Military Victims of Kuffarphobia

This room is to help protect Soldiers rights, who are vulnerable to particular forms of abuse by the government, by acts of both commission and omission.

Load Previous Comments
  • Philip Smeeton

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-24/you-might-be-british-righ...
    The tragedy is that the people that come up with these definitions actually believe them to be reasonable.
    "....so called 'National Identity' -It used to be called the "British" army. Is Britain no longer a Nation?
    "Claim that immigration is the root of injustices against vulnerable people (e.g. old age pensioners, veterans)" -add (rape and violent crime victims). As most of this crime is carried out by immigrants you would have to have been severely "indoctrinated" to be unable to reach this logical conclusion.
    "Refer to Political Correctness as some left wing or communist plot" -I would say that PC is rather, lack of moral courage. An inability to stand up for what is right and just. And dishonesty.
    "Threaten violence when losing an argument...." -That sounds more like leftist SJW behaviour.
    "Use blatantly untruthful or incorrect references to immigrants, Judaism or Islam" -I doubt if anything soldiers say about immigration and Islam is untruthful or incorrect.
    "Talk of an impending racial conflict or 'Race War' -There is a racial conflict going on and a war with Islam. Are we, including soldiers, not to be allowed to voice an opinion about something that is actually happening?
    "Claim that it is acceptable to abuse Jews or Muslims as Judaism or Islam are not 'races' -I doubt if anyone has ever made this claim in the real world. They are more likely to beat someone up or insult them just because they don't like them or what they stand for. Arguing that Islam is not a race is used to counter accusations of being a racist if you fear or hate Islam. Jew can be a racial description but Muslim cannot, nor can Christian. Islam can anyway never be described as a race because it is a system of belief, and its followers can come from all races.

  • Kinana

    The Daily Mail have confirmed that the Army leaflet on signs of right-wing extremism is genuine. It came out in 2017.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7082855/British-army-offic...

    They observe in their report that " It is not known whether similar literature has been produced on how to spot left-wing extremists or Islamists."

    When I first heard of this leaflet, I thought for sure it was fake news.

    So 'Patriot' has now become a four letter word. When the grip of the Leftists/globalists/Islamists is so strong in the military then we are even in worse trouble than I imagined.

  • Alan Lake

    How far off are we, from when the once great British Army has become a flaccid and ineffectual tool of the government? As Adam Smith said, "there is a great deal of ruin in a nation", so it would normally take generations for such degradation to occur. But things are happening so quickly now, that that stage, when we see British Armed Forces simply refuse to carry out some of their orders, and suffer a major defeat against what would normally be considered a weaker enemy, could be less than 20 years away.

  • Philip Smeeton

    It crossed my mind that it could be a fake leaflet, but I believed it because I know how depraved our institutions have become. Back in the time that censorship was on the retreat after the release of ladychatterleyslover I bought a book with a title something like- the dictionary of English swear words- cunt twat arse fuck and all of the forbidden words and their variations. There was a general belief in society that things could only improve, peace and love. It was impossible to imagine the future we now suffer.

    As an ex-soldier I can tell you that the only thing, aside from money, that a soldier will fight for is his homeland and all that that entails. For the Empire also once upon a time and against any external enemy. The pride of being a great nation and ruling the seas. These are things not to be despised and are what men are willing to fight for. 

    Right now our war  is civil and internal, a polarizing ideological warfare. And if I judge my countrymen correctly many would like to avenge themselves in a bloody conflict.

  • Philip Smeeton

    The British are as brave and fierce as they ever were, and as brutal and ruthless. The fault lies entirely with the want of leadership. Islam has to go, and the others, it is a job that has to be done.

  • Antony

    This is how war with Iran is manufactured ; https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-11/how-war-iran-manufactured

  • Antony

  • Antony

  • Antony

    Majority of US Vets think Middle East regime change wars were not worth fighting ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I55OuR3Svh4

  • Antony

  • Philip Smeeton

    Even in peace time the worst and most violent fanatics are on the Left. The correct definition for the human race is- murder ape. All of our great achievements are outweighed by our barbarity and absolute disregard for human life and dignity.

    Just look at the political hatred in the witchhunt against Trump. And every single day thousands of innocents worldwide suffer intolerable violence and cruelty.

  • Philip Smeeton

    The only safety is within your own tribal civilisation sharing a common understanding. Respecting our own laws and sharing the same blood.

    A nation is an organism with a protective skin, that penetrated too deeply will cause it to die.

  • Philip Smeeton

    https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2019/12/06/report-6-saudis-...
    We really should not give Muslims weapons training.

