The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

The Jewish War on White Australia: Refugee Policy and the African Crime Plague, Part 1


Originally posted June 6, 2016

In 2005, Andrew Fraser, then Associate Professor of Public Law at Macquarie University in Sydney, wrote a letter to his local newspaper warning that “experience practically everywhere in the world tells us that an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems.” Following publication, Jewish lawyers George Newhouse, David Knoll (then president of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies) and Anna Katzmann submitted a complaint to Australia’s Human Rights Commission on behalf of the General Secretary of the Sudanese Darfurian Union. They argued that Fraser had breached Section 18C of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act and demanded he publish an acknowledgement that he had engaged in “unlawful conduct” and unreservedly apologize “for the hurt thereby caused to the Sudanese people who live in the Parramatta-Blacktown area, promising not to repeat such conduct and retracting on the public record all of the imputations.”

I previously discussed Australia’s notorious Section 18C (and its Jewish ethno-political origins) regarding the case brought against the conservative commentator Andrew Bolt. I also described how, in 2014, former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott abandoned an election pledge to repeal this totalitarian speech code after coming under sustained attack from Jewish activist organizations. The veteran Jewish journalist Michael Gawenda observed at the time how: “The repeal of section 18C was vigorously opposed by the leadership of virtually every ethnic community in the country. But it would be fair to say — without wishing to give succor to those who reckon the Jews are too powerful — that Jewish community leaders have played a crucial role in organizing the opposition to any potential change to the RDA. It is the opposition of the Jewish communal leaders that had been of major concern to [Attorney General] Brandis and, to a significant extent, Tony Abbott.”

The complaint against Professor Fraser was upheld by the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. In responding to the ruling, and noting how Whites are regularly deprecated in the mainstream media and held collectively responsible for crimes against Australia’s Aborigines and others, Fraser observed that: “Apparently, in contemporary Australia, people of White, European ancestry can be identified routinely as the root of all evil while it is forbidden for Whites ever to mention publicly the social pathologies associated with black Africans, even if they are well-known to any informed person and openly acknowledged by reasonable black people themselves.”

The reckoning

A decade after his ominous warning on the dangers of African immigration, Fraser has, not surprisingly, been totally vindicated. The country is in the grip of an African crime plague that has shocked people in its scale and savagery. While African gang violence has been a problem for many years, news of its horrifying extent has been routinely suppressed by politicians and the mainstream media. In March, however, this studied silence was shattered when members of the Sudanese-based “Apex” gang were responsible for a vicious riot which left the streets of Melbourne completely trashed. The riots broke out when “About 200 youths of the Apex and Islander 23 gangs stormed Federation Square chanting ‘fuck the police,’ before gang members started beating and punching each other.” During the riots, “People dining in City Square ran for their lives as gang members used cafe chairs as weapons, running riot from Federation Square to City Square.”

Occurring in the middle of Melbourne’s annual Moomba Festival, this very public and extremely violent riot was impossible to suppress or downplay. News Limited was forced to admit that “South Central Melbourne became more like South Central Los Angeles on Saturday as rioters swept through the CBD terrifying locals and tourists alike.”


The Apex gang was originally founded by Sudanese youths in the south-eastern Melbourne suburb of Dandenong. It quickly metastasized to include young people from Pacific Islander and Middle Eastern backgrounds. As a direct result of Australia’s disastrous Jewish-engineered immigration and refugee policies, this “ethnically diverse” suburb now has crime rates about 40 percent higher than the rapidly climbing Victorian state average.

Nevertheless, according to Mark Dreyfus, the Jewish Federal Labor MP who represents the area (but lives far away in a wealthy Jewish inner-city enclave): “Our community is a wonderful example to others of a modern, diverse, and harmonious society.” This is despite the fact that, following a wave of assaults, stabbings and street brawls involving “youths” in the suburb, police warned residents that: “If you see a large group approaching, get back in your car and go, or walk off — don’t hang around to see what they might do.” Recently two African men armed with knuckle dusters were responsible for three vicious attacks in this “modern, diverse and harmonious society.” In one of the attacks, “without saying a word they punched the victim in the face and head, and stole his mobile phone and an amount of cash.”

Dandenong was recently identified as one of Melbourne’s “crime hot spots” where a web of closed-circuit television cameras will be installed “to crack down on the violent Apex gang, which has been terrorizing the city.” According to the Herald-Sun, “The sophisticated security measures have been in response to a rising tide of violence blamed on the Apex gang, which has been involved in violent carjackings, serious assaults, and home invasions.” Crimes that were once extremely rare in Australia have become daily occurrences. Crime reporter Andrew Rule recently noted that: “A decade ago “carjacking” was something we heard about from South Africa, Miami and Beirut. Now it’s part of the conversation in Australia. The first time I can recall the phrase being used locally it involved young men ‘of African appearance’ forcing female drivers out of cars around Flemington, Carlton and Parkville. Not that anyone said much. It was too sensitive.”

Dandenong: “a wonderful example of a modern, diverse and harmonious society”

Dandenong: “a wonderful example of a modern, diverse and harmonious society”

African gangs have gone on violent, drug and alcohol-fuelled rampages through Melbourne’s once genteel suburbs, aided and abetted by an insipid, politically correct governmental and legal establishment, and a clique of leftwing apologists in the media and academia. Recently, two Apex gang members escaped criminal convictions “after bashing an elderly couple in their beds during a brutal home invasion.” The victims, aged in their 70s, were left “left deeply traumatized after waking to find the young armed intruders in their house” and were “assaulted with weapons during the onslaught.”

Another victim was woken and beaten with golf clubs, while victims of another invaded home were “subjected to demeaning behavior of a sexual nature.” A carjacking victim was repeatedly threatened with being slashed with a knife despite handing over his car, and in a “brazen public attack,” a 16-year-old gang member used a box-cutter to slash the torso of a teenager who refused to hand over his phone on a train. Police have expressed concerns “about attackers taking ‘pleasure’ in bashing victims.” One police officer observed that: “Drugs or money aren’t the driver. It’s purely for the fun. They’re getting off on humiliating their victims.”

