The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Women Victims of Kuffarphobia


Women Victims of Kuffarphobia

To protect women and society from abuse which is ideologically authorised, i.e. Honor Killings, Forced Marriage, Bigamy, Legal Sub-status, and Face Covering

The idea of the inferiority of, and need to suppress women, is bound up in the Islamic concept of Purdah.

Search Site:
Members: 39
Latest Activity: Mar 20

Discussion Forum

Acid Attacks on Women

Started by Indoeuropean. Last reply by Alan Lake Aug 8, 2017. 10 Replies

Honour Killings - collected articles

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony Jul 21, 2017. 7 Replies

Mohammed's Wives and Islams Permitted Polygamy

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Jan 22, 2017. 2 Replies

Rape of Yazidis by ISIS

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony Nov 7, 2016. 1 Reply

Burqa Deceit and Abuse - collected articles

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony Oct 22, 2016. 90 Replies

taharush - the 'respect' for women

Started by Herman Van Keer. Last reply by Antony Aug 19, 2016. 8 Replies

One Law for All - collected articles

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Aug 8, 2016. 11 Replies

Femen - Collected Articles

Started by Joe. Last reply by Antony Jan 28, 2016. 121 Replies

it never ends... never ever

Started by Herman Van Keer Jan 20, 2016. 0 Replies

A brave testimony from a woman

Started by Herman Van Keer Jan 19, 2016. 0 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Women Victims of Kuffarphobia to add comments!

Comment by Heather Gilbert on August 25, 2011 at 8:41

Hard to pinpoint when it started Indo, but I think it definitely got worse in the 60's

I was sent some vintage images recently. 2 of the photos included Victorian girls. I found these tasteless and comparable to the young girls dressed up for beauty pageants that we see in today's newspapers. These weren't cute photos of kids dressing up, but kids who had been dressed up to look like adults.  Hard to say how many of these images were produced back then? It's the first time I've come across any offensive vintage images involving children. 

Television plays a large part in forcing children to grow up too fast. Cindy, Barbie dolls etc  The pushing of boundaries in the 60's

I don't know enough about Kinsey et al to know the influence they may have had. 

Comment by Indoeuropean on August 25, 2011 at 7:24

This is very interesting Heather: when did this Sexualisation start? Is that possible to expose this starting Point? And possibly even expose the Shadow (...) that brought to such way of - so to say - Thinking?

[For instance, if this started with PEDOPHILE Kinsey and his Collaborators/Friends, this was the Sixties, and one should analize which Society/Parenthood/Context the same Pedophile comes from: one should analize the (mental) Condition/Health of his Parents/Forefathers/Foremothers, which stricly depends on their Life Conditions, and see if we can expose their Illness and eventually see if we can avoid this same Illness to infect other Members of our (Western/European) human Race, and/or other Members of the masculine Gender and of the feminine one.

According to what I observed here, where I live, Leftiests come from rightist Families, and the latters were living during War Times, and concretely had a very hard Life, therefore they had no Time, Energy or even Capabilities to take properly Care of their own Offsprings; the formers, (practically) abandoned, or frustraded, or submitted Children, once they (came over their Childhood and saw the End of World War II), decided to create some more brilliant and more free Future (for themselves), and repudiate the Culture and the social Environement they (and their Parents) came from.

Fact is though, that these Youngs internalized the Ban to criticize the very Root of their Suffering (which is/was their own Parents - concrete Beings - and their Behaviour), and they tried destroy the Plant that made them suffer so much (the Culture and social Environment). This Lack of very accurately addressed Criticism made so, that the Reality they gave Form to resulted so sick as the former Reality.

This can be seen in the leftist Praising of III. World's Realities, where Gender or social Discriminations is the Rule, and Kids get regularly abused: they praise the Form (foreign Countries, foreign People, Diversity, ...), but they miss to criticize the Essence, which is UNIVERSAL HUMAN BEHAVIOUR. And human Behaviour, the one we personally experience, is fist of all that of one's Parents, then that or our Family Members, and eventually that of our cultural/social Environment. Not the other way 'round.


