It takes a nation to protect the nation
Latest UN shocker: 'It's ok to kill gays' - Melanie Phillips
Latest UN shocker: 'It's ok to kill gays'.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/6520779/latest-un-shocke...
Those who persist in the delusion that the Club for the Perpetuation of Tyranny and Terror, aka the United Nations, is the authoritative arbiter of global justice and ‘human rights’ should be asked whether they still think the same thing after reading this:
Last week, the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly voted on a special resolution addressing extrajudicial, arbitrary and summary executions. The resolution affirms the duties of member countries to protect the right to life of all people with a special emphasis on a call to investigate killings based on discriminatory grounds. The resolution highlights particular groups historically subject to executions including street children, human rights defenders, members of ethnic, religious, and linguistic minority communities, and, for the past 10 years, the resolution has included sexual orientation as a basis on which some are targeted for death.
The tiny West African nation of Benin (on behalf of the UN's African Group) proposed an amendment to strike sexual minorities from the resolution. The amendment was adopted with 79 votes in favor, 70 against, 17 abstentions and 26 absent.
A collection of notorious human rights violators voted for the amendment including Afghanistan, Algeria, China, Congo, Cuba, Eritrea, North Korea, Iran (didn't Ahmadinejad tell the world there were no gays in Iran?), Egypt, Malaysia, Pakistan, Russia, Sudan, Uganda, Vietnam, Yemen, and Zimbabwe.
Add to this Bahamas, Belize (where you get 10 years for being gay), Jamaica (10 years of hard labor), Grenada (10 years), Guyana (life sentence), Saint Kitts and Nevis (10 years), Saint Lucia (10 years), Saint Vincent (10 years), South Africa (Apartheid? What apartheid?), and Morocco (ruled by a gay monarch!). They are all on the list of nations that do not think execution of gays and lesbians is worthy of condemnation or investigation. (The full vote tally is published beneath this column.) To its shame, Colombia was among the 16 nations who abstained.
Those against the amendment include every European nation present, all Scandinavian countries, India, Korea, most of Latin America, all of North America, and only one Middle Eastern nation: Israel. In most countries in the Middle East, it is a crime to be gay--in some, like Saudi Arabia, it is punishable by beheading and in others, like Iran, by hanging.
The UN has a remarkable track record of doing virtually nothing when presented with mass killings or genocide. ‘Never again!’ was the cry after the holocaust. Since then, the world has witnessed a dozen more never agains with strong condemnation from the UN coming after the corpses pile up. A resolution of the sort that was voted on in the General Assembly is significant for its clarity of message: ‘It’s okay to kill the gays.’
It is because the western world relies upon the UN as the touchstone for international law, justice and ‘human rights’ that the western world now appeases and empowers tyrants and terror states while abandoning or dumping upon their victims. The UN is a global deformity that now stands at the very fulcrum of the madness that has consumed the free world. Civilisation will not be saved unless and until the UN is recognised as the problem, not the solution.
Tags: 'It's, -, Latest, Melanie, Phillips, UN, gays', kill, ok, shocker:, More…
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Heather Gilbert on
-
I think because the UN started off as a credible and well meaning organization, that people have perhaps slipped into a certain apathy, trusting them to just get on with the job. Their sole function these days seems to be to condemn Israel, which is incredible really, given the human rights violations taking place in the middle East, the rape and genocide of Rwandan's etc. It really is time for these anti-Semitic muslim controlled, overpaid dinosaurs, to be disbanded forever.
Where is the gay lobby? They turn out in huge numbers for gay parades etc., but never a pip-squeak from them about the atrocities happening against them in Iran etc. Maybe this will be a wake-up call, but I very much doubt it. -
-
Permalink Reply by Pat McCrann on
-
HI Heather, I think one of the conspiracy theories claims that the UN was set up by post-war Nazis in the US together with the CIA, or some such scenario. As if, eh? However US government documents recently released (I read somewhere) actually confirmed this. But I would say the UN has always, being a creation of the Left, been fascist in intent. I'm even beginning to think they set up the State of Israel in 1948 in order to make the Jews easier to target. The trouble with conspiracy theories is that much of it is deliberate disinformation. The good thing is you can tell when this is the case, as they always trace the conspiracy to Catholics or Jews. This is the left at work, in other words. Alex Jones is an example.
