The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Given the reach and significance of the BBC as pointed out here:
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4068/the_bbc_s_groupthink_on_...

and the depth of their manipulation shown here:  http://melaniephillips.com/the-real-bbc-scandal
they are a key player in all current political issues.

Its now clear that the BBC is controlled by Muslims, who get any awkward messages for Islam, suppressed.  Thus the BBC is another of our Watchmen that has been hijacked.  This forum will be used to collect their fabrications, obfuscations and misdirections.

Some older 4F discussion is in this forum: http://4freedoms.com/group/freespeech/forum/topics/bbc-bias-ian-duncan-smith-complains

More monitoring is on this website:  http://bbcwatch.org/

___________________________________________________________________________________

The BBC's Misrepresentation of Islam

http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6134-...

Published on Friday, 25 October 2013 21:28.  Written by IQ al Rassooli 

I was directed to the BBC web pages on the religion of Islam. Having read most of the content and found an enormous number of misconceptions, misrepresentations and blatant falsehoods, I came to the conclusion that it could not have been put up by the BBC but by the Boko Haram Broadcasting Corporation.

Before I even begin to point out the most important errors, I would like readers to know that the politically correct dimwits and the followers of Muhammad will most certainly accuse me of being a racist, an Islamophobe or both.

There are three types of people who could have authored such incredible misrepresentations and unconscionable mendacities:

1) A person who knows as much about Muhammad's Quran and Sunna as a pig knows about the science of personal hygiene.

2) A Muslim who is deliberately whitewashing the hatemongering and warmongering verses of Muhammad's Quran.

3) A total moron.

Let me point out the following to the dimwits and to the Muslims:

1) Islam is not a religion but a cult belief system, the cult of Muhammad. It has followers of every race, colour, nationality and tradition, and hence is not a race, therefore I cannot be called a racist.

2) The immense majority of people who accuse anyone who points out the true characteristics of the cult of Muhammad (Islam) are invariably accused of being Islamophobic, without the accusers actually knowing how to spell the term or what it really means.

3) The single most important item to be remembered by every person reading my articles or listening to my talks is the fact that humanity has only the word of Muhammad that he received 'revelations' from Allah through the Angel Gabriel.

Neither Muhammad's wives nor his companions ever saw or heard Gabriel talk to Muhammad. All that humanity has are the unsubstantiated, unwitnessed and uncorroborated words and declarations of a single man called Muhammad that what he is telling his followers are truths.

Let me enlighten these holier-than-thou Sharia ignoramuses that 'phobia' is usually associated with irrational fear, such as arachnophobia (fear of spiders), acrophobia (fear of heights), ailurophobia (fear of cats) etc. These fears – there are hundreds of them – are not associated with any prior dreadful experience by the person, which is why these fears are irrational.

Hence fearing Islam's scripture is totally rational and not fearing Islam's scripture would be totally irrational.

Having set the stage, I shall now address the most important misconceptions, mistranslations or deliberate falsifications in the BBC version of Islam.

A) Anyone reading (let alone studying) the history of Arabia prior to, during and after Muhammad would know that Allah is not God but the name and only the name of the supreme god of pagan Arabia of 360 deities set in stone centuries before Muhammad and his Quran. After all, Allah, the pagan god of Arabia, had three daughters: al Lat; al Uzza and al Manat (famous for The Satanic Verses controversy).

Muhammad very cleverly metamorphosed the god of pagan Arabia (Allah) into the God of Jesus, Moses and Abraham.

Muhammad actually repackaged the pagan god Allah and Islamised it into the one and only God of Israel.

Can I prove my assertion that Allah is not God and most definitely not the same as the God of Jesus, Moses and Abraham?

Of course I can; in over twenty different ways in less than sixty seconds, each way based entirely on the Islamic scripture itself.

B) The BBC gives the word 'Jihad' the benefit of the doubt that it is holy war but can also mean a spiritual struggle to commune with God. To dispel even a shadow of a doubt that there is any chance that Jihad (according to Sharia) can be other than total war against unbelievers/ kuffar, I am willing to wager the sum of $100,000 to the first person who can show us all a single operative verse in either Muhammad's Quran or Sunna demonstrating Jihad as a spiritual struggle to commune with God.

Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 4.50 narrated by Anas bin Malik

"The Prophet said, 'A single endeavour of fighting in Allah's cause {Qital fi Sabil Allah} [Jihad] is better than the world and whatever is in it.'"

