History of the Jihad against Australia (2001 - Ongoing)

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Charles Martel on October 6, 2009 at 22:03

With the nation heading into another hot, dry summer, Australian intelligence agencies are treating the possibility that bushfires could be used as a weapon of terrorism as a serious concern.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland said the Federal Government remained "vigilant against such threats", warning that anyone caught lighting a fire as a weapon of terror would feel the wrath of anti-terror laws.

Adam Dolnik, director of research at the University of Wollongong's Centre for Transnational Crime Prevention, said that bushfires (unlike suicide bombing) were generally not considered a glorious type of attack by jihadis, in keeping with a recent decline in the sophistication of terrorist "With attacks like bushfires, yes, it would be easy. It would be very damaging and we do see a decreasing sophistication as a part of terrorist attacks," Dr Dolnik said.

"In recent years, there have been quite a few attacks averted and it has become more and more difficult for groups to do something effective."

Dr Dolnik said he had observed an increase in traffic on jihadi websites calling for a simplification of terrorist attacks because the more complex operations had been failing. But starting bushfires was still often regarded as less effective than other operations because governments could easily deny terrorism as the cause.

__________________________________

The website, posted by a group called the Al-Ikhlas Islamic Network, argues in Arabic that lighting fires is an effective form of terrorism justified in Islamic law under the "eye for an eye" doctrine.

The posting — which instructs jihadis to remember "forest jihad" in summer months — says fires cause economic damage and pollution, tie up security agencies and can take months to extinguish so that "this terror will haunt them for an extended period of time".


The root of this Danger lies in the waves of Muslims who immigrate into Australia and New Zealand as Laborers, Refugees, Spouses and Students

The first wave of Muslims into Australia were as laborers from colonial India. These sections lived on the margins of Australian society as day laborers, driver and menial workmen. They migrated in to Australia during its heyday of British colonial rule over its Indian territories in the late 19th century. They were joined by Muslims from the Middle East especially during the decades after WW2

These Muslims were docile, and were overawed by the grandeur of the Australian nation. They called it the Saltanat-e-Bartania (British Empire). But the growing prosperity of the second generation immigrants changed all that especially after 9/11.

The first generation Muslim settlers in Australia in were a subdued one, as their empires the Mughal, Ottoman, Mameluk, had been defeated and destroyed by Europeans.

The Muslims are arrogant by nature, but the behavior of the first generation Muslim settlers in Australia in the late 19th century was a subdued one, since their empires the Mughal, Ottoman, Mameluk, etc had been defeated and destroyed by Europeans. But after the departure of colonialism, things began to change, and the Muslims began to return to their original disposition. Herein lies a lesson for us, the Muslims understand only the language of coercion. If you want to tame them, then the ringmasters whip is the only way to bring these beasts in line with civilized behavior.

Will one of these be the next target of the Terrorists residing amongst us in Australia.

Over the 20th century, the Muslim community in Australia was enhanced numerically by the waves of migration of laborers from the Middle East, Pakistan through the 1950s to the 1970s. and later Bangladesh after 1971.

These laborers after working in Australia for some years became naturalized Australian citizens and then they could legally get in their wife (or wives, since the Muslims could have up to four at a time) and their innumerable children. The Muslims decry abortion and hence breed like locusts. In fact, the Jihad by the womb is a very potent weapon of the Muslims to outrun the native non-Muslim population of their host countries. This is happening at alarming rates in Australia as it has already happened all across Europe where in France and Germany the Muslim population is approaching its critical mass to demand special privileges and Islamic law. Can Muslims in Australia be far behind?

________________________



Over the late 19th and 20th centuries, the Muslim community in Australia was enhanced numerically by the waves of migration of laborers from the Middle East, Pakistan through the 1950s to the 1970s. and later Bangladesh after 1971.

