The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

The death of George Floyd in Minneapolis caused widespread riots, destruction, and deaths across the United States. However, only 2 years earlier in that same city, Justine Damond was shot dead by a black Muslim police officer, when in her pyjamas and barefoot, as she approached the police car to tell them about the noise she had heard of a woman possibly being raped. Justine Damond was a 40 year old Australian American with no criminal convictions (unlike George Floyd), she was a slim woman (not a stocky tall man), she was not high on drugs (unlike George Floyd), she was barefoot and in pyjamas (unlike George Floyd). 

By any account, the death of Justine Damond is far worse than that of George Floyd, yet there were no riots. Why is that? Simply put, it is because white people have not formed a tribal group to push for special privileges and exemptions, and do not try to gain the latter by rioting and looting whenever there is a perceived slight to that agenda. 

There is no equal treatment in the media. There is no quid pro quo. The anti-white racism increases and becomes more dangerous day be day. Unless white people in the West push back on this 'splittism', this intent to divide society into competing race groups that hate each other and just push for benefits for their own tribal group - it could lead to situations like in Zimbabwe and South Africa, where the levers of power have been seized by black supremacists, and anti-white hate, discrimination, violence and even genocide run out of control.

Possible Acronyms

Black Lives Mafia

Beating Lying Murdering

Black Lynch Mob

Tags: BLM, Preferential, Racial, Treatment, Tribalism

Views: 398

Replies to This Discussion

Police Commissioner Cressida Dick In July: Blacks In London EIGHT TIMES More Likely To Be Murder Perpetrators | Blog Posts |

Please Pray for Richard. He was attending the #millionmagamarch when a group of #blmthugs came up from behind him and cracked his skull with a hammer. Richard is currently in the ICU at medstar in DC. Doctors say he’s got a bumpy road ahead but he will survive. He needs all the prayers he can get.


Concern After European ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Boss Discussed ‘Necessity’ of Killing White People

Mamadou Ba, head of the Portuguese “anti-hate” group SOS Racismo, spoke of the need to “kill the white man” at a recent online conference on “hate speech”.

Ba, a Portuguese citizen originally from Senegal, attended the conference on Saturday which was on the topic of “Racism and the Advancement of Hate Speech in the World”.During the conference, which was attended by Portuguese speakers from Portugal and Brazil, Ba stated “it is necessary to kill the white man, murderer, colonial, and racist” to “prevent the social death of the black political subject”.

According to a report from Portuguese daily newspaper Correio da Manhã, the statement was a quote from Algerian far-left anti-colonialist political philosopher Frantz Fanon, who openly advocated for violence during the French rule of Algeria in his seminal work The Wretched of the Earth.

The newspaper states that it is not clear whether Ba was quoting the far-left philosopher, but said it was presumed he did so in agreement.

“Refutation is part of the proposition, but what matters most to combat hate speech is to propose a new narrative,” Ba said during the online meeting.

Earlier this year, the European Network Against Racism (ENAR), which is partnered with Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, called for support of SOS Rascimo, which it described as one of the “founding members” of the ENAR.

According to the ENAR, Ba and other activists had been sent threats online, and Ba himself had received a letter with a bullet casing inside it.

The incident is not the first controversial moment for a so-called “anti-hate” group in Europe, many of which have direct ties to both Open Society Foundations and George Soros, such as Hope Not Hate in the UK which was identified in a Swedish military report on far-left extremism in 2018.


'many of which have direct ties to both Open Society Foundations and George Soros, such as Hope Not Hate in the UK which was identified in a Swedish military report on far-left extremism in 2018.'

There seems to be no end of funding for hate groups. 

‘Remember HIS name...’? With Kim Kardashian, Bernie Sanders & race-baiting SJWs, justice and mercy are reserved for the murderer

That poor Kim Kardashian is just beside herself with grief, and Democrat Senator Bernie Sanders is accusing the federal government of “premeditated murder” for executing death-row inmate Brandon Bernard.

