The 4 Freedoms Library

It takes a nation to protect the nation

The modern State of Israel has been many things to many people over the years. A century ago, it was merely a Zionist dream. In 1948, it became the homeland for Jewish people and an inspiration for Jews around the world. Concurrently, however, Israel also became the object of hatred for much of the Arab world. Since then, over the past 61 years, it has reluctantly represented a fault line among various global forces: the Soviets and the US, the non-aligned movements and democracies and, more recently, Islamists and the West.

George Gilder, a venture capitalist and author of 14 books about business and social issues, now argues that Israel is the ultimate fault line. Indeed, he argues in The Israel Test that it presents a moral and ethical challenge to all of us. Boldly, he states that we can either choose to support Israel or choose to reject justice, democracy, free-market economics and excellence.

In essence, Gilder claims that support for Israel is a question of right vs wrong. But if he can't convince you of that, he convincingly argues that it is also a question of capitalism vs communism.

"Israel's critics see the world as a finite sum of resources," he notes. Critics of the Jewish state "advocate programs of international retribution and redistribution." Specifically, they advocate for the redistribution of land, wealth and other resources.

Indeed, in the name of "social justice," Israel's enemies continue to call for the tiny state to shed territory and to make concessions that would ultimately weaken its strategic position.

To this end, Gilder exposes the enemies of Israel for what they are. He argues that, "anti-capitalists, like anti-Semites throughout history, have always been obsessed with the gaps everywhere... gaps of income, power achievement and status." His assertions go a long way to explaining the Left's obsession with Israel, and its love affair with both the Palestinians and the Islamist movement.

Interestingly, Gilder's argument is not anti-Palestinian. Indeed, he reasons that if the Palestinians would simply give up their fantasy of destroying Israel, they could join Israel in its quest for excellence. A true capitalist, he believes there is enough wealth to go around - even among the Israelis and Palestinians.

He argues that if the Palestinians decide to make the best of their situation, work together with Israel and build their economy, they can become "once again the most successful of all Arabs, as they were between 1967 and 1987" when the West Bank and Gaza Strip were officially part of the Israeli economy.

Gilder lays out his compelling argument in 255 succinct pages. Throughout, he also provides the highlights of Israel's escape from socialism, leading to its brief yet successful history of entrepreneurship. To this end, he lauds Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who "promoted a supply-side program of tax-rate reductions, exemptions from double taxation for foreign investors, trade liberalization and venture-capital programs" and sees Israel as becoming the "Hong Kong of the desert."

While Gilder knows business best, he has an exceptionally strong grasp of the flawed politics of peacemaking in the Middle East. He attacks the land-for-peace paradigm, calling it "peace now and then war" citing the sad yet familiar history of Arab rejection of Israel. He takes particular issue with the criticism of "disproportionality" when Israel responds to terrorist attacks with force.

One can only imagine what Gilder might have written in response to the Goldstone report. The report's primary author, South African jurist Richard Goldstone, undoubtedly fails the author's Israel test. He audaciously accused Israel of war crimes during its incursion into Gaza to stem the threat of Palestinian rocket fire in December 2008 and January 2009.

For that matter, US President Barack Obama might fail Gilder's test, too. As former US ambassador to the UN John Bolton wrote earlier this year, "The Obama administration believes that Israel is as much or more of a problem as it is an ally." Gilder's moral clarity is refreshing, and his writing is quite often electrifying. However, it comes with a price. The strident tone of this book will undoubtedly reinforce the strong pro-Israel views often held by those on the Right, but will just as easily repel readers from the Left. This risks alienating an important audience that desperately needs to hear Gilder's message.

It is also important to note Gilder often conflates Jews with Israelis. While the majority of Israelis are Jews, less than half of all Jews are Israelis. At times, Gilder appears to forget this - particularly when discussing the unparalleled Jewish achievements in modern history.

Still, The Israel Test is a critically important read. The test, itself, should serve as an important guide to understanding the ideology and guiding philosophies of leaders on the world stage.

source: http://schanzer.pundicity.com/6729/the-israel-test

Views: 17

Tags: Israel.Palestinians.

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of The 4 Freedoms Library to add comments!

Comment by pyrus on December 29, 2009 at 21:57
superb - a great read

I particularly like this bit:

"In essence, Gilder claims that support for Israel is a question of right vs wrong. But if he can't convince you of that, he convincingly argues that it is also a question of capitalism vs communism."

