All Discussions Tagged 'for' - The 4 Freedoms Library2024-03-29T15:34:40Zhttp://4freedoms.com/group/us/forum/topic/listForTag?tag=for&feed=yes&xn_auth=noPresident Donald Trump - collected articlestag:4freedoms.com,2016-10-24:3766518:Topic:1835112016-10-24T23:23:46.994ZAlan Lakehttp://4freedoms.com/profile/AlanLake
<p align="left" class="western"><span class="font-size-3"><strong>Donald Trump: Disruptive Technology for the U.S. Political System</strong></span></p>
<p align="left" class="western"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">At the recent gathering,</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">we had</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">some discussion of the meaning of the Trump phenomenon. Related to this in the Autumn 2015 Crossbow magazine…</font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><span class="font-size-3"><strong>Donald Trump: Disruptive Technology for the U.S. Political System</strong></span></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">At the recent gathering,</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">we had</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">some discussion of the meaning of the Trump phenomenon. Related to this in the Autumn 2015 Crossbow magazine (page 25), Ed West discusses "</font></font><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif"><i>the blob, or the Cathedral, or new establishment, but whatever we call it, it is understood this new church is all-powerful and institutionally hostile to conservatism".</i></font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">I think these two discussions are connected. </font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><strong><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">The Cathedral and the MIASM</font></font></strong></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">The Cathedral is a concept described and explained at great length by Mencius Moldbug, and it is remiss to degrade the term by calling it "the blob". The Cathedral is said to consist of the main stream media, the social media with its SJW (Social Justice Warriors), and the Power Elite, which would be the key movers and shakers of society, those with great financial and political power. It is easier to distinguish this Power Elite in the U.S., because only those with sufficient financial means or backers, are able to throw their hat into the political ring. For the rest, it's a waste of time. This model is complex and difficult to describe precisely. I prefer to call the media subset of the cathedral, the Mainstream Including All Social Media, as the MIASM, which is indicative of the illness it can spread. </font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">Sometimes a well supported political actor like Obama the senator, can implant concepts into the MIASM, as he did with 'Yes we can' and</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif"><i>drive</i></font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">the narrative. Other times the MIASM will promote a concept so powerfully that Obama the president is</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif"><i>driven</i></font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">to adopt that narrative as well, as happened with the "Hands up don't shoot" lie. So you cannot say what is the central driver of this process, sometimes it's the political leaders, sometimes it's the mainstream media, sometimes it's the social media.</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">Noam Chomsky’s term term for this in his enemies is ‘a conspiracy of common interest’,</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">such that a group moves together with no co-ercion or direction being visible</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">- but we can use</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">that term</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">too.</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">T</font></font><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">he end result of this</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">MIASM is</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">the same for all conservatives: it will produce a narrative designed to constantly pull conservatives to the left and destroy them.</font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><strong><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">Preservationism</font></font></strong></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">Trump is the classic</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif"><i>anti-progressive</i></font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">(like Margaret Thatcher). He appeals to a conventional or traditional set of values, which the Left loathes, partly because of its 'irrational' appeal to inherited values, but mostly for the values themselves. Thus anti-progressives in the line of Edmund Burke may also b</font></font><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">e</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">called conservatives or traditionalists, since they wish to be more cautious about the rate of change and introduction of new and untested models. Alternatively they can be called nationalists, since nationalism identifies with a set of values unique to that place and time, and hence it wishes to preserve them against change. But all these terms have been tainted by the narrative of the Cathedral to have negative connotations. A Conservative is painted as a posh speaking twerp from a public school. A traditionalist is someone who just can't get with the times, and would certainly be lost on Strictly Come Dancing. Finally, the Nationalist is the worst of all, since he is a 'far right' xenophobe, who is prejudiced against people of other nations and cultures.