Others, such as New York Times “journalist” Maggie Haberman, noted the cruel irony of President Donald Trump tweeting about saving lives just hours after Thursday's execution of Bernard at a prison in Indiana. And those brave race-baiters – the ones who stoke and feed on our nation's divisions like insatiable horse-leeches – saw an irresistible opportunity to do their thing because Bernard was black. For instance, Bishop Talbert Swan chimed in with misleading comparisons of Bernard's death sentence being carried out with supposedly lenient treatment for white killers.

None of the celebrity critics expressed any concern over the husband-and-wife youth pastors whom Bernard helped murder in 1999. Kardashian at least focused her defense of Bernard on how he has changed as a person during his two decades on death row. Others played absurd games with what-about-isms to make Bernard the real victim.

Swan made one of the most twisted and disingenuous arguments, first nothing that Bernard was 18 at the time of the crime and “shot no one.” He failed to mention that Bernard doused the couple's car with lighter fluid and burned the woman to death (her husband had already died from a gunshot wound to the head while both were confined in the trunk after being robbed).

Swan then points out that Trump, who denied clemency for Bernard, praised Kyle Rittenhouse, who “murdered two Black Lives Matter protesters.” He added that white “Christians” – since when does a “bishop” use “Christians” as a pejorative? – raised money for Rittenhouse's bail. He fails to mention that Rittenhouse was 17 at the time of his alleged crimes and apparently hasn't seen the video evidence that appears to show the white teen being attacked before firing his weapon.

The bishop then points out that police bought Dylann Roof a Burger King hamburger after his arrest for killing nine black people at a church in Charleston, South Carolina. Other distraught tweeters noted that Bernard is dead, and yet Roof remains alive in prison. The implication is that Roof was shown favor for being a white murderer of black people, in contrast to Bernard being unfairly executed by a racist, bloodthirsty president because he was a black man whose victims were white.

What these race-based conspiracy theorists fail to factor in is that Roof was sentenced to death in 2017 for the heinous murders he committed in 2015. He's on death row and will be executed in due time if Democrats don't eliminate the death penalty and ban such sentences from being carried out. Bernard was sentenced 20 years ago and was killed by lethal injection after his legal appeals were exhausted.

ALSO ON RT.COMActivists plead with Biden to ‘ABOLISH the death penalty’ after federal execution of Brandon Bernard

As for the burger, police aren't allowed to starve suspects during interrogation, regardless of the skin color of alleged murderers or their victims. Doing so could lead to allegations of false confessions. While Swan falsely said police “took” Roof to Burger King, the fact is that they brought him food during questioning. Perhaps the race-baiters wouldn't have been as triggered if police had instead stopped the interrogation to make Roof a bad sandwich (and leave off the mustard).

Others aggrieved by Bernard's execution point out that some of the people who support such sentences – perhaps those Christians mentioned by Swan – also oppose abortion. The alleged problem is that they oppose killing unborn children but favor executing at least some convicted murderers. But think about the opposite: opposing the execution of any convicted murderers while favoring rights to kill unborn children.

The outrage is driven at least partly by the fact that death sentences are being carried out by the Trump administration, which has executed nine federal inmates since July. For sufferers of Trump Derangement Syndrome, anything the Bad Orange Man does is exponentially infuriating. It doesn't matter that Barack Obama's administration declined to grant Bernard clemency during its eight years in charge. Trump is the bogeyman, and Trump alone is the culprit.

And for many observers, Bernard's execution is just the latest in a long line of unjust murders of black people by the state. For some, regardless of justification (or lack thereof), the killing of a black person by government agents is automatically racist and probably reason enough to burn and loot our cities. We're told to “say his name,” say Brandon Bernard, to remember this latest victim and inspire us to take revenge.

