The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Peter McLoughlin's book on the Muslim grooming gangs, Easy Meat: Inside the British Grooming Gang Scandal, has now been updated to include new material bringing it up to 2016. It can be bought in paperback and ebook from Amazon. McLoughlin is maintaining a website of material supplementary to the Easy Meat book - http://www.pmclauth.com/ . The link to his website points to a page showing you what the additional material in the book covers. There is also a very useful interactive, searchable table on McLoughlin's website. You can search and sort this table using names, towns, dates to see this grooming gang scandal from different angles.


This analysis is being misrepresented by a website called "Sharia Unveiled". http://shariaunveiled.wordpress.com/2013/08/06/95-of-child-rape-and...

My analysis pertains to "grooming gangs". They have transformed this into "child rapes and molestations".  It seems highly likely in a country where 90% of people are non-muslims, that most child molestation is by non-muslims (just as in a muslim-majority country the majority of rapes and the majority of anal sex is by muslims).


"Localised Grooming" Gangs (convictions from 1997)

This list is compiled based on definitions provided by Andrew Norfolk, The Times, 5 January 2011:

"The 17 cases identified by The Times which showed a pattern of exploitation"

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article2863078.ece

Andrew Norfolk won the Orwell Prize for Journalism for his reporting on grooming gangs. He was the only journalist who provided expert testimony to the House of Commons select committee, in their (2012-2013) investigation into the grooming gangs.  This parliamentary investigation (published June 2013) concluded that it  "would certainly seem to be the case" that most of grooming gangs are muslim.  See p.52.

 

trial   first 2nd name/
date location name surname
Nov 1997 Leeds Mohammed Naim Rashid
Nov 1997 Leeds Abid Hussain Sadique
Feb 2005 Keighley Shabir Ahmed
Feb 2005 Keighley Munwar Khan
Apr 2006 Blackpool Sandeep Chauhan
Apr 2006 Blackpool Puppy Parmar
Jun 2007 Oldham Shahzad Masood
Jun 2007 Oldham Mohammed Suleman
Aug 2007 Blackburn Zulfqar Hussain
Aug 2007 Blackburn Qaiser Naveed
Oct 2007 Sheffield Ayad Mahmood
Oct 2007 Sheffield Aziz Sabir Hamed
Aug 2008 Oldham Shofiqul Islam
Aug 2008 Oldham Shamim Ahmed
Nov 2008 Manchester Mirza Baig
Nov 2008 Manchester Mohammed Ditta
Nov 2008 Blackburn Ian Hindle
Nov 2008 Blackburn Andrew Wells
Apr 2009 Blackburn Imran Pervez
Apr 2009 Blackburn Zaheer Khan
Jul 2009 Skipton Mohammed Zackriya
Jul 2009 Skipton Mohammed Taj
Jul 2009 Skipton Mohammed Shabir
Jul 2009 Skipton Shafaq Hussain
Feb 2010 Rochdale Ajmal Afridi
Feb 2010 Rochdale Imtiaz Syed
Feb 2010 Rochdale Tayub Hussain
Feb 2010 Rochdale Mustafa Arshad
Feb 2010 Rochdale Mohammed Usman Raja
Jun 2010 Nelson Azeem Shah
Jun 2010 Nelson Tabassum Shah
Aug 2010 Rochdale Asad Yousaf Hassan
Aug 2010 Rochdale Mohammed Basharat
Aug 2010 Rochdale Mohammed Atif
Aug 2010 Rochdale Aftab Khan
Aug 2010 Rochdale Abid Khaliq
Aug 2010 Rochdale Mohammed Anwar Safi
Aug 2010 Rochdale Ahmed Noorzai
Aug 2010 Rochdale Mohammed Khan
Aug 2010 Rochdale Najibullah Safi
Sep 2010 Preston Mohammed Moosa
Sep 2010 Preston Faisal Ghani
Nov 2010 Rotherham Razwan Razaq
Nov 2010 Rotherham Umar Razaq
Nov 2010 Rotherham Zafran Ramzan
Nov 2010 Rotherham Mohsin Khan
Nov 2010 Rotherham Adil Hussain
Nov 2010 Derby Abid Siddique
Nov 2010 Derby Mohammed Liaqat
Nov 2010 Derby Mohamed Imran Rehman
Nov 2010 Derby Faisal Mehmood
Nov 2010 Derby Akshay Kumar
Nov 2010 Derby Naweed Liaqat
Nov 2010 Derby Farooq Ahmed
Nov 2010 Derby Graham Blackham
Nov 2010 Derby Ziafat Yasin
Aug 2011 Accrington Amjad Hussain
Aug 2011 Accrington Shahid Hussain
Aug 2011 Accrington Tanveer Butt
Mar 2012 Telford Shamrez Rashid
Mar 2012 Telford Amar Hussain
Mar 2012 Telford Jahbar Rafiq
Mar 2012 Telford Adil Saleem
Mar 2012 Telford Amer Islam Choudhrey
May 2012 Rochdale Kabeer Hassan
May 2012 Rochdale Abdul Aziz
May 2012 Rochdale Abdul Rauf
May 2012 Rochdale Mohammed Sajid
May 2012 Rochdale Adil Khan
May 2012 Rochdale Abdul Qayyum
May 2012 Rochdale Mohammed Amin
May 2012 Rochdale Hamid Safi
May 2012 Rochdale Shabir Ahmed
May 2012 Bradford Shabir Ahmed
May 2012 Bradford Munwar Khan
Feb 2013 Ipswich Surin Uddin
Feb 2013 Ipswich Mohammed Sheikh
Feb 2013 Ipswich Hamza Ali
Mar 2013 Birmingham Raja Khan
Mar 2013 Birmingham Adeeb Sultan
Mar 2013 Keighley Shazad Rehman
Mar 2013 Keighley Bilal Hussain
Apr 2013 Brierfield Mohammed Imran Amja
May 2013 Oxford Kamar Jamil
May 2013 Oxford Akhtar Dogar
May 2013 Oxford Anjum Dogar
May 2013 Oxford Assad Hussain
May 2013 Oxford Mohammed Karrar
May 2013 Oxford Bassam Karrar
May 2013 Oxford Zeeshan Ahmed
Jul 2013 Barking Naeem Ahmed
Jul 2013 Barking Nabeel Ahmed
Jul 2013 Barking Hassan Raza
Jul 2013 Manchester Shamin Uddin
Jul 2013 Manchester Giash Uddin
Jul 2013 Manchester Robert Jackson
Aug 2013 Leicester Aabidali Mubarak Ali
Aug 2013 Leicester Rakib Iacub
Aug 2013 Leicester Wajid Usman