In the western suburbs of Sydney a 14 year-old girl was gang raped by up to six African men. One of the perpetrators, a 16-year-old, “claimed to be a member of Blackdanna, a self-proclaimed ‘alliance of all niggas’ in the Blacktown area who share photos of drugs, knives and graffiti online and wear black bandannas.” In another case, a 21 year-old Sudanese refugee embarked on “a three-day rape spree and sliced an elderly woman’s throat” just one month after arriving in Australia. He rewarded Australia’s generosity by immediately setting out “on a drug and alcohol-fuelled campaign of terror on the streets of Dandenong” which included “a string of depraved sex attacks.”

Three Sudanese youths who raped a young mother in her Victorian country home as her children slept in another room “sat whispering and giggling among themselves” as they were sentenced by a magistrate to just 36-month terms in juvenile detention for what the magistrate called “a cruel, callous and degrading attack on a vulnerable young mother for their own sexual gratification.” Another Sudanese refugee claimed diminished responsibility for the “horrific” aggravated rape of a 17 year-old girl when he was just 13, which was followed up with a string of violent crimes and serious traffic offences over the next six years. His lawyer said he could not be held fully responsible for his crimes because of an “intellectual disability and a severe behavioral disorder.” Given that the Sudanese mean IQ is 71, this defense would apply to virtually every Sudanese defendant.

Increasingly, victims of this African crime plague are circumventing the media blackout by reporting their experiences directly on social media. After a man was assaulted with baseball bats and robbed of his Mercedes in broad daylight by a group of African youths (who later used it in a violent home invasion), it only made headlines because the driver went public. Andrew Rule notes that:

All over town, (non-ABC) radio station switchboards jammed as people called in to tell chilling tales of similar incidents. Of houses being broken into and car keys taken by violent young thugs with no respect for anybody, let alone watered-down Australian laws made toothless by overcrowded jails caused, ironically, by migrant intake outstripping our fragile infrastructure. This was a wake-up from the real world, the one mostly ignored by the myopic civil libertarians of the cardigan Left. Until, of course, the day comes when they, too, become victims of the latest wave of barbarians at the gate.

A Melbourne mother-of-two was killed in November last year after a Sudanese teenager, high on drugs, crashed a stolen car into her while driving on the wrong side of the road after “an out-of-control suburban rampage of carjackings, armed robberies and aggravated burglaries.” The Herald-Sun noted that three high-powered cars were passed between African youths “as they left a trail of traumatized victims across six suburbs.” For taking the life of this woman, the Sudanese refugee, Isaac Gatkuoth, was handed a pathetic 14 month prison sentence. According to police, such crimes now “were typical of a new breed of thugs swept up in gangster culture.” This “gangster culture” has, it should be noted, been overwhelmingly promoted and spread around the world by the Jews that dominate Hollywood. Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton recently dubbed it the “Grand Theft Auto generation,” when attempting to explain yet another surge in Victoria’s crime rates, which included double-digit rises in car thefts, burglary, drug and weapons offences.

Isaac Gatkuoth: enriching Australia with death

Isaac Gatkuoth: enriching Australia with death

These predatory gangs of African youths have also targeted international students from China who are prime targets because they often have “the latest in technology, which can be traded for good money to buy drugs,” and are unlikely to fight back when stood over for their property. In April a group of Chinese students were among the victims of “a citywide rampage” by African youths who raided their townhouse. One of the students was woken by punches in the face by the assailants, some of whom were armed with hammers. A victim recalled that “One or two of them had weapons — hammers. I don’t want to die, I thought about that. I’ve got no idea why they picked here. I now think Australia’s not a safe place. I thought it was safe before, but not now.’’ Groups of up to 20 teens and young men have for months “been terrorising students around the University of Melbourne precinct and other parts of the inner-city in after-dark ambushes.”

As well as terrorizing Whites and Asians, African-on-African crime in Australia has also become a huge problem. The eruption of extreme violence within the Sudanese community, or between Sudanese and Somali youths, is a frequent occurrence. In one case young Sudanese immigrants in Melbourne engaged in deplorable acts of violence including the use of machetes — a weapon still associated with the horrific scenes of the Rwandan genocide — after a beauty pageant held in Springvale, southeast of that city.” Last year the Salvation Army accused Victoria’s police of covering up a violent New Year’s Eve brawl between more than 200 African youths in Melbourne’s CBD. Police did not issue a media release on the brawl and no media outlet reported it.

Melbourne’s Herald-Sun recently revealed that even once apprehended by police, African offenders “are bashing staff and other inmates amid growing tensions between gangs at teen detention centers … where assault rates have climbed by 46 percent.” Andrew Rule, in response to the desperate efforts of the leftist media elite to suppress news of, or make apologies for, the horrifying extent of African gang violence, affirms that we should not pretend that “the rising wave (a statistical fact, not a rhetorical flourish) of violent ethnic gangs in Melbourne and Sydney are as harmless as the conga line of apologists, sycophants, ‘doctors’ wives’ and naive young lawyers who turn themselves inside out to cover for them. … The Moomba riots have highlighted a rise in gang crime that has been allowed to gather strength far too long. Police have talked privately for years of its poisonous effects. Now that particular chicken has come home to roost and it’s the size of an ostrich.”

Conservative commentator Andrew Bolt recently observed that “This level of mass violence — like the terrorism threats and the shootings in Melbourne’s north and Sydney’s west — is relatively new to Australia and demands an explanation.” Decrying the police and media cover-up, he notes how most media reporting of the Apex gang has “studiously avoid mentioning one of the most important things about it — that it is made up predominantly of Africans who are refugees or the children of refugees,” and how there seems to be “a conspiracy to stop the public knowing that our refugee and immigration policies have become a threat, introducing new levels of violence and gun crime to our cities.” This stubborn refusal by the Leftist media elite to be honest “is misleading readers and leaving them unable to conclude the nature of the threat to public safety.”

While Bolt’s observations are entirely valid, he is also guilty of misleading his readers and leaving them “unable to conclude the nature of the threat to public safety.” This is because Bolt (at least publically) denies the reality of racial differences and ascribes the dysfunctional behaviour of Africans, Pacific Islanders and Arabs solely to cultural differences — rather than to empirically-measurable differences in traits like intelligence, aggression, and impulse control. The problem for Bolt is simply that Australia is taking in “people from war zones who have a martial culture, few employable skills, and very different religious and cultural values.” For Bolt, if these criminal youths could only be made to embrace Western values they would become fully functional and productive members of society.