But what about their names? Oops, we haven't mentioned their names. Their names are Todd and Stacie Bagley. They, too, were young, at 26 and 28. They were white (sorry) youth pastors from Iowa who were on a visit to Texas when they agreed to give a ride to two of Bernard's friends. But those two and a third accomplice robbed the Bagleys and forced them into the trunk of their own vehicle in a pre-planned carjacking, according to prosecutors.

Bernard had supplied the gun for the robbery and helped buy the lighter fluid that he and an accomplice doused the couple's car with at a remote recreation area on a military base. After one of the other teens shot the husband in the head and the wife in the face, prosecutors say, Bernard set the car alight. Stacie Bagley allegedly died in the fire.

According to one of the teens, the woman's last words were, “Jesus loves you,” and “Jesus, take care of us.” While locked in the trunk, the couple had tried for hours to preach to two of the robbers, who were sitting in the back seat. They even told the teens about their upcoming revival meeting at the local church.

In the end, they were shot and burned. They didn't get 20 years to reflect on their lives and try to become better people while awaiting death. They didn't get to spend time building relationships with celebrities, say final goodbyes to loved ones, or make any requests about a last meal. All Stacie Bagley could do was say, “Jesus, take care of us” before watching her husband be shot dead, and then be shot herself and burned.

So yes, remember the names. Remember Todd and Stacie Bagley. Today is a day to lament the taking of their innocent lives – not to pretend that one of their murderers is a victim.

Keir Starmer gets trolled over BLM ! ;

Black tribalist argues for her criminal gang members to be kept in the country, so they can terrorise those not in her group, and make her tribe stronger.

WAR ON WHITES: Tori Smith's Murder Just The Latest Black-On-White Atrocity Not "Fit To Print" According To The NEW YORK TIMES

The New York Time's motto, dating back to 1896, is "All The News That's Fit To Print".One of the earliest articles I read on , before I started working here myself, was Scott McConnell's Unfit To Print, January 10, 2000, about the Wichita Massacre, in which three white men and two white women were abducted, abused, and then shot by two black men, killing four of them and wounding one. The details of that didn't appear in the NYT until 15 years later, when Justices Alito and Scalia mentioned them in the killers' death penalty case.

Murders of whites by blacks are very rarely "national news" as far as the New York Times news section is concerned.

On the other hand, any mild incident of alleged racial disrespect to blacks does turn out to be national news. For example, Steve Sailer likes to highlight the fact that an anti-white agenda is being injected into news reporting by saying that some particular item is "from the New York Times news section".

Here's an example:

From the New York Times news section, an example of massively important National News:

Black Deliveryman Says He Was Blocked and Interrogated by White Driver

Travis Miller Sr. said he was trying to leave a gated neighborhood in Oklahoma after a delivery when a vehicle blocked his path.

By Mariel Padilla, May 17, 2020

In contrast, the New York Times has never once published the names of the two white octogenarians visiting their son’s grave who were gunned down by a black man on May 8, the day after the first (of now 3) arrests in the Ahmaud Arbery story promoted so extravagantly by the NYT. Two and a half weeks later, the police have yet to venture to suggest a motive.

Some news is not fit to print

The allegedly random murder of two elderly white people, Paul and Lidia Marino, in a Delaware Veterans Memorial Cemetery, by a black man named Sheldon Francis, is one of the many anti-white hate crimes which the NYT finds Unfit To Print.

We covered the Marino case, based on fragmentary reports from the local press, but the NYT didn't:

The (as far as I know) justifiable homicide of black ex-convict Ahmaud Arbery did get a lot of publicity, because the white guy who shot him when Arbery tried to grab his shotgun has been charged with murder. (See Faith Goldy's Faith Goldy: Black Lies Don’t Count—And White Lives Don’t Matter. )

This was pre-Floyd, so it was the biggest thing at the time, and it may well have motivated the murder of Marinos, just as Obama's rhetoric may well have motivated the five murders committed by BLM gunman Micah X. Johnson in Dallas in 2016.  Since Sheldon Francis was killed by police, and won't go to trial, the Regime Media is free to run headlines like Motive Remains Unclear In Delaware Cemetery Shooting That Left Elderly Elkton Couple Dead, CBS Baltimore, May 23, 2020.