</font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">So I suggest a better term for an anti-progressive is a Preservationist: someone who wishes to preserve something we currently have that is of value and under threat, as we do with Wildlife reserves and archaeological museums. This Preservationist term attacks the fundamental fallacy and trick of the term Progressivism: its suggestion that all progress is beneficial and an improvement. A moments thought shows that this clearly cannot be the case.</font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><strong><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">Progressivism</font></font></strong></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">Firstly, all movement forward involves giving something up, so when you build a railway to Tibet, it loses its isolation. Is that all good? Not if the latter is an instrument for population replacement.</font></font><br/> <br/> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">Secondly, even if the things you are giving up are not considered of value, the 'progressives' must at some point, climb up the front side of the hill of obstacles, and achieve the Utopian goal they demanded at the beginning of their social crusade, of an equal meritocratic society, for example. So what does 'progressivism', or movement forward, mean, when you've attained the defined goal, i.e. reached the peak of the hill? Well, it has to mean that you move forward, away from the peak, down the other side of the hill, and 'progressivism' becomes 'regressivism', movement away from the defined peak.</font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">Thus we see the movement in the US, away from an egalitarian, meritocratic society, to one that once again discriminates against people based on their ethnicity or culture, under the guise of positive discrimination. Thus Chinese and Korean students must obtain higher grades than the others, in order to obtain entry to the top universities, in order to satisfy the latter's quota systems. To escape from this seeming contradiction, the MIASM now re-casts the original meritocratic goal of 'Equality of opportunity' with a new Marxist one of 'Equality of result'. Discrimination on the grounds of race or culture is once again seen as normal, even going as far as demands for the racial segregation of 'Safe Spaces'. Martin Luther King, who asked that people be judged according to the quality of their character not the colour of their skin, must be turning in his grave. That is how progressivism, applied over decades, ultimately takes you to a place unthinkable at the beginning. It's also why I believe one of the most important guiding principles of the conservative position is a warning on the law of unintended consequences,</font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><strong>The Post Dialogue World</strong></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">The field of argument on these topics has now been so messed up by the Alinskyite dirty tricks of the progressives, that it is no longer possible for a normal, untrained person, to argue against their agenda, in an attempt to protect and preserve his current world and its values. Because the dialogue is messed up, many normal citizens feel that the current narrative, as hammered into them by the MIASM, is grossly unfair to them, but they are unable to argue against it. That is now a job for a few hardened professionals. Thus we have entered the post-dialogue world.</font></font><br/> <br/> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">What Trump is doing is tapping into the doubt and alienation created by the MIASM. Trump is not doing this deliberately. Trump supporters are relieved that finally a Preservationist has appeared to stand up for them, vindicate their beliefs, and protect their lifestyles, since they</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif"><i>feel</i></font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">they are right, even though they do not have the technical equipment to</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif"><i>prove</i></font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">that they are right.</font></font><br/> <br/> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">In fact, I don't think even Trump has the equipment to make that proof, either.</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">But</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">he just doesn't care. As the Leftist media spin their classic deceit and trickery around him, trying to trap him in a web of self-contradiction or ambiguity, he just says "Whatever" and walks through, leaving threads of spider silk trailing in the wind. Indeed, why should he care? The MIASM has given a free pass on self-contradiction and ambiguity to everyone from Islam to Obama for the past 40 years, so I think we are immured to it by now. We've listened as learned Imams trample all over the law of non-contradiction, with barely a flutter of our post-Hellenic eyelids. Aristotle also, must be turning in his grave.