Of course, the reality is that no amount of taxpayer money or values education can remedy an African mean IQ deficit of two standard deviations compared to White Australians. Like Australia’s aborigines, African migrants will, with rare exceptions, inevitably impose a lifelong burden on Australia’s welfare and criminal justice systems. This was Andrew Fraser’s essential point back in 2005. In Part 2 of this essay I examine the Jewish role in shaping Australia’s current refugee policies and in creating the Frankenstein’s monster that is today’s multicultural Australia.

Tags: Andrew, Fraser's, Prof., conviction, crime, for, stating, statistics

Views: 7

Replies to This Discussion

The Jewish War on White Australia: Refugee Policy and the African Crime Plague, Part 2

Reaping the whirlwind of decades of Jewish activism

Australia’s African (and Pacific Islander, and Middle Eastern) crime epidemic is the inevitable result of the successful campaign waged by Jewish activists to end Australia’s White Australia policy. As detailed in my series of essays entitled The War on White Australia, Jewish ethnic activism was pivotal in overthrowing Australia’s longstanding European-only immigration policy. The Jewish academic Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges this, noting that “In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.”


Jews have likewise been at the forefront of those lobbying for a massively expanded refugee intake for Australia (both in terms of numbers and countries of origin). Walter Lippmann, the Jewish community leader and activist who chaired the committee that produced the first parliamentary report strongly endorsing state-sponsored multiculturalism, also played a critical role, alongside former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser, in shaping Australia’s current refugee policy. That Fraser was such a willing ally of Lippmann is perhaps not surprising given that Fraser’s mother, Una Woolf, was of Jewish descent. In her 2010 biography Malcolm Fraser: The Political Memoirs (co-written by Fraser), Margaret Simons notes that Fraser’s “mother’s father Louis Woolf had been born in New Zealand, the son of a Jewish father who had emigrated from South Africa, and Esther Reuben. Una believed that her grandmother was not Jewish, but the name suggests that the Jewish heritage may have been on both sides of the family.”[i] Thus Malcolm Fraser was, it seems, Jewish enough to qualify as a citizen of Israel.

Jewish historian Suzanne Rutland acknowledges that “Fraser’s positions in terms of multiculturalism, Soviet Jewry and Israel while he was Prime Minister were very much to the benefit of both the Australian Jewish community and world Jewry, and were very much appreciated at the time.” Uncertain to what extent he was influenced by his Jewish background, she notes how under his leadership “Australian Jewry benefitted from Fraser’s liberal approach to multiculturalism.” Mark Lopez has likewise noted that Fraser, the first federal politician to use the word “multiculturalism,” was “politically and morally predisposed to cultural pluralism.” The Executive Director of the Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council, Colin Rubinstein, has also spoken admiringly of Fraser’s contribution to the development of Australian multiculturalism, observing that the former Prime Minister regarded “diversity as a quality to be actively embraced” which was a position he believed was dictated by “both morality and hard-nosed reason.”

Part-Jewish former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser

Part-Jewish former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser

Fraser himself proudly stated that, under his leadership, “The days of Anglo-Saxon conformity have gone from Australia forever, and we are a better country for it.” In her biography of Fraser, Simons observes that Fraser was the first Liberal leader “to break with the Anglocentric and assimilationist traditions of his party” and was “well aware that the decision to take large numbers of Asian refugees and their families was a fundamental one, changing the face of Australia and with the potential for vicious electoral backlash.” According to veteran Canberra journalist Michelle Grattan, “the fight against racism” was one of Fraser’s “defining issues, although it took observers a while to realise just how central this was for him.” Interestingly, Fraser was involved in brokering the agreement for Black majority rule in the new Zimbabwe. Grattan notes that “the disaster that eventually unfolded there has to be a devastating disappointment.”

In 1976 Walter Lippmann led a delegation to Canberra that successfully lobbied for the introduction of Australia’s first dedicated refugee policy. Academic Bronwyn Hinz notes that:

Meeting with senators and senior government officials the delegation strongly recommended the federal government increase its humanitarian intake, and that this intake be separate from the regular immigration intake to allow the acceptance of refugees on humanitarian grounds even if they did not meet immigration criteria or if immigration quotas had been met. Within a few months of Lippmann’s lobbying, the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence acknowledged the “complete lack of policy for the acceptance of people into Australia as refugees rather than as migrants,” and using Lippmann’s arguments, recommended as a matter of urgency “a comprehensive set of policy guidelines and the establishment of appropriate machinery” to be applied to refugee situations, including those currently unfolding.[ii]

The first Indo-Chinese and Vietnamese boat people started to arrive in Australia in 1976. In the same year Malcolm Fraser ignored strong warnings from his own immigration department that potential refugees from Lebanon “were of questionable character” and lacked the language, vocational skills, and cultural norms to fit into Australian society. Fraser was also warned of “the possibility that the conflicts, tensions and divisions within Lebanon will be transferred to Australia,” and was told by his immigration minister that a high percentage were “illiterate.”

Fraser defied all these warnings, and the result was revealed, decades later, in the 2011 Census which showed that nearly one in five of those born in Lebanon still struggled to speak English. They earned a median income of just $333 a week on average, far below the Australian average of $577, and were four times more likely to be on a disability pension. Moreover, eleven of the 21 people jailed here for terrorism offences are from Lebanese families. Lebanese Muslims also predominate among the 150 “Australians” currently fighting with Islamic State — far more than are serving in the Australian Defence Forces. A further 100 thought likely to join Islamic State have had their passports confiscated and another 200 have been pulled off planes. Meanwhile, ASIO is investigating 400 other cases involving Islamic terrorist threats. Gun crime, involving men of Lebanese background is extraordinarily high in western Sydney and in northern Melbourne.

The joys of multiculturalism in south-western Sydney

The joys of multiculturalism in south-western Sydney

The Australian recently investigated how Lebanese crime gangs in Sydney’s west are involved in “a battle for the city’s multi-million-dollar drug trade that has sparked a series of shootings and murders” and who “are expanding their influence interstate and internationally.” The head of NSW’s Middle East Organised Crime Squad, established in 2006 in response to rampant criminality in this community, described how it often involves “drugs, and from the drugs comes extortion, stand-overs, drug-runs and all that internal-external violence that comes from that, whether that be shootings, drive-by shootings, right up to murders.”