These laborers after working in Australia for some years became naturalized Australian citizens and then they could legally get in their wife (or wives, since the Muslims could have up to four at a time) and their innumerable children. The Muslims decry abortion and hence breed like locusts. In fact, the Jihad by the womb is a very potent weapon of the Muslims to outrun the native non-Muslim population of their host countries. This is happening at alarming rates in Australia as it has already happened all across Europe where in France and Germany the Muslim population is approaching its critical mass to demand special privileges and Islamic law. Can Muslims in Australia be far behind?

Muslim Alibi to immigrate in to Australia changed from that of being laborers in the 19th century to being political refugees in the 20th

When under pressure from some of our astute leaders Australia tried to curb the inflow of migrant laborers, the pattern of Muslim migration changed, rather the alibi to get into Australia changed from that of laborers to those seeking political asylum and asking for refugee status.

Student migrants were the most politically volatile and violent of the Muslims

Those who came in the garb of refugees from persecution came from mainly Pakistan and Bangladesh. Thus by the early 1990s the Muslims in Australia had burgeoned to some three hundred thousand. Added to these were students coming to Australia from all over the Muslim world.

These students migrants were the most politically volatile and violent of the Muslims. They were young and many of them (the Shias) were under the influence of Khomeini and the Sunnis under that of Al Qaeda. This trend was more prominent from the 1990s.

There were frequent soap box orators at our Parks, asking bemused passers by to understand Islam and embrace it. So far so good. But we Australians had our first brush with Muslim violence when we had to fight to reclaim our beaches.

Muslims today come in stealthily like termites, whose entry was hardly noticed, till they brought about their first disturbances on our beaches.

While their ancestors had gone as beastly invaders in Europe (Spain, France, Balkans), these Muslims came in stealthily like termites, whose entry was hardly noticed, till their first disturbances took place on the beaches, and now the plot to bob the nuclear reactor has rung the alarm bells.

________________________



The Muslims of our times are invading Australia through the customs and immigration counters!

But the fundamental change in this Muslim invasion (of sorts) in Australia was that apart from the beach fights (and apart from what may come in the future), the Muslim migration was entirely deceptively peaceful, and was undertaken by exploiting the loopholes in the existing Australian law. While all other Muslim invasions in history were undertaken by violent Jihadis who gave the option to people to embrace Islam or face a Muslim invasion, the Muslims of our times invaded Australia through the customs and immigration counters!

Muslims today come in stealthily like termites, whose entry was hardly noticed, till they brought about their first explosions on our beaches

While their ancestors had come in as beastly invaders, these Muslims came in stealthily like termites, whose entry was hardly noticed, till their first explosion took place on our beaches, in the pronouncements of Imams who compared Australian women to uncovered meat and now the plot to bomb the nuclear reactor which has truly rung the alarm bells although it is still a chime!

But even now after the plot to bomb the nuclear reactor has been uncovered, the danger signal in Australia has still not started flashing Red. Are we waiting for a 9/11 or 7/7 to happen here when Muslims born and bred in the US and UK staged successful and dramatic attacks on innocent civilians. Bali should have given us a foretaste of what lies in store for us!

We in the West have no dearth of Artificial Intelligence like the one that captured the London bombers electronically a few minutes before then boarded the tube on their murderous mission on 7/7. Where the Australian and all other Westerners (except the Israelis) lack is in Natural Intelligence for recognizing the enemy who resides amongst them and to eject or eradicate that enemy as we would do with any vermin afflicting our homes or virus in our bodies.

__________________________


But so far, the saving grace has been that no real big attack has happened. Australia awaits with bated breath its future equations with its growing Muslim population. An attack that would put not just 7/7 in the shade but also 9/11. The Muslim ambition is murder millions of Westerners at one go! And unfortunately for us, they may go about doing that successfully someday soon!


From a howling Jihad, we now have a stealthily creeping Jihad The Muslims of our times invaded Australia through the customs and immigration counters!