</font></font><br/> <br/> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">So that is the source of Trumps power, and it is the reason for the MIASM's uniform bafflement at his rise. They can't understand how some of</font></font> <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif"><i>their</i></font></font></span> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">'demos' can reject the authorised narrative. Even worse, they can't understand why their classic weapons have not worked against him.</font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">If Trump gains the Republican nomination but loses the presidency, it will not be because he hasn't touched a nerve and connected with a core of the American people. It will be because he was outgunned by Hilary's money, outplayed by a media largely supporting her, outnumbered by voters imported through the Southern border,</font></font> <font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">and outsmarted by the devious trickery of those for whom politics, has been a decades long metier.</font></font></p>
<p class="western" align="left"><font color="#555555"><font face="Arial, serif">But that will be yet another sad step in the loss of a functioning democracy in the US, and a step further towards the one-party, single-media, biased-judiciary, partisan-executive - state. Bizarrely, we tend to hate those most who contain some aspect of ourselves. Perhaps that's why Russia's totalitarianism really gets Hilary Clinton going.</font></font></p> Turn the Tables on Fascism: exploit their demand for protective censorship with a demand for proscriptiontag:4freedoms.com,2012-10-06:3766518:Topic:1126832012-10-06T02:41:35.843ZDajjalhttp://4freedoms.com/profile/Dajjal
<p>The current push for international imposition of Islamic blasphemy laws is an ideal opportunity for a counter attack. Strike while the iron is hot. </p>
<p>A petition has been created at Petition2Congress.com entitled: "International Qur'an Petition. </p>
<p>The petition body is short and sweet, including a demand that Islam be defrocked and proscribed, backed up with a few links to relevant documents and a three page pdf file with the evidentiary quotes and links to support the…</p>
<p>The current push for international imposition of Islamic blasphemy laws is an ideal opportunity for a counter attack. Strike while the iron is hot. </p>
<p>A petition has been created at Petition2Congress.com entitled: "International Qur'an Petition. </p>
<p>The petition body is short and sweet, including a demand that Islam be defrocked and proscribed, backed up with a few links to relevant documents and a three page pdf file with the evidentiary quotes and links to support the demand.</p>
<p></p>
<p>When a US Citizen signs the petition, he can easily send it to his Congressman and Senators. 588 such emails have been sent as of the time of this writing. </p>
<p>The petition also has a widget supporters can place on their blogs. The petition is located here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.petition2congress.com/8001/international-quran-petition/" target="_blank">http://www.petition2congress.com/8001/international-quran-petition/</a></p>
<p>Its supporting evidence is here, you can also embed it on your blog. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/108500978">http://www.scribd.com/doc/108500978</a></p>
<p>This is the text of the petition which gets sent to your Congressman: </p>
<p></p>
<p><span id="overview_trunc">Whereas Islam and its apologists accuse Kuffar of inculcating hatred of Muslims and inciting violence against them; and<br/> <br/> Whereas Islam is pursuing national and international legislation to impose <a title="http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=613" href="http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=613" target="_blank">their blasphemy laws</a>[1] <a title="http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=627" href="http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=627" target="_blank">upon us[2]</a> so as to prevent or punish exposure of their execrable doctrines which <a title="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/098-qmt.php#098.006" href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/098-qmt.php#098.006" target="_blank">inculcate hatred [3]</a>, <a title="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.123" href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.123" target="_blank">incite violence</a>[4] and <a title="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php#002.216" href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php#002.216" target="_blank">sanctify & mandate</a>[5] <a title="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.067" href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.067" target="_blank">genocidal</a>[6], <a href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.057" target="_blank">terroristic[7]</a> {<a title="http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora= 9&l=eng&nAya= 120# 9_ 120" href="http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=%209&l=eng&nAya=%20120#%209_%20120" target="_blank">9:120</a>}[8] conquest; the intent of which legislative campaign is to render us defenseless; <br/> <br/> Now, therefore, the undersigned Kufar & Harbi do declare, swear and demonstrate proof from the ample testimony of Allah and his Messenger that Islam is and will always be in egregious violation of the recognized rights of free men and must therefore be condemned and proscribed<strong>.