99 convictions
6 non-muslims (maybe they saw muslims getting away with it, so copied them)


20% of those convicted in the grooming gangs are called "Mohammed"
94% of those convicted in the grooming gangs are muslims

The Times article from Jan 5 2011, on this grooming phenomenon shows a realisation (at least in one newspaper) of the scale of the problem (attached as a PDF here).  You can see his original list (to the end of 2010).  There have been as many convictions since 2010, as there were in the previous 13 years investigated by Norfolk.


The vast majority of the victims of the gangs listed above were white/non-muslim girls.  However, some were asian (there's no evidence of any of the asian girls being of any religion other than sikhism). 

See this discussion on the grooming of Sikh/Hindu young women/girls.  The police have been as inactive about prosecuting the abusers of those girls as they have been inactive in prosecuting the white victims. 

http://4freedoms.ning.com/xn/detail/3766518:Comment:115036 

This shows that it is not the police being anti-white per se, as them refusing to do anything to upset muslims, because of muslims being prepared to act collectively to deflect any criticism.  Muslims will close ranks (and thus protect the groomers).  Muslims will do this by rioting or by using their 100s of pressure groups/infiltrators.

We originally began collecting information based on Norfolk's definition in early 2012.  The main table in this post will be updated regularly, as new convictions come to light.

Views: 30266

Attachments:

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

This blog by Brendan O'Neill in The Telegraph is better than The Independent's whitewash. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100157120/muslims-...

However, even he cannot help but lump non-muslim asians into the guilty demographic:

The truth is that there is something specific going on here, something which is more prevalent among Asian communities, particularly Muslim ones, than among other communities.

I couldn't care any more about the Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists being tarred with the same brush.  They've kept quiet long enough about being blamed for this alongside muslims - it is their own fault if they get treated the same as muslims.  The sikh community knew 10 years ago that the grooming gangs were targetting their girls and issued specific instructions within their community about how to deal with it.  The white working class community has been broken apart across the country (we don't have meaningful communal festivals, or a religion, or a language of our own to keep us together).