The point to be noted is that till the Muslim population does not reach a certain critical mass, the Muslims adapt to the country of adoption. Till then they pretend assimilate the host countries culture, but like to create their Ghettos, away from the mainstream of that country. And when their numbers reach a critical mass, they start what Mohammed started in Mecca, the Razzias or Gazhawats (raids) against the non-Muslims. The beach riots were just the tip of the iceberg of such Razzias. The plot that we have uncovered that would have bombed our nuclear reactor is the first critical warning shot of the shape of things to come.

There is more to it than meets the eye. Australia needs to watch out, or it would be in real peril, if and when the Muslim population inevitably crosses the more than 10 percent mark. This benchmark has been crossed in France, and we saw the first warning shots in the form of the car burning riots. In the next round the Algerian and Morrocan Muslims in France will try to draw blood from what they derisively term the "White Cheese" when referring to the French.

Learning from the European experience, Australia needs to wake up from its slumber and while it is laudably participating in the War on Terror in Iraq and Afghanistan, we need to start the same war by deporting trouble-making Muslims of the irascible Imams first, and then move on to deporting all Muslim political activists, and finally all other troublemaking Muslims (in fact most of them are troublemakers).

Those that remain after these purges need to pledge that for them loyalty to Australia is above loyalty to Islam and the Australian constitution ranks higher than the Quran. If they cannot do this publicly, they should be deported too.

This brings us to the point of asking ourselves "How do Australian born and bred Muslims end up becoming Unrepentant Murderers who glorify death?"


How and Why do Australian born and bred Muslims end up becoming Unrepentant Murderers who glorify death?

To answer this question we need to know what happens in every Muslim home in Australia (and in fact all across the globe):

Before the Eid-ul-Zuha festival, every Muslim father brings home a baby goat (kid) and tells his child to play with that kid. As days pass, the child grows fond of the goat-kid for some days and when the day of Eid-ul-Zuha comes when the child is shocked to see that his pet goat is slaughtered in front of his entire gleeful and cheering family. The child feels guilty, he cries and asks for his friend (the goat-kid) to be spared. But when the goat is slaughtered in spite of this, and the child is told that this is part of Muslim tradition - the child is bewildered.

After one year round the same time, the same ritual is repeated. Now the child is one year older, but he still has the innocence to play with a pet and grow fond of the pet. When the day arrives, the goat is again slaughtered, and the child is reminded of this being a hoary tradition. The child still feels guilty, but his guilt is now numbed by the words that repeatedly fall on his ears, that this is a qurbani (a sacrifice) and that it is our holy duty to kill.

A year after that the child is again asked to play with a goat and on the day of the feast of Eid-ul-Zuha, he is asked to hold the dagger and help out in slaughtering the goat. The child gradually grows hard-hearted and now starts enjoying this ritual of killing the goat - A Muslim is made!

Islam, Fanatic Islam and Islamic Terrorism

Today many in Australia and also the world over are innocent of how Islam was founded, how it grew and what Islam implies for the future of Humankind. So there are endless debates that Islam is a religion of peace, that all Muslims are not fanatical, and that we need to differentiate between, Muslims and terrorists.

The reading of the story of Islam so far should be enough to dispel the notion that Islam differs from Islamic fanaticism, or that Islam is a religion of peace and that the Terrorists have hijacked a peaceful religion. No it is not. It is Islam which gave birth to Terrorism, which started from the evil mind of its founder Mohammed (yimach shmo ve-zichro - may his name and memory be obliterated) and has filtered down to the last follower (Muslim) today. Islam is Fanaticism, it is high time we woke up to this chilling reality.

How Islam prevents Muslims from leaving Islam - Murder any Muslim leaving Islam

Mohammed (yimach shmo) was a shrewd man who knew that there was always a danger of Muslims deserting Islam and reverting to some other less blood-thirsty religion, so he made it an offense punishable with death for anyone leaving Islam, having once accepted it. According to the Shariah, a Murtad (Muslim Apostate) has to be killed, and it is the duty of a Muslim to kill any other Muslim who leaves Islam.