  • Antony

  • Philip Smeeton

    All British troops should be on British soil and concerned only with defending Britain. Which would imply that they should be used to round up undesirables and pack them off back to where they originated.

  • Antony

  • Philip Smeeton

    An intelligent person will avoid violence, but if forced into violence is likely to win by applying an more effective method of killing, except in the case of one on one combat where the opponent is overwhelmingly superior in physical strength. Better to win by unfair means than to lose due to a sense of fairness.
    The third world war has been going on for sometime and is not open warfare, it is the replacement of populations through migration and outbreeding.
    The intelligence will be lowered because the invaders are less intelligent than the populations of developed countries that they replace.
    "Lynn then cites a number of different studies all showing the same thing: in World War II, smarter soldiers were more likely to be killed than dumber soldiers. This was because more intelligent soldiers tended to be officers, leading the troops into risky situations such as sniper-filled abandoned towns; and also because intelligence is associated with being pro-social, including with bravery and self-sacrificial behavior,"
    Intelligent and university educated people (IQ 122) are more welcoming to mass-immigration due to their high-principled self-sacrificing nature. The highly intelligent are above this. Thankfully with the majority of Europeans being average and around the 100 mark common sense will prevail and we will survive this war. I hope.

  • Alan Lake

    I think intelligence is a bit over-rated. For one thing, in modern society, we have a bit of a surplus of higher 'intelligence' people, on paper. Sorry, these words are all mixed up. What I'm trying to say is that I'd rather have a relatively 'simple' minded society of moral people than a 'sharp' society of decadent and corrupt moral values. 

    I'm talking about the old Britain, the Britain of our parents and grand-parents. They maybe would struggle with smartphones and so on, but in the end it doesn't matter as much as being honest, hard working, diligent, loyal, patriotic and respecting the traditions of your ancestors.  You only need a few smart people to get the advanced technology working; after that, just being of average intelligence but good moral fibre, will work just fine.  And those smart people don't even need to have super high pay (although a better pay is merited); they will pursue the tricky work for fun anyway. 

  • Philip Smeeton

    "....being honest, hard working, diligent, loyal, patriotic and respecting the traditions of your ancestors."

    Honesty to me is the greatest virtue. My vanity requires that I see myself as being reasonably intelligent, but when I look back on my life, normal average kind and pleasant people are the ones that enriched my life. The everyday heros that get up and go to work and care about their families. 

    I used to love movies but now I can hardly watch them, they are so dishonest, with a political agenda destroying any semblance of enjoyable storytelling.

  • Kinana

    Philip

    "I used to love movies but now I can hardly watch them, they are so dishonest, with a political agenda destroying any semblance of enjoyable storytelling."

    I know what you mean!  I have discovered a new series on Netflix which may be of interest to you.  It is called 'Medal of Honor'.  It is about the few soldiers who have earned that medal.  The only annoying thing about it is having to see and hear President Obama put the Medal on some of the soldiers!  The history and comment on each of their stories I find to be sober, realistic and human.

  • Philip Smeeton

    I have Netflix but all I can watch there are some European texted series that somehow are politically neutral and just tell a story, the way things used to be. I watched a movie called Hostiles with Christian Bale, it was like one of those second rate Christian movies with morality pasted on in a thick layer. I could make a long list and itemize what is wrong with the movies and series but then I would end up in the loony bin, the only way to remain sane is to recognise the signs and just not watch.

  • Alan Lake

    The infantile moralising of Hollywood movies generally disgusts me, but there are other options open now on Netflix. 

    • "Better than us" is a Russian series which is surprisingly non-Hollywood, i.e. normal and realistic in how people think and behave.
    • "First They Killed My Father" about the Cambodian Khmer Rouge
    • "Spy" (with Sasha Cohen) is pretty nuanced in its subjects
  • Antony