But the New York Times has run nothing at all.

The same thing happened with the murder of Cannon Hinnant, a five-year old white boy in North Carolina, shot by Darius Sessoms, who is black, apparently for accidentally riding his little bike in the black man's front yard.

This has not once been mentioned by the New York Times. But it was mentioned by Forbes Magazine in what people think of as a "conservatives pounce" story:

How The Murder Of 5-Year-Old Cannon Hinnant Became A Conservative Controversy About Race, by Lisette Voytko,  August 17, 2020,

The shooting death of a 5-year-old North Carolina boy in his front yard on August 9 has since erupted into a political argument over how the media covers race and crime, with conservative commentators on Fox News and other outlets criticizing the media for ignoring the fact that the boy was white and the suspect Black, though many national news outlets did in fact cover the killing, which both police and the boy's parents say they don’t believe was racially motivated.[More]

I called this a "conservatives pounce" story, but the Washington Post actually said that "seized upon" by "some conservative outlets" [What we know about the killing of 5-year-old Cannon Hinnant, by Brittany Shammas, August 14, 2020].

But the New York Times didn't even run a "conservatives pounce" story because there's no way of reporting this story that doesn't say a black man shot a five year old white boy.

The latest case not fit to print: the death of Victoria "Tori" Rose Smith, a white child who was allowed to be adopted by a radical black couple...and is now dead. (There are lobbies and laws to prevent white people from adopting black and Native American children, but obviously no such restrictions the other way.)

See, by Paul Kersey Her Name Is Victoria "Tori" Rose Smith: Three-year-old White Girl Beaten To Death By Her Black Adoptive Parents  and by Michelle Malkin: The Matter of Tori Rose Smith's Life.

As you can see, below, her black adoptive parents put her hair in "corn-rows" for some reason.

This story, about an adopted child found dead from multiple blunt force trauma to her head in the home of a woman who, her social media reveals, expressed hate towards white people and thought her own adopted children had "white privilege" actually made the Los Angeles Times, on a strictly non-racial basis, because of the woman's minor television celebrity: Food Network removes season of cooking show after winner arrested i... by Christi Carras, January 25, 2021.

It hasn't made the New York Times.

The Times's apparent reason for this policy is that reporting this stuff makes blacks look bad, and could cause "racism".

This could be true. Here are some of the details of the Wichita Massacre, which as I said at the top of the page, went unreported for years:

Their cases “involve some of the most horrendous murders that I have seen in my 10 years here,” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said. “And we see practically every death penalty case that comes up anywhere in the country.”

Justice Scalia recited the details of the brothers’ crimes at length.

They broke into a Wichita home where five people were staying and forced their victims to strip naked and perform sex acts on each other. The brothers then raped the women in turn. Then they drove all five victims, still naked or partly clothed, to a snowy field where they shot them execution-style in the backs of their heads as they knelt.

One woman survived, spared when a bullet was deflected by her hair clip. “Oh, and they ran over her, too,” Justice Scalia said. “After shooting her in the head, the car ran over her.”

Justices Hear Capital Cases That Elicit a Muted Tone, by Adam Liptak,  October 7, 2015

That only appeared in the NYT when lawyers for killers Jonathan and Reginald Carr appeared at the Supreme Court in attempt to prevent their well-deserved execution, an attempt the Supremes rejected, 8-1 (Sonia Sotomayor dissenting) although the Carrs are still alive on Death Row in Kansas.

Maybe if NYT readers found out about things like that, they'd stop believing in the myth of "racism".

James Fulford [Email him] has been a writer and editor for for twenty years.

BLM spawn attack Chinese - I expect as the victims are not white, now they will do something about it ;


Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2021   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service