The murderous Quran is the inviolable word of god

There can also never ever be any discussion on the murderous commands of the Quran, since it is the word of god, or so Mohammed (yimach shmo ve-zichro - may his name and memory be obliterated) told his followers.

Assemble five times a day to swear your loyalty to Islam

To be doubly sure that his flock remains together in to its murderous ken (prison), he decreed that it was compulsory for all Muslims to come together and pray five times during the day. So there wasn't any chance for his followers to leave Islam and emancipate themselves.

Getting into Islam was a one way street.

Islam was a dead end, where you could enter, (in fact you were forced to enter at the pain of death) , but could never leave, since you would be killed. In fact such was the indoctrination and mass hysteria that Mohammed (yimach shmo) started, that in a generation or so, the new converts forgot that their forefathers were not Muslims, and in fact in North Africa, they even forgot that they were not Arabs. They forgot that their forefathers were made to submit to Islam at the pain of death.

This sealed the fate of all those who were forced to embrace Islam from ever becoming decent thinking humans ever again.


Only the total destruction of non-Muslim heritage and wholesale slaughter of non-Muslims has got the Muslims Victory

With every Muslim military victory, there was not just a change of ruler, but a wholesale slaughter of those who refused to convert or pay Jaziya. There was also a total destruction of the pre-Islamic culture, educational institution, libraries, etc. The planned and deliberately implemented slaughter of the non-Muslim priestly and warrior class was done to enfeeble the conquered populace so much that they would forget who they were their national and cultural identity be subsumed under a newly imposed Arabized Muslim identity.

This kind of tyranny was never known to the human race, with any other conqueror, like Alexander, Julius Caesar, Hannibal, or even those who came after the Muslims like the British Colonialists, or the Spanish Conquistadors. Yes the Spanish Conquistadors were ruthless, but in spite of all they did to he native Americans, the native Americans still have preserved their memory of they being a people different from the Spanish Conquistadors, not so with the Egyptians, North Africans, Berbers, et al.

Ask any Egyptian who he is, he will say he is an Arab, were the Pharaohs Arabs? Were the builders of the Pyramids, Arab? Ask any Libyan, Sudanese, Algerian, Tunisian, Somalian, who he is he will say he is an Arab. These are people, whom the conquering Muslim Arab, so Arabized that they have forgotten who they are, their national identities have completely been submerged into the Arab Muslim Ummah.

This has not happened with the native Americans or the Maoris or the Africans, in spite of the fact that apartheid was practiced in South Africa. The Arabs as conquerors totally brainwashed at the point of the sword all the conquered people, Arabized and Islamized them at the pain of death.

Knowing all this is relevant today for those who seek to defeat Islam. To do so we have to first understand the depth of depravity in Islam. If the Muslims have to be saved from Islam, then it is not sufficient to conquer the Muslim countries and try to being democracy to them, we have to de-Islamize these people, if they are to be emancipated into civilized beings.

Islam has brutalized them and made them robotic followers and into robotic killers, narrow-minded individuals, despotic rulers, and cruel sadists by following the injunctions of the Instruction Manual of Terrorism (the Quran). This is proven by the bloodied Shiite-Sunni murders that have started in Iraq despite elections, and elections by people who support a murderous creed throw up murders as their legislators as in the case of Hamas and the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Islam is a perverted mentality, a mental sickness based on intimidation to convert all non-Muslims to Islam, and to murder if you refuse to convert. And if you manage to save your head, then you have to live under their dehumanizing tyranny and live as non-Muslims (Dhimmis or Zimmis).

