The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

MI5 feared British police attended terrorist camps

MI5 warned Scotland Yard that policemen in its ranks were suspected of attending terrorist training camps, it can be disclosed.

Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/9262379/...

I recall a case a couple of years ago where a muslim police employee was caught using police computers to find out information about muslim girls and women who had fled forced or abusive marriages and were in hiding from their families. This guy was giving or selling the information to men who were hunting down the fugitive women.

We've also had some high profile muslim senior officers who have milked police budgets for tens of thousands of pounds in compensation for alleged racial discrimination. Others have been sacked and even imprisoned for corruption and mis-using their authority.

Facts are now emerging about police forces refusing to take action in multiple cases of child abuse by muslim grooming gangs: even when the girls' families begged police officers to intervene.

So how far has this infiltration gone, and is there anything can be done about it?

Tags: #infiltration, #uk, British, Muslim, Police, of

Views: 162

Replies to This Discussion

Reply by Kinana

MI5 warned Scotland Yard that some of its officers had attended terrorist training camps

  • A number of police officers are believed to have lost their jobs after checks were carried out
  • One of the police officers suspected of being at a terrorist training camp in Pakistan is Abdul Rahman
  • The father-of-four resigned from the force and is suing Scotland Yard for compensation

By Anthony Bond

 | 

Scotland Yard was warned by MI5 that some of its policemen were suspected of attending terrorist training camps, it has emerged.

Following the warning, the police officers lost their jobs after checks were carried out because of concerns that potential terrorists had infiltrated the police.

One of the police officers suspected of being at a terrorist training camp in Pakistan in 2001 is Abdul Rahman.

Worrying: Scotland Yard was warned by MI5 that some of its policemen were suspected of attending terrorist training camps

Worrying: Scotland Yard was warned by MI5 that some of its policemen were suspected of attending terrorist training camps

He had been a constable for nearly three years when MI5 warned Scotland Yard about its suspicions.

The 33-year-old is the first British policeman revealed to have failed counter-terrorism checks.

The father-of-four, who is married, resigned from the force rather than be dismissed and is suing Scotland Yard for compensation.

He has said he is innocent and has never been to a training camp.

According to The Sunday Telegraph, a source close to the case said there were one or two other police officers who also lost their jobs due to fears by MI5 that they may have trained as terrorists.

The senior Metropolitan Police source told the newspaper: 'There was concern that these people had come into the force under false pretenses.

Concerns: It is believed that at least two police officers have lost their jobs due to fears by MI5 that they may have trained as terrorists. MI5's headquarters in London is pictured

Concerns: It is believed that at least two police officers have lost their jobs due to fears by MI5 that they may have trained as terrorists. MI5's headquarters in London is pictured

'There were two or three cases at the same time that were of a similar nature, where there were concerns about potential terrorist links.'

Mr Rahman's clearance was believed to have been revoked following a security review carried out by MI5 following the July 7, 2005, terrorist attack.

The details of his case and MI5's suspicion have been made public through court documents as he fights a legal case over his exit from Scotland Yard.

Mr Rahman, who is Muslim and was raised in London after being born in Bangladesh, does not dispute that he went to Pakistan back in 2001.

But his lawyers say he has been tangled up in national security legislation.

His security clearance was suspended on June 22, 2006 and he was interviewed three times - probably by counter-terrorism officers - in the following months.

He resigned in 2007 after an appeal hearing upheld the decision to remove his counter-terrorist check clearance.

During this time, MI5 checked details of police staff at the Met against its own records of suspects who had been to Pakistan or Afghanistan who it suspected of attending training camps.

Mr Rahman has declined to comment on the case.

But his lawyer, Jasmine van Loggerenberg, said it's important to stress that this is a case being brought by Mr Rahman, not by the Metropolitan Police.

There are no criminal proceedings against him.

She confirmed he has never been arrested, questioned or charged under terrorism legislation.

 

Mr Rahman's case is due to be taken up in secret by an Employment Appeal Tribunal.

He is claiming to be the victim of racial and religious discrimination.

A spokesman for Scotland Yard confirmed he was bringing two employment tribunal claims against the Metropolitan Police.

Reply by Paul Collings

The problem with this case is the evidence from Mi5. They will probably not want to give any for fear of exposing operatives, and so mr Rahman will most likely get a nice payout. And the public will be left guessing again about the integrity of our police force.

 People are asked everyday to trust members of our community that are muslim. We are asked to trust Doctors, nurses,  Policemen, who come from the islamic faith. And yet we're constantly hearing half storys about doctors who don't wash their hands, members of our community that want us under the sharia, and go to pakistan and other countries for  terrorist training, and police who are  suspected of being security risks.

We then see these people sacked or forced to leave, we then see them get massive payouts.  It just builds more mistrust and more resentment.

Reply by Richard Barry

Good day mates, I have a queston ferom across the pond. I do not know your laws, but can't you impeach or get this plice chief out of office as we did here in Ca. W/ Gov. Davis

Reply by Paul Collings

 Hi Richard,

In this case the officer who resigned has done so because he feels he has is suffering from constructive dismisal. 

If the security services can offer no credibal or admissible evidence,  the officer will get a nice payout. He's probably got a no win no fee solicitor. So he loses nothing by making a claim.

As for the impeachment laws in this country, we do have them, But generaly for political officials. The police officer who was sacked was a police constable as opposed to a high ranking official.

RSS

Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2021   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service