Joe, its good that the issue of (muslim) Albanians has cropped up, whilst it may not (always) involve underage girls, I've heard recent reports that state that many (the greater percentage ?)  brothels are run by Albanian gangsters (who are also thought to be involved in heroin and people trafficking) , but then the issue seems to be glossed over in the same manner that female genital mutilation by Somali Muslims and pimping and rape by "yardie" gangs & individuals are issues that are perpetually kicked into the long grass.

These are issues that investigative journalists would do well to get their teeth into to force the debate into the public domain.

I won't paste Melanie Phillips entire discussion of this issue here, but it merits reading. 

Thanks, Antony for the link.  It is probably the most cogent analysis so far.

Two years ago, when I first started to hear these stories about the grooming gangs, the thing that came up time & again, was how muslim taxi drivers formed a lynch pin in muslim criminal networks in Britain.  They would travel the country as bounty hunters looking for girls & women who ran away from arranged marriages.  They ferried drugs around.  They were an informal network that kept surveillance on the towns.  People were telling me that they were to be avoided at all costs.

The profiles of the men involved in this latest case can be found here: http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1493258_profiled...

It is extraordinary how much taxi driving features in those profiles.

There's an article on the Rochdale case by 'moderate muslim' Ghaffar Hussain at The Commentator  http://www.thecommentator.com/ He condemns the PC attitudes which have prevented police and politicians from tackling the problem head on - but argues that these crimes are not 'muslim-specific.' Here's a taste, not from his piece but from a comment defending his piece:

The slide towards theo-centrisism everytime a crime is committed by a Muslim is both predictable and depressing. Do you really think these guys read the Quran and were thinking of verses in the Quran when they were raping these young girls? Do you really think they have ever read the Koran in a language they understand? I doubt it very much. When British people from an ostensibly Christian background commit a crime we don't start digging in the Bible to fing verses that could have motivated them. That is because we know that most of these criminals couldn't care less what the Bible says. And guess what? It's the same with most criminals from a Muslim background. Equally ridiculous is the notion that these individuals thought these girls were sex slaves captured in a theatre of war. Again I doubt they are even aware of the Islamic ruling on such a practise, a practise which is really a thing of the past and not advocated today outside of certain ultra-conservative and extreme circles.

Get real guys!!!

Worth a look - if only to question his 'It's not just Muslims, could be anyone doing this' evasiveness.

Whenever some comment like this appears you always find a comment like this one: 'It's the same with most criminals from a Muslim background.'

Well, how does he know this?  Does he speak for Muslim criminals?  Is he their representative?  Is he an expert on, or knowledgeable of, Islamically inspired behaviours?  Without reference to the texts and the culture he cannot know.  He cannot say for certain that the teachings of Islam have nothing to do with this particular case.  So what he says as a certainty is not certain at all.  But even his sentence of certainty undermines his own position by using the word 'most'.  Which means he must think that some criminals who are Muslims are indeed inspired by Mohammed and Allah.

Evasive indeed.

I assume it is the same Ghaffar Hussain who spreads taqiyya for Quilliam - claiming that islam as a political doctrine came into being in Egypt in the 20th century, and that it spread from Egypt because of the establishment of the state of Israel.

I wouldn't by a used car from that man.

I think his comment is even more pernicious and disingenuous than that.

We mostly inherit concepts from our birth culture without even realising it.  Many people have told me how there is a Northern European assumption of honesty, and that's what aided the growth of a modern industrial society - whereas in other societies its every man for himself (sadly, that generalisation is less true of the 'North' nowadays).  But nobody told the citizens of Naples to grab what they can for themselves.  And perhaps nobody explicitly told these Pakistanis to treat kaffir women as war bounty.  But the fact is, its in their texts, idea meme's spread like viruses throughout every society, and they don't have to read it to believe it.

A theory of mine is that Western society has advanced so much further than Islamic society because of the injunction to 'love one another'.  OK, there's not a lot of love going round, but we do get the message that hating each other is not the way to be, and that leads to the concept of co-operating to achieve joint endeavours.  That is the antithesis of the 'Gangsterism' way of moving forward, which we've talked about in this well trodden forum.  Those two concepts of honesty and working together are unspoken memes which have constructed the Western mindset, and given us an efficient technocratic and industrial society beyond the wildest dreams of any Islamic one.