The Retrograde Negative Spirit of Islam pervades all across that Islamic civilization(sic). Although to call it "civilization" is a contradiction in terms

The very first verse uttered by that lecherous mass-murderer, the accursed Mohammed-ibn-abdallah was "La Ilah Il Allah, Mohammed ur Rasoolallah" which translated literally would read "No god but god, Mohammed is prophet of god". In Arabic "La" connotes "No". So what can one expect from a mentality whose very first of its five principles is based on negativism?

Negativism permeates all through Islam, its attitudes towards all non-Muslims, its use of dishonesty to portray itself as a victim, its murderous intent towards all those who refuse to convert to Islam, its use of any level of cruelty to Islamize entire humankind.

We can save ourselves from this Malignant Madness of Islam, only if we see it through to its grave. The other option is landing in the grave ourselves along with liberty, progress and free-thinking, freedom of speech and scientific advancement, all of which will be become slaves to that Instruction Manual of Hate and Terror - the Quran.

Why is a threat of death the only way to defeat Islam?

Islam was spread with the use of death threats. The defeated non-Muslims were given the choice of Islam or Death. After having been forced to accept Islam through such terminal coercion, the converted people had no way of renouncing Islam. If they did so, they were targeted as Murtads (apostates) and were killed. It is mandatory in Islam for Muslims to kill anyone who leaves the cult. So the converts were forced to remain Muslims. And as this was their fate, then the best bet for them was to imbibe the murderous attitude themselves and impose it on others.

Today although "Islam or Death" is not possible openly, unless you live in Muslim ruled countries of the Islamic crescent like Egypt, Sudan, Iran, Pakistan or in areas contiguous to Muslim majority areas like Malaku in Indonesia, Southern Sudan, Kashmir, North Nigeria.

Muslim converts today are convicts or psychological wrecks like Jose Padilla and Richard Reid

But the Muslims have devised ingenious methods to reach those best suited for Islam, so they evangelize in Prisons, where they can appeal to the dregs of society, or those come from broken families, those who have gone through divorces, or those who have had some heart-breaking personal experience.

It is on the emotions of such unfortunate wrecks and irredeemable convicts that these Muslim missionaries prey like vultures and hyenas to make them join the murderous ranks of Islam. Richard Reid, the Shoe bomber, Jose Padilla are specimen of those who become Muslim today.

The cardinal fact is that across the fourteen centuries of Islam's existence, it has been its death threat that made people Muslim and it was the same death threat that kept them Muslim. The same death threats are used today to intimate Ayan Hirsi Ali, Salman Rushdie and many others like them to keep them from speaking the truth about Islam.

He who was born by the sword shall die by the sword

Modifying the age-old adage "He who lives by the sword shall die by the sword." We can say that -Islam which was born by the sword shall die by the sword" As it was a death threat that made people into Muslims and kept them as Muslims, the only way these scum can be shaken out of their adherence to the savagery called Islam is a death threat. Not individual death threats as the Muslims hurl today at Hirsi and Salman, but a death threat of extermination through a nuclear holocaust of the entire Muslim population across the globe!

Only when the beastlike Muslims see the determination of a world to do them in, upto their last man and woman, can the Ummah of Islam be smashed.

When the Muslims see that there is no option other than death, if they persist in remaining Muslim, will the fort of Islam be breached and once the first trickle of Muslims who renounce Islam starts, the trickle will turn into a flood and an avalanche that will wipe out Islam.

Yes there will certainly be many Muslims who will try to kill those who renounce Islam, but when these murderers are themselves hunted down with equal ferocity, will the lay Muslims believe that it is safe for them to give up Islam. Then and only then, shall we see Muslims coming over in droves to give up Islam. But this can happen only we seriously hurl and start executing a death threat of mass killing of all Muslims across the globe. There are no soft options here.

Do we have it in us to do that?

The answer decides whether civilization wins or Islam wins!

