The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

Women Victims of Kuffarphobia


Women Victims of Kuffarphobia

To protect women and society from abuse which is ideologically authorised, i.e. Honor Killings, Forced Marriage, Bigamy, Legal Sub-status, and Face Covering

The idea of the inferiority of, and need to suppress women, is bound up in the Islamic concept of Purdah.

Search Site:
Members: 39
Latest Activity: yesterday

Discussion Forum

Burqa Deceit and Abuse - collected articles

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony May 21, 2022. 96 Replies

Femen - Collected Articles

Started by Joe. Last reply by Antony Nov 8, 2021. 122 Replies

Acid Attacks on Women

Started by Indoeuropean. Last reply by Antony Apr 22, 2021. 11 Replies

it never ends... never ever

Started by Herman Van Keer. Last reply by Alan Lake Feb 19, 2020. 2 Replies

Mohammed's Wives and Islams Permitted Polygamy

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Nov 26, 2019. 5 Replies

Rape of Yazidis by ISIS

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Antony Nov 7, 2016. 1 Reply

taharush - the 'respect' for women

Started by Herman Van Keer. Last reply by Antony Aug 19, 2016. 8 Replies

One Law for All - collected articles

Started by Alan Lake. Last reply by Alan Lake Aug 8, 2016. 11 Replies

A brave testimony from a woman

Started by Herman Van Keer Jan 19, 2016. 0 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Women Victims of Kuffarphobia to add comments!

Comment by Indoeuropean on March 7, 2011 at 6:47

Here are three Translations of the Booklet by Sami AlDeeb about mixed Marriages with Islamic Partners (Case of Switzerland, but the Rules apply Everywhere):


German - Gemischte Ehen mit Muslimen
- French - Mariages mixtes avec des musulmans
- Spanish - Casamientos mixtos con musulmanes
- Italian - Matrimoni misti con musulmani


and of course Everyone of the Family will become islamized, and leaving Islam will mean Apostasy and therefore (confront Nonie Darwish, expelled by her own Family for embracing Christanity)

subjected to loosing one's Family's Rights (confront Sami AlDeeb, Publications, about Islamic Family Law in Islam, which is really applied in the real World, within so called Sharia Courts), Custody of Children, Inheritage

and eventually subjected to Death Penalty.


Not to forget that Women/Girls/Females not behaving or not embracing Islam are privately mistreated (EVEN BY FEMININE MEMBERS OF THE FAMILY, this has to be very clearly and loudly pointed out), and eventually even subjected to sexual Abuses, as a Sign of Power from the Islamic Side of the Couple, because she did not freely "submitted".


It is a racist (Arabicity is the only Race and Heritage "allowed", a Non arab converting to Islam must convince him-/herself to be an Arab!), discriminating (every Non islamic Person is - shortly - a Shit), and misogynist (no Need to clearify it further).


Bye and enjoy your Life('s Journey).

Comment by Albert on March 6, 2011 at 23:51

A Slow-Motion Conquest by Stealth


YESTERDAY a commenter named Reilly left an interesting comment on the article, The Terrifying Brilliance of Islam, and I wanted to share it with you:

I started thinking about Islam as a dangerous, self-replicating "meme" a few years back.

The catalyst was a Muslim colleague who tried to convince me Islam was tolerant. His evidence was a source claiming that the Koran demanded that Muslim men could marry Christian/Jewish women and were obliged by the Koran NOT to interfere with their wive's religion (thus allegedly proving how tolerant Koran is).

But... the same source also declared that:

1 - Children should follow the father's religion.
2 - And while Muslim men were allowed to marry infidels, Muslim women were not.

And then I thought how those rules interacted with each other.

And then I realized that, under a thin disguise of supposed "tolerance", these rules gave an evolutionary/competitive advantage to the Muslims over the long term (ie: birthrate/religon of children).

In reality, these rules didn't facilitate "tolerance". They simply facilitated a steady, slow-motion conquest by stealth.

Now I don't know the providence of these claimed traditions, but when even the evidence shown to me directly by a "Moderate Muslim" clearly shows a Supremacist mindset, this is not encouraging!

And so my suspicion began...

Thank you for laying this all out so clearly and easy-to-understand in a single article.
Comment by Albert on March 1, 2011 at 23:25

Putting Women's Rights Back on the Mideast Media Agenda

Comment by Albert on February 28, 2011 at 6:43

Diversity & Cultural Enrichment Report

by sheikyermami on February 27, 2011

Thanks to Swensson

Eleven year olds violated and traumatized by “child refugees” at birthday party at public swimming pool in Sweden

(PI in Swedish)

This is, however, a non-existing non-happening incident, according to Swedish mainstream media which does not report about it.

The 11 year old girls and their two boy birthday guest who tried to help their friends from the 20 asylum seekers harassments (tearing off their swimsuits) at the swimming pool, have tragically been traumatized by this incident at the birthday party which turned into a nightmare for them and for the father who organized the trip to the swimming pool, Husbybadet, at Solna outside Stockholm.