Most of the crime families the squad deals with are “from the same three places in north Lebanon: Tripoli, el-Minieh and Akkar.” Sydney’s Lebanese community, estimated at 300,000, is the largest in Australia with the majority having arrived at Malcolm Fraser’s discretion during the Lebanese civil war. As a result of their presence, journalist John Lyons notes that driving around parts of southwest Sydney “is like a macabre tour of the city’s criminal world — someone shot dead in that park; someone shot dead in his driveway two streets away; two cars firebombed down there.”

In 1983, Malcolm Fraser was replaced as Prime Minister by Bob Hawke who, while not Jewish, was described by the Jewish intellectual Antony Loewenstein as “the best friend the Australian Zionist lobby ever had, until the arrival of John Howard.”[iii] James Jupp notes that Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke “was strongly in favor of multiculturalism, which was not necessarily true for all his ministers. He was particularly close to the Jewish community,” including “influential individuals such as Walter Lippmann, James Gobbo and Peter Abeles who had direct access to the prime minister.”[iv] Bronwyn Hinz also notes that Hawke was “a personal friend of ECCV [Ethnic Communities Council of Victoria] founding Chairperson Walter Lippmann, and provided Lippmann and other ECCV activists with direct access to his office.  In the first year of the Hawke government, the ECCV’s lobbying [led by Lippmann] culminated in the reduction of citizenship waiting period to two years, the replacement of the term alien with “non‐citizen” in the 1983 Migration Act, and an increase of the refugee intake.”[v] 

Chances of a Holocaust in Australia now “remote”

As a result of this concerted campaign by Jewish activists to transform Australia’s immigration and refugee policies  — ostensibly to prevent another “Holocaust”  — White Australians are increasingly forced to live under the threat of South African-style violent crime. Thanks to the increased “diversity” triggered by the Jewish-led overthrow of the White Australia policy, and virtual commandeering of Australia’s immigration and refugee polices, Jewish activist and lawyer Ruth Barson is now confident that: “The chances of the Holocaust occurring in Australia today are remote,” but she cautions that history shows Jews are never truly safe, and consequently, “we should have no tolerance for even the shadows of racism and xenophobia. These are dangerous in any guise.”

Dvir Abramovich, the chairman of Australia’s B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission, likewise contends that “The horrors of the Holocaust did not begin in the gas chambers — but with hateful words of incitement and contempt, and with the demonizing of anyone who was deemed unworthy by the Nazis.” Accordingly, in addition to continuing to aggressively prosecute “hate speech” through Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, he insists that “it’s time that compulsory teaching about the Holocaust is introduced in all Australian schools, to not only develop an understanding of the dangerous ramifications of racism and prejudice, but to heighten awareness of the value of diversity, religious freedom, acceptance and pluralism.” How the current African crime plague, which is a direct result of Jewish-engineered “diversity” and “pluralism” contributes anything of “value” of Australian society is not explicated by Abramovich.


With staggering (but oh so characteristic) hypocrisy and chutzpah, Abramovich recently hailed the 68th anniversary of the founding of the state of Israel. Despite Israel having one of the lowest asylum-seeker acceptance rates in the world, he extolled the “Jewish state” for “putting out the welcome mat to refugees, traumatized survivors and victims of anti-Semitism” and for being “a thriving, free and tolerant state” that “comprises a multitude of ethnic and religious groups whose cultural and artistic diversity add to the country’s spirituality and creativity.”

He naturally declined to mention that this diverse “multitude” are all Jews. He also neglected to mention that Israel’s treatment of African refugees is far from “tolerant.” As reported in the New York Times last year:

Israel’s policy toward African asylum seekers is to pressure them to self-deport or, as the former interior minister Eli Yishai put it, to “make their lives miserable” until they give up and let the government deport them. … A law passed in 2013 requires male African asylum seekers already in Israel to be detained automatically and indefinitely in the open detention center, Holov, in the Negev desert. The detainees are allowed to wander the desert between three obligatory check-ins every day, and they must remain in Holov overnight. If they miss a check-in, they can be transferred to the nearby prison. Their only alternative is to accept a sum of $3,500 to return to their country of origin, or a third country, usually Uganda or Rwanda, often without proper documentation to stay. … Prime Minister Benjamin Natanyahu once warned that the arrival of African people poses a demographic risk to Israel: “If we don’t stop their entry, the problem that currently stands at 60,000 could grow to 600,000, and that threatens our existence as a Jewish and democratic state.”

Given Abramovich’s fervent support for the ethno-nationalist state of Israel, despite its harsh policies toward African refugees, his sanctimonious words about the virtues of “diversity” are exposed for what they truly are: a rhetorical mask for ethnic aggression against White Australians.

Abramovich and other Jewish activists recently forced the Victorian Education Minister to review the text selection process for schools after they “condemned the inclusion of a play on the [senior school] drama list, Tales of a City by the Sea, which depicted life in Gaza and was written by Palestinian playwright Samah Sabawi.” The minister initiated the review “after the B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission and the Jewish Community Council of Victoria complained that the play promoted an anti-Jewish agenda and could isolate Jewish students.” Abramovich claimed, in truly Orwellian words, that students should not be exposed to “pedagogical materials” that “create tension and disharmony” and that school text selection “must reflect community standards by ensuring that students are provided with plays that promote understanding of complex issues and which furnish its learners with appropriate context and balance.” “Community standards” is Abramovich’s lexical camouflage for “Jewish standards” — which demand that pro-Palestinian and pro-White voices are systematically censored within education and the arts.

Abramovich’s hypocritical attitude (in tacitly lauding policies in Israel that he stridently condemns when implemented elsewhere) is standard among the ranks of Australia’s activist Jews. Rabbi Jonathan Keren-Black, another staunch Zionist, conveniently ignored Israel’s refusal to take a single Syrian refugee when he last year condemned Hungary’s response to the European migrant crisis for its “blatantly racist tone.” The ultra-Zionist Executive Council of Australian Jewry has, alongside other Jewish activist organizations, been silent about Israel’s treatment of African refugees and the country’s refusal to take a single Syrian refugee. Yet it heartily endorsed the Australian government’s decision last year to admit an additional 12,000 Syrian refugees, despite the fact there is already a problem with Syrian organized crime gangs in Sydney’s southwest. Police recently moved to “stop violence between two Syrian gangs: the Assyrian Kings and Dlasthr” which has included “drive-by shootings” and “murders between opposing groups in the Assyrian community.”