Comment by Heather Gilbert on August 24, 2011 at 9:15

Free thinking and free thinkers?  More like thorougly brainwashed sheep Indo.

You are right about the moral decline of the West. The sexualization of our children should be deeply worrying people. Instead, we somehow equate pornography with freedom, ignoring the damage it does to our society.

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the
freedom of thought which they avoid"
-- Soren Kierkegaard
Comment by Indoeuropean on August 24, 2011 at 6:43

Since Antony posted a Link recalling Feminists (Feminism), I'd like to add something about the main Theme(s) approached in this Room, and them, in conjunction with Heather's latest Post and mine.


Here we talk about/against genital Mutilation(s) [that becomes SEXIST when it is a Fight against FEMALE genital Mutilation and NOT against MALE genital Mutilation as well], and about (Araboislamic) Pedophilia [underage Marriages of little young Girls with far old (or simply old) Men], and about (its) Gender DISequality [or Gender Apartheid], and/but the Question is:


what have we, what has the West, and Europe, to offer INSTEAD of those (sick, unsane, globally unhealthy) Behaviours? Unfortunately nothing really better ->


once we talked on this Forum about Pornography, and Psychologist Dr. Phyllis Chesler already published several Articles citing "the Pornification of Society". I was recently reading a Book by Psychologist Dr. Willy Pasini about (nowadays) "Extimacy" [which exposed nowadays Attitude in showing off anything which is (was) intimate, and notably right in/through the Medias], and I'm now reading what did Psychologist Dr. Alexander Lowen observed about "the Construction of Charachter", [not to mention the Undercovering of scandalous sexual Abuses within the ... catholic Church, which is most of the times associated with the West/Europe, and its (very, classical) Culture]:


well, appearently ... Western/European (today's) Ethics/Morality has (too) little to offer, and the West/Europe has Nothing to teach to Others. I'm notably talking about (today's) PORNOGRAPHY, appearently supported by a certain Wing of Feminists (Feminism).


This "very (un)civilized Industry" is appearently succesfully growing, and it does encourage all of that we (the West/Europe) are supposed to fight against [when it belongs to "other (Sub)cultures, and (In)civilizations]: sexual (genital) Mistreatement, (from light to extreme) Pedophilia, and the Misrepresentation of Women (the Feminine) and Men (the Masculine), which drives to (severe) Misunderstanding(s) between the two (Genders) [that, willingly or not, are still responsible for human Reproduction, which are potential Parents meant to be responsible for (their) Kids and for (their) Education].




since we (our Society) appears to be so ... sick, insane, unhealthy, so (blatantly <- watch the Medias) focused on the Belly [which is tied to most bestial Needs/Behavious, while Chest and Head dominate other (more human) Needs/Behavious]?


Most probably free Thinking and free Thinkers is the only good Point about the West/Europe, which mainly includes CRITICAL THINKING THAT HAS TO BE APPLIED to other (Sub)cultures and (In)civilizations, and TO OURSELVES (the West/Europe) as well,


no matter which ... Wing, Gender, social Class, Ethnicity/Race, ... one belongs to, or which Belief, Education, ... one comes from.


