The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Family Security Matters August 14 2008   By Leslie Sacks

The Human Rights Council at the United Nations has now banned any criticism regarding Sharia Law and human rights in the Islamic World

According to President Doru Romulus Costea - and following the efforts of delegates from Egypt, Pakistan and Iran - the Council will no longer tolerate criticism of either Sharia
or specific fatwas in the name of human rights.

In many parts of the Islamic world, it is becomingly increasing clear not only that the Koran (the written record of the original oral transmissions of Mohammad’s life teachings)
and the Hadith (the later delineations of those teachings) are
considered sacrosanct in their perfection, but also the various
implementations of these teachings, known as Sharia Law.

No evolution or refinements are required. No matter that nearly every multitudinous Muslim sect or group has a differing interpretation of this God-given Sharia Law. Nor that
the stoning to death of women, beheading of men, and all the 6th century
niceties of feudal Arabia are still part and parcel of the immovable
Islamic tradition. Never mind that Sunni will decimate Shia - and vice
versa - over differences of interpretations far more modest than those
between (modern) Catholics and Protestants, between Hindus and
Buddhists. Islamic sect can war on Islamic sect, Arab can criticize

Because Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism and all other religions are imperfect, they are fair game for any and all attacks. Since Israel, Zionism, America and the Western World were
created and developed outside the Islamic World and its divine
perfection, they are likewise subject to criticism.

Now, not only has the Islamic God forbidden outside criticism of the Sharia Law, but the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) is its enjoined messenger on earth.

Of course, observers of the HRC should not be surprised. The ostensibly prestigious body has become a revolving door for countries with an ambivalent (or even well nigh invisible)
relationship with freedom and democracy. In the two years following its
replacement of the equally dictatorship-friendly Human Rights
Commission, Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Cameroon, China, Cuba, Egypt,
Pakistan, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Tunisia have all been elected
to the Council. As a majority of the Council’s resolutions are
concerned with Israel, it would effectively cease functioning were it
not for its compulsive focus on the Jewish state.

Due to this resolution the Council - and thus, perversely, the UN - is endorsing a worldview in which human interpretation and understanding has been placed beyond the pale of
critical thinking and investigation as long as it’s part of Sharia Law
or the Islamic tradition. Perhaps we should rename the United Nations
and call it the “Nations of Islam - United in Unique and Ineffable
Perfection.” Sounds appropriate.

Tags: Bans, Criticism, Islam, UN

Views: 66

Replies to This Discussion

Reply by Kinana on March 2, 2009 at 11:53pm

there is truely an islamic conspiracy! on 28 February 2009, orkut, run and owned by google, handed over networkwork communities to Muslims who have been complaining constantly about abuse of Islam and their so-called prophet. they eventually recently escalated with threats. writing on the orkut forum to orkut administrators was this gem:

quote: "If action is not taken Muslims living in United Kingdom, USA, Canada, Australia and India will visit google offices to launch official complain against orkut."

orkut and google buckled. years of work and discussions and dozens of communities were deleted and handed over to Muslims.

we need to make our own freedoms and protect our own corner.
Reply by Alan1 on March 3, 2009 at 10:28am

This seems wrong to me on so many levels.

Of course, a commercial organisation is not tasked with defending the basic freedoms of the country, thats the governments job (if it ever decided to do it). So a company will fold under pressure unless it gets protection.

But whats ridiculous here is that the forums were given to muslims??? there is no pressure or commercial precedent for that. They should have at the most, closed down the forums and archived them. What next? Will they hand over the keys to their offices and passwords to the servers to muslims?

If only we had a group of similar thugs that could threaten google in the same way.
Reply by Netcon on March 3, 2009 at 11:47am

We must be made to feel subdued:
9:29 "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the last day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and his apostle nor acknowledge the religion of truth of the people of the Book (the Jews and the Christians) until they pay the Jizya [tax on non-Muslims] with willing submission and feel themselves subdued."
We must be made to feel subdued:
9:29 "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the last day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and his apostle nor acknowledge the religion of truth of the people of the Book (the Jews and the Christians) until they pay the Jizya [tax on non-Muslims] with willing submission and feel themselves subdued."



Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2023   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service