NSW Jewish Board of Deputies CEO, Vic Alhadeff, said his organization wholeheartedly supported  the decision to increase the Syrian refugee intake on the basis that: “As a nation we have a responsibility to be a sanctuary for those in need and play our part in the spirit of humanity and kindness. Now is the time for compassion and to ensure those who are most in need can establish a life in our country.” In March, Robin Margo, the former president of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, addressed a pro-refugee rally which, the Australian Jewish News reported, included “dozens who came together under a banner that read ‘Jews for Refugees.’ Among them were members of the progressive Zionist Youth movement Netzer.” In his speech Margo “made reference to the Australia-wide rabbinical support ‘from all streams of Judaism’ for refugees that has been formally expressed through statements from 16 rabbis and from the Rabbinical Council of Victoria,” who have unanimously called “on the government to observe Australia’s obligations under international law and to show compassion to these most vulnerable people.” Neither Alhadeff nor Margo have ever uttered a single word of criticism of Israel’s refugee policies.

In what can only be described as poetic justice, members of Melbourne’s Jewish community have also fallen victim to predatory gangs of African youths because of their comparative wealth. Despite comprising a population of just 120,000 out of 24 million (0.5%), it was recently revealed that four of the five wealthiest people in the country are Jewish. African gangs have carjacked luxury vehicles in suburbs of Melbourne heavily populated by Jews, and in response, The Age reported that: “A group of Jewish residents fed up with a spate of violent crimes in Melbourne’s south-east hope that banding together will help create safer streets for the community,” creating a Facebook page called J-Safe to enable Jews “to share their experiences and warn others of crime in real time.”

The hypocrisy of Australia’s Jewish-controlled media on refugees

An important part of the Jewish matrix of power in Australia is the leftwing media infrastructure created by the multimillionaire property developer and publisher Morris (Morrie) Schwartz. This Jewish media mogul, who migrated to Australia from Hungary via Israel, is the proprietor behind Black Inc. publishing, the leftwing journals The Monthly and Quarterly Essay (which have been called “the most powerful leftwing voices in Australia”), and The Saturday Paper. Schwartz’s various media organs churn out a never-ending stream of articles indignantly demanding that Australia dramatically increase its refugee intake and end the off-shore processing of asylum-seekers.


Conspicuously absent from these same media organs, however, is any discussion (let alone critique) of Israel’s brutal treatment of the Palestinians, or its unaccommodating policies toward non-Jewish refugees and asylum-seekers. The slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza in 2014 went totally unreported across Schwartz’s media empire. One commentator observed that, while the Schwartz publications are full of articles about “indigenous rights, climate change, [and] asylum-seeker policy,” they were “shamefully silent” when it came to “Israel’s assault on the Palestinians.” A former editor and staff writer at The Monthly explained that when working under

Morrie Schwartz at Black Inc. or The Monthly, you work very closely with the publisher and things do get spiked and you have raving rows about what goes through and what doesn’t and there are certain glass walls set by the publisher that you can’t go outside of and… one of those is Palestine. I means it’s seen as a leftwing publication, but the publisher is very rightwing on Israel. … And he’s very much to the, you know, Benjamin Natanyahu end of politics. So you can’t touch it: just don’t touch it. It’s a glass wall.     

In her profile of Schwartz for The Australian, journalist Kate Legge notes that “everyone says Schwartz responds viscerally” to all issues concerning Israel. She quotes his close friend, the Jewish academic Robert Manne, who pointed out that “loyalty to the idea of a Jewish homeland is very important to him.” Former editor of The Monthly, Peter Craven, observed that: “He’s very one-eyed on these sort of things. I once said to [his wife] Anna that I was going to see [the Wagner opera] Tristan and Isolde and she said, “Peter, I won’t even buy German goods.” Legge mentions how, back in 1982, Schwartz published a biography of former Prime Minister Bob Hawke that other publishers had turned down. The author noted that “Morrie was very influenced by the fact that Bob was a huge supporter of Israel. It was really Bob’s connection to Israel that he leapt at.”

Morrie Schwarz: hardline ethno-nationalism for Israel and open borders for Australia

Morrie Schwarz: hardline ethno-nationalism for Israel and open borders for Australia

To give an indication of just how wealthy and intensively-networked the Australian Jewish community is, consider that Schwartz, this supporter of hardline ethno-nationalism for Israel yet leading propagandist of open borders and multiculturalism for Australia, is related through marriage to yet another property developer, Albert Dadon, who was former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s “most trusted kitchen cabinet advisor on Israel.” Journalist Jason Koutsoukis observed in 2009, regarding Dadon, that “in the small but competitive world of Australian Jewish politics, the ultimate test of esteem is whether or not you have the ear of the Prime Minister of the day.”

Dadon, another radical Zionist who nevertheless favors open borders and multiculturalism for Australia, took on the role of that Colin Rubinstein had assumed during John Howard’s tenure as Prime Minister. Dadon had spotted Rudd’s potential soon after he entered parliament in 1998 and “courted the future Prime Minister assiduously.” Rudd was the man who disastrously scrapped Australia’s tough border laws, opening the doors to 50,000 illegal boat people. Koutsoukis notes that it was under Dadon’s direction that Rudd also inaugurated the annual Australia-Israel Leadership Forum in Jerusalem — a two-day talkfest for Australian and Israeli politicians, academics and businesspeople designed to further consolidate the Australia-Israel alliance.