A criticism might be that this sounds an awful lot like it's a question of right vs left.

We might think that right vs left is pretty much the same as right vs wrong, but that's perhaps not quite so compelling.

More broadly, I think Israel helps us draw a line between the antequated radical left (which sadly still has some militant supporters today, and perhaps, we might argue, is particularly prevalent in Islam) and the rest of the modern world (not just the 'Western' part of it).

This is the bit I had trouble with though:

"if the Palestinians would simply give up their fantasy of destroying Israel, they could join Israel in its quest for excellence"

I can't see any reason for them to give up this fantasy. Unfortunately the only solution I can see is force - overwhelming force. Much like Germany after WWII, they need to be made to understand that there is no way that they can win.

But how do can you convince 'Palestinians' of this. They have elected a terrorist group - a group that receives support from all around the world.

Nazi Germany was the epicentre - and it soon became the front.

'Palestine' is just the front - where is the epicentre?

There can be no reasoning with 'Palestinians'. Only when they are completely destroyed will the fantasy die.

I should explain at this point that I'm not suggesting genocide. (No one was jumping to that conclusion were they?)

We have to wipe out the idea of 'Palestine' or of the 'Palestinians' (hence the ' ' marks). This doesn't need to mean destroying the people themselves - but should instead mean destroying their identity.

You can't destroy the dream of Palestine (which goes hand-in-hand with aggression against Israel) without first destroying the means by which the 'Palestinians' believe that their goals will be achieved.

The people have put their faith in a terrorist organisation - and there must be an international acknowledgement of what this means. Some Israelis have long claimed that 'Palestine' would essentially be a terrorist nation. Now it is official.

'We' (all other nations) should not negotiate with terrorists. The 'Palestinians' should receive no aid. None. It should receive no seat at the table. It should receive no sympathy, no moral support.

Israel should be given a free hand, to do whatever it deems reasonable to combat the birth of a terrorist nation within its borders.

Admittedly this might not be pretty - but I do have a great deal of faith in the Israeli people not to 'go overboard'.

'Palestinians' must play by our rules if there is to be any kind of future for them.

Give up the fantasy of Israel's destruction, and then we can talk.

Unfortunately this isn't going to happen.

So as long as 'Palestine' is obsessed with this fantasy, then Israel should be provided with all the financial, cultural and military support that we can muster to help it defeat its enemy.

Page Monitor

Just fill in the box below on any 4F page to be notified when it changes.

Privacy & Unsubscribe respected

Muslim Terrorism Count

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Mission Overview

Most Western societies are based on Secular Democracy, which itself is based on the concept that the open marketplace of ideas leads to the optimum government. Whilst that model has been very successful, it has defects. The 4 Freedoms address 4 of the principal vulnerabilities, and gives corrections to them. 

At the moment, one of the main actors exploiting these defects, is Islam, so this site pays particular attention to that threat.

Islam, operating at the micro and macro levels, is unstoppable by individuals, hence: "It takes a nation to protect the nation". There is not enough time to fight all its attacks, nor to read them nor even to record them. So the members of 4F try to curate a representative subset of these events.

We need to capture this information before it is removed.  The site already contains sufficient information to cover most issues, but our members add further updates when possible.

We hope that free nations will wake up to stop the threat, and force the separation of (Islamic) Church and State. This will also allow moderate Muslims to escape from their totalitarian political system.

The 4 Freedoms

These 4 freedoms are designed to close 4 vulnerabilities in Secular Democracy, by making them SP or Self-Protecting (see Hobbes's first law of nature). But Democracy also requires - in addition to the standard divisions of Executive, Legislature & Judiciary - a fourth body, Protector of the Open Society (POS), to monitor all its vulnerabilities (see also Popper). 
1. SP Freedom of Speech
Any speech is allowed - except that advocating the end of these freedoms
2. SP Freedom of Election
Any party is allowed - except one advocating the end of these freedoms
3. SP Freedom from Voter Importation
Immigration is allowed - except where that changes the political demography (this is electoral fraud)
4. SP Freedom from Debt
The Central Bank is allowed to create debt - except where that debt burden can pass across a generation (25 years).

An additional Freedom from Religion is deducible if the law is applied equally to everyone:

  • Religious and cultural activities are exempt from legal oversight except where they intrude into the public sphere (Res Publica)"

© 2022   Created by Netcon.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service