Loveliest Regards and have a beautiful Life, to everyone :-)

Comment by Indoeuropean on August 22, 2011 at 14:04

Dearest Heather,


I think that religious Supremacists can/could be easily debunked (if they just didn't have/manage all that Money -> and -> Wealth ...), since they usually (and nowadays) claim special Rights for themselves and they fight against (alleged) Discrimination(s) against themselves, ... while they do deny (same) special Rights to Others and they do discriminate against Others!!! I do not think one (we) need(s) a Dictatorship to make them ... understand/see ... such an obvious Thing/Inconsistency (of theirs). Well, then they should be free to decide (and let them Others free to do the same ...):


special Rights (to themselves and to Others) and no Discrimination (against themselves and against Others), or no special Rights (to Others and to themselves) and Discrimination (against Others and against themselves)? Again: if they just did not have/manage all that Wealth <- and <- Money that they do have/manage .... Eventually I see it very clear(er) today: the only Thing that matters, ON THIS EARTH, among (this) Humanity (understandably) is right that, what they (religious Supremacists) have [Wealth <- and <- Money]. It is the only way and this is the only Means to ... survive and live [on this Planet, within this (and other) Civilization(s). Actually, it has been so since always!].


Same goes for any "Party" or "political Mouvement" that eventually establish [all of them do so! That's historically proved, and there is no Reason to think that "for a same Cause (human Greediness) there might be different Results] a "priviledged Class", which suffers of (self Sense of) Supremacism and (Instict of) discriminating (against Others).


I agree with you, the Chart of human Rights misses his/her (needed) twin Soul, which is, the/a Chart of human Duties [which must not be like the so called Trieste Chart created by the Council for human Duties, since this simply is a Reformulation of the Chart of human Rights, nothing added, nothing more evolved, nothing completed, nothing worked out],


where human Duties should be actively listed [such as: Adults have the Duty to protect Children and not to abuse and/or exploit them for their own Enjoyment and/or Pleasure], or passively listed by adding something to already existing Articles (of the Chart of human Rights) [such as: adding something about Soustainability to Art. 12, Art. 16, Art. 23, Art. 25; and adding something about the Liberty to free lancing Teaching to Art. 26 (*)]. I can't really give up the Hope (for a better World/Future for Everyone)


[though I (too often) feel like giving it up], because I can't ignore the next Generation (...): anyway I fully understand you and your Desponency [there are very few enlightened human Beings on this Planet, and notably they do not manage the (Humanity's) Wealth <- and <- Money. Worst of all, those who manage it aren't enlightened at all (despite what they say/think to be).] Disastrous Results are there/here to be observed/seen!].


Loveliest Regards to you :-)


NOTE: (*) I'm supposed to live in a Place where there are the best Schools ... of the World (Nothing less than that!) but do you know what, when it comes to (public) Schools there appearently is enough Money to pay (enough) Teachers, therefore Kids are left ... (litteraly) sleeping since the (existing) Teacher do not have Time to take Care of them (and notably to teach them).


Instead of teaching Kids as much as possible (Kids do learn without Efforts: it's Youngs and Adults who difficultly learn, because their Brains are no more flexible as they were), and (the State <- Tax Payers) investing on the Kids (= future Generation, Future of Humanity, Future of the World), (Society <- Rulers <- Budget Managers) teach(es) the Kids as least as possible, because they (practically) prefer to invest in their own Salary/-ies [Director, Sub director, Mega director, Substitute of the Director, Co director, Director to be, ...], instead of investing in the Teaching and in [GLOBAL (here Globalization would be an absolute plus!)] (human) Education (Formation/Developement).


Not enough, they ("the State") forbids (!) free Lancing and Education is submitted to several Permissions [which are very hard to obtain]. Funny, isn't it? [And of course, we (Westerners) are supposed to go to the III. World and bring there Civilization and Education! The III. World is here, not (only) there!]


So, do you see? In the Country where there are the best Schools of the World ... Kids and People are stupid like the Sheeps, they are put to sleep instead of getting taught, and Money -> Wealth is used to fill the Pokets of the fews (few Adults) who manage the Power (private and public "Directors"), and therefore, I ask myself (as you probably ask yourself):


what should we expect (of good/better) from this (present) World/Humanity? [Not that exterminating it would change anything: it's (dis)human Greediness that must be changed, and for that no other Revolution is needed than a so called "inner Revolution", which might be called a "humanist (inner) Revolution", whose Principles have been ALREADY very well exposed by intelligent People such as: Jiddu Krishnamurti, (Mikhael Omraam Aivanhov and Osho Rajineesh), Daisaku Ikeda. Just to mention few (famous) of them.]