Noting the incredible hypocrisy of those who, like Schwartz and Dadon, simultaneously condemn immigration restrictions in Western nations like Australia while defending the Jewish ethno-nationalist state of Israel (and traditional Jewish prohibitions against intermarriage), Kevin MacDonald observed in The Culture of Critique that

ironically, many intellectuals who absolutely reject evolutionary thinking and any imputation that genetic self-interest might be important in human affairs also favor policies that are rather self-interestedly ethnocentric, and they often condemn the self-interested ethnocentric behavior of other groups, particularly any indication that the European-derived majority …  is developing a cohesive group strategy and high levels of ethnocentrism in reaction to the group strategies of others. …  A Jew maintaining [that nativist opposition to immigration is irrational] … should, to retain intellectual consistency, agree that the traditional Jewish concern with endogamy and consanguinity has been irrational. Moreover, such a person would also believe that Jews ought not attempt to retain political power in Israel because there is no rational reason to suppose that any particular group should have power anywhere. Nor should Jews attempt to influence the political process … in such a manner as to disadvantage another group or benefit their own. And to be logically consistent, one should also apply this argument to all those who promote immigration of their own ethnic groups, the mirror image of group-based opposition to such immigration.[vi]

The obvious Jewish ethnic aggression underpinning the hypocritical moral stance of Jews like Schwartz, Dadon and innumerable other activist Jews, has, of course, been especially channeled into the propagation of the culture of the “Holocaust” throughout the West. I noted earlier this year how this decades-long campaign of psychological terrorism has had a truly demoralizing effect on the German people. The Jewish state MP and deputy chair of the NSW Parliamentary Friends of Israel, Walt Secord, was last year impressed by the “pragmatic acceptance” of most Germans and their “readiness to assist” in the migrant crisis, comparing the current openness and acceptance to that nation’s “darkest days.” Writing in The Australian he observed that

the memory of the Holocaust remains, rightly, etched not only in the minds of everyday Germans but in the very fabric of their cities. As I walked among the stone columns of the Berlin Holocaust Memorial, the Berlin Jewish Museum’s Holocaust memorial chamber, and through Israeli artist Menashe Kadishman’s disturbing installation Fallen Leaves, it did not escape me that Germany is disproportionately shouldering the response to the refugee intake. It is apparent that there is a collective German fear — particularly by Merkel — that as a nation, it cannot be callous. Not in light of the Holocaust.        

This culture of the Holocaust has been used to devastating effect throughout the West to stifle opposition to the Jewish diaspora strategies of mass non-White immigration and multiculturalism. It is the rhetorical lynchpin of the White displacement agenda, with any hint of European racial or ethnic identification or solidarity being instantly linked by Jewish activists with “the single most evil event in human history.” In Part 3 of this essay I examine the response of Australia’s leftwing intellectual and media elites (who have been marinated in this culture their entire lives) to the African crime plague and the many other failings of Australian multiculturalism.

[i] Margaret Simons & Malcolm Fraser, Malcolm Fraser: The Political Memoirs (Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing, 2010), 24.

[ii] Bronwyn Hinz, “Ethnic associations, networks and the construction of Australian multiculturalism,” Paper presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Corcordia University, Montreal, 1‐3 June 2010,, 7.

[iii] Antony Loewenstein, My Israel Question: Reframing the Israel/Palestine Conflict (Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing, 2009).

[iv] James Jupp, From White Australia to Woomera  — The Story of Australian Immigration (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 46-47.

[v] Hinz, “Ethnic associations,” 9-10.

[vi] Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth‑Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Westport, CT: Praeger, Revised Paperback edition, 2001), 311 & 324-325.

End of Part 2 of 3

The Jewish War on White Australia: Refugee Policy and the African Crime Plague, Part 3


From a television news report following the Moomba riots

Part 1
Part 2

Australia’s elites double-down on the multicult

Despite the trail of traumatized victims left behind by Australia’s (still comparatively small) African population, the country’s Jewish-dominated intellectual and media establishment have scorned all doubters and doubled down in their monomaniacal (essentially theological) commitment to the virtues of mass non-White immigration and multiculturalism. Australians must open their hearts, minds (and especially their borders) to everyone in the whole world because, rampant non-White criminality, terrorist threats, welfare dependency and White displacement aside, “the lived experience of decades since the White Australia policy was abandoned has been overwhelmingly positive.”

The African crime epidemic, rather than representing a calamitous failure of immigration and refugee policy, is instead dismissed as “a calamitous law enforcement failure.” Thus, White police are held to be ultimately responsible for Black criminality. Instead of arguing for an urgent review of Australia’s immigration and refugee policies, Jewish state MP David Southwick has instead urged the Victorian government to fund more frontline police to tackle the exponential rise in violent crime. Rather than ascribing higher rates of African offending to innate racial traits observable across all times and places, the crime writer for The Age, Cameron Houston, attributes the phenomenon to “social disadvantage, domestic dysfunction, poor employment prospects, addiction issues, or just plain old fashioned boredom.” White Australians therefore need to do more “to get these kids involved in their local communities and improve their prospects.”

White Australians are also held to be responsible for the abysmally low educational performance of African children. White flight from inner-city public schools with high enrollments of Africans and Muslims has been blamed for the woeful educational standards of these “sink schools” which have been “drained of affluent families and high-achieving students.” The Age quotes Abeselom Nega, an Ethiopian refugee and community leader who is “alarmed” by this trend. “The white parents don’t send their kids to these schools because all they see is black kids,” says Nega, who sits on the board of the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission. “They may not view it as racism, but it is. … You can sugar coat it, and put it differently, but I won’t.”

Dr Arathi Sriprakash, a lecturer at Cambridge University who is researching racial politics in Australian schools, claims that “We don’t have the White Australia policy any more, we are not talking about explicit or overt racism that you might recognize from the past, but racism exists in more coded ways. It occurs in school choice, in the way parents decide what is a good, bad or risky school.” According to Victoria University adjunct Professor Richard Teese, wealthy families have the “privilege” of being more selective with their children’s schooling, and claims that “If we start educating people separately, we run the risk of creating ghettos, and the formation of hostile social attitudes.”       

White parents with the financial means to avoid these “sink schools” are thus held responsible for African educational failure and face moral censure for refusing to sacrifice their children’s welfare on the altar of political correctness. Of course, unlike working class Whites, Jews in Australia are totally exempt from dealing with the pernicious daily consequences of the decades-long social engineering of their community leaders. Australia’s wealthiest ethnic group can avoid having their children’s education sabotaged by low-IQ Africans and Muslims by utilizing their extensive network of lavishly resourced (and ethnically homogeneous) Jewish day-schools.