Permalink Reply by nilk on November 3, 2009 at 8:45

Aust Islamist Monitor has an article discussing the first documented case of jihadi behaviour here in Oz (pics and links in the original):


The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Despite attempts from ”progressive” authors, who try to explain the actions of the two Muslim men as acts of misplaced patriotism or as a desperate response to brutal racial persecution, the reasons for the terrorist attack were clearly stated by the perpetrators themselves. Both men knew very well they were going to die and (as any present day terrorists do) and left notes explaining that they had to become martyrs - DEFENDING THEIR FAITH and the caliphate.

The attack was not spontaneous. It was a very well planned and a premeditated act. Both men wanted to inflict as much damage and kill as many infidels as possible and having almost the entire population of the tiny settlement packed into forty open, wooden carriages where people sat in rows, shoulder to shoulder on flat wooden benches, presented a great opportunity to do just that.

Gool and Abdullah knew very well that each January 1st, the Manchester Unity Order of Oldfellows held its annual New Year’s day picnic. The train carriages were normally used for taking ore to Port Pirie but once a year they were washed thoroughly, fitted with wooden benches and transformed into the Broken Hill Picnic Train. It was a perfect target in a flat area, with the train moving slowly and people sitting close to each other without much chance to hide or run anywhere.

The two Muslim men used Gool’s ice-cream cart to transport their rifles, the flag and ammo to the place previously selected by them for the ambush, to avoid raising any suspicions.

The train left Broken Hill Sulphide Street station at 10 a.m.

About two miles out of Broken Hill, an ice cream cart flying a Turkish flag was noticed by those on the train. It was on the northern side of the line close to the railway fence and two men, later identified as Gool Mohamed and Mulla Abdulla, lay in a trench beside the track within 30 yards of the passing train. They began firing as the train drew level with them The firing continued as the train passed with 20 or 30 shots being fired in total.

The train was brought to a halt further up the line. It was found as a result of the attack on the train two people were killed and seven wounded. (source)
Six not seven people were wounded on the train the seventh injured person was a police constable, who was wounded during the pursuit, which followed the assault)

The murdered passengers were: 17-year-old Alma Cowie and William John Shaw who died instantly.
The six wounded people were: Mary Kavanagh, George Stokes, Thomas Campbell, Lucy Shaw (daughter of William Shaw), Alma Crocker and Rose Crabb.

Soon after the assault Gool and Abdullah withdrew towards the west. During their attempted escape they came across and murdered Alfred E. Millard who had tried to hide in his hut.Picnic Train

By this time the police were in full pursuit and when they sighted the two running assassins they fired their guns above their heads in order to force them to surrender, but instead Gool and Abdullah returned fire and seriously wounded Constable Robert Mills.

The murderous pair made their last stand at the top of a hill where they found good cover behind large rocks.
They were both shot dead by the police during an hour and a half gun battle.

Interestingly, the locals as well as most of the contemporary Australians, did not understand the nature of this terrible “incident”.


First of all, it did not appear possible to the people that the pair acted simply out of religious Islamic fanaticism. Patriotic zeal or even a simple act of revenge were blamed but religious piety was not even considered a valid reason for the massacre.

Secondly, people could not believe that the pair acted alone without any links and orders from a larger, organized The last standgroup, as for most of non-Muslims it simply doesn’t occur that the orders to kill them are not given from enemies in this material world but by Allah himself from the depths and core of the Islamic religion.

As a result, the authorities suspected that the men acted on orders issued by their local German or Turkish handlers and the fact that the two were not even closely related to Turkey, or that they openly admitted in their letters to acting in the name of Allah just did not make any sense.

Conclusion:
Islamic loyalties cannot be changed because their allegiances are hard-wired into their religious doctrine. There are many examples from the past, similar to the tragedy described above, and so it would be natural that our current leaders and “social visionaries” would come to a logical conclusion that forcing Muslim immigration upon an innocent population will all work out in the end – but in reality it is just like setting a time bomb with a hope that the timer will somehow stop ticking.


Unfortunately history’s lessons are often not understood or are simply ignored or forgotten