Comment by Heather Gilbert on August 22, 2011 at 7:38
To achieve a ban Indo, at best we would need a benign dictatorship to enforce it. Can you imagine the resistance of the religious people who are the worst supremacists on the planet?  As you rightly observe, humans find thousands of justifications for their damaging behaviour. What you or I may see as greed, others would see as self preservation. Human rights laws were probably well intentioned, but we see a flagrant abuse of these laws on a daily basis, benefitting the most criminal and most selfish people. I wish I had a glimmer of hope for the future, but I don't think anything other than a worldwide disaster will bring about any real change. Even then, we have very convenient amnesia.
Comment by Indoeuropean on August 22, 2011 at 7:11
Sorry, I add an Explanation: I talked about (self) Justification, and I say that you'll be amazed in aknowledging how many times "Religion" is used as such. [In the case of a (so to call it) atheist Belief like Communism, "Communism" self is the/that Religion (used as - self - Justification).] To rephrase most famous Animal Farm's "every Animal is equal, but some Animals are more equal than Others", (as - leftist or rightist - self Justification) one might listen to (or use it) another Sentence "every Religion (or religious Person) is equal, but some Religions (religious People) are more equal than Others" [which means: "the more equal" deserve (?) are worthy of (?) a better Life, a more comfortable Life, a higher Quality of Life, (more priviledged Life/Existance), ....] Sorry for adding that. That's what I (in a very orwellian way indeed) observed. Have a most beautiful Day and Life.
Comment by Indoeuropean on August 22, 2011 at 6:49
Dearest Heather, I think the Problem is much greater than that. I think a Ban must be set for everyone, notably for those who think: "I have Kids, I deserve to be rich, richer, richest" [which for the Kids is okay, but for the social Sustainability is not okay at all]. In my Opinion, the Problem is a WORLDWIDE very bad Management of the Richness (intellectual and matterial Resources and Products), WHICH DEPENDS ON HUMAN FEELING OF GREEDINESS, and in the WORLDWIDE Irresponsibility when it comes to SUSTAINABLE THINKING/BEHAVIOUR(S), WHICH DEPENDS ON HUMAN FEELING OF SUPREMACISM, which drives to Discrimination(s) (= many Priviledges for the/a Minority, and few for the/a Majority). Humans find thousand (or more) Justifications to ... justify ... such greedy and insustainable Thinking/Behaviour(s): BE THEM POOR(EST), BE THEM RICH(EST) [I got to directly observe both of them, therefore I talk out of personal Experience, which is whether leftist, nor rightist.] Loveliest Regards.
Comment by Heather Gilbert on August 21, 2011 at 19:58
I don't hold much hope for so called liberals agreeing to your proposed ban Indo, but I certainly agree with you
Comment by Indoeuropean on August 20, 2011 at 6:10

Genital Mutilation(s) without medical Reason(s) must be banned, both for Females and Males. Activists for basic human Rights (and basic Freedoms) have to fight against them and in favour of genital Integrity for both. Many Woman (as Dr. Psychologist Phyllis Chesler pointed out) internalized the discriminating Mentality against Women/Females [a part of later, unconsciously, seeking a sort of Revenge against such a mysogynist masculine Supremacism (...)], and for instance, they exult as the Result of their Pregnancy/-ies "it's a Boy!" [meaning that this is better than a Girl]. How cruel can be ... Parents ... and Adults, toward/against Kids: and this is just the Beginning of (a) Life <- no Wonder that Suffering is (still) a common Condition on/in today's (discriminating) World. Loveliest Regards.


Monitor this Page

You don't have to be a member of 4F to follow any room or topic! Just fill in on any page you like.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2018   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service