Women Victims of Kuffarphobia

Add a Comment

Comment by Antony on June 19, 2014 at 16:48

Ex Muslims take off hijabs ; http://richarddawkins.net/2014/06/an-ex-muslims-project-to-show-wom...

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 18, 2014 at 10:45

Honour killing and other atrocities.

I have great respect for Anne Marie Waters. How can anyone read her article and not be outraged. As she says at the end she is confused by it all, as we all are, as the entire society is.

We all know it is wrong and unlawful what is happening here, not only what is being done to women but what is being done to us all as a result of indiscriminate immigration.

We are left with fury and impotence, if we vent our anger we get locked up.  We are the soft target that the law goes after whilst the real criminals enjoy racial, religious and cultural imunity.

-As we know, criticism of cultural practices which happen to be attached, rightly or wrongly, to the religion of Islam, is particularly "racist".  In such cases, race, religion, and culture become one, and criticism of any of the three is deemed "racism" and thus unacceptable - even criminal.  

At the foot of all of this lies an obsession with “equality” (with the notable exception of equality for all people before the law).  “Equality” however is somewhat ill-defined.  It is not about the equal rights and protections of the human being; instead “equality” means equality of beliefs and cultural values.  The result is that cultures in which women are treated as property (as a matter of state law) are equal to those in whichthey are not. Cultures in which women are routinely beaten and abused in the name of honour are equal to those in which they are not.

Comment by Antony on June 17, 2014 at 21:49

Anne Marie Waters ; Cultural division is a killer ; http://www.annemariewaters.org/latest-blog/

Comment by Philip Smeeton on June 16, 2014 at 10:46

Another word that Muslims do not understand, or understand differently than we do, is consent. Rape is a crime.

Comment by Antony on June 16, 2014 at 6:39

Glasgow women organise 3000 strong anti rape march ; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/thousands-march-in-g... - why put this here ? - the clue is in the police saying "both communities".... the alleged rapists were described as Pakistani muslim elsewhere... and why on earth is the msm narrative that Scotland loves multi-culti being pushed ? recent polls show most scots are broadly in favour of UKIP's stance on mass immigration, whilst many support independence, it does not mean they support alex Salmond or Labour's love of mass immigration !, maybe they are just using it as a cover fro refugeee resettlement to take the pressure off the rest of the UK, and to ensure a larger Labour voting base as well as to ensure a divided populace.

Comment by Joe on May 26, 2014 at 23:59

I stumbled upon a geek site which annotated the dossier of the killer Elliot Rodgers.

Yesterday the Rap Genius community annotated Elliot Rodger’s manifesto on News Genius. Because this tragedy is still so raw, there was internal debate as to whether this document belonged on the site at all. Ultimately we decided that it was worthy of close reading – understanding the psychology of people who do horrible things can help us to better understand our society and ourselves.

The current version of the annotated document is far from great, but the hope is that the annotations will improve over time as the story unfolds and it will eventually be a good resource for people looking to understand this tragedy.

Almost all the annotations were at least attempting a close reading – they were genuinely, though imperfectly, trying to add context to the text and make it easier to understand.

However, Mahbod Moghadam, one of my co-founders, annotated the piece with annotations that not only didn’t attempt to enhance anyone’s understanding of the text, but went beyond that into gleeful insensitivity and misogyny. All of which is contrary to everything we’re trying to accomplish at Rap Genius.

Another search for Mahbod Moghadam turns up that he is a muslim.  Colour me surprised.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on May 18, 2014 at 8:50

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/robert-spencer/vindicated/

I really like this frontpagemag.

As others have said- the truth (and facts) has an inconvenient tendency to leak out.

Comment by Antony on May 17, 2014 at 21:57

Alan - muslims don't need internet porn to inspire them to defile kufar women - the oldest violent porn book named the koran does that with continual tales of rape by their head film star mohammed !

Many people look at porn, it does not mean they become violent, my own view is that violent porn is distasteful, and 99.9% of ordinary porn is just plain dead boring !, though I don't think it should be banned.. we must be careful of unforeseen consequences, for instance, there is a vid circulated by an Ethiopian Christian/human rights group that was taken by muslim arabs of an Ethiopean women being whipped/abused it would'nt surprise me if the PC Elite censored this claiming it was "violent porn".  some things are ugly, but that does not mean to say they should not be depicted so that change can occur.

On the subject of prostitution, I think it should be legalised , aside from the fact that what two consenting adults do in private is none of anyone else's business, the illegality surrounding it forces women into the hands of pimps and gangsters, precisely the people we are fighting against.

Comment by Alan Lake on May 17, 2014 at 20:07

Yes, I've got no objection to porn which is just about sex, but its the depiction of sex with violence and abuse that is wrong.  I wonder how many of the hundreds of Muslim grooming gangs were inspired by watching filthy and violent porn on the internet.

But as I said, the most ridiculous thing of all, is that we would not allow a Muslim terrorist to be abused in a fraction of the way we allow porn actresses to be abused.  Some female writers have also been noting recently have it now seems to be permissible to be abusive or MCP about women on twitter and so on, in a way that would not be accepted in the old media.  That is just a tiny fragment of the slippery mind change that is going on.

Back to a theme of Joe's, and there are many instances (Sicilian Mafia, Spanish Inquisition, the slave trade) where the evil and corrupting influence of Islam has infected the non-Muslims it mixes with.  Perhaps this is another case, happening in our own lifetimes?  We accept that Burqa'd and veiled women walk our streets in black, why shouldn't we accept multiple violent gang rape and degradation of women in porn?  Or perhaps its the other way round in this case.  Perhaps our acceptance of abuse of women in porn has eased our acceptance of abuse of women in Islam.

Hmm, this subject could have gone in a forum all of its own.

Comment by Philip Smeeton on May 17, 2014 at 9:47

Porn violence: I do not think that porn should be forbidden, but it definitely should be subject to some restriction. Sex and violence have nothing in common. Rape movies are obscene while people enjoying consenting sex is not.

Prostitution: In Norway they have a rediculous law now that forbids the buying of sex but not its sale. Something that only assists the human trafficing pimp criminals. If a consenting adult wants to sell sex that is ok by me, for some customers it is the only way that they can get sex. But it should be in regulated public bordellos.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 54
• 55
• 56
• 57
• 58
• …
• 80
• Next ›
• Page