The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Kuffarphobia via Burqa, Clothing & Symbols

Information

Kuffarphobia via Burqa, Clothing & Symbols

This room documents the ways in which the burqa and niqab are used oppress the kuffar, and extract extra rights from him.

[Some forums on this topic are currently in the Women Victims room.  They will be relocated here once technically possible]

Members: 4
Latest Activity: on Thursday

Key Info

The burqa and niqab (B-N) are used to oppress the kuffar by imposing these extra risks and burdens on his society, by extracting special privileges to cover the face.

  • It is a used for crime - there are many documented cases of criminals wearing B-N and so being able to proceed to the crime unchallenged
  • It is a security risk for terrorism.  There are many documented cases of Muslims wearing burqas in order to commit acts of terrorism, or in order to escape when being chased by the police.
  • It is a divisive element in society, stopping fellow citizens in the community from recognising and relating to each other
  • It is a political statement of the political ideology of kuffarphobia.  In the same way that we are offended by someone walking down the street wearing a swastika armband, we should be offended by someone wearing B-N

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Kuffarphobia via Burqa, Clothing & Symbols to add comments!

Comment by Kinana on Thursday

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4895810/Woman-deported-refu...

Danish woman is deported from Belgium to Tunisia because she refused to take off her niqab at Brussels Airport
Belgian official Theo Francken said traveller was sent back to Tunisia on Friday
He said on Twitter: 'Police could not identify her. She was sent back to Tunis'
The niqab was banned in Belgium in 2011 along with the burqa
By Harvey Day For Mailonline
PUBLISHED: 16:10, 18 September 2017 | UPDATED: 18:48, 18 September 2017

A Danish woman has been deported from Belgium to Tunisia because she refused to take off her niqab at Brussels Airport.

Theo Francken, the Belgian State Secretary for Asylum and Migration, said the unidentified traveller was sent back to Tunisia on Friday because police could not identify her.

He said on Twitter: 'A Danish citizen coming from Tunis refused to take off her niqab at our border. Police could not identify her. She was sent back to Tunis.'

Comment by Philip Smeeton on Wednesday

I keep asking myself why we put up with this shit. The English have to stop being so self-effacing(polite) and get nasty.

Comment by Alan Lake on Tuesday

Shopkeeper Assaulted for Selling Lingerie Near Islamic Headscarves

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/09/07/niqab-clad-woman-assault...

Comment by Philip Smeeton on August 5, 2017 at 15:07

BBC Typical British family. Mixed race.

BBC Typical British woman. Preferably not even her eyes showing.

Comment by Alan Lake on August 4, 2017 at 20:05

BBC accused of ‘normalizing’ Islamic burqa in ‘propaganda’ video https://www.rt.com/uk/398442-bbc-islam-burqa-video/

Comment by Alan Lake on July 31, 2017 at 11:35

European court backs Belgian face veil ban 
https://www.rt.com/news/396021-belgium-niqab-ban-upheld-echr/

Comment by Alan Lake on June 10, 2017 at 15:01

‘Enlightenment values’: Austria enacts anti-burqa & compulsory integration law 

https://www.rt.com/news/391753-austria-burqa-ban-integration/

Comment by Philip Smeeton on May 22, 2017 at 12:44

Asked to lift their veils.

Horror! Horror has a face, and you must make a friend of horror. Horror and moral terror are your friends. If they are not, then they are enemies to be feared. They are truly enemies.

The horror! The horror! (Colonel Walter E. Kurtz). 

Comment by Alan Lake on May 22, 2017 at 7:17

Dutch lawmakers say no to police officers wearing headscarves  https://www.rt.com/news/389082-dutch-police-muslim-headscarves

Comment by Alan Lake on May 22, 2017 at 7:14

Austria passes law forbidding full-face Islamic veils in public  https://www.rt.com/news/388707-austria-bans-islamic-veils/

 

Members (4)

 
 
 

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service