<br/> <br/></strong></span> <span id="overview_trunc"> Since Muslims are promised eternity in a <strong><a href="http://qb.gomen.org/QuranBrowser/cgi/bin/retrieve.cgi?version=pickthall%20yusufali%20khan%20shakir%20sherali%20khalifa%20arberry%20palmer%20rodwell%20sale&layout=auto&searchstring=055:54" target="_blank" title="http://qb.gomen.org/QuranBrowser/cgi/bin/retrieve.cgi?version=pickthall yusufali khan shakir sherali khalifa arberry palmer rodwell sale&layout=auto&searchstring=055:54">celestial bordello</a></strong>[9] for participating in Jihad and threatened with eternal damnation if they refuse, it is impossible that free men can live in peace and security while Islam exists upon the face of the earth. We therefore pray for injunctive relief: proscription of the practice and propagation of Islam. Islam is not a religion protected by the umbra of the First Amendment's free exercise clause, it is a way of life: predation upon the human race; a continuing criminal enterprise: a war crime. </span> <br/> <br/> Exhibits of evidence including quotes from and links to applicable international human rights covenants and Islam's canonical texts is included in this 30kb pdf file which signers are exhorted to download, read, embed in their blogs and use as an email attachment: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/108500978" target="_blank">http://www.scribd.com/doc/108500978</a> .<br/> <br/> [Copy and paste these urls to read the text behind the assertions above.]<br/> [1] <a href="http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=613">http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=613</a><br/> [2] <a href="http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=627">http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=627</a><br/> [3] <a href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/098-qmt.php#098.006">http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/098-qmt.php#098.006</a><br/> [4] <a href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.123">http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.123</a><br/> [5] <a href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php#002.216">http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php#002.216</a><br/> [6] <a href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.067">http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.067</a><br/> [7] <a href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.057">http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.057</a><br/> [8] <a href="http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=%209&l=eng&nAya=%20120#%209_%20120">http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=%209&l=eng&nAya=%20120#%209_%20120</a><br/> [9] <a href="http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/078-qmt.php#078.031">http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/078-qmt.php#078.031</a></p>
<p></p> Promote IQ al-Rassooli for Congressman King's Hearings!tag:4freedoms.com,2010-12-27:3766518:Topic:328292010-12-27T01:35:13.000ZAlan Lakehttp://4freedoms.com/profile/AlanLake
<span class="font-size-3"><strong>KING TO CALL OUT RADICAL ISLAM<br></br></strong>
<strong>NY Congressman Says He Will Hold Hearings<span style="font-size: 16pt;"> </span></strong></span><br></br>
<p> </p>
<span class="font-size-3"><br />
With the welcome changing of the guard in Congress, following the November election shakeup, Representative Peter King (R) of New York (pictured) will step in as the chairman of the House’s Homeland Security Committee. And, perhaps in a move long overdue, King says he will…</span>
<span class="font-size-3"><strong>KING TO CALL OUT RADICAL ISLAM<br/></strong>
<strong>NY Congressman Says He Will Hold Hearings<span style="font-size: 16pt;"> </span></strong></span><br/>
<p> </p>
<span class="font-size-3"><br />
With the welcome changing of the guard in Congress, following the November election shakeup, Representative Peter King (R) of New York (pictured) will step in as the chairman of the House’s Homeland Security Committee. And, perhaps in a move long overdue, King says he will hold hearings on radical Islam (see the <i>WSJ</i> article below).</span><br/>
<p> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0cm; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Needless to say, he’s already under siege from the bastions of political correctness, fronted by far leftists and controversial Muslim groups like CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations). But much to the admiration of two undisputed experts on the subject of radical Islam and its recruitment of homegrown U.S. operatives, King isn’t blinking.</font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0cm; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3" xml:lang="EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0cm; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><b>IQ al-Rassooli is an </b><b>Iraqi-born religious scholar of Islam </b>who is never at a loss for words on the subject of enlightening the West to the true enemy. And it’s not simply al Qaeda. He writes:</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0cm; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">“The incoming chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, Representative Peter King, is absolutely correct in conducting this investigation. I am also glad that he is upset with the Imams who will not allow Muslims to cooperate with the security services.