  • Alan Lake

  • Philip Smeeton

    Attack Attack Attack. Never give the leftist loonies any rest.
    My purpose is to restore my homeland and destroy its enemies.
    Terrorists have no rights. As said here, a different kind of justice system must be applied to anyone that sets out to kill innocents. They must be permanently removed from society. Breivik will never see the light of day again but Muslim terrorists do, and that is perverted political bias. Not that I think Breivik should be released. In fact deliberately targeting and killing civilians for the sake of an ideology should carry a death sentence.
    The negative aspects of socialism (indoctrination in schools) and immigration (the attack on whiteness) are the causes of the demoralization of our youth. Actually far-right doctrine is the only thing that can restore their belief in themselves and pride in their nation.
    The immigrants themselves would be better off if they were returned to country of origin, it would surely be a great relief to them to not have to deal with whites anymore and to have only their own kind to blame for their own inadequacies.
    I was in Northern Ireland with the Parachute Regiment training for border patrol deployment in 1965. I was invited home by a girl to meet her parents in Belfast. They had a huge union jack on the living room wall together with a framed portrait of the queen. Nice people. Later I was transfered to Libya, to an armoured brigade, also Irish. I was a radio technician corporal. Apparently we were there to protect the arab king and train in desert warfare. We actually defeated a US Marine Corps amphibious landing near to El Alamein, on exercise. This was before Gaddafi. When I was in England I used to hitchhike home in uniform, met a lot of nice people. It would not be advisable to travel in uniform now. I was very proud of my parachutist badge and red beret.

  • Alan Lake

  • Philip Smeeton

    Tanks are very vulnerable on the battlefield in a major war, because there are missles with multiple warheads that can knock out several tanks at the same time (from above) there is no armour capable of stopping these projectiles. Artillery is also vulnerable when facing a professional enemy, because the trajectory of the shells fired can now be tracked precisely and missiles or shells from a counter-battery will follow-backtrack this path and wipe out artillery instantly.
    A major advantage is that the enemy does not know your precise location. You notice that after firing these tanks in the video retreat behind cover. A tank that can be seen or located is easy prey for even hand-held missiles.
    Drones have taken over many of the roles of fighter-bomber aircraft, and can be operated from secure bunkers. Note that they want anti-ship missiles, these missiles make a shipborne force vulnerable. In a major war you would not want to be on an aircraft carrier, there are unstoppable missiles being developed by China that attack from outside the atmosphere with an ultra-high velocity, specifically designed to take out carriers. A carrier force is only useful against low-tech nations like Iran.
    I expect that America is more likely to station all of its forces within the US in the future. With specialised units going out and taking-out targets that the drones cannot deal with. Stealth ships and land bases in friendly countries will enable deployment.
    Heavy tanks will meet the same fate that battleships did, became outpaced by technological advances. In the case of battleships it was divebombers (from carriers) and torpedoes.
    Warfare evolves. But is not going away.

  • Philip Smeeton

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz64eYmRN2Y
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaDtHaBaGh4&t=16s
    Proud to be British.
    And why Africa should not be on our streets.
    The UN are of no use in Africa, peace in Sierra Leone was brought about entirely by British force. The only thing keeping Sierra Leone together is British administration otherwise it would have reverted back to pre-colonial savagery.
    The White Man's Burden !

  • Antony

  • Philip Smeeton

    We should stay well out of involving ourselves in Muslim countries. The UN is to blame for the idea that these refugees should be taken in by Western countries.

  • Antony

    The Extent of NATO's Destruction in Yugoslavia - https://russia-insider.com/en/history/extent-natos-destruction-yugo...

  • Antony

  • Antony

  • Antony

  • Antony

  • Alan Lake

    I totally agree about the United States using world war 2 to strip Britain of every last penny. It was disgraceful pure greed.. Then, afterwards, they stopped the UK and France from reclaiming the Suez Canal after it had been illegally requisitioned by Egypt. I think this was to rub our noses in the dirt and show us that we were no longer a major world power.

  • Alan Lake

  • Antony

  • Antony

  • Joe

    The Suvorov claim informed Diana West's 2014 book American Betrayal.  She was attacked all around by American "conservatives" and "ex-communists" for her book.

    I think Diana West is not given the credit she deserves for her analysis of the West's failures.

  • Antony

  • Antony

    4 x more US soldiers & vets die of suicide than in combat ; https://www.rt.com/usa/527233-us-military-suicides-study/

  • Antony

    A Gulf of Tonkin Incident in the Gulf of Oman ? ; https://www.unz.com/pbuchanan/a-tonkin-gulf-incident-in-the-gulf-of...

  • Philip Smeeton

    Islam is the enemy of everyone. No British or American troops should be involved in Muslim conflicts. Our troops should defend only direct threats to our homelands. Let the muslims slaughter each other, support Israel and do not allow Iran to develope a nuclear capacity. Bomb from afar. And deport muslims from our homelands.

  • Antony

  • Antony

  • Antony

    Neo-Con congenital wanker Bill Kristol gets beaten in debate ; https://www.zerohedge.com/political/anti-interventionist-vs-neocon-...

  • Philip Smeeton

    If you disrespect the military they are less likely to be willing to fight to defend you.

  • Antony

  • Antony