It takes a nation to protect the nation
Censorship by Twitter
Just look at the names of the managers doing the censoring: Olinda Hassan and Mohammed Norai. Go figure.
|
Tags: Censorship, Twitter, by
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Philip Smeeton on
-
These Twitter twits can hardly speak English. It all just makes me more determined, I could not possibly be more angry than I already am. I am compelled to continue to define reality, and have a need to understand and to expose the fallacy of every belief. They are fucking up my world, the one I love. I know what kind of world I want to live in.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Alan Lake on
-
This morning President Trump acknowledged what we have all known for a long time: Twitter is shadowbanning users and targeting one side of the political spectrum. Gab broke this story earlier this week and explained how Twitter's "QFD" shadowban works. We also caught the attention of Congressman Matt Gaetz when we helped expose that his account was being hidden from Twitter search results.
Learn what Twitter's Quality Filter Shadowban is:
See Twitter's Shadowban in action on the President's Tweets:
Please join us on Gab and break free from the chains of Silicon Valley censorship.
-
-
-
Shadowbanned: Prominent Republicans missing from Twitter search
https://www.rt.com/usa/434268-republicans-shadowban-twitter-search/ -
-
Permalink Reply by Joe on
-
This is not directly related to Twitter (but does relate more to Gab).
Yesterday I heard a part of a discussion on Radio 4 (probably The Moral Maze).
The editor of the in-store magazine of Waitrose was sacked for making a joke in an email about killing and eating vegans rather than pandering to them.
On R4 someone was saying "he wasn't censored, he's welcome to go and find some far right niche on the internet and say his hateful things there".
Well, as we know with the closure of Gab, this is not the case. When a Muslim terrorist blows up kids at a pop concert in Manchester all the mosques in Britain aren't closed down. Not even all the mosques in Manchester. Not even the mosque which he attended and where the speakers promoted Jihad. Yet a killer makes a comment on Gab, and Gab is closed down.
Moreover, these SJWs who hound elderly men out of jobs pretend they "are opposed to hate". Yet that is manifestly not so. Those on Twitter who incite hatred and violence for Tommy are not censored. Those who hate actual Nazis are not censored.
Once again, it's all a sleight of hand. Some forms of hatred are encouraged, whilst inconsequential "offences" against the cult of Leftism result in people being sacked or burned at the stake.
-
-
-
For those of you who haven't seen the NPC meme and the fallout from it.
I will add an image of a NPC (a term referring to a non-playing character in a computer game). This meme swept Twitter a couple of weeks ago, because it allowed people to point out what a bunch of cultist drones the Left are, all their responses automated to conform to political correctness. Since I was banned from Twitter years ago, I am relying on second hand reports of this. I'm told that anyone who changed the faces in some photo to make the people into NPCs was banned. Twitter justified this on the grounds that it was dehumanizing. However, calling anyone with whom the SJWs disagrees with a racist, nazi, fascist is not dehumanizing and leads to no ban.
-
-
-
I want that t-shirt :-) Especially since Che Guevara was a racist, a murderer and a torturer.
-
-
-
I can remember when students marched on our streets chanting che che che guevara and ho ho ho chi minh.
Being a working class youth that loved his country they disgusted me even then, now I just hate that sort and what they have wished on us.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_of_1968
https://www.dw.com/en/rudi-dutschke-and-the-struggle-of-the-1968-st...
-
-
-
If a death threat isn’t a ‘violation’ of Twitter’s rules on abuse, what is?
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/446290-death-threat-twitter-rules/ -
-
-
I know people that believe that their telephone conversations are under surveillance. True or not, the thought just makes me less guarded in my telephone conversations. I am careful who I converse with though in public. "They" have taken over the schools, media and political institutions, and now industry and commerce, even the streets. Seems people are terrified of saying something wrong. You lose friends, your job and risk the police banging on your door, or getting a beating. I can remember we used to sit in the pub and talk about anything and never had to guard our tongue. If I had no one that I could honestly talk to I would go mad.
Also I note that the standard for goodness now in Christian circles is how much can be done to help refugees(muslims) locally. And so as not to offend, they avoid talking about Christ.
This is a reality that seemed impossible just a short while ago.
-
-
-
In 2012 I was warning this censorship was coming. By then both Paul and I had been banned from commenting on the "far right" Daily Mail website. Neither of us had posted spam, foul language, porno, nor threats. We were banned because of our opinions.
I warned that people would lose payment processors, that we'd be banned from Facebook and Twitter, that people would even lose their domain names (I remember saying to Alan that 4F was only safe because it had such a minimal profile).
I remember saying that books would be the last thing they would censor. However, on reflection I was wrong - the censorship in books had been underway for decades. Publishers had been refusing books after the attacks that came following The Satanic Verses, The Jewel of Medina. There is no satire since the Hebdo attacks (even though Hebdo were Leftists who never really tore into Islam). In recent years I've heard of printers who refuse to print books, even when there is payment up front, in case it gets out that they printed the books.
The good news is that even in Dhimmi Britannia the public are already overwhelmingly opposed to Islam. So there is really virtually no need for any more discussion of Islam. See this survey -- 47% want no more Muslims. Only 23% don't want to stop Muslim immigration (obviously it is likely that 5% of the total number surveyed are Muslims). Remove "don't know" as an option, and I'm sure the "no more" segment increases to about 75%. Remove the Muslims from the survey, and you are close to 80% want no more Muslims.
https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/what-do-europeans-think...
Even given the propaganda in schools, the hostility to Muslims is going to be maintained. Outside of education, those who've been brainwashed by the Quislings will still run up against the horrors of Islam in the subsequent decades.
What the censorship does is to stop us organizing against Islam, unlike the 1000s of meeting places Muslims have where they organize against us.
We should give up on Christians qua Christians and give up on all their organizations. Their organizations are as much our enemy as the Muslim organizations are. The Vatican commanded Catholics in the 1960s to forget all they knew about the history of Islam; by the 1990s Pope John Paul II was kissing the Koran (the book that denounces Christianity, a book which is responsible for more genocide than any other ideology in history; Pope Francis is carrying on in that tradition and replaced Benedict because the latter dared not to prostrate himself before Islam). The Anglican Church just follows suit. We can be confident that these organizations have got 1000s of documents and 1000s of staff who know the truth about Islam. But like the SS, they just follow their orders. The few Christians I know who have attempted to bring up the truth about Islam in church organizations are people who have been ostracized within their church. So, whilst most of the UK is opposed to Muslims, the church organizations have sided with Islam. That makes the churches enemies of the people.
Philip Smeeton said:I know people that believe that their telephone conversations are under surveillance. True or not, the thought just makes me less guarded in my telephone conversations. I am careful who I converse with though in public. "They" have taken over the schools, media and political institutions, and now industry and commerce, even the streets. Seems people are terrified of saying something wrong. You lose friends, your job and risk the police banging on your door, or getting a beating. I can remember we used to sit in the pub and talk about anything and never had to guard our tongue. If I had no one that I could honestly talk to I would go mad.
Also I note that the standard for goodness now in Christian circles is how much can be done to help refugees(muslims) locally. And so as not to offend, they avoid talking about Christ.
This is a reality that seemed impossible just a short while ago.
-
Welcome to 4 Freedoms!
(currently not admitting new members)
Page Monitor
Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.
Muslim Terrorism Count
Mission Overview
Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them.
At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.
Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.
We need to capture this information before it is removed. The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.
We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.
The 4 Freedoms
These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper).
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:
- Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"
© 2023 Created by Netcon.
Powered by
