It takes a nation to protect the nation
Israel is on the front line against the Islamic jihad.
More on Jew hatred here:
If you keep up with the news, you may know how many terror attacks have been perpetrated against Israelis in the last couple of weeks, how many have been murdered or maimed. For myself, I’ve lost count.
Here in Rehovot we’ve been lucky. So far we haven’t experienced what they are undergoing in Jerusalem, or even Ra’anana. There’s still plenty of anxiety. When my daughter was very small and we read her the story of Little Red Riding Hood, she expressed concern about wolves. We reassured her that there were no wolves anywhere near where we lived. “Do they have feet?” she asked. Terrorists have feet, cars, and the ability to ride buses and trains like anyone else.
When something bad happens, we should make it a learning experience. What do we know about this latest murder epidemic and what lessons can be learned?
Some terror attacks seem to be organized by groups like Hamas, and some are spur-of-the-moment attacks by amateur terrorists, young women, university students, municipal employees, telephone installers, and 13-year old boys. All you need to do is take a stout kitchen knife with you in the morning. If you see a Jew, come up behind him and bury it in his neck. Anyone can do it. Someone may shoot you, but martyrdom is part of the appeal.
It seems to be extra points to get a soldier (female soldiers are sometimes softer targets), but visibly religious Jews also seem to be singled out.
Many have noted the cold hatred, the lack of empathy that characterizes the terrorists and those that cheer them on. Odel Bennett, whose husband Aharon was murdered and her son injured in a vicious stabbing attack in the Old City, reported that local Arabs laughed and spat at her as she bled from her wounds.
Some Israelis and other Westerners have difficulty understanding the motivation of the murderers and the apparent ease with which they can approach a stranger and try to slaughter him or her in cold blood. It seems to me that there are three important explanatory factors.
One is ideology, closely intertwined with the second, Islam. And the third is Arab culture.
When Israel made the historic mistake of reintroducing the poisonous PLO and particularly Yasser Arafat into its own body, the very first thing Arafat did was take control of the mosques, media and educational system of the territories. Imams, teachers or journalists were required to follow the PLO line, and anyone who did not was removed. They were instructed to teach the myth of an indigenous ‘Palestinian people’ who were dispossessed from their ancestral land by the subhuman Jews from Europe, and to aspire to the ultimate ‘liberation’ of all of ‘Palestine’.
Part of what they learned is that as an oppressed people they have the right to use any means necessary to achieve liberation. The choice of terrorist violence, peaceful protest, lawsuits, diplomacy or all-out war is entirely based on the efficacy. Whatever works is good.
Every subject taught in the schools, every sermon in the mosques, radio and television programs, summer camps, everything was utilized to carry the message of Palestinian victimization and ultimate vindication, along with generous helpings of anti-Jewish themes taken from Islamic and European sources, and countless stories of how the Jews have stolen from, humiliated, raped and murdered Palestinian Arabs.
Jews are not seen as individuals, with personalities and families. Jews are Zionists or ‘settlers’, representatives of the forces of oppression.
This is what I refer to as ‘ideology’, and you can hear it echoed in the speeches of the Arab members of the Knesset. Every ‘Palestinian’ believes this to a greater or lesser extent, and much of it is taught in Israeli schools in the Arab sector.
The influence of Islam is important: the constant humiliation of Muslims living in a state where the sovereign power is not only non-Muslim but Jewish; the availability of triggers for furious action, like the always-effective lie that “Al-Aqsa is in danger,” which has been used to provoke riots and murder at least since the 1920s; and the appeal of martyrdom, especially for young or especially susceptible Muslims.
Traditional Islamic Jew-hatred is invoked in the mosques of the PA and Hamas, where Jews are dehumanized as descended from apes and pigs. So not only are Jews not individuals, they are not even people.
Today the Palestinian Authority, Hamas and the Islamic Movement in Israel are saying over and over that Israel plans to destroy the Al-Aqsa mosque and build a third Temple on its ruins. Some are explicitly calling on Muslims to become martyrs in its defense.
Finally there is the Muslim-Arab culture, with its honor-shame motivators. Every day that an Arab allows the humiliations and thefts to stand takes away from his honor and adds to his shame. The honor must be regained and the shame wiped out – and the only act powerful enough to do this is a violent one, the bloodier the better.
I must also note their familiarity with the slaughter of animals – every year on the holiday of Eid Al-Adha, mass public slaughterings of cows, sheep and goats take place (videos too disturbing to link), and Palestinian children participate in slaughtering animals at home. In general, Palestinian Arabs are exceptionally cruel to animals by Western standards.
