The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation




I first entered the blogosphere intent on exploring and revealing the dangers posed by Barrack Hussein Obama. Oh, I had so much to learn. The first thing that I learned was that Obama is but one of many dangers this nation faces and that he is but the tip of the iceberg in a long and twisted narrative with but one goal: The ruin of America.

The political arena is sordid. It always has been and always will be, but never in the history of this great nation have those involved stooped to such levels as has been witnessed since Barrack Obama entered the Oval Office.

For many years even the traditionalists of this nation were cowed by the forces of political correctness. PC has long been an assault on our First Amendment rights, laying out a road map of what could and could not be discussed, and in order to achieve harmony and perhaps reach a working compromise that road map was pretty much followed by all. Now we are beginning to see where that map leads, and the more courageous are tossing PC to the winds. They are also being viciously attacked for being the Paul Reveres of the 21st century.

America, our freedom of speech has already died and few are even aware of its passing. Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton have signed a U.N. treaty that totally nullifies the First Amendment. It is called U.N. Resolution 16/18 and it is the ultimate form of political correctness and the final nail in the coffin of liberty. It will absolutely ban any discourse on the dangers of Islam and if you do discuss Islam or write about it as I am doing now, you will be violating a treaty that our traitorous leaders signed with the Islamic dominated United Nations.

There are two basic types of political revolution, each with its own varying degrees of violence and stealth. Violent revolution has long been the calling card of communism while the Fabian socialist of England and Europe, and the Progressives of America, have long preferred the slower but less destructive stealth tactics, i.e.: Lawfare. It appears that Islam, still the mental throwbacks to the seventh century are very adept at both. 

There is still a third variety, economic revolution/control employed by the banksters of the New World Order but that is a different topic altogether, so I shall return to U.N. Resolution 16/18 and the the ruin of the First Amendment.

Statement for the record: We have the best politicians that money can buy, and most have long since been bought! Just how much has been paid to whom is unknown and actually irrelevant as their actions speak far louder than the funds in off shore bank accounts. One thing though is quite certain, the amounts must be staggering, as the American public pays them well, but apparently not enough to retain their loyalties as most are now involved in service to the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliate Al Qaeda.

The Cairo Declaration On Human Rights In Islam...Now that sounds like a noble endeavor. What American could possibly fault a group whose goal is to protect human rights? I am one American who can, because I understand the trap being set when Islam reverses the meaning of our words. Hillary Clinton understand them as well and knows the trap that they have set for the West, and she endorses their plan and our enslavement. 

For those who value their head and hope to keep it attached to their body and are willing to invest one hour and ten minutes of your time, there is a video at the end of this essay. It is presented by Ret. Major Stephen Coughlin of the Center For Security Policy, a think tank founded by Frank Gaffney, and I will guarantee you this: If you take the time to view this video you will come away from it shaken to the very core at how openly our leaders dismiss the welfare of this nation's people and put us at the mercy of barbarians. Those barbarians, by the way, are not known for their mercy.

I cannot possibly hope to put all of the information into this essay that Mister Coughlin provides. You simply MUST watch the video. 

A few things worthy of note. By now everyone has probably heard the term Caliphate and how Islam hopes to recreate a worldwide caliphate for the 21st with all mankind living under the dictates of Sharia. Another term that many are not familiar with is Ummah, which means community. The Muslim population of the world is estimated to be approximately 1.5 billion people and while member states of the Muslim community can be at war with each other, through the Ummah, they still present a united front against the world of infidels. A little oddity about the word Ummah is the Department of Homeland Security does not want the word used by Americans. They are doing their best to provide a smokescreen behind which Islam can operate undetected.

Moving right along: Everyone has heard of CAIR. most have heard of ISNA, the Islamic Students of North America, and they, along with many other Islamic groups are unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation terrorist funding trial, where a group of Islamists were found guilty of sending twelve millions dollars via Islamic charity organizations to HAMAS. (Personal thought about Islamic charity...That is when they quickly behead you instead of slowly sawing it off). 

Today our State Department is openly sending billions of our tax dollars to terrorist linked organizations throughout the Middle East. Oh yes, occasionally you hear a faint protest from the Republican Party that controls the House of Representatives and can defund any program they choose.