Sahih Muslim Hadith 4631 and 4626 Abu Huraira

"I heard Muhammad say: ... 'I love that I should be killed in Allah's Cause [Jihad]; then I should be brought back to life and be killed again.'"

Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 4.73 narrated by Abdullah bin Abi Aufa

Allah's Apostle said, "Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords."

There are hundreds more similar verses in the Quran and Hadiths (traditions about Muhammad as transmitted by his wives, family and companions) for those who have the appetite for blood.

According to the exegetes of Islam, Jihad is the unwritten Sixth Pillar of Islam.

C) The BBC alleges that Muslims conduct Jihad invariably in self-defence like Muhammad. Really?

Dear readers, It was Muhammad who aggressed against his own kith and kin the pagan Quraysh in the years 620 to 622AD when he started on his self-proclaimed mission as the messenger of Allah.

According to the Hadiths, it was Muhammad who started his aggression against the Quraysh by insulting, demeaning and humiliating the (pagan) religion and beliefs of the Arabs in Mecca for almost 13 years, and they did not slaughter him.

It was Muhammad who declared war against his own people because they refused to accept him as the messenger of Allah their God.

Al Tauba 9:05: "And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them with every strategy of war. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful."

It was Muhammad who ambushed the caravans of the Quraysh for plunder, starting at Badr.

The Quraysh was a trading tribe. Their richest caravan was coming home from Syria heading to Mecca under the leadership of Abu Sufyan. The caravan was protected by some thirty men. News of the arrival of the caravan reached Muhammad, who couldn't resist the temptation.

Sirat Ibn Hisham tells us:

Muhammad called for the Muslims and said: "These are the camels of Quraysh with their money, go for it may Allah make it yours."

What a nice messenger of Allah! He then organised a force of over three-hundred of his followers to ambush the caravan before it arrived in Mecca.

Bukhari vol. 3 book 46 no. 717 pp. 431-432

"The Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day."

Dear readers, I can go on and on and on till hell freezes, but neither you nor I have the time or the stomach for these wilful deceptions and mendacities.

Having studied and researched the subjects of Muhammad, his Quran, his Sunna, Sharia, the New Testament and Hebrew Bible for over thirty years (in Arabic mother tongue as well as in English) the only conclusion I could come to is the following:

No one ever revealed the Quran to Muhammad because every single letter, word, verse/ aya and chapter/ sura is the product of Muhammad's imagination. These are the secretions of his mind, representing his alter ego, his autobiography, but very cleverly projected into the unsuspecting mouths of Allah and Gabriel to give them the aura of sanctity and divinity.

Anyone finding my statements and/ or conclusions unacceptable, do yourselves a favour: put up or shut up!

IQ al Rassooli – kafir and proud!

Tags: BBC, Controlled, Muslim, The

Views: 755

Replies to This Discussion

Secret filming uncovers charity shop's anti-Islamic stock

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-37904421

So now it is Islamophobic just to refer to yourself as an infidel, even when Muslims call you that?  Or to refer to pork, which you aren't allowed to have even if you are paying for the meals thru taxes, because that touches on a forbidden topic that might 'offend' Muslims?  The cowardice just gets deeper and deeper.

BBC Plan To Counter 'Christian Bias' Could Include Broadcasting Muslim Call to Prayer 

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/11/14/bbc-plan-counter-christi...

Well, well, well.  A few years ago we noted that the Head of Religious Broadcasting at the Muslim Controlled BBC was now a Muslim.  Looks like his stealth jihad project is progressing well.

The BBC's chickens are coming home to roost.
BBC, VoA reporters detained in southeast Turkey
https://www.rt.com/news/368360-turkey-detains-foreign-journalists

BBC ‘Muslim Big Brother’ Show Features Terrorist Sympathiser

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/12/04/bbc-air-muslim-big-broth...

This is interesting - concerns a Panorama programme on napalmed kids in Syria and its timing relation to a parliamentary debate. Whole Panorama docu seems staged. Charity Commission not remotely interested in charity workers posing with the latest guerilla arms technology.

Once again, the BBC has put a Muslim in charge of the state-approved religious broadcasting.  People are really, really dumb if they fail to recognize that the elite have submitted to Islam.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/02/25/new-bbc-head-religion-ga...

RSS

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom of Movement
The government can import new voters - except where that changes the political demographics (i.e. electoral fraud by means of immigration)
4. SP Freedom from Over-spending
People should not be charged for government systems which they reject, and which give them no benefit. For example, the government cannot pass a debt burden across generations (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is be deducible by equal application of law: "Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight - except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2017   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service