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Tragically, Mr. King most probably—just like in most cases like this—will listen to the wrong people of both sides of the debate.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Based on my knowledge, I would advise Mr. King to bring to his investigation not only Muslim so-called ‘scholars of Islam’ and such, like Imams who have the agenda of deceiving the American public, but to also ask the following people to attend:</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Mr. Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch; Ms. Brigitte Gabriel of ACT! For America; Mrs. Wafa Sultan; Mr. Ali Sina and Congressman Allen West, who have more factual knowledge of the subjects of Muhammad, his Quran, his Sunna and his Fundamentalist followers than any and all so-called ‘experts’ in the whole of the administration.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Mr. King must understand that the following fundamentals <b><i>PROHIBIT</i></b><i> </i>any believing Muslim from being loyal to the U.S. Constitution and/or people of the U.S.A.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">1.) Muhammad’s Quran forbids them from ever putting the lives or well being of other Muslims in danger at the hands of the Kuffar (all unbelievers).</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">2.) Using their Islamic religious dogma of subterfuge called <b><i>Taqiyah,</i></b> believing or fundamentalist Muslims will do their utmost to subvert, misinform and deceive Mr. King and his investigation.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">3.) American Muslims are NOT being <b><i>‘radicalized!’ </i></b>Believing American Muslims are <b>radica</b>l without any input from al Qaeda or anyone else, because they are only following Allah’s explicit instructions to the letter from Muhammad’s Quran and Sunna.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">4.) Muhammad’s Quran is a hatemongering, warmongering, misogynist, racist and, hence, ungodly scripture that <b>forbids</b> its followers from ever abiding by the U.S. constitution, because it is NOT from Allah.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">5.) Again, I must put forth one – out of hundreds of others - of the most revealing and devastating verses in Muhammad’s Quran that leaves very little for the imagination of any being, even if it had only two brain cells.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><i><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Al Tauba 9:29 ‘Fight [qatiloo] those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His apostle nor acknowledge the religion of truth [ISLAM] (even if they are) of the People of the Book [Christians & Jews] until they pay the Jizya [Poll Tax] with willing submission and feel themselves humiliated.’</font></font></i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><i><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Is there anything ambiguous about the contents of these verses even though they are in English?</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Mr. King’s ‘investigation’ must concentrate on the Quran’s scripture that started with conciliatory verses in Mecca, but were all abrogated by the vile verses from the Medina period.</font></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 18pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; text-align: justify; font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Looking for young Muslims being radicalized by anyone <b>other than</b> Muhammad’s Quran by Imams in Mosques in the U.S.A.—and every other country on Earth—would not bring forth a single correct answer and would, in reality, be a total waste of time and effort.</font></font></span></p> Islam Not For Me (a you tube song)tag:4freedoms.com,2010-07-09:3766518:Topic:254462010-07-09T03:37:24.000ZJuniperSagehttp://4freedoms.com/profile/JuniperSage894
<a href="%3Cobject%20width="></a><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2dsd_79XPPc&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="never" width="480" height="385"></embed>
"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2dsd_79XPPc&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="never"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2dsd_79XPPc&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="never" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> The US has been defending itself against Islam for 200 yearstag:4freedoms.com,2010-05-08:3766518:Topic:218762010-05-08T08:34:20.000ZAlan Lakehttp://4freedoms.com/profile/AlanLake
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/21HcGZ4iXiI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never"></param><embed wmode="opaque" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/21HcGZ4iXiI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="never" width="640" height="385"></embed> <param name="wmode" value="opaque"></param></object>
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/21HcGZ4iXiI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never"></param><embed wmode="opaque" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/21HcGZ4iXiI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="never" width="640" height="385"></embed> <param name="wmode" value="opaque"></param></object> Muslim Brotherhood in USA - Plans for Dominationtag:4freedoms.com,2009-10-11:3766518:Topic:24322009-10-11T01:00:14.000ZNetconhttp://4freedoms.com/profile/Netcon
Document attached.
Document attached.