Targeting children  of “Swedish background”

Felicia, a former pupil at the school Dammhagsskolan, at Landskrona, where more than 90% are of foreign origin, was targeted by fellow pupils because she is Swedish. (source in Swedish)

“Swedes Begin to Question Liberal Migration Tenets”

About time:

“Rosengard hardly has the look of a troubled ghetto. Lawns and playgrounds abound. But the area does not look like traditional Sweden, either. Satellite dishes hang from every balcony. The bakery sells Middle Eastern confections. Al Jazeera plays on the televisions. And young men huddle on street corners casually bragging about doing battle with the police.” (Full article from the NYT below the fold)

20 refugees Mohammedan welfare cheats rape an 11-year old girl in a public bath, Stockholm Sweden, Husbybadet.  (GoV)

here's a link which also has a video;
Comment by Albert on February 21, 2011 at 5:29

Here is some very good reading regarding Women in Islam.

Comment by Albert on February 20, 2011 at 4:12

"The Frog and the Scorpion"

This is a beautiful fairy tale, to tell to children, to explain why the non-Muslim world should be very cautious when dealing with Islam. 

This improved version of the classic tale raises the same old question: Are we all essentially the same?


A frog was hopping along in the forest, heading home to her family, when all of a sudden she came upon a small river. Now, the frog, being a great swimmer as frogs are, was about to leap into the river in order to cross it - when she heard a voice:

"Is there any chance, kind lady, that you can help me across this river? For I cannot swim."

The frog turned toward the direction of the voice, and was startled to see a scorpion moving toward her on the river bank. Now, everyone knows the history of scorpions - they sting and have a deadly poison. So the frog was understandably a bit frightened, and trembled as she asked the scorpion:

"If I help you across the river, will you promise not to sting me? You see, I am on the way home to my family and they would miss me terribly."

The scorpion answered:

"Kind lady, I understand your concern, but I too am on the way home to my family, and if I sting you, we would both drown, and who wants that? Besides, contrary to what you may have heard, I only sting for self defense - like if a fox should try to eat me. Please do me this great favor - I would be so grateful!"

The frog considered the scorpion's words, which didn't seem like the words of a killer. She thought to herself: "I mean no harm to the scorpion, why should he sting me? If he stings me, we will both drown, and he must value life as much as I. If I help him, he will be my friend - because he knows that I am a nice frog. As my friend, the scorpion would surely tell all the other scorpions that I am a friend, and that they too should never sting me! And they wouldn't sting my frog family or my frog friends either! And we frogs would be more than happy to help all scorpions cross the rivers! And maybe all the scorpions would help protect all the frogs and other small creatures from the truly dangerous creatures of the forest!"

By this time, the frog was so excited about helping the scorpion that she didn't want to even start thinking of reasons not to help. Besides the danger was too scary to think about - compared to the wonderful future that awaits the frogs and other small creatures of the forest with this new era of cooperation. "It will truly be a paradise.", she thought. So the frog crouched down and let the scorpion jump onto her back. She then hopped into the river with the scorpion on her back and began swimming - and she swam beautifully, as frogs do. But when they got to the middle of the river she felt something painful in her side.

"Ouch!" said the frog, "What was that???"

"I just stung you.", said the scorpion.

The frog began to feel the poison take effect. It became harder for her to move, harder to swim. She thought about the paradise of universalistic brotherhood that could have been, and she cried out to the scorpion:

"Why did you do that?! Now we will both drown - we could have been friends! Perhaps you can save yourself; swim to the other side!"

But it was too late, and scorpions can't swim. As they began to sink, the scorpion answered:

"I am not like you; we don't care about dying or making friends. We lie and sting

Comment by Albert on February 18, 2011 at 7:58

Egyptian Muslims told they can’t be nude while having sex.

In an apparent attempt to win the coveted World Prude Championship Cup, Egyptian Muslim cleric Rashad Hassan Khalil has issued a fatwa declaring that being completely naked during sex is not only prohibited, but that it annuls your marriage:

But raping and assaulting a non-Muslim foreign female journalist in the streets of Cairo is OK, nice one.   


Comment by Netcon on October 15, 2009 at 22:48

Please Respond to Government Consultation on Home Education

The Department for Children, Schools and Families published a consultation on home schooling. Please respond in order to preserve the freedoms of those parents who wish to educate their children at home. The closing date is Monday, 19th October 2009.

Parents are responsible for ensuring that their children receive a “suitable” education. The Government wants to usurp the role of parents and impose more governmental control, thus intruding upon families who choose to educate their children at home. Both the Bible and the law recognise it is a parent’s responsibility to educate their children, not that of the Government. Education is compulsory, but school is not. Parents can choose either to send their children to school, or to educate them at home. The Badman Report reviewed elective home education. In our opinion, the Badman Report makes disproportionate and unreasonable recommendations for compulsory registration and invasive monitoring of those families who choose to educate at home.

The point of most concern to all parents, especially Christian ones, is the proposal that those who choose to educate at home will have Government officials interview a child alone—without even a parent being present.

To read the Badman Report, the Consultation, or to respond on line, click here. Please note that the Government have produced a full response to the Badman Report very recently. To read the press release or the Government’s response, both dated 9th October 2009, click here.

Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2023   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service