As a result of the mass-importation of low-IQ migrants and refugees, educational standards in Australia have plummeted. The OECD recently expressed alarm at the nation’s educational slide. Education chief at the OECD, Andreas Schleicher, “slammed Australia over its declining results in international student assessments (PISA).” The Sydney Morning Herald observed that “Where once Australia kept up with South Korea, now our east Asian neighbors are streaking ahead on tests that compare the academic ability of 15-year-olds around the world. Students from Poland and Vietnam are now outperforming Australia’s teenagers. … The warning signs have been there for over a decade. Australia’s PISA results have been on the slide since 2003.” Academics have scrambled for reasons (other than the obvious fact of the changing racial make-up of the student body) to account for this sudden decline. Some ascribe the decline to inadequate resourcing of schools — despite the fact that government funding of education in Australia is at an all-time high.


The reason for plummeting educational standards in Australia is a complete mystery

Any idea of protecting the Australian community by actually deporting members of Melbourne’s violent street gangs back to Africa is dismissed by refugee activists as “inherently racist,” “deeply disturbing” and “akin to apartheid.” Cucked human rights lawyer Anthony Kelly maintains that, “these are our young people. They go to our schools, they are brought up in our Australian communities, they buy video games in our department stores, they learn from Australian society like everybody, so to call for a deportation or keep focusing on their backgrounds or ethnicity is disingenuous or cowardly. The Australian community is not taking responsibility.”

Kelly, in brazen defiance of the facts, claims using existing laws targeting criminal gangs to deport African criminals would be “inherently racist because it implies that race or ethnic background is a causal factor in their offending when we know that not to be true.” In Kelly’s warped mental universe “There is no correlation or link between a person’s race or ethnicity and their propensity for criminal activity.” For this preening moral paragon, the race of violent criminals and their victims is irrelevant and just “confuses the issue, rather than clarifies it.” The only reason it would even be mentioned is because “we live in an extraordinarily racist society. It’s really as simple as that.”

Unlike in the United States, the “legacy of slavery and segregation” cannot be invoked in Australia to account for the rampant social dysfunction of Africans migrants and refugees. The failure of most of them to become productive members of Australian society, despite being lavishly supported by White Australian taxpayers, can only be because, in the words of Kelly, “we live in an extraordinarily racist society.” The truth, or course, is that the races are not equal, and the expectation that Africans will conform to White behavioural norms is to expect them to be something other than what they are. Blacks and Whites are not the same and Blacks have never been able to even approximate White academic behaviour in any historical or geographical context.

Contrary to Kelly’s fantasy world, police statistics prove that, in the real world, Africans are vastly overrepresented as criminal offenders. Back in 2011 it was revealed that “Sudanese-born Victorians are the most violent ethnic group in the state.” Assistant Police Commissioner Tim Cartwright actually apologized to African immigrants in 2012 as he released figures showing that “Sudanese and Somali born Victorians are about five times more likely to commit crimes than the wider community” — a trend that must, he warned, be addressed to prevent Cronulla-style social unrest. The most common crimes committed by Somali and Sudanese-born Victorians were “assault and robbery, illustrating the trend towards increasingly violent robberies by disaffected African youths.”

Back in 1997, in response to surging crime rates (four to eight times higher than average) among Sudanese youth, then immigration minister Kevin Andrews announced that Australia would take fewer refugees from Sudan because “some groups don’t seem to be settling and adjusting into the Australian way of life as quickly as we would hope.” Andrews was screamed down by the intellectual and media class. The Labor Party denounced Andrews as a “racist,” and The Age slammed him for making “inflammatory” remarks designed “to arouse a predictably base reaction from those sensitive to immigration on racial grounds,” and went on to indignantly ask: “Precisely how ‘quickly’ should ‘we’ expect people who come from such severe deprivation to adjust to the so-called Australian way of life? We take our refugees as we find them, which is not to absolve any group of civic responsibility.”

Encouraged by sickening apologists like Kelly and the media Left, since the Moomba riots, Sudanese community members have condemned the media for having eschewed their usual policy of suppressing all news of African gang violence. The South Sudanese Community Association released a statement condemning the “damaging” media coverage of the Moomba riots. “The media headlines and police spokespersons have screamed ‘Sudanese ethnicity’ and linked it to this group of wild youth,” the statement said. “This is significant damage to our ethnic identity. Time over and time over, we suffer from this endless game of blaming our ethnicity.”

Straying from the politically-correct line on refugees will not be tolerated

In the context of an election campaign, the Australian Immigration Minister Peter Dutton recently enraged anti-White elites by daring to state some facts: that some refugees end up taking low-end jobs otherwise available to Australians, and that others (the vast majority) are functionally illiterate and innumerate in their own languages (let alone English), and will consequently impose an ongoing (often lifetime) financial burden on taxpayers. His comments were in response to news that the opposition Labor Party was planning to double Australia’s refugee intake from the current 13,750 per year (alongside Canada the highest per capita intake in the world), and that the extreme-Left Greens Party supported lifting this to at least 50,000 a year.

The Sydney Morning Herald, a principal mouthpiece of the Jewish-dominated cultural-Marxist establishment, reacted with furious abuse, labelling Dutton’s factual statements “a naked appeal to base prejudice” and an “outrageous slur against refugees” that should “have no place in political debates.” Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who has otherwise expressed his deep obeisance to the multicult, had supposedly “displayed a remarkable lack of faith in the country’s academic institutions” in failing to condemn Dutton’s remarks, and had “given succor to dark instincts that betray Australia as an egalitarian society.” The debate set off by Dutton was just a “feral outbreak,” and Dutton was guilty of “seeking to create and fan irrational fears.”

Roger Cohen, the long-time Jewish foreign correspondent for the New York Times added his voice to those condemning Dutton’s “Donald Trump-like” comments in particular, and the Australian government in general, for “their pointless cruelty” and “progressively dehumanization” of asylum-seekers. Cohen, who frequently writes about “the Holocaust,” accused Australia of following the “textbook rules for the administering of cruelty” by keeping asylum seekers in offshore detention. Parroting the rhetoric of Jewish activists in Australia, Cohen claimed Australia’s history included “the long and unhappy chapter of its White Australia policy under which a vast landmass was portrayed as under threat of invasion by uncivilized ‘natives’ from across Asia. Politicians like Dutton are playing scurrilously on similar fears.” Not surprisingly, Cohen has never criticized Israel’s refugee and settlement policies for “their pointless cruelty” and “progressive dehumanization.”

