It takes a nation to protect the nation
2007 Policy Exchange Survey of 1,000 British Muslims
From the BBC's website. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6309983.stm
What is significant is that on a whole range of key issues (sharia law, terrorism), the younger generation are almost 3x more supportive of these issues than the older generation. This shows the stupidity and self-delusion of the assumption that "those who are born here will integrate and moderate".
British Muslims poll: Key points
- 86% of Muslims feel that religion is the most important thing in their life
- 36% of 16 to 24-year-olds believe if a Muslim converts to another religion they should be punished by death, compared with 19% of over-55s
- 62% of 16 to 24-year-olds feel they have as much in common with non-Muslims as Muslims, compared with 71% of over-55s
- 60% of Muslims would prefer to send their children to a mixed state school, compared with 35% who would prefer to send their child to an Islamic school
- 37% of 16 to 24-year-olds would prefer to send their children to Islamic state schools, compared with 19% of over-55s
- 59% of Muslims would prefer to live under British law, compared with 28% who would prefer to live under Sharia law
- 37% of 16 to 24-year-olds prefer Sharia compared with 17% of over-55s
- 74% of 16 to 24-year-olds would prefer Muslim women to choose to wear the veil, compared with only 28% of over-55s
- 21% of Muslims have consumed alcohol
- 65% have paid interest on a normal mortgage
- 19% have gambled
- 9% have admitted to taking drugs
- 7% "admire organisations like al-Qaeda that are prepared to fight the West". 13% of 16 to 24-year-olds agreed with this statement compared with 3% of over-55s
- 41% named foreign policy as an important issue to Muslims but they were not necessarily more informed or engaged than the wider population
- 58% believe that "many of the problems in the world today are a result of arrogant Western attitudes"
- 37% believe that "one of the benefits of modern society is the freedom to criticise other people's religious or political views, even when it causes offence"
- 28% of Muslims believe that authorities in Britain go over the top in trying not to offend Muslims
- 75% believe it was wrong for a council to ban an advertisement for a Christmas carol service in 2003 for fear of causing tension
- 64% believe it was wrong for a council to ban all images of pigs from its offices, for example on calendars and toys in 2005, for fear of offending Muslims
- Stop emphasising difference and engage with Muslims as citizens, not through their religious identity
- Recognise that the Muslim "community" is not homogenous, and attempts to give group rights or representation will only alienate sections of the population further
- Stop treating Muslims as a vulnerable group. The exaggeration of Islamophobia does not make Muslims feel protected but instead reinforces feelings of victimisation and alienation
- Encourage a broader intellectual debate in order to challenge the crude anti-Western, anti-British ideas that dominate cultural and intellectual life. This means allowing free speech and debate, even when it causes offence to some minority groups
- Keep a sense of perspective. The obsession of politicians and the media with scrutinising the wider Muslim population, either as victims or potential terrorists, means that Muslims are regarded as outsiders, rather than as members of society like everyone else
Under the Suggestions section it says that the muslim community is not "homogenous". But this is a dishonest remark. Whatever differences exist between muslims, there is clearly a unifying feature. How else were they able to find a target "demographic" in order to survey their opinions? They were not stopping random people in the street. They were asking muslims; not atheists, not ex-muslims, not sikhs.
Tags: policy-exchange, radicalisation, sharia, survey
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Alan Lake on
-
Comment from Joe
The best refutation of the Leftist dogma that "the next generation will integrate and become atheists" is this survey:
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/1/h...
The survey wasn't conducted by "far right islamophobies" but by "moderate muslims", blessed with the approval of Peter Tatchell. And the survey demonstrates that the younger generation, who benefited from a state PC-MC education in Britain, are 3x more fascistic than their parents.
The full survey reveals something even more shocking to me. 60% to 70% want to see gay people "punished" and homosexuality made a crime. And again, the younger people surveyed were more enthusiastic for this. The punishment in the survey is not revealed, but since almost 40% want sharia law, we can conclude that 40% of muslims want to see gay people exterminated.
Of course, the media have buried this survey, and it has received virtually no publicity in the past 7 years.Imagine the furore if 70% of EDL said they wanted to have islam made illegal, possibly wanting them killed for being born muslims.
-
-
-
36% of 16 to 24-year-olds believe if a Muslim converts to another religion they should be punished by death, compared with 19% of over-55s
So, the number of Muslims who believe in killing apostates has doubled with the new generation, to reach 1/3rd. And our leaders and media liars tell us not to worry, that all will be ok.
But of course, the Muslims are right. Anyone who leaves the gang has to be killed, to preserve gang integrity. That's how all gang's work, they can't work on a democratic basis with free entry and exit.
-
Welcome to 4 Freedoms!
(currently not admitting new members)
Page Monitor
Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.
Muslim Terrorism Count
Mission Overview
Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them.
At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.
Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.
We need to capture this information before it is removed. The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.
We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.
The 4 Freedoms
These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper).
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).
An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:
- Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"
© 2023 Created by Netcon.
Powered by
