The information below is part of an article from the Washington Post, hence the American use of the word ‘grade’ rather than ‘year’, but it is equivalent to 12-13 year olds which the ISEB Guide is for.


"As cited in Ibn Abbas: The apes are Jews, the people of the Sabbath; while the swine are the Christians, the infidels of the communion of Jesus."

"God told His Prophet, Muhammad, about the Jews, who learned from parts of God's book [the Torah and the Gospels] that God alone is worthy of worship. Despite this, they espouse falsehood through idol-worship, soothsaying, and sorcery. In doing so, they obey the devil. They prefer the people of falsehood to the people of the truth out of envy and hostility. This earns them condemnation and is a warning to us not to do as they did."

"They are the Jews, whom God has cursed and with whom He is so angry that He will never again be satisfied [with them]."

"Some of the people of the Sabbath were punished by being turned into apes and swine. Some of them were made to worship the devil, and not God, through consecration, sacrifice, prayer, appeals for help, and other types of worship. Some of the Jews worship the devil. Likewise, some members of this nation worship the devil, and not God."

"Activity: The student writes a composition on the danger of imitating the infidels."


"The clash between this [Muslim] community (umma) and the Jews and Christians has endured, and it will continue as long as God wills."

"It is part of God's wisdom that the struggle between the Muslim and the Jews should continue until the hour [of judgment]."

"Muslims will triumph because they are right. He who is right is always victorious, even if most people are against him."

I hope you found my comments and information helpful in understanding Islam. I trust that they will motivate you and other teachers to use other resources if this Guide is not changed considerably. I believe children need to learn about Islam but this Guide is so deficient it amounts to propaganda rather than pedagogy.

Yours sincerely,

Kinana Nadir

P.S. Please see the appendix for the full quotes of the Qur'an and Hadith referred to above.

Tags: Eton, ISEB, Kinana, Revision Guide, Wilcockson

Views: 392


Replies to This Discussion

Some teachers know the score and get punished for it.

but the pushback is happening too

Last year in Texas, a teacher was disciplined for a handout ― printed off anti-Muslim hate sites ― that described Islam as an “ideology of war” led by the “false prophet” Muhammad. 

A teacher in Michigan was suspended for passing out an assignment called “The Top 10 Talents Of Miss Iraq,” which listed “Blowing self up in a car in a parking lot,” “Describing what they would look like in a bathing suit if they were permitted to wear one” and “Withstanding the kick of a donkey.”

Parents across the country have also launched campaigns to either eliminate school lessons about Islam, or to remove positive depictions of Islam from school textbooks. 

When a high school teacher in Virginia had students copy the Shahada, the Islamic statement of faith, as part of a calligraphy lesson, parents accused the teacher of trying to indoctrinate their children. The backlash became so heated that district closed schools across the county for a day.  

In Texas, protesters stood outside the first day of a kindergarten class that included an Arabic immersion program. And in Tennessee, state legislators introduced legislation “to officially stop Islamic religious indoctrination in Tennessee schools” after outcry over an innocuous lessons about the Five Pillars of Islam. 

By Patti Pierucci, PRB News

Christian Action Network Correspondent

A student and her father who brought a federal lawsuit against a Maryland public school district, alleging that it compelled the student to “profess” tenets of Islam and be subjected to Islamic indoctrination at school, have lost the first round in court.

In a summary judgement decision handed down in March 2018, the Southern Division of the U.S. District Court for Maryland ruled that an 11th grader who attended La Plata High School in La Plata, Md., and her father did not have a case to sue the school district for violating their First Amendment rights.

The student, Caleigh Wood, and her father, John Kevin Wood, have appealed the decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The court also ruled in March that the school district did not violate the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution by compelling students to study Islam extensively, which the attorneys for the student and her father stated was at least two weeks long compared to one day spent studying Christianity.

Kate Oliveri, trial counsel for the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm which is defending the Woods, criticized the decision.

“We believe the court was wrong in its decision and that this course on Islam does violate the Establishment Clause,” she said. “The Woods are ready to keep on fighting because they don’t want what happened to Caleigh to happen to other students.”

The Thomas More Law Center filed the suit against the school district in 2016 after Caleigh was subjected to Islamic indoctrination and propaganda in her high school World History class. The Woods are a Christian family.

At issue was the study of Islam when Caleigh was in the 11th grade. She was forced to profess and to write out the “Shahada,” the Islamic declaration of faith, which states:

“There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” For non-Muslims, reciting the statement is sufficient to convert the speaker to Islam.

Caleigh was also required to memorize and recite the “Five Pillars,” or core beliefs, of Islam.

Furthermore, Caleigh’s teacher proclaimed in class that “Most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian” and that “Islam, at heart, is a peaceful religion.”

Despite the plaintiff’s belief that this is an obvious attempt to indoctrinate students into a false view of Islam, the Judge George J. Hazel sided with the school district and said the Constitution does “not prohibit a high school teacher from leading a purely academic study of a religion that may differ from the religious beliefs of some of his students.”

Mawyer slammed the court decision. “If that’s what the court believes is ‘a purely academic study,’ I would hate to see what it views as a biased study of Islam,” he said.

Oliveri agreed. “That’s exactly why we are appealing this decision. The court ruled that this study was ‘purely academic,’ but in the same decision admits that some of the course material was ‘offensive.’ This was clearly a subjective study, with unquantifiable statements made in class to students.”

The court also found that while the teacher’s statement that “most Muslims’ faith is stronger than the average Christian” may have been “inartful, or, to some, offensive,” it was not “entirelymotivated by a purpose to advance religion.”

“The Woods were absolutely right to be outraged by this propaganda,” Mawyer added. “When you believe that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, as the Woods family does, then you cannot in good conscience be forced to recite the lie that Allah is the one true god. That’s blasphemy, pure and simple.”

The Charles County schools also taught:

* “To Muslims, Allah is the same God that is worshipped in Christianity and Judaism.”

* The Koran states, “Men are the managers of the affairs of women” and “Righteous women are therefore obedient.”

But this “sugarcoated version of Islam” did not mention that the Koran explicitly instructs Muslims “to kill the unbelievers wherever you find them (Sura 9-5),” according to the attorneys for the Thomas More Law Center.

“Try to imagine a public school curricula that forces students to accept that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, that he was crucified, died and rose on the third day,” said Mawyer. “It is unthinkable that such a study would not be challenged by Muslim or Jewish parents, as an attempt to indoctrinate students into the Christian belief. Why is Islam any different?”

Mr. Wood had also claimed that his First Amendment rights were trampled when a No Trespass order was issued against him after he complained to the school about the lessons. School officials said he issued threats and was profane on the phone, but Mr. Wood said the No Trespass order was an effort to silence his pro-Christian speech.

The school ultimately refused to allow Caleigh to opt-out of the assignments, forcing her to either violate her faith by making a pledge to Allah or receive zeros for the assignments.

“They remained faithful to God and refused to complete the assignments,” said Mawyer, “even though it could have jeopardized Caleigh’s college admission.”

Mr. Wood served eight years in the Marine Corps and was deployed in Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. He also was a firefighter on 9-11 and responded to the Islamic terror attack on the Pentagon.

“He witnessed firsthand the destruction created in the name of Allah and knows that Islam is not ‘a religion of peace,’” said Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel for the Thomas More Law Center. “The school prevented John Kevin Wood from defending his daughter’s Christian beliefs against Islamic indoctrination, even though as a Marine, he stood in harm’s way to defend our nation, and the Charles County Public School. 


Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2018   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service