There is one Islamic group that I did not mention above and most have never heard of it. It is the OIC, discussed at great length in the recommended video. They have been operating in plain view and are almost invisible to Americans and that is the way it is meant to be. Our politicians and media choose to overlook their existence and goals, for their goals present a major danger to America. Although almost unheard of they are the second biggest organization in the world, second only to the U.N. They are the group who put together the The Cairo Declaration On Human Rights In Islam treaty that has led to Resolution 16/18 and the demise of our First Amendment.

I love the word "oddity" and I have another for you. The Cairo treaty mentioned above was first put forth in 1990. They would not have dared such nonsense with Reagan, but the cat and mouse game to have it implemented began under President Bush the Elder who, being a faithful believer in the United Nations, informed us that a New World Order was being rolled out to assure a peaceful world, and we have been going down hill ever since.

I began this essay with a photo of Hussein Obama delivering a speech at the U.N. and there is a reason. That speech validates everything that I have said above and everything that is in the video below. The two paragraphs below are an excerpt from this link

"The president told the UN that the "Future must not belong" to a series of people including "corrupt" leaders and those who "bully women'" But one line from that list stood out. "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."
That line appeared almost nowhere in the old media where Obama's supposed defense of free speech dominated. The broadcast networks ignored it and only Jake Tapper noted that Team Obama had also tried to get the video pulled from YouTube for violation of "terms of use." 

Those two highlighted lines also highlight the future that the Muslim in Chief has planned for us. The terms of Resolution 16/18 have already taken their intended toll on our intelligence gathering forces and our military. All wording that portrays Islam as it is has already been scrubbed from training manuals. This is imposing an information blackout on those whose job it is to gather information, and it is costing the lives of American service men in Afghanistan.

We are all to be sacrificed to the dictates of Sharia.

Suggested Reading...
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and its Role in Enforcing Islamic Law(Video}
Led By Evil...Destroyed By Apathy
The New Gatekeepers 3.0

 

Views: 290

Replies to This Discussion

Resolution 16/18 looks like dream come true for Islam. And it gets ever closer. If its good for Islam, it wont be good for the rest of us.

OIC Ramps Up ‘Islamophobia’ Campaign

Posted on February 28, 2013

By Deborah Weiss: The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has long been on the forefront of the Islamist mission to establish the equivalent of Islamic blasphemy laws in the West. Now, during its 12th Islamic Summit held in Cairo February 7-8, 2013, the OIC set forth new and creative ways to silence, and ultimately criminalize criticism of Islam.

The OIC is a 57-member state organization that claims to represent 1.5 billion Muslims around the globe. As the second largest international organization in the world, behind only the UN, and as the largest Islamic organization in the world, it is obviously quite powerful. Though it is arguably the largest voting block in the UN, most people have never heard of it.

One of the OIC’s primary aims for at least the last fourteen years has been the international criminalization of speech that is critical of any Islam-related topic, including Islamic terrorism, Islamic persecution of religious minorities and human rights violations committed in the name of Islam.

Since 1999, the OIC has set forth UN resolutions that would “combat defamation of religions.” These resolutions condemned criticism of religion, but in the OIC’s interpretation, it applied only to Islam. True statements of fact constituted no exception.

Support for the resolutions declined once the United States and other Western countries caught wind of the true meaning of “defamation of religions” and its inevitable chilling effect on freedom of expression.

In 2011, at the State Department’s request, the OIC drafted an alternative resolution that was intended to retain freedom of expression and still address the OIC’s concerns about alleged Islamophobia. The result was Resolution 16/18 to Combat Intolerance Based on Religion or Belief.

The US State Department and numerous Christian organizations were elated, believing that the OIC had abandoned its mission to protect Islam from so-called “defamation,” and instead replaced it with the goal of protecting persecuted religious minorities from discrimination and violence. In other words, many assumed a paradigm shift away from providing legal protections to a religion and toward legal protections for people.

But the OIC had some very creative interpretations of the language embodied in the new resolution. By its manipulation of words such as intolerance and incitement, giving new meanings to what many thought was plain English, the OIC made it clear that it had not dropped its ultimate goal of protecting Islam from “defamation.”

read more here.

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/deborah-weiss/oic-ramps-up-islamophobi...

RSS

Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2022   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service