Most of the left wing lobby groups and organisations are just fronts for the left, and some always have been. I read an article recently, somewhere, which quoted one of the original founders of Greenpeace who said that the original board was forced out when it was taken over by the radical fascist left, i.e. the Green Party.
The gay lobby and the animals rights lobby and the feminist lobby are all Trojan Horses of the left, and always have been. That's why they're unconcerned about gay rights, or halal meat, or women being stoned. Go to Stonewall (a former paedophile group like most 'gay' groups) and Pink News and you'll find they have no problem with Islam. Quite the contrary in fact. That is why we're now having to defend the rights of gay people against Islam, because the left ain't going to do it. And God help all of us if we don't.
As for Islamic treatment of animals, PETA, the animal rights group, says Muslims have the highest regard for animals, whilst Jews 'treat animals as they like and EVEN EAT THEM'. -
-
-
Phew! I learn something new every day. Most of this is news to me, though I was aware of the obnoxious Pink News fascists. I know things are really bad, but I didn't realize the extent of the leftist infiltration. Like most Brits, I just drifted along for years, wearing my rose tinted glasses. I got my wake up call trying to debate an American friend and rescue him from what I viewed as extremism, religious intolerance, xenophic views etc. Forced me to take a look at islam and had to subsequently admit that he's not an extremist. He is just reacting to what is happening. I have so much catching up to do.
There's a lot of food for thought in what you have written Pat. TY -
-
-
Hi Heather, well we're all in the same boat really. It's difficult to believe the depth of infiltration. What's really worrying is their control of the agenda in the mainstream media and in education, hence their control of the whole narrative. For example, the history channels on television are chockful of programmes about Hitler and the Nazis and their atrocities, to the almost complete absence of all the other 20th century fascists. Why? It's so you don't connect the dots, in my opinion. Almost all the fascists in the 20th century were left wing 'progressives', including Hitler. Why is Hitler a fascist and not, say, Stalin, who killed millions more? Because Hitler betrayed the international socialist (global socialism; no borders) movement by opting for NATIONAL socialism, as did Mussolini. Anyone who is not radical left is a fascist. So Stalin, beng an international socialist, was not fascist. That's why people who have family values or who disagree with, say, abortion on demand (up to the ninth month of pregnancy) are RIGHT WING fascists.
The most useful book for getting to grips with this that I have found is a book I mentioned in the book room, which is Jonah Goldberg's 'Liberal Fascism'. At the time I bought the book about a year ago I think it was the no. 1 bestseller in America BUT you coudln't get it on Amazon in the US. That's the power the left have.Goldberg shows how popular Hitler was with the 'respectable' left, in Britain and elsewhere, even when they knew his genocidal agenda. Roosevelt wrote very warm letters to him, as did many Fabians and other prominent British thinkers. Our respected novelist GB Shaw was far more fascist than even Hitler, and called on scientists to invent a 'humane gas' for killing people in large numbers before the invention of Cyklon B. Another Fabian star, Beatrice Webb, on seeing a group of poor people in England said, 'Certainly they should be killed'.
Why is GB Shaw still regarded as 'respectable'? Because the left control the educational and media agenda. How they have done this is clear from a study of the history and progress of the British Fabian Society.
But you're quite correct.They did all this whilst we were sleepwalking into the materialist trap set for us in the last few decades, during which time they were allowed to destroy our moral culture. It was always a conscious plan, and school sex ed. was and still is a big part of this. It is specifically designed to achieve a goal - sexualising children is the best and quickest way to corrupt and destroy moral culture, esp. family culture. Schools are now teaching four years olds to masturbate. All state schools. Check out the sex ed videos with your local council if you don't believe me. You may meet some resistance.
