The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

The following posts were collected from the comment wall.
"New Zealand mosque suspect Brenton Tarrant 'an ordinary white man' inspired by Anders Breivik."
Do they really expect white people to accept being replaced and excluded, and not to react, in white countries. Some are bound to react with violence when all other forms of reaction and protest are blocked.
Of course, they are going to use this as justification for censorship and the shutting down of the right-wing. They will never admit that it is their open-borders politic that will allow muslim terror and cause right-wing terror. Shutting the borders and deportations would solve the terrorist problem.

Tags: Brenton, Christchurch, NZ, Shooting, Tarrant, in

Views: 68

Replies to This Discussion

Christchurch - the wages of multiculturalism ;

New Zealand mosque linked to al queda suspect ;

A very good analysis by Morgoth in that video. As is this one by Blond in the Belly of the Beast.

Comment from Philip:
Quite frankly this woman disgusts me. She is everything I despise in politicians. They believe themselves to be strong when they are only limp and ineffectual.
With leaders like her the mess only worsens. Totally blind to immigrant crime and Muslim aggression she sacrifices us on the alter of her own self-righteousness. self-(goodness, honesty, honour, virtue, uprightness, morality, integrity, justice, blamelessness, faithfulness, equity, ethicalness, purity, holiness, sanctification).

Ooh, she is so daring, wearing a hijab to a mosque. What next? Maybe she will speak out against FGM, honour killings and Islamic Hate speech?

Better yet, maybe she will pose with other leaders in a safely evacuated street, holding a pencil a la Charlie Hebdo, or a quran, or God knows what, to prove her fearless stance for freedom and equality.

I will annoy a lot of people by saying this, but if you look at Brenton Tarrant's manifesto strategically, he was a kind of visionary, whether you view it from the Muslim point of view or the non-Muslim point of view.

From strategy, or from game theory, I don't think any of the previous scenarios could play out to give a win for non-muslims. Whatever is done now, Islam will be taking control of Europe by 2060, and once that happens, with all Europe's weapons, the US is going to feel very lonely indeed (and that's if the dollar hasn't collapsed by then).  So Tarrant realised that the only possible route for kuffar to survive, is if he can kick off conflict and backlash now, before it is too late.

But I think he made one mistake, if he wanted the best strategic direction. That would have been to use the methods that Al Qaeda recommended themselves in Inspire, like using trucks to mow down civilians in a particular area. This would have been more effective for 2 reasons:

  • It would have echoed the Islamic actions, and thus tended to trigger an Italian vendetta type response of tit-for-tat attacks which just got worse and worse in a never ending cycle
  • It would have suggested to others on his side, a means of joining the kuffar 'jihad', which is not so technically difficult. After all, only a small number of people in a small number of countries are able to get hold of ballistic weapons and use them like he did. But the Al Qaeda methods are specifically designed to be implemented by unskilled people with the most basic of equipment, like cars, gas bottles and kitchen knives.

This is only a strategic analysis, which may give insights into our future, where our societies are heading; it is neither a recommendation nor an endorsement.

Thank you Alan. Tarrant is the most interesting thing that has happened in a long while.

Our purpose is to annoy people Alan.

Our going to jail would serve no purpose, so we must not be found guilty of inciting to murder. They'll put us in jail anyway for protesting murder done by muslims. However in the end violence on a massive scale, civil war, may be the only solution.
Killing the enemy in war is not murder. Islam is at war with the West, so muslims do not see killing us as murder or morally wrong, rather to them it is a heroic act. By that same token we are also justified in killing muslims.
A political solution seems unlikely, but I will continue to work in hope that a legal solution carried out by some sort of patriotic party will end our sorrows. We must not go out with a whimper.

 The mosque attacked in New Zealand had been linked to Islamic terrorism back in 2014:

 The war on terror is actually a war on Islam and until we acknowledge this we will remain at a disadvantage. A war has to be won using every means at our disposal and the enemy has to be utterly defeated and rendered incapable of doing us further harm.


Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2023   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service