Roger Cohen

Roger Cohen

The chief executive of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre in Australia denounced Dutton for his “racist fearmongering” and for “using a narrative that belongs to the days of the White Australia policy.” Making false equivalences between Australia’s post-War intake of mostly skilled refugees from northern and eastern Europe, and those arriving today from the Third World, he enjoined Australians to see “the opportunity refugees offer our country” and “imagine if we saw the potential rather than bought the lie of burden and threat.” One letter writer chided Dutton for his apparent “ignorance” of the fact that “in a number of African cultures, there is only an oral tradition” and consequently “no written languages for these people to be illiterate in.”

The predisposition of many Anglo-Australians toward this kind of extreme moralizing that followed in the wake of Dutton’s unremarkable comments is, to a significant extent, a sociocultural legacy of the Australia’s English origins. The traditional English class system with its hypocrisy, smugness and snobbery has been grafted onto the regnant Jewish-dominated intellectual and political establishment, with the result that having the correct Jewish-approved political opinions, generally imbibed through the academy, is now the main way (alongside wealth) to elevate oneself socially above the despised lower classes of suburban “rednecks” and “Hansonites.” Existing social prejudices are thereby channeled into pro-Jewish and anti-White directions. Andrew Fraser observed the same phenomenon at work in 2005, when he noted that:

Unlike other racial, ethnic or religious groups well-equipped to practice the politics of identity, white Australians lack a strong, cohesive sense of ethnic solidarity. As a consequence, ordinary Australians favouring a moratorium on non-white immigration cannot count on effective leadership or support from their co-ethnics among political, intellectual and corporate elites. On the contrary, our still predominantly Anglo-Australian rulers take pride in their active collaboration with the Third World colonization of Australia. None of the major parties, indeed not one member of the Commonwealth Parliament, offers citizens the option of voting to defend and nurture Australia’s Anglo-European identity. The problem, in short, is clear: the Australian nation is bereft of a responsible ruling class.              

Writing for The Australian, the conservative journalist Chris Kenny has similarly noted the yawning chasm between the political/media class and average Australians on the issues of immigration and refugees. He observed how Australia’s Leftist elites “consider themselves superior to the masses” and love to “lecture and hector the mainstream.” Worse than this, they

try to dictate what facts can even be discussed. They seek to silence dissent. They have compiled an informal list of unmentionables, facts that should not be uttered: the truths whose name we dare not speak. One of these, as we saw last week, is the lack of education and employment prospects for many refugees who are settled in Australia. … Apparently we should not mention such things because it will incite the ignorant masses. … It is all about moral vanity, public gesture and the politics of identity. Certain facts or views will disrupt the picture these people have of themselves. It is difficult for them to display their tolerance and sophistication except by condemning those who don’t measure up. They look to take offence and public shaming becomes virtue signalling. This week, Dutton and the facts were sacrificed so thousands of others could display their superiority.

Observing the same phenomenon at work in the US, where Donald Trump is despised by the same clique, Kenny notes that “their disdain fuels his popularity.” Kenny could have been talking about The Age journalist Michael Gordon who, lamenting the breakdown of the cross-party politically correct consensus on refugees, insisted that “the national interest is advanced when both issues [immigration and refugees] are the subject of bipartisan consensus, as they were before 2001.”

The origin of political correctness has been traced back to communist ideologues who would not tolerate any deviation from the party line. Everybody must follow that line or be ruthlessly crushed. When you’re not allowed to call things what they are, the correct identification of words and reality, your perceptions and thoughts and morals are degraded, and with them your body politic. To live according to reason, you need to be able to use the correct terms. Political correctness is an attempt, with the backing of the state through laws like Section 18C, to force everybody to go along with a bogus, Jewish-empowering conception of the world. Jews come up with the frames, the loaded terminology, and the acceptable arguments for understanding the world, and anybody who, like Professor Fraser, departs from this line, is treated like a wayward cult member.

For Jewish activists, and those non-Jews who derive personal and financial advantage from furthering the Jewish agenda, the mere hint of any departure from the notion that the integration of Africans into the Australian community is morally good and entirely feasible is inconceivable, and any alternative is unthinkable as government policy. The only political disagreements that are permitted are within very narrow parameters — debate among options that equally further Jewish ethnic interests and harm White interests. The only good options for White Australians, those that further their group evolutionary interests, are off limits because they are “sick” or “evil.”

For Australia’s traitorous elites, the lies of Boasian anthropology must be accepted as the basis for government policy no matter what the social cost. Of course, Boas spread the lie that race doesn’t exist in order to empower his own race, and Jews overwhelmingly support the mass importation of Africans into Australia: not because they genuinely believe they have the same capacities as White Australians, but because their presence serves Jewish interests by disrupting the settled White society that looms, in their fevered imaginations, as a proto-Nazi threat to their very existence. This policy of social disruption through alien immigration and the fetishizing of “diversity” is a strategy that Jews have pursued everywhere they have resided in the West — but not, of course, in Israel. Jews always move into a situation that is more or less settled and where they comprise a conspicuously alien group. Beginning in the early twentieth century with Boaz et al., accelerating after World War II, and achieving dominance since the 1960s, they have unsettled these societies by disingenuously dismissing the importance of obvious group differences and, on this basis, start transforming the society through displacement-level non-White immigration. With the current African crime plague, White Australians are paying a horrific (and often deadly) price for ceding control of the demographic destiny of their nation to a hostile, self-interested ethnic minority.

I posted this because it contains the conviction details for Prof. Fraser - but I haven't had time to read it all. 

Also, this massive 3-part article is later followed by a similar 4-part series in 2017 on the "Jewish War ...", this time regarding "The Anti-Defamation Commission and 'click against hate'". 

This was followed by another 4-part series in 2018 on the "Jewish War ...", this time regarding "Colin Tatz and the Genocide Charge". 

Someone has clearly put a lot of effort  into this topic. 

"The white man's burden"

I would gladly shoot them. which is what the police should be doing.


Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2023   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service