Note to all: Check out 'Neighbours from Hell: The Politics of Behaviour' by Frank Field MP. It's a blueprint for a state takeover of the family - all families. Frank Field, contrary to his reputation, is one of the most dangerous people on the planet. -
-
-
George Bernard Shaw???!!!! I'm gobsmacked.
There are plenty of copies of Jonah Goldberg on Amazon UK I just ordered a copy and am going to suggest to family members to buy a copy as a Christmas present for a loathsome family member who is a Fabian. I love mischief making ;-)
Whilst he quietly works his way up the ranks of the Fabian society, guess who the family thinks is the extremist? Yes, me with the big gob which will not be silenced lol
I shall take a look at what Frank Field is up to too.
Thanks for the info Pat. -
-
-
You're welcome Heather. If you really want to stick it to your socialist family member - and it's great fun isn't it? - then you could do no better than Google the Fabian society's history and give him a few quotes. I just realised that the Beatrice Webb quote I gave came from Virginia Woolf, although I'm fairly sure Webb said something similar. Here's a couple more from Shaw...
"Extermination must be put on a scientific basis if it is ever to be carried out humanely and apologetically as well as thoroughly," he wrote. "[I]f we desire a certain type of civilization and culture we must exterminate the sort of people who do not fit into it [Shaw 1933]
“We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living... A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people's time to look after them." The Daily Express (London), March 4, 1910
Asked what Britons should do if the Nazis crossed the channel into Britain, Shaw replied, "Welcome them as tourists."
A bit like the way the Left has welcomed Islam. And here's Virginia Woolf, another 'respected' literary figure...
Virginia Woolf, diary 9th January 1915, reports to have passed a long line of imbeciles, every one of them ‘miserable, ineffective, shuffling, idiotic creatures,’ and suffered a sense of instant revulsion that Shaw and Wells would have echoed: ‘It was perfectly horrible. They should certainly be killed’.
Ask your relative what the meaning is of the Fabian society logo of a wolf in sheep's clothing. Ask him who the sheep are, and whence they are being herded. When you've finished with him (like the Nazis they think history will be theirs and they won't be judged, either by God or history) ask him if he minds you recording your discussion in your diary for posterity, just in case the socialists do what they always do when they get power, so you can pass on the evidence for the grandchildren. A bit cruel I know, but fun to see little grey cells suddenly start to fire up and make connections. You only get through to lefties when you accuse them and name them for what they are. Then their self survival instinct kicks in.
By the way you won't find anything on Frank Field. The only evidence is in the book. -
-
-
If I ever have the misfortune to be in the same room together with him again, I shall certainly do that:-)
-
-
Permalink Reply by Alan Lake on
-
Gosh- thats amazing info. Of course the leftists themselves will never read their own history, they are too busy judging everyone else.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Hough on
-
Here in Louisiana we have a State Constitution that prohibits gambling but we have casinos all over the state. That is because the legislature was allowed to define what gambling is and they just defined all gambling games as not gambling but as gaming and while gambling is definately prohibited gaming is not. When it comes to the word Gay muslims have done the same thing. They believe that as long as they take the male role in the relationship they are not gay but that disgusting submissive that they are getting so much pleasure from is one of those lower than low gay people that deserves to be beheaded or hung. The truth is the whole muslim world are a bunch of gays but since they are able to define the terms they defined it so all other folks probably including straight infidels are gay but they aren't. What a world we live in.
-
Welcome to 4 Freedoms!
(currently not admitting new members)
Page Monitor
Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.
Muslim Terrorism Count
Mission Overview
Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them.
At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.
Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.
We need to capture this information before it is removed. The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.
We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.
The 4 Freedoms
These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper).
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:
- Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"
© 2022 Created by Netcon.
Powered by