What we are seeing is the in his reply is the well worn Muslim trick of equivocation.  He is trying to say that those verses are ridiculous old fashioned nonsense that nobody pays any attention to nowadays.  But if you suggest that we cut out this "ridiculous, old fashioned nonsense" from the text, since it is so irrelevant, nonsensical and just plain bad - he'll probably threaten to cut your throat for having the temerity to suggest that anything in his "holy scripture" is not divinely inspired wisdom direct from the mouth of God.

The one thing this slimy rat will not do is "get real guys".

This is typical of these cover-up merchants (like Fiyaz Mughal).  When Panorama exposed muslim schools teaching that jews were "apes and pigs" and that homosexuals should be executed, the "counter-extremism think tank" jumped into action... to provide cover for savage behaviour by muslims.  This is more of the same.



http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/index.php/component/content/artic...

 

Quilliam responds to BBC report on Muslim schools 

 


22 November 2010
Quilliam, the counter-extremism think-tank, has responded to BBC Panorama’s investigation into a number of Muslim schools, by saying that while most Muslim schools in Britain do good work to prepare their pupils to play a full and positive role in British society, tonight’s programme also raises a number of difficult questions both for British Muslims and for society in general.

Talal Rajab, a spokesman for Quilliam, the London-based counter-extremism think-tank, said:

‘While most Muslim schools are doing good work and are entirely unproblematic, there is clearly room for improvement in a minority of cases. Schools should be places where young people learn to play a full part in the society around them. They should not be venues for indoctrination where young minds are taught hatred and intolerance.

‘The Saudi government has recently taken much-needed steps to modernise religious education in its own country. It is unfortunate that these so-called Saudi schools in Britain do not seem to have similarly moved with the times. The Saudi authorities need to use their influence to ensure that hate-preaching is fully tackled both at home and abroad.

The government must also urgently review and strengthen its procedures to protect school children from being groomed by extremists, whether extreme Islamists or BNP members.The government needs to balance the right of schools to set their own curriculums against the right of children to enjoy a rounded and balanced education that adequately prepares them for life in a diverse and complex society.’




What was going on in those schools wasn't "islamism" (in the sense of a pro-caliphate political ideology).  It was muslim fundamentalism.  So, why does Quilliam jump into the ring?  And moreover, why pretend that there are BNP schools teaching jew-hatred (and by implication, much worse)?  No such BNP school exists - the BNP can barely hold a public meeting without having people throwing dangerous sharp objects into people's faces.  Yet Quilliam uses the idea of BNP schools to provide cover for save muslim behaviour.

Here we see another of the Quilliam luvvies providing cover for islam.  What does this case have to do with political extremism?  If he was concerned with protecting people from e.g. an extreme reaction from the working-class, then his concern shouldn't be for islam, but for "people who look muslim" i.e. sikhs, and hindus.  But it is clear, his concern is to protect islam, the institutions of islam, and muslims.

But once a muslim always a muslim.  Even when you purportedly work for a counter-extremism think-tank.

As the MEN profiles mentioned earlier show, at least 2 of these muslim were considered "pillars" of their community.  Most of them refused to swear on the koran in court (I wonder why - because they were going to lie?)

This bit is so funny:
"The Saudi authorities need to use their influence to ensure that hate-preaching is fully tackled both at home and abroad".

Yeah, because the British government is TOTALLY incapable of exerting any authority over the schools in Britain, isn't it? 

It reminds me of when our government paid a lot of money for adverts to go on Pakistani TV telling them to please, don't become a terrorist and come over to the UK to hurt us.  

Awww, diddums.

Ghaffar Hussain said: " I doubt they are even aware of the Islamic ruling on such a practise, a practise which is really a thing of the past and not advocated today outside of certain ultra-conservative and extreme circles."

 Islam has a pick 'n' mix counter? Who knew!

David Starkey talking sense again. 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9258403/Asian-se...

Of course, the multi-culturalists won't see it that way.  These paedophile grooming gangs are just bringing their cultural norms over here and applying them, exactly as the multiculturalists have taught them.  In fact, it's even worse, because the lie of multiculturalism is the legal system.  And these men were not even confronted with that for years, and years, because political-correctness prevented the police from applying the law.

RSS

Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2018   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service