We can put this together: the ideology provides a reason for violent acts and a justification for them, Islam ignites their anger and provokes action, and culture demands that the action draw blood. And their particular relationship to slaughter makes plunging a knife into living flesh – especially if that flesh belongs to a being that is less than human – a comfortable, or at least familiar, act.
Westerners, including most Israelis, may be able to understand the ideology, but the religious motivations are harder to grasp, particularly the veneration of martyrdom. The honor-shame concept is also alien in the West. And how many of us have slaughtered an animal with a knife, or could do so?
All this contributes to our latest learning experience.
In 2000-2002, we learned that the Arabs, led by the PLO and Hamas, didn’t want their own state; they wanted ours. In 2005, we learned that withdrawal from any part of the land of Israel brings war and not peace.
In the short term, this uprising will have to be put down by force. There is no one to negotiate with about it. The inciters will have to be stopped as well as the terrorists themselves, something that has never been tried. Maybe now we are beginning to learn how important that is. That’s the first lesson of 2015.
The second lesson, which is nothing new and is really just being reinforced, is that the conflict isn’t about borders or anything concrete. It’s about Arabs denying our right to be here, arrogating our indigenous status and ownership of the land to themselves. It’s about Muslims who won’t live under Jewish sovereignty and who will only tolerate us in a subordinate role. It’s about lost honor that can only be regained by murder.
There is another lesson from all this. That is that there is no way we can change to make it possible to coexist with them. Either they must change or one or the other side will disappear.
I promise it won’t be us.
the lies from the CBC
CBC continues to minimize the recent terror attacks in Israel. Through their biased choice of words and images, the CBC depict Palestinians as victims rather than perpetrators.
CBC also hasn't aired any of the widely available footage of Israelis being randomly attacked by knife-wielding Muslim terrorists.
CBC journalist Margaret Evans has been singled out for criticism in a new investigation by Honest Reporting Canada.
There are things that it is just not possible to understand because they cannot be understood.
Generally the media "...depict Palestinians as victims rather than perpetrators".
"..being randomly attacked by knife-wielding Muslim terrorists". Sounds like the streets of some European city, just not on such a scale as in Israel.
I think the way they do it here is that every time Jews are killed they end the report by saying how many more Palestinians were killed in the same period. But when Palestinians die they do not mention that this is mostly in response to Jews being attacked. They never mention that these young Palestinians often provoke their own deaths by violently confronting the Israeli security forces, seek a martyrs death and to make a political statement. While the Jews that die are mostly just trying to get on with their lives and live in peace.
Why do the journalists so hate Israel and the Jews?, I just don't know.
The Palestinians can claim that their land was stolen as justification, but why do well-educated non-Muslims hate the Jews so?
I respect the Jews for saying enough is enough and carving out a homeland for themselves, better than continuing as persecuted minorities at the mercy of the next despot. These well-educated journalists and leftists would have been better employed accepting Israel and negotiating a settlement, and compensation for those Arabs that have forfeited property.
Supporting those that are sworn to destroy Israel is to perpetuate the suffering and conflict. The leftist-journalists and politicians that oppose Israel instead of supporting the Jewish need for a safe-haven are accomplices to murder. they are in part responsible for every death that is Israel related. Every other death in the Middle-East can be blamed mostly on Islam, and to some degree the stupidity of Western leaders for meddling in Arab affairs.
I can almost understand Arabs, Muslims and Jews, what I cannot understand is why the Leftists are so engaged in the Israel conflict and are so biased and intent on doing harm. But then they so love the Muslims that they are intent on sacrificing and destroying their own socialist homelands. Could be as simple as that the Muslims and Leftists just love to hate.
Mahmoud Abbas, leader of the Palestinian Authority, recently said “The Al-Aqsa Mosque is ours, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is ours, and the Jews have no right to defile it with their filthy feet.” This is why Jews are being chopped to death with cleavers in the streets.
Well I know little about that whole Temple Mount site, but it wouldn't surprise me if somewhere in the Islamic canon they boast about building their own mosque as a victory statement on top of the destroyed temple of the conquered Jewish peoples.
It also wouldn't surprise me if Muslims actually read both the original claim of construction, and their new claim on location, without any problem over the inherent contradiction between those two claims. As Bill Warner constantly states, Islamic thinking is fundamentally dualistic, and does not have a problem with holding two conflicting thoughts at the same time.