The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

'The Calcutta Quran Petition' denounced Yesterday in India, what Others (for Instance Geert Wilders) denounce Today in Europe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Calcutta_Quran_Petition

On-line Book: http://voiceofdharma.com/books/tcqp/

Tags: Europe, GeertWilders, India, Petition, TheCalcuttaQuranPetition

Views: 52

Replies to This Discussion

The Calcutta Quran Petition

The Calcutta Quran Petition (Bengali: কলকাতা কোরান মামলা) is a book by Sita Ram Goel and Chandmal Chopra published by Goel under his Voice of India imprint. The first edition was published in 1986, the second in 1987 and the third in 1999.

The Calcutta Quran Petition
Author Sita Ram Goel, Chandmal Chopra
Country India
Language English
Subject Censorship
Publisher Voice of India
Publication date
1986, 1987, 1999
Media type Book
ISBN 81-85990-58-1
OCLC 50035155
297/.1228
LC Class KNS2162 .A49 1986

The subject matter of this book is censorship, the banning of books and the Quran.[1]

Himangshu Kishore Chakraborty letter


On July 20, 1984, H.K. Chakraborty wrote to the Secretary, Department of Home Government of West Bengal, demanding the ban of the Quran. He wrote again on 14 August that year, but received no response. Chakraborty lived in Bangladesh before moving to Kolkata after Partition of India.

Chakraborty thereafter met Chandmal Chopra, who also wrote to the Department of Home Government of West Bengal on March 16, 1985.[1] But Chopra's letter, too, went unanswered. Chopra therefore filed a writ Petition in the High Court.

Chandmal Chopra's petition

Chandmal Chopra tried to obtain an order banning the Quran, by filing a Writ Petition at the Calcutta High Court on 29 March 1985. The petition claimed that Sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code, and Section 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code were often used by Muslims to ban or proscribe publications critical of Islam, and stated that "so far it had been the privilege of the Peoples of the Book to ban and burn the sacred literature of the Pagans."[1] Chandmal Chopra thought that the Quran "on grounds of religion promotes disharmony, feeling of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities and incite people to commit violence and disturb public tranquility..."

Chandmal Chopra also included a list of several dozens of Quran verses that "promote disharmony" in his petition. The book claims that these Quran verses embody one of the main themes of the book: "Nor have these passages been culled at random from different chapters of the Quran with a view to making the book sound sinister. On the contrary, they provide an almost exhaustive list of Allah’s sayings on a subject of great significance, namely, what the believers should believe about and do to the unbelievers..."

The Telegraph of May 9, 1985 reported that the Union Government would make itself a party in the case, and the Union law minister Ashoke Sen and the attorney-general of the Government of India were going to take action against the case.[2] Muslim lawyers after a meeting condemned the case. According to The Telegraph of May 10, the Chief Minister of West Bengal called the petition "a despicable act". Other politicians in the Lok Sabha at New Delhi, and the Minister of State for Law condemned the Petition.[3]

Pakistan's minister of state for religious and minority affairs claimed that the petition was the ‘worst example of religious intolerance’, and he urged the Indian government to ‘follow the example of Pakistan’ in ensuring freedom of religion.[4]

The petition was however dismissed in May 1985. The text of the judgment is included in the book. The Attorney-General of the Government of India and the Advocate-General of West Bengal appeared in the case and argued against Chopra's petition.

On June 18, 1985 Chandmal Chopra filed a review petition, which was dismissed on June 21.

Riots

The petition by Chandmal Chopra led to many riots in India and Bangladesh.[5]

The Statesman reported that "at least 12 people were killed[6] and 100 wounded all are poor Hindus" in a border town of Bangladesh during a demonstration of 1000 people. In Dhaka, at least 20,000 people demonstrated against the petition. The demonstrators were trying to storm the office of India's High Commission.[7] Other riots followed in Kashmir and Bihar.

After the case was closed, the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, during a mass rally in Srinagar, demanded action against Justice Padma Khastgir who permitted the petition to be filed. During this mass rally, one person was killed and others injured. A "hartal" (strike) against the interference in Muslim personal law was observed during which all shops and colleges were closed.

Sita Ram Goel

On August 31, 1987, Chandmal Chopra was arrested by the police and kept in police custody until September 8 for publishing with Goel this book on the petition. Sita Ram Goel had to abscond to avoid getting arrested.[citation needed]

The authors write in this book that they do "not stand for a ban on the publication of the Quran. We take this opportunity to state unambiguously that we regard banning of books, religious or otherwise, as counterproductive. In the case of the Quran, we believe and advocate that more and more non-Muslims should read it so that they know first hand the quality of its teachings."[1]

The book was received with great interest in India and abroad, according to Goel. Goel also read primary Islamic sources like the Urdu translations of six Hadis during his research for this book.[8] In one chapter, Goel also compares Genghis Khan, the Mongols and Tengiri with Islam.

Opinion of Media

The Times of India published three articles which praised the Quran during the Petition controversy. Goel claims that a rebuttal to these articles could not be published in the Times of India[citation needed]. Goel claims that the chief editor, Girilal Jain, regretted his inability to do so for reasons he could not reveal.

References

  1. ^ a b c d Chandmal, Chopra; Ram, Goel, Sita; India), India. High Court (Calcutta (1 January 2012). The Calcutta Quran petition. Voice of India. ISBN 978-8185990583. OCLC 935213876.
  2. ^ The Telegraph May 9, 1985. The Telegraph May 10, 1985.
  3. ^ The Statesman 11 May 1985.
  4. ^ The Telegraph, May 14, 1985
  5. ^ "Quran Day: A legacy of blood and impunity | Progress Bangladesh". progressbangladesh.com. Retrieved 14 May 2017.
  6. ^ Shaheb, Talukder (11 May 2015). "Quran Day: A legacy of blood and impunity". Talukder Shaheb's Blog. Retrieved 14 May 2017.
  7. ^ The Statesman, May 13, 1985. May 10, 1985
  8. ^ Preface to Third Edition of the Calcutta Quran